Multi-energy CT imaging for large patients using dual-source photon-counting detector CT

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CTPA With Iodine Maps: A Prospective Randomized Study of High-Pitch Mode Photon-Counting Detector CT Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT

BACKGROUND. Dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with energy-integrating detector (EID) technology is limited by the inability to use high-pitch technique. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of anatomic images and iodine maps between high-pitch photon-counting detector (PCD) CTPA and dual-energy EID CTPA. METHODS. This prospective study included 117 patients (70 men and 47 women; median age, 65 years) who underwent CTPA to evaluate for pulmonary embolism between March 2022 and November 2022. Fifty-eight patients were randomized to undergo PCD CTPA (pitch, 2.0), and 59 were randomized to undergo EID CTPA (pitch, 0.55). For each examination, 120-kV polychromatic images, 60-keV virtual monogenetic images (VMIs), and iodine maps were reconstructed. One radiologist measured CNR and SNR. Three radiologists independently assessed subjective image quality (on a scale of 1-4, with a score of 1 denoting highest quality). Radiation dose was recorded. RESULTS. SNR and CNR were higher for PCD CTPA than for EID CTPA for polychromatic images and VMIs, for all assessed vessels other than the left upper lobe artery. For example, for PCD CTPA versus EID CTPA, the right lower lobe artery on polychromatic images had an SNR of 34.5 versus 28.0 (p = .003) and a CNR of 29.2 versus 24.4 (p = .001), and on VMIs it had an SNR of 43.2 versus 32.7 (p = .005) and a CNR of 37.4 versus 29.3 (p = .002). For both scanners for readers 1 and 2, the median image quality score for polychromatic images and VMIs was 1, although distributions indicated significantly better scores for PCD CTPA than for EID CTPA for polychromatic images for reader 1 (p = .02) and reader 2 (p = .005) and for VMIs for reader 1 (p = .001) and reader 2 (p = .006). The image quality of anatomic image sets was not different between PCD CTPA and EID CTPA for reader 3 (p > .05). The image quality of iodine maps was not different between PCD CTPA and EID CTPA for any reader (p > .05). For PCD CTPA versus EID CTPA, the CTDIvol was 3.9 versus 4.5 mGy (p = .03), and the DLP was 123.5 mGy × cm versus 157.0 mGy × cm (p < .001). CONCLUSION. High-pitch PCD CTPA provided anatomic images with better subjective and objective image quality versus dual-energy EID CTPA, with lower radiation dose. Iodine maps showed no significant difference in image quality between scanners. CLINICAL IMPACT. CTPA may benefit from the PCD CT technique.

Reduced versus standard dose contrast volume for contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in overweight and obese patients using photon counting detector technology vs. second-generation dual-source energy integrating detector CT

PURPOSE

To compare image quality of contrast-enhanced abdominal-CT using 1st-generation Dual Source Photon-Counting Detector CT (DS-PCD-CT) versus 2nd-generation Dual-Source Energy Integrating-Detector CT (DS-EID-CT) in patients with BMI ≥ 25, applying two different contrast agent volumes, vendor proposed protocols and different virtual monoenergetic images (VMI).

METHOD

68 overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kgm2) patients (median age: 65 years; median BMI 33.3 kgm2) who underwent clinically indicated, portal-venous contrast-enhanced abdominal-CT on a commercially available 1st-generation DS-PCD-CT were prospectively included if they already have had a pre-exam on 2nd-generation DS-EID-CT using a standardized exam protocol. Obesity were defined by BMI-calculation (overweight: 25-29.9, obesity grade I: 30-34.9; obesity grade II: 35-39.9; obesity grade III: > 40) and by the absolute weight value. Body weight adapted contrast volume (targeted volume of 1.2 mL/kg for the 1st study and 0.8 mL/kg for the 2nd study) was applied in both groups. Dual Energy mode was used for both the DS-PCD-CT and the DS-EID-CT. Polychromatic images and VMI (40 keV and 70 keV) were reconstructed for both the DS-EID-CT and the DS-PCD-CT data (termed T3D). Two radiologists assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert-scale. Each reader drew ROIs within parenchymatous organs and vascular structures to analyze image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

