Adaptation of stochastic microdosimetric kinetic model to hypoxia for hypo-fractionated multi-ion therapy treatment planning

Particle arc therapy: Status and potential

There is a rising interest in developing and utilizing arc delivery techniques with charged particle beams, e.g., proton, carbon or other ions, for clinical implementation. In this work, perspectives from the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) 2022 physics workshop on particle arc therapy are reported. This outlook provides an outline and prospective vision for the path forward to clinically deliverable proton, carbon, and other ion arc treatments. Through the collaboration among industry, academic, and clinical research and development, the scientific landscape and outlook for particle arc therapy are presented here to help our community understand the physics, radiobiology, and clinical principles. The work is presented in three main sections: (i) treatment planning, (ii) treatment delivery, and (iii) clinical outlook.

Effects of cellular radioresponse on therapeutic helium-, carbon-, oxygen-, and neon-ion beams: a simulation study

Objective. Helium, oxygen, and neon ions in addition to carbon ions will be used for hypofractionated multi-ion therapy to maximize the therapeutic effectiveness of charged-particle therapy. To use new ions in cancer treatments based on the dose-fractionation protocols established in carbon-ion therapy, this study examined the cell-line-specific radioresponse to therapeutic helium-, oxygen-, and neon-ion beams within wide dose ranges.Approach. Response of cells to ions was described by the stochastic microdosimetric kinetic model. First, simulations were made for the irradiation of one-field spread-out Bragg peak beams in water with helium, carbon, oxygen, and neon ions to achieve uniform survival fractions at 37%, 10%, and 1% for human salivary gland tumor (HSG) cells, the reference cell line for the Japanese relative biological effectiveness weighted dose system, within the target region defined at depths from 90 to 150 mm. The HSG cells were then replaced by other cell lines with different radioresponses to evaluate differences in the biological dose distributions of each ion beam with respect to those of carbon-ion beams.Main results. For oxygen- and neon-ion beams, the biological dose distributions within the target region were almost equivalent to those of carbon-ion beams, differing by less than 5% in most cases. In contrast, for helium-ion beams, the biological dose distributions within the target region were largely different from those of carbon-ion beams, more than 10% in several cases.Significance.From the standpoint of tumor control evaluated by the clonogenic cell survival, this study suggests that the dose-fractionation protocols established in carbon-ion therapy could be reasonably applied to oxygen- and neon-ion beams while some modifications in dose prescription would be needed when the protocols are applied to helium-ion beams. This study bridges the gap between carbon-ion therapy and hypofractionated multi-ion therapy.

Carbon Ions for Hypoxic Tumors: Are We Making the Most of Them?

Hypoxia, which is associated with abnormal vessel growth, is a characteristic feature of many solid tumors that increases their metastatic potential and resistance to radiotherapy. Carbon-ion radiation therapy, either alone or in combination with other treatments, is one of the most promising treatments for hypoxic tumors because the oxygen enhancement ratio decreases with increasing particle LET. Nevertheless, current clinical practice does not yet fully benefit from the use of carbon ions to tackle hypoxia. Here, we provide an overview of the existing experimental and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of C-ion radiotherapy in overcoming hypoxia-induced radioresistance, followed by a discussion of the strategies proposed to enhance it, including different approaches to maximize LET in the tumors.

Event-by-event approach to the oxygen-effect-incorporated stochastic microdosimetric kinetic model for hypofractionated multi-ion therapy

An oxygen-effect-incorporated stochastic microdosimetric kinetic (OSMK) model was previously developed to estimate the survival fraction of cells exposed to charged-particle beams with wide dose and linear energy transfer (LET) ranges under various oxygen conditions. In the model, hypoxia-induced radioresistance was formulated based on the dose-averaged radiation quality. This approximation may cause inaccuracy in the estimation of the biological effectiveness of the radiation with wide variation in energy deposited to a sensitive volume per event, such as spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) beams. The purpose of this study was to apply an alternative approach so as to consider the energy depositions on an event-by-event basis. The production probability of radiation-induced lesions per energy was formulated with oxygen partial pressure to account for the hypoxia-induced radioresistance. The reduction in the oxygen enhancement ratio for high-LET radiations was modeled by reducing the sensitive-volume size and increasing the saturation energy in microdosimetry. The modified OSMK model was tested against the reported survival data of three cell lines exposed to six species of ions with wide dose and LET ranges under aerobic and hypoxic conditions. The model reasonably reproduced the reported cell survival data. To evaluate the event-by-event approach, survival distributions of Chinese hamster ovary cells exposed to SOBP beams were estimated using the original and modified OSMK models. The differences in the estimated survival distributions between the models were marginal even under extreme hypoxia. The event-by-event approach improved the theoretical validity of the OSMK model. However, the original OSMK model can still provide an accurate estimation of the biological effectiveness of therapeutic radiations.

