1
|
Mody P, Huiskes M, Chaves-de-Plaza NF, Onderwater A, Lamsma R, Hildebrandt K, Hoekstra N, Astreinidou E, Staring M, Dankers F. Large-scale dose evaluation of deep learning organ contours in head-and-neck radiotherapy by leveraging existing plans. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100572. [PMID: 38633281 PMCID: PMC11021837 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Retrospective dose evaluation for organ-at-risk auto-contours has previously used small cohorts due to additional manual effort required for treatment planning on auto-contours. We aimed to do this at large scale, by a) proposing and assessing an automated plan optimization workflow that used existing clinical plan parameters and b) using it for head-and-neck auto-contour dose evaluation. Materials and methods Our automated workflow emulated our clinic's treatment planning protocol and reused existing clinical plan optimization parameters. This workflow recreated the original clinical plan (P OG ) with manual contours (P MC ) and evaluated the dose effect (P OG - P MC ) on 70 photon and 30 proton plans of head-and-neck patients. As a use-case, the same workflow (and parameters) created a plan using auto-contours (P AC ) of eight head-and-neck organs-at-risk from a commercial tool and evaluated their dose effect (P MC - P AC ). Results For plan recreation (P OG - P MC ), our workflow had a median impact of 1.0% and 1.5% across dose metrics of auto-contours, for photon and proton respectively. Computer time of automated planning was 25% (photon) and 42% (proton) of manual planning time. For auto-contour evaluation (P MC - P AC ), we noticed an impact of 2.0% and 2.6% for photon and proton radiotherapy. All evaluations had a median Δ NTCP (Normal Tissue Complication Probability) less than 0.3%. Conclusions The plan replication capability of our automated program provides a blueprint for other clinics to perform auto-contour dose evaluation with large patient cohorts. Finally, despite geometric differences, auto-contours had a minimal median dose impact, hence inspiring confidence in their utility and facilitating their clinical adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prerak Mody
- Division of Image Processing (LKEB), Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC consortium – Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Holland Proton Therapy Centre, Delft, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden and Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Merle Huiskes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas F. Chaves-de-Plaza
- HollandPTC consortium – Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Holland Proton Therapy Centre, Delft, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden and Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Group, EEMCS, TU Delft, Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
| | - Alice Onderwater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Rense Lamsma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Klaus Hildebrandt
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Group, EEMCS, TU Delft, Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke Hoekstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Eleftheria Astreinidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Marius Staring
- Division of Image Processing (LKEB), Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Dankers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oud M, Breedveld S, Rojo-Santiago J, Giżyńska MK, Kroesen M, Habraken S, Perkó Z, Heijmen B, Hoogeman M. A fast and robust constraint-based online re-optimization approach for automated online adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy in head and neck cancer. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:075007. [PMID: 38373350 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad2a98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Objective. In head-and-neck cancer intensity modulated proton therapy, adaptive radiotherapy is currently restricted to offline re-planning, mitigating the effect of slow changes in patient anatomies. Daily online adaptations can potentially improve dosimetry. Here, a new, fully automated online re-optimization strategy is presented. In a retrospective study, this online re-optimization approach was compared to our trigger-based offline re-planning (offlineTBre-planning) schedule, including extensive robustness analyses.Approach. The online re-optimization method employs automated multi-criterial re-optimization, using robust optimization with 1 mm setup-robustness settings (in contrast to 3 mm for offlineTBre-planning). Hard planning constraints and spot addition are used to enforce adequate target coverage, avoid prohibitively large maximum doses and minimize organ-at-risk doses. For 67 repeat-CTs from 15 patients, fraction doses of the two strategies were compared for the CTVs and organs-at-risk. Per repeat-CT, 10.000 fractions with different setup and range robustness settings were simulated using polynomial chaos expansion for fast and accurate dose calculations.Main results. For 14/67 repeat-CTs, offlineTBre-planning resulted in <50% probability ofD98%≥ 95% of the prescribed dose (Dpres) in one or both CTVs, which never happened with online re-optimization. With offlineTBre-planning, eight repeat-CTs had zero probability of obtainingD98%≥ 95%Dpresfor CTV7000, while the minimum probability with online re-optimization was 81%. Risks of xerostomia and dysphagia grade ≥ II were reduced by 3.5 ± 1.7 and 3.9 ± 2.8 percentage point [mean ± SD] (p< 10-5for both). In online re-optimization, adjustment of spot configuration followed by spot-intensity re-optimization took 3.4 min on average.Significance. The fast online re-optimization strategy always prevented substantial losses of target coverage caused by day-to-day anatomical variations, as opposed to the clinical trigger-based offline re-planning schedule. On top of this, online re-optimization could be performed with smaller setup robustness settings, contributing to improved organs-at-risk sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Oud
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jesús Rojo-Santiago
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michiel Kroesen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Steven Habraken
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Zoltán Perkó
- Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Radiation Science and Technology, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knäusl B, Belotti G, Bertholet J, Daartz J, Flampouri S, Hoogeman M, Knopf AC, Lin H, Moerman A, Paganelli C, Rucinski A, Schulte R, Shimizu S, Stützer K, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Czerska K. A review of the clinical introduction of 4D particle therapy research concepts. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100535. [PMID: 38298885 PMCID: PMC10828898 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Many 4D particle therapy research concepts have been recently translated into clinics, however, remaining substantial differences depend on the indication and institute-related aspects. This work aims to summarise current state-of-the-art 4D particle therapy technology and outline a roadmap for future research and developments. Material and methods This review focused on the clinical implementation of 4D approaches for imaging, treatment planning, delivery and evaluation based on the 2021 and 2022 4D Treatment Workshops for Particle Therapy as well as a review of the most recent surveys, guidelines and scientific papers dedicated to this topic. Results Available technological capabilities for motion surveillance and compensation determined the course of each 4D particle treatment. 4D motion management, delivery techniques and strategies including imaging were diverse and depended on many factors. These included aspects of motion amplitude, tumour location, as well as accelerator technology driving the necessity of centre-specific dosimetric validation. Novel methodologies for X-ray based image processing and MRI for real-time tumour tracking and motion management were shown to have a large potential for online and offline adaptation schemes compensating for potential anatomical changes over the treatment course. The latest research developments were dominated by particle imaging, artificial intelligence methods and FLASH adding another level of complexity but also opportunities in the context of 4D treatments. Conclusion This review showed that the rapid technological advances in radiation oncology together with the available intrafractional motion management and adaptive strategies paved the way towards clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriele Belotti
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Juliane Daartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antje C Knopf
- Institut für Medizintechnik und Medizininformatik Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Astrid Moerman
- Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Reinhard Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University
| | - Shing Shimizu
- Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Katarzyna Czerska
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nenoff L, Amstutz F, Murr M, Archibald-Heeren B, Fusella M, Hussein M, Lechner W, Zhang Y, Sharp G, Vasquez Osorio E. Review and recommendations on deformable image registration uncertainties for radiotherapy applications. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:24TR01. [PMID: 37972540 PMCID: PMC10725576 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0d8a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Deformable image registration (DIR) is a versatile tool used in many applications in radiotherapy (RT). DIR algorithms have been implemented in many commercial treatment planning systems providing accessible and easy-to-use solutions. However, the geometric uncertainty of DIR can be large and difficult to quantify, resulting in barriers to clinical practice. Currently, there is no agreement in the RT community on how to quantify these uncertainties and determine thresholds that distinguish a good DIR result from a poor one. This review summarises the current literature on sources of DIR uncertainties and their impact on RT applications. Recommendations are provided on how to handle these uncertainties for patient-specific use, commissioning, and research. Recommendations are also provided for developers and vendors to help users to understand DIR uncertainties and make the application of DIR in RT safer and more reliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Nenoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Dresden Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Florian Amstutz
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martina Murr
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Marco Fusella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Italy
| | - Mohammad Hussein
- Metrology for Medical Physics, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
| | - Wolfgang Lechner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Greg Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Eliana Vasquez Osorio
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smolders A, Lomax A, Weber DC, Albertini F. Deep learning based uncertainty prediction of deformable image registration for contour propagation and dose accumulation in online adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:245027. [PMID: 37820691 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Online adaptive radiotherapy aims to fully leverage the advantages of highly conformal therapy by reducing anatomical and set-up uncertainty, thereby alleviating the need for robust treatments. This requires extensive automation, among which is the use of deformable image registration (DIR) for contour propagation and dose accumulation. However, inconsistencies in DIR solutions between different algorithms have caused distrust, hampering its direct clinical use. This work aims to enable the clinical use of DIR by developing deep learning methods to predict DIR uncertainty and propagating it into clinically usable metrics.Approach.Supervised and unsupervised neural networks were trained to predict the Gaussian uncertainty of a given deformable vector field (DVF). Since both methods rely on different assumptions, their predictions differ and were further merged into a combined model. The resulting normally distributed DVFs can be directly sampled to propagate the uncertainty into contour and accumulated dose uncertainty.Main results.The unsupervised and combined models can accurately predict the uncertainty in the manually annotated landmarks on the DIRLAB dataset. Furthermore, for 5 patients with lung cancer, the propagation of the predicted DVF uncertainty into contour uncertainty yielded for both methods anexpected calibration errorof less than 3%. Additionally, theprobabilisticly accumulated dose volume histograms(DVH) encompass well the accumulated proton therapy doses using 5 different DIR algorithms. It was additionally shown that the unsupervised model can be used for different DIR algorithms without the need for retraining.Significance.Our work presents first-of-a-kind deep learning methods to predict the uncertainty of the DIR process. The methods are fast, yield high-quality uncertainty estimates and are useable for different algorithms and applications. This allows clinics to use DIR uncertainty in their workflows without the need to change their DIR implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Smolders
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A Lomax
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D C Weber
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - F Albertini
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|