1
|
Götz S, Dickmann J, Rit S, Krah N, Khellaf F, Schulte RW, Parodi K, Dedes G, Landry G. Evaluation of the impact of a scanner prototype on proton CT and helium CT image quality and dose efficiency with Monte Carlo simulation. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35086073 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4fa4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective.The use of ion computed tomography (CT) promises to yield improved relative stopping power (RSP) estimation as input to particle therapy treatment planning. Recently, proton CT (pCT) has been shown to yield RSP accuracy on par with state-of-the-art x-ray dual energy CT. There are however concerns that the lower spatial resolution of pCT compared to x-ray CT may limit its potential, which has spurred interest in the use of helium ion CT (HeCT). The goal of this study was to investigate image quality of pCT and HeCT in terms of noise, spatial resolution, RSP accuracy and imaging dose using a detailed Monte Carlo (MC) model of an existing ion CT prototype.Approach.Three phantoms were used in simulated pCT and HeCT scans allowing estimation of noise, spatial resolution and the scoring of dose. An additional phantom was used to evaluate RSP accuracy. The imaging dose required to achieve the same image noise in a water and a head phantom was estimated at both native spatial resolution, and in a scenario where the HeCT spatial resolution was reduced and matched to that of pCT using Hann windowing of the reconstruction filter. A variance reconstruction formalism was adapted to account for Hann windowing.Main results.We confirmed that the scanner prototype would produce higher spatial resolution for HeCT than pCT by a factor 1.8 (0.86 lp mm-1versus 0.48 lp mm-1at the center of a 20 cm water phantom). At native resolution, HeCT required a factor 2.9 more dose than pCT to achieve the same noise, while at matched resolution, HeCT required only 38% of the pCT dose. Finally, RSP mean absolute percent error (MAPE) was found to be 0.59% for pCT and 0.67% for HeCT.Significance.This work compared the imaging performance of pCT and HeCT when using an existing scanner prototype, with the spatial resolution advantage of HeCT coming at the cost of increased dose. When matching spatial resolution via Hann windowing, HeCT had a substantial dose advantage. Both modalities provided state-of-the-art RSP MAPE. HeCT might therefore help reduce the dose exposure of patients with comparable image noise to pCT, enhanced spatial resolution and acceptable RSP accuracy at the same time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Götz
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany
| | - J Dickmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany
| | - S Rit
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Unversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, UMR 5220, U1294 F-69373, Lyon, France
| | - N Krah
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Unversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, UMR 5220, U1294 F-69373, Lyon, France.,IP2I, UMR 5822 F-69622, Villeurbanne, France
| | - F Khellaf
- University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Unversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS, UMR 5220, U1294 F-69373, Lyon, France
| | - R W Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, United States of America
| | - K Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany
| | - G Dedes
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany
| | - G Landry
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, D-81377 Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), D-81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
DeJongh DF, DeJongh EA, Rykalin V, DeFillippo G, Pankuch M, Best AW, Coutrakon G, Duffin KL, Karonis NT, Ordoñez CE, Sarosiek C, Schulte RW, Winans JR, Block AM, Hentz CL, Welsh JS. A comparison of proton stopping power measured with proton CT and x-ray CT in fresh postmortem porcine structures. Med Phys 2021; 48:7998-8009. [PMID: 34739140 PMCID: PMC8678357 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Currently, calculations of proton range in proton therapy patients are based on a conversion of CT Hounsfield units of patient tissues into proton relative stopping power. Uncertainties in this conversion necessitate larger proximal and distal planned target volume margins. Proton CT can potentially reduce these uncertainties by directly measuring proton stopping power. We aim to demonstrate proton CT imaging with complex porcine samples, to analyze in detail three-dimensional regions of interest, and to compare proton stopping powers directly measured by proton CT to those determined from x-ray CT scans. METHODS We have used a prototype proton imaging system with single proton tracking to acquire proton radiography and proton CT images of a sample of porcine pectoral girdle and ribs, and a pig's head. We also acquired close in time x-ray CT scans of the same samples and compared proton stopping power measurements from the two modalities. In the case of the pig's head, we obtained x-ray CT scans from two different scanners and compared results from high-dose and low-dose settings. RESULTS Comparing our reconstructed proton CT images with images derived from x-ray CT scans, we find agreement within 1% to 2% for soft tissues and discrepancies of up to 6% for compact bone. We also observed large discrepancies, up to 40%, for cavitated regions with mixed content of air, soft tissue, and bone, such as sinus cavities or tympanic bullae. CONCLUSIONS Our images and findings from a clinically realistic proton CT scanner demonstrate the potential for proton CT to be used for low-dose treatment planning with reduced margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Greg DeFillippo
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark Pankuch
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrew W Best
- Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - George Coutrakon
- Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - Kirk L Duffin
- Department of Computer Science, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - Nicholas T Karonis
