1
|
Zhang L, Cui S, Bi H, Chen Q, Kan M, Wang C, Pu Y, Cheng H, Huang B. The research focus and frontiers in surgical treatment of essential tremor. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1499652. [PMID: 39722689 PMCID: PMC11668671 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1499652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders, with surgery serving as the principal treatment option. This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of research in the field of ET surgery from 2004 to 2024, aiming to identify current research hotspots and inform future research directions. Methods This study employs CiteSpace to analyze publication trends, countries/institutions, authors, keywords, and co-cited references in ET surgery, using the Web of Science core database from 2004 to 2024 to delineate the research pathways. Results A total of 1,362 publications were included in this study. The number of publications has shown steady growth over the analyzed period from 2004 to 2024. Research in this field was carried out in 58 countries and by 371 institutions. The United States had the highest volume of publications, with the University of California System identified as the most prolific institution. Dr. Michael S. Okun from the University of Florida was the most prolific author, also based in the United States. This study identified 879 keywords, with significant citation bursts noted in areas such as the caudal zona incerta, ventral intermediate nucleus, location, and MR-guided focused ultrasound. Among the top ten highly cited articles, five pertained to MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy, two addressed localization techniques, and one focused on surgical targets. Conclusion This study employs comprehensive bibliometric and visualization analyses to elucidate the evolution of research and identify emerging hotspots. The identified hotspots are as follows: First, deep brain stimulation (DBS), the most advanced technology in ET surgery, has room for improvement, especially in neuromodulation automation. Second, MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy is a new surgical approach that requires further research on efficacy, safety, and side effect management. Third, novel surgical targets have demonstrated some efficacy, yet further research is essential to validate their effectiveness and safety. Lastly, localization techniques are fundamental to ET surgery, with ongoing efforts directed towards achieving more precise, individualized, and intelligent localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linlin Zhang
- Nantong Fourth People's Hospital, Nantong, China
| | - Shifang Cui
- Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China
| | - Hongyan Bi
- Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Qiang Chen
- Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Mengfan Kan
- Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Cheng Wang
- Nantong Fourth People's Hospital, Nantong, China
| | - Yu Pu
- Nantong Fourth People's Hospital, Nantong, China
| | | | - Bin Huang
- Nantong Fourth People's Hospital, Nantong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stocchi F, Bravi D, Emmi A, Antonini A. Parkinson disease therapy: current strategies and future research priorities. Nat Rev Neurol 2024; 20:695-707. [PMID: 39496848 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-024-01034-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/06/2024]
Abstract
Parkinson disease (PD) is the fastest growing neurological disorder globally and poses substantial management challenges owing to progressive disability, emergence of levodopa-resistant symptoms, and treatment-related complications. In this Review, we examine the current state of research into PD therapies and outline future priorities for advancing our understanding and treatment of the disease. We identify two main research priorities for the coming years: first, slowing the progression of the disease through the integration of sensitive biomarkers and targeted biological therapies, and second, enhancing existing symptomatic treatments, encompassing surgical and infusion therapies, with the goal of postponing complications and improving long-term patient management. The path towards disease modification is impeded by the multifaceted pathophysiology and diverse mechanisms underlying PD. Ongoing studies are directed at α-synuclein aggregation, complemented by efforts to address specific pathways associated with the less common genetic forms of the disease. The success of these efforts relies on establishing robust end points, incorporating technology, and identifying reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis and continuous monitoring of disease progression. In the context of symptomatic treatment, the focus should shift towards refining existing approaches and fostering the development of novel therapeutic strategies that target levodopa-resistant symptoms and clinical manifestations that substantially impair quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Stocchi
- Department of Neurology, University San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.
- Deptartment of Neurology, Institute for Research and Medical Care, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.