Roadmap: helium ion therapy

Helium ion beam therapy for the treatment of cancer was one of several developed and studied particle treatments in the 1950s, leading to clinical trials beginning in 1975 at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The trial shutdown was followed by decades of research and clinical silence on the topic while proton and carbon ion therapy made debuts at research facilities and academic hospitals worldwide. The lack of progression in understanding the principle facets of helium ion beam therapy in terms of physics, biological and clinical findings persists today, mainly attributable to its highly limited availability. Despite this major setback, there is an increasing focus on evaluating and establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams, with both therapy and imaging initiatives to supplement the clinical palette of radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive disease and sensitive clinical cases. Moreover, due its intermediate physical and radio-biological properties between proton and carbon ion beams, helium ions may provide a streamlined economic steppingstone towards an era of widespread use of different particle species in light and heavy ion therapy. With respect to the clinical proton beams, helium ions exhibit superior physical properties such as reduced lateral scattering and range straggling with higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LET_d) ranging from ∼4 keVμm^-1to ∼40 keVμm^-1. In the frame of heavy ion therapy using carbon, oxygen or neon ions, where LET_dincreases beyond 100 keVμm^-1, helium ions exhibit similar physical attributes such as a sharp lateral penumbra, however, with reduced radio-biological uncertainties and without potentially spoiling dose distributions due to excess fragmentation of heavier ion beams, particularly for higher penetration depths. This roadmap presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art and future directions of helium ion therapy: understanding physics and improving modeling, understanding biology and improving modeling, imaging techniques using helium ions and refining and establishing clinical approaches and aims from learned experience with protons. These topics are organized and presented into three main sections, outlining current and future tasks in establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams-A. Physics B. Biological and C. Clinical Perspectives.

Spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) therapy: A proof of concept using single and multi-ion strategies with helium, carbon, oxygen and neon ions

PURPOSE

To present particle arc therapy treatments using single and multi-ion therapy optimization strategies with helium (⁴ He), carbon (¹² C), oxygen (¹⁶ O) and neon (²⁰ Ne) ion beams.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An optimization procedure and workflow were devised for spot-scanning hadron arc therapy (SHArc) treatment planning in the PRECISE (PaRticle thErapy using single and Combined Ion optimization StratEgies) treatment planning system (TPS). Physical and biological beam models were developed for helium, carbon, oxygen and neon ions via FLUKA MC simulation. SHArc treatments were optimized using both single ion (¹² C, ¹⁶ O, or ²⁰ Ne) and multi-ion therapy (¹⁶ O+⁴ He or ²⁰ Ne+⁴ He) applying variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) modeling using a modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) with (α/β)_x values of 2Gy, 5Gy and 3.1Gy respectively, for glioblastoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and prostate adenocarcinoma patient cases. Dose, effective dose, linear energy transfer (LET) and RBE were computed with the GPU-accelerated dose engine FRoG and dosimetric/biophysical attributes were evaluated in the context of conventional particle and photon-based therapies (e.g., volumetric modulated arc therapy [VMAT]).

RESULTS

All SHArc plans met the target optimization goals (3GyRBE) and demonstrated increased target conformity and substantially lower low-dose bath to surrounding normal tissues than VMAT. SHArc plans using a single ion species (¹² C, ¹⁶ O, or ²⁰ Ne) exhibited favorable LET distributions with the highest-LET components centralized in the target volume, with values ranging from ∼80-170keV/μm, ∼130-220keV/μm and ∼180-350keV/μm, for ¹² C, ¹⁶ O, or ²⁰ Ne, respectively, exceeding mean target LET of conventional particle therapy (¹² C:∼60, ¹⁶ O:∼78 ²⁰ Ne:∼100 keV/μm). Multi-ion therapy with SHArc delivery (SHArc_MIT ) provided a similar level of target LET enhancement as SHArc compared to conventional planning, however, with additional benefits of homogenous physical dose and RBE distributions.

CONCLUSION

Here, we demonstrate that arc delivery of light and heavy ion beams, using either a single ion species (¹² C, ¹⁶ O, or ²⁰ Ne) or combining two ions in a single fraction (¹⁶ O+⁴ He or ²⁰ Ne+⁴ He), affords enhanced physical and biological distributions (e.g., LET) compared with conventional delivery with photons or particle beams. SHArc marks the first single and multi-ion arc therapy treatment optimization approach using light and heavy ions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.