- Department of Computer Science, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
- Argonne National Laboratory, Data Science and Learning Division, Argonne, Illinois, USA
| | - Caesar E Ordoñez
- Department of Computer Science, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - Christina Sarosiek
- Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | | | - John R Winans
- Department of Computer Science, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
| | - Alec M Block
- Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Service, Hines, Illinois, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Courtney L Hentz
- Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Service, Hines, Illinois, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - James S Welsh
- Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, Radiation Oncology Service, Hines, Illinois, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paganetti H, Botas P, Sharp GC, Winey B. Adaptive proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:10.1088/1361-6560/ac344f. [PMID: 34710858 PMCID: PMC8628198 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac344f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy treatments are typically planned based on a single image set, assuming that the patient's anatomy and its position relative to the delivery system remains constant during the course of treatment. Similarly, the prescription dose assumes constant biological dose-response over the treatment course. However, variations can and do occur on multiple time scales. For treatment sites with significant intra-fractional motion, geometric changes happen over seconds or minutes, while biological considerations change over days or weeks. At an intermediate timescale, geometric changes occur between daily treatment fractions. Adaptive radiation therapy is applied to consider changes in patient anatomy during the course of fractionated treatment delivery. While traditionally adaptation has been done off-line with replanning based on new CT images, online treatment adaptation based on on-board imaging has gained momentum in recent years due to advanced imaging techniques combined with treatment delivery systems. Adaptation is particularly important in proton therapy where small changes in patient anatomy can lead to significant dose perturbations due to the dose conformality and finite range of proton beams. This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art of on-line adaptive proton therapy and identifies areas requiring further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Pablo Botas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Foundation 29 of February, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gregory C Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Brian Winey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dickmann J, Sarosiek C, Götz S, Pankuch M, Coutrakon G, Johnson RP, Schulte RW, Parodi K, Landry G, Dedes G. An empirical artifact correction for proton computed tomography. Phys Med 2021; 86:57-65. [PMID: 34058718 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To reduce image artifacts of proton computed tomography (pCT) from a preclinical scanner, for imaging of the relative stopping power (RSP) needed for particle therapy treatment planning using a simple empirical artifact correction method. METHODS We adapted and employed a correction method previously used for beam-hardening correction in x-ray CT which makes use of a single scan of a custom-built homogeneous phantom with known RSP. Exploiting the linearity of the filtered backprojection operation, a function was found which corrects water-equivalent path lengths (RSP line integrals) in experimental scans using a prototype pCT scanner. The correction function was applied to projection values of subsequent scans of a homogeneous water phantom, a sensitometric phantom with various inserts and an anthropomorphic head phantom. Data were acquired at two different incident proton energies to test the robustness of the method. RESULTS Inaccuracies in the detection process caused an offset and known ring artifacts in the water phantom which were considerably reduced using the proposed method. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of mean RSP values of all inserts of the sensitometric phantom and the water phantom was reduced from 0.87% to 0.44% and from 0.86% to 0.48% for the two incident energies respectively. In the head phantom a clear reduction of artifacts was observed. CONCLUSIONS Image artifacts of experimental pCT scans with a prototype scanner could substantially be reduced both in homogeneous, heterogeneous and anthropomorphic phantoms. RSP accuracy was also improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannis Dickmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Am Coulombwall 1, Garching bei München, Germany.
| | - Christina Sarosiek
- Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, 1425 W. Lincoln Highway, DeKalb, Illinois, United States.
| | - Stefanie Götz
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Am Coulombwall 1, Garching bei München, Germany.
| | - Mark Pankuch
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Parkway, Warrenville, Illinois, United States.
| | - George Coutrakon
- Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, 1425 W. Lincoln Highway, DeKalb, Illinois, United States.
| | - Robert P Johnson
- Department of Physics, U.C. Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California, United States.
| | - Reinhard W Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, 11175 Campus Street, Loma Linda, California, United States.
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Am Coulombwall 1, Garching bei München, Germany.
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Am Coulombwall 1, Garching bei München, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Marchioninistraße 15, Munich, Germany.
| | - George Dedes
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Am Coulombwall 1, Garching bei München, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|