1
|
Hinz C, Jahnke S, Metzner R, Pflugfelder D, Scheins J, Streun M, Koller R. Setup and characterisation according to NEMA NU 4 of the phenoPET scanner, a PET system dedicated for plant sciences. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:055019. [PMID: 38271724 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad22a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective.ThephenoPET system is a plant dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) scanner consisting of fully digital photo multipliers with lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate crystals and located inside a custom climate chamber. Here, we present the setup ofphenoPET, its data processing and image reconstruction together with its performance.Approach.The performance characterization follows the national electrical manufacturers association (NEMA) standard for small animal PET systems with a number of adoptions due to the vertical oriented bore of a PET for plant sciences. In addition temperature stability and spatial resolution with a hot rod phantom are addressed.Main results.The spatial resolution for a22Na point source at a radial distance of 5 mm to the center of the field-of-view (FOV) is 1.45 mm, 0.82 mm and 1.88 mm with filtered back projection in radial, tangential and axial direction, respectively. A hot rod phantom with18F gives a spatial resolution of up to 1.6 mm. The peak noise-equivalent count rates are 550 kcps @ 35.08 MBq, 308 kcps @ 33 MBq and 45 kcps @ 40.60 MBq for the mouse, rat and monkey size scatter phantoms, respectively. The scatter fractions for these phantoms are 12.63%, 22.64% and 55.90%. We observe a peak sensitivity of up to 3.6% and a total sensitivity of up toSA,tot= 2.17%. For the NEMA image quality phantom we observe a uniformity of %STD= 4.22% with ordinary Poisson maximum likelihood expectation-maximization with 52 iterations. Here, recovery coefficients of 0.12, 0.64, 0.89, 0.93 and 0.91 for 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm and 5 mm rods are obtained and spill-over ratios of 0.08 and 0.14 for the water-filled and air-filled inserts, respectively.Significance.ThephenoPET and its laboratory are now in routine operation for the administration of [11C]CO2and non-invasive measurement of transport and allocation of11C-labelled photoassimilates in plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Hinz
- IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., D-52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - Siegfried Jahnke
- IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., D-52425 Jülich, Germany
- Biodiversity, Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 5, D-45141 Essen, Germany
| | - Ralf Metzner
- IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., D-52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - Daniel Pflugfelder
- IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., D-52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Scheins
- INM-4: Medical Imaging Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., D-52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - Matthias Streun
- ZEA-2: Electronic Systems, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., D-52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - Robert Koller
- IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., D-52425 Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pain CD, Egan GF, Chen Z. Deep learning-based image reconstruction and post-processing methods in positron emission tomography for low-dose imaging and resolution enhancement. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3098-3118. [PMID: 35312031 PMCID: PMC9250483 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05746-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Image processing plays a crucial role in maximising diagnostic quality of positron emission tomography (PET) images. Recently, deep learning methods developed across many fields have shown tremendous potential when applied to medical image enhancement, resulting in a rich and rapidly advancing literature surrounding this subject. This review encapsulates methods for integrating deep learning into PET image reconstruction and post-processing for low-dose imaging and resolution enhancement. A brief introduction to conventional image processing techniques in PET is firstly presented. We then review methods which integrate deep learning into the image reconstruction framework as either deep learning-based regularisation or as a fully data-driven mapping from measured signal to images. Deep learning-based post-processing methods for low-dose imaging, temporal resolution enhancement and spatial resolution enhancement are also reviewed. Finally, the challenges associated with applying deep learning to enhance PET images in the clinical setting are discussed and future research directions to address these challenges are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Dennis Pain
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Gary F Egan
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Zhaolin Chen
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Data Science and AI, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|