Machine learning-based personalized subthalamic biomarkers predict ON-OFF levodopa states in Parkinson patients

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Speech Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative movement disorder and a growing health concern in demographically aging societies. The prevalence of PD among individuals over the age of 60 and 80 years has been reported to range between 1% and 4%. A timely diagnosis of PD is desirable, even though it poses challenges to medical systems.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to classify PD and healthy controls based on the analysis of voice records at different frequencies using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

METHODS

The voices of 252 individuals aged 33 to 87 years were recorded. Based on the voice record data, ML algorithms can distinguish PD patients and healthy controls. One binary decision variable was associated with 756 instances and 754 attributes. Voice records data were analyzed through supervised ML algorithms and pipelines. A 10-fold cross-validation method was used to validate models.

RESULTS

In the classification of PD patients, ML models were performed with 84.21 accuracy, 93 precision, 89 Sensitivity, 89 F1-scores, and 87 AUC. The pipeline performance improved to accuracy: 85.09, precision: 92, Sensitivity:91, F1-score: 89, and AUC: 90. The Pipeline methods improved the performance of classifying PD from voice record.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that ML classifiers and pipelines can classify PD patients based on speech biomarkers. It was found that pipelines were more effective at selecting the most relevant features from high-dimensional data and at accurately classifying PD patients and healthy controls. This approach can therefore be used for early diagnosis of initial forms of PD.

Machine Learning in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. The success of SCS is dependent on candidate selection, response to trialing, and programming optimization. Owing to the subjective nature of these variables, machine learning (ML) offers a powerful tool to augment these processes. Here we explore what work has been done using data analytics and applications of ML in SCS. In addition, we discuss aspects of SCS which have narrowly been influenced by ML and propose the need for further exploration. ML has demonstrated a potential to complement SCS to an extent ranging from assistance with candidate selection to replacing invasive and costly aspects of the surgery. The clinical application of ML in SCS shows promise for improving patient outcomes, reducing costs of treatment, limiting invasiveness, and resulting in a better quality of life for the patient.

Hyper-parameter tuning and feature extraction for asynchronous action detection from sub-thalamic nucleus local field potentials

Introduction

Decoding brain states from subcortical local field potentials (LFPs) indicative of activities such as voluntary movement, tremor, or sleep stages, holds significant potential in treating neurodegenerative disorders and offers new paradigms in brain-computer interface (BCI). Identified states can serve as control signals in coupled human-machine systems, e.g., to regulate deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy or control prosthetic limbs. However, the behavior, performance, and efficiency of LFP decoders depend on an array of design and calibration settings encapsulated into a single set of hyper-parameters. Although methods exist to tune hyper-parameters automatically, decoders are typically found through exhaustive trial-and-error, manual search, and intuitive experience.

Methods

This study introduces a Bayesian optimization (BO) approach to hyper-parameter tuning, applicable through feature extraction, channel selection, classification, and stage transition stages of the entire decoding pipeline. The optimization method is compared with five real-time feature extraction methods paired with four classifiers to decode voluntary movement asynchronously based on LFPs recorded with DBS electrodes implanted in the subthalamic nucleus of Parkinson's disease patients.

Results

Detection performance, measured as the geometric mean between classifier specificity and sensitivity, is automatically optimized. BO demonstrates improved decoding performance from initial parameter setting across all methods. The best decoders achieve a maximum performance of 0.74 ± 0.06 (mean ± SD across all participants) sensitivity-specificity geometric mean. In addition, parameter relevance is determined using the BO surrogate models.

Discussion

Hyper-parameters tend to be sub-optimally fixed across different users rather than individually adjusted or even specifically set for a decoding task. The relevance of each parameter to the optimization problem and comparisons between algorithms can also be difficult to track with the evolution of the decoding problem. We believe that the proposed decoding pipeline and BO approach is a promising solution to such challenges surrounding hyper-parameter tuning and that the study's findings can inform future design iterations of neural decoders for adaptive DBS and BCI.

Landscape and future directions of machine learning applications in closed-loop brain stimulation

Brain stimulation (BStim) encompasses multiple modalities (e.g., deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation) that utilize electrodes implanted in deep brain structures to treat neurological disorders. Currently, BStim is primarily used to treat movement disorders such as Parkinson's, though indications are expanding to include neuropsychiatric disorders like depression and schizophrenia. Traditional BStim systems are "open-loop" and deliver constant electrical stimulation based on manually-determined parameters. Advancements in BStim have enabled development of "closed-loop" systems that analyze neural biomarkers (e.g., local field potentials in the sub-thalamic nucleus) and adjust electrical modulation in a dynamic, patient-specific, and energy efficient manner. These closed-loop systems enable real-time, context-specific stimulation adjustment to reduce symptom burden. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a vital component in designing these closed-loop systems as ML models can predict / identify presence of disease symptoms based on neural activity and adaptively learn to modulate stimulation. We queried the US National Library of Medicine PubMed database to understand the role of ML in developing closed-loop BStim systems to treat epilepsy, movement disorders, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Both neural and non-neural network ML algorithms have successfully been leveraged to create closed-loop systems that perform comparably to open-loop systems. For disorders in which the underlying neural pathophysiology is relatively well understood (e.g., Parkinson's, essential tremor), most work has involved refining ML models that can classify neural signals as aberrant or normal. The same is seen for epilepsy, where most current research has focused on identifying optimal ML model design and integrating closed-loop systems into existing devices. For neuropsychiatric disorders, where the underlying pathologic neural circuitry is still being investigated, research is focused on identifying biomarkers (e.g., local field potentials from brain nuclei) that ML models can use to identify onset of symptoms and stratify severity of disease.

Deep Brain Stimulation Can Differentiate Subregions of the Human Subthalamic Nucleus Area by EEG Biomarkers

Introduction: Precise lead localization is crucial for an optimal clinical outcome of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Currently, anatomical measures, as well as invasive intraoperative electrophysiological recordings, are used to locate DBS electrodes. The objective of this study was to find an alternative electrophysiology tool for STN DBS lead localization.

Methods: Sixty-one postoperative electrophysiology recording sessions were obtained from 17 DBS-treated patients with PD. An intraoperative physiological method automatically detected STN borders and subregions. Postoperative EEG cortical activity was measured, while STN low frequency stimulation (LFS) was applied to different areas inside and outside the STN. Machine learning models were used to differentiate stimulation locations, based on EEG analysis of engineered features.

Results: A machine learning algorithm identified the top 25 evoked response potentials (ERPs), engineered features that can differentiate inside and outside STN stimulation locations as well as within STN stimulation locations. Evoked responses in the medial and ipsilateral fronto-central areas were found to be most significant for predicting the location of STN stimulation. Two-class linear support vector machine (SVM) predicted the inside (dorso-lateral region, DLR, and ventro-medial region, VMR) vs. outside [zona incerta, ZI, STN stimulation classification with an accuracy of 0.98 and 0.82 for ZI vs. VMR and ZI vs. DLR, respectively, and an accuracy of 0.77 for the within STN (DLR vs. VMR)]. Multiclass linear SVM predicted all areas with an accuracy of 0.82 for the outside and within STN stimulation locations (ZI vs. DLR vs. VMR).

Conclusions: Electroencephalogram biomarkers can use low-frequency STN stimulation to localize STN DBS electrodes to ZI, DLR, and VMR STN subregions. These models can be used for both intraoperative electrode localization and postoperative stimulation programming sessions, and have a potential to improve STN DBS clinical outcomes.