RESULTS

Median time interval between scans was 12 months (Min: 6 months; Max: 36 months). BMI classification included overweight (n = 10, 14.7 %), obesity grade I (n = 38, 55.9 %), grade II (n = 13, 19.1 %) and grade III (n = 7, 10.3 %). The SNR achieved with DS-PCD-CT at QIR level 3was 12.61 vs. 11.47 (QIR 2) vs. 10.53 (DS-EID-CT), irrespective of parenchymatous organs. For vessels, the SNR were 16.73 vs. 14.20 (QIR 2) vs. 12.07 (DS-EID-CT). Moreover, the obtained median noise at QIR level 3 was as low as that of the DS-EID-CT (8.65 vs. 8.65). Both radiologists rated the image quality higher for DS-PCD-CT data sets (p < 0.05). The highest CNR was achieved at 40 keV for both scanners. T3D demonstrated significantly higher SNR and lower noise level compared to 40 keV and 70 keV. Median CTDIvol and DLP values for DS-PCD-CT and DS-EID-CT were 10.90 mGy (IQR: 9.31 - 12.50 mGy) vs. 16.55 mGy (IQR: 15.45 - 18.17 mGy) and 589.50 mGy * cm (IQR: 498.50 - 708.25 mGy * cm) vs. 848.75 mGy * cm (IQR: 753.43 - 969.58 mGy * cm) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Image quality can be maintained while significantly reducing the contrast volume and the radiation dose (27% and 34% lower DLP and 31% lower CDTIvol) for abdominal contrast-enhanced CT using a 1st-generation DS-PCD-CT. Moreover, polychromatic reconstruction T3D on a DS-PCD-CT enables sufficient diagnostic image quality for oncological imaging.

Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: "One Does Not Fit All"

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) uses different energy spectrum x-ray beams for differentiating materials with similar attenuation at a certain energy. Compared with single-energy CT, it provides images with better diagnostic performance and a potential reduction of contrast agent and radiation doses. There are different commercially available DECT technologies, with machines that may display two x-ray sources and two detectors, a single source capable of fast switching between two energy levels, a specialized detector capable of acquiring high- and low-energy data sets, and a filter splitting the beam into high- and low-energy beams at the output. Sequential acquisition at different tube voltages is an alternative approach. This narrative review describes the DECT technique using a Q&A format and visual representations. Physical concepts, parameters influencing image quality, postprocessing methods, applicability in daily routine workflow, and radiation considerations are discussed. Differences between scanners are described, regarding design, image quality variabilities, and their advantages and limitations. Additionally, current clinical applications are listed, and future perspectives for spectral CT imaging are addressed. Acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses of different DECT scanners is important, as these could be adapted to each patient, clinical scenario, and financial capability. This technology is undoubtedly valuable and will certainly keep improving.

An introduction to photon-counting detector CT (PCD CT) for radiologists

The basic performance of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD CT) is superior to conventional CT (energy-integrating detector CT: EID CT) because its spatial- and contrast resolution of soft tissues is higher, and artifacts are reduced. Because the X-ray photon energy separation is better with PCD CT than conventional EID-based dual-energy CT, it has the potential to improve virtual monochromatic- and virtual non-contrast images, material decomposition including quantification of the iodine distribution, and K-edge imaging. Therefore, its clinical applicability may be increased. Although the image quality of PCD CT scans is superior to that of EID CT currently, further improvement may be possible. The introduction of iterative image reconstruction and reconstruction with deep convolutional neural networks will be useful.

First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low-dose quantitative spectral imaging

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of image characteristics at ultra-low radiation dose levels of a first-generation dual-source photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) compared to a dual-source dual-energy CT (DECT) scanner.

METHODS

A multi-energy CT phantom was imaged with and without an extension ring on both scanners over a range of radiation dose levels (CTDI_vol 0.4-15.0 mGy). Scans were performed in different modes of acquisition for PCCT with 120 kVp and DECT with 70/Sn150 kVp and 100/Sn150 kVp. Various tissue inserts were used to characterize the precision and repeatability of Hounsfield units (HUs) on virtual mono-energetic images between 40 and 190 keV. Image noise was additionally investigated at an ultra-low radiation dose to illustrate PCCT's ability to remove electronic background noise.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrate the high precision of HU measurements for a wide range of inserts and radiation exposure levels with PCCT. We report high performance for both scanners across a wide range of radiation exposure levels, with PCCT outperforming at low exposures compared to DECT. PCCT scans at the lowest radiation exposures illustrate significant reduction in electronic background noise, with a mean percent reduction of 74% (p value ~ 10^-8) compared to DECT 70/Sn150 kVp and 60% (p value ~ 10^-6) compared to DECT 100/Sn150 kVp.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper reports the first experiences with a clinical dual-source PCCT. PCCT provides reliable HUs without disruption from electronic background noise for a wide range of dose values. Diagnostic benefits are not only for quantification at an ultra-low dose but also for imaging of obese patients.

KEY POINTS

PCCT scanners provide precise and reliable Hounsfield units at ultra-low dose levels. The influence of electronic background noise can be removed at ultra-low-dose acquisitions with PCCT. Both spectral platforms have high performance along a wide range of radiation exposure levels, with PCCT outperforming at low radiation exposures.

Photon-Counting Detector CT: Key Points Radiologists Should Know

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is a new CT technology utilizing a direct conversion X-ray detector, where incident X-ray photon energies are directly recorded as electronical signals. The design of the photon-counting detector itself facilitates improvements in spatial resolution (via smaller detector pixel design) and iodine signal (via count weighting) while still permitting multi-energy imaging. PCD-CT can eliminate electronic noise and reduce artifacts due to the use of energy thresholds. Improved dose efficiency is important for low dose CT and pediatric imaging. The ultra-high spatial resolution of PCD-CT design permits lower dose scanning for all body regions and is particularly helpful in identifying important imaging findings in thoracic and musculoskeletal CT. Improved iodine signal may be helpful for low contrast tasks in abdominal imaging. Virtual monoenergetic images and material classification will assist with numerous diagnostic tasks in abdominal, musculoskeletal, and cardiovascular imaging. Dual-source PCD-CT permits multi-energy CT images of the heart and coronary arteries at high temporal resolution. In this special review article, we review the clinical benefits of this technology across a wide variety of radiological subspecialties.

Metal artefact reduction in low-dose computed tomography: Benefits of tin prefiltration versus postprocessing of dual-energy datasets over conventional CT imaging

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the potential for metal artefact reduction in low-dose multidetector CT as these pose a frequent challenge in clinical routine. Investigations focused on whether spectral shaping via tin prefiltration, virtual monoenergetic imaging or virtual blend imaging (VBI) offers superior image quality in comparison with conventional CT imaging.

METHODS

Using a third-generation dual-source CT scanner, two cadaveric specimens with different metal implants (dental, cervical spine, hip, knee) were examined with acquisition protocols matched for radiation dose with regards to tube voltage and current. In order to allow for precise comparison, and due to the relatively short scan lengths, automatic tube current modulation was disabled. Specifically, the following scan protocals were examined: conventional CT protocols (100/120 kVp), tin prefiltration (Sn 100/Sn 150 kVp), VBI and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VME 100/120/150 keV). Mean attenuation and image noise were measured in hyperdense and hypodense artefacts, in artefact-impaired and artefact-free soft tissue. Subjective image quality was rated independently by three radiologists.

RESULTS

Objectively, Sn 150 kVp allowed for the best reduction of hyperdense streak artefacts (p < 0.001), while VME 150 keV and Sn 150 kVp protocols facilitated equally good reduction of hypodense artefacts (p = 0.173). Artefact-impaired soft tissue attenuation was lowest in Sn 150 kVp protocols (p ≤ 0.011), whereas all VME showed significantly less image noise compared to conventional or tin-filtered protocols (p ≤ 0.001). Subjective assessment favoured Sn 150 kVp regarding hyperdense streak artefacts and delineation of cortical bone (p ≤ 0.005). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.776 (95% confidence interval: 0.712-0.831; p < 0.001) indicating good interrater reliability.

CONCLUSION

In the presence of metal implants in our cadaveric study, tin prefiltration with 150 kVp offers superior artefact reduction for low-dose CT imaging of osseous tissue compared with virtual monoenergetic images of dual-energy datasets. The delineation of cortical boundaries seems to benefit particularly from spectral shaping.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Low-dose CT imaging of osseous tissue in combination with tin prefiltration allows for superior metal artefact reduction when compared to virtual monoenergetic images of dual-energy datasets. Employing this technique ought to be considered in daily routine when metal implants are present within the scan volume as findings suggest it allows for radiation dose reduction and facilitates diagnosis relevant to further treatment.

Improving digital charge sharing compensation in photon counting detectors with a low-threshold comparator

PURPOSE

Charge sharing is a major non-ideality in photon counting detectors (PCDs) and can increase variance in material decomposition images. Analog charge summing (ACS) is an effective mechanism for charge sharing compensation (CSC), but is complex to implement and may limit the maximum count rate of the PCD. Digital CSC mechanisms such as digital count summing (DCS) may be simpler to implement; however, earlier simulation studies suggest that digital CSC only provides half the benefit of ACS. We propose including an additional low-threshold comparator (LTC) underneath the noise floor of the PCD to improve the effectiveness of digital CSC.

METHODS

We simulated a PCD with four or eight equally spaced energy bins. X-ray photons arrived on the PCD following a Poisson distribution, and charge was allocated to PCD pixels following Monte Carlo techniques. Gaussian electronic noise was added with standard deviation of 2 keV and the signals were processed with four CSC schemes: no CSC, ACS, DCS, and DCS with LTC. The energy bins were placed from 25 to 100 keV at 25 keV intervals (for four bins) or from 25 to 112.5 keV at 12.5 keV intervals (for eight bins), and the LTC threshold was placed at 8 keV in both cases. The binned counts were transformed into estimates of water and iodine material thickness using a linear estimator that was fitted to the data. Our simulations were performed in the low-flux limit without any pileup, assuming a 120 kVp spectrum, 25 cm water object, and 0.3 mm PCD pixel size.

RESULTS

All CSC schemes decreased variance in basis material decomposition. In the four-bin PCD, the relative dose efficiencies (inverse of the variance) for iodine material decomposition were 1.0, 2.4, 3.2, and 4.3 for a PCD without CSC, DCS without LTC, DCS with LTC, and ACS, respectively. In the eight-bin PCD, the relative dose efficiencies were 1.1, 2.5, 3.1, and 4.8, respectively. In a sensitivity analysis, electronic noise had a stronger deleterious effect on ACS than DCS. In simulated visual images, DCS and ACS improved high frequency contrast in material decomposition images.

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing an LTC may reduce the performance differential between DCS and ACS. These findings have been derived from simulation studies only and have not been validated experimentally.

Computed tomography with a full FOV photon-counting detector in a clinical setting, the first experience

OBJECTIVES

to assess the feasibility of CT with an integrated photon-counting-detector system (PC-CT) in the body imaging of clinical patients.

METHODS

120 examinations using photon counting detector CT were evaluated in six groups: 1/ a standard-dose lung, 2/ low-dose lung, 3/ ultra-high resolution (UHR) lung, 4/ standard-dose abdominal, 5/ lower-dose abdominal, 6/ UHR abdominal CTA. All CT examinations were performed on a single-source prototype device equipped with a photon counting detector covering a 50 cm scan field of view. Standard dose examinations were performed with the use of detector element size of 0.4 mm, ultra-high-resolution examinations with the detector element size of 0.2 mm, respectively. The stability of the system during imaging was tested. The diagnostic quality of the acquired images was assessed based on the imaging of key structures and the noise level in five-point scale, the effective dose equivalent, dose length product and noise level, and also relation to body mass index and body surface area were compared with three similar groups of CT images made with energy integrating high end scanner. The parameters were evaluated using Wilcoxon test for independent samples, the independence was tested using Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

When PC-CT images radiation dose is compared with the similar imaging using energy integrating CT, the PC-CT shows lower dose in ultra-high resolution mode, the dose is significantly lower (p < 0.0001), the standard dose examinations were performed with the comparable radiation doses. PC-CT exhibited the significantly higher ratio between parenchyma signal and background noise both in lung and in abdominal imaging (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PC-CT showed imaging stability and excellent diagnostic quality at dose values that are comparable or better to the quality of energy integrating CT, the better signal and improved resolution is most important advantage of photon counting detector CT over energy integrating detector CT.

CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice

Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range of charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) have been proposed and validated by different groups to reduce CSEs, however their performance is often compared solely to the same system when no such corrections are made. In this paper, a combination of Monte Carlo and finite element methods are used to compare six different CSCAs with the case where no CSCA is employed, with respect to four different metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency. The performance of the various CSCAs is explored when running on systems with pixel pitches ranging from 100 µm to 600µm, in 50 µm increments, and fluxes from 106 to 108 photons mm-2 s-1 are considered. Novel mechanistic explanations for the difference in performance of the various CSCAs are proposed and supported. This work represents a subset of a larger project in which pixel pitch, thickness, flux, and CSCA are all varied systematically.