| | - Daniele Bravi
- Deptartment of Neurology, Institute for Research and Medical Care, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
| | - Aron Emmi
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Institute of Human Anatomy, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND), Department of Neuroscience, Padua Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang G, Yu H, Chen Y, Gong C, Hao H, Guo Y, Xu S, Zhang Y, Yuan X, Yin G, Zhang JG, Tan H, Li L. Neurophysiological features of STN LFP underlying sleep fragmentation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2024; 95:1112-1122. [PMID: 38724231 PMCID: PMC7616489 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep fragmentation is a persistent problem throughout the course of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the related neurophysiological patterns and the underlying mechanisms remained unclear. METHOD We recorded subthalamic nucleus (STN) local field potentials (LFPs) using deep brain stimulation (DBS) with real-time wireless recording capacity from 13 patients with PD undergoing a one-night polysomnography recording, 1 month after DBS surgery before initial programming and when the patients were off-medication. The STN LFP features that characterised different sleep stages, correlated with arousal and sleep fragmentation index, and preceded stage transitions during N2 and REM sleep were analysed. RESULTS Both beta and low gamma oscillations in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep increased with the severity of sleep disturbance (arousal index (ArI)-betaNREM: r=0.9, p=0.0001, sleep fragmentation index (SFI)-betaNREM: r=0.6, p=0.0301; SFI-gammaNREM: r=0.6, p=0.0324). We next examined the low-to-high power ratio (LHPR), which was the power ratio of theta oscillations to beta and low gamma oscillations, and found it to be an indicator of sleep fragmentation (ArI-LHPRNREM: r=-0.8, p=0.0053; ArI-LHPRREM: r=-0.6, p=0.0373; SFI-LHPRNREM: r=-0.7, p=0.0204; SFI-LHPRREM: r=-0.6, p=0.0428). In addition, long beta bursts (>0.25 s) during NREM stage 2 were found preceding the completion of transition to stages with more cortical activities (towards Wake/N1/REM compared with towards N3 (p<0.01)) and negatively correlated with STN spindles, which were detected in STN LFPs with peak frequency distinguishable from long beta bursts (STN spindle: 11.5 Hz, STN long beta bursts: 23.8 Hz), in occupation during NREM sleep (β=-0.24, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Features of STN LFPs help explain neurophysiological mechanisms underlying sleep fragmentations in PD, which can inform new intervention for sleep dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02937727.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guokun Zhang
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing, China
| | - Huiling Yu
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Chen
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Gong
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing, China
| | - Hongwei Hao
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Guo
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shujun Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Qingdao, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Yuhuan Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuemei Yuan
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guoping Yin
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Huiling Tan
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research at Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oehrn CR, Cernera S, Hammer LH, Shcherbakova M, Yao J, Hahn A, Wang S, Ostrem JL, Little S, Starr PA. Chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation versus conventional stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a blinded randomized feasibility trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:3345-3356. [PMID: 39160351 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03196-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but lacks dynamic responsiveness to changing clinical and neural states. Feedback control might improve therapeutic effectiveness, but the optimal control strategy and additional benefits of 'adaptive' neurostimulation are unclear. Here we present the results of a blinded randomized cross-over pilot trial aimed at determining the neural correlates of specific motor signs in individuals with PD and the feasibility of using these signals to drive adaptive DBS. Four male patients with PD were recruited from a population undergoing DBS implantation for motor fluctuations, with each patient receiving adaptive DBS and continuous DBS. We identified stimulation-entrained gamma oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus or motor cortex as optimal markers of high versus low dopaminergic states and their associated residual motor signs in all four patients. We then demonstrated improved motor symptoms and quality of life with adaptive compared to clinically optimized standard stimulation. The results of this pilot trial highlight the promise of personalized adaptive neurostimulation in PD based on data-driven selection of neural signals. Furthermore, these findings provide the foundation for further larger clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of personalized adaptive neurostimulation in PD and other neurological disorders. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03582891 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina R Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren H Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Shcherbakova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jiaang Yao
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guidetti M, Bocci T, De Pedro Del Álamo M, Deuschl G, Fasano A, Fernandez RM, Gasca-Salas C, Hamani C, Krauss J, Kühn AA, Limousin P, Little S, Lozano A, Maiorana N, Marceglia S, Okun M, Oliveri S, Ostrem JL, Scelzo E, Schnitzler A, Starr P, Temel Y, Timmermann L, Tinkhauser G, Visser-Vandewalle V, Volkmann J, Priori A. Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Delphi Consensus Study. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.08.26.24312580. [PMID: 39252901 PMCID: PMC11383503 DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.26.24312580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
Importance If history teaches, as cardiac pacing moved from fixed-rate to on-demand delivery in in 80s of the last century, there are high probabilities that closed-loop and adaptive approaches will become, in the next decade, the natural evolution of conventional Deep Brain Stimulation (cDBS). However, while devices for aDBS are already available for clinical use, few data on their clinical application and technological limitations are available so far. In such scenario, gathering the opinion and expertise of leading investigators worldwide would boost and guide practice and research, thus grounding the clinical development of aDBS. Observations We identified clinical and academically experienced DBS clinicians (n=21) to discuss the challenges related to aDBS. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire along with a Delphi method was employed. 42 questions were submitted to the panel, half of them being related to technical aspects while the other half to clinical aspects of aDBS. Experts agreed that aDBS will become clinical practice in 10 years. In the present scenario, although the panel agreed that aDBS applications require skilled clinicians and that algorithms need to be further optimized to manage complex PD symptoms, consensus was reached on aDBS safety and its ability to provide a faster and more stable treatment response than cDBS, also for tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease patients and for those with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Conclusions and Relevance Despite the need of further research, the panel concluded that aDBS is safe, promises to be maximally effective in PD patients with motor fluctuation and dyskinesias and therefore will enter into the clinical practice in the next years, with further research focused on algorithms and markers for complex symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Guidetti
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - T. Bocci
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | | | - G. Deuschl
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel and Christian Albrechts-University of Kiel Kiel Germany
| | - A. Fasano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson’s Disease Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R. Martinez Fernandez
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Carlos III, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain
| | - C. Gasca-Salas
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Carlos III, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain
| | - C. Hamani
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Toronto, M5T 1P5, ON, Canada
| | - J.K. Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - A. A. Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure, Exzellenzcluster, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - P. Limousin
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - S. Little
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - A.M. Lozano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - N.V. Maiorana
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - S. Marceglia
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - M.S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, United States
| | - S. Oliveri
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - J. L. Ostrem
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - E. Scelzo
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - A. Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - P.A. Starr
- UCSF Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Department of Physiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Y. Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - L. Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - G. Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - V. Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - J. Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - A. Priori
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lefaucheur JP, Moro E, Shirota Y, Ugawa Y, Grippe T, Chen R, Benninger DH, Jabbari B, Attaripour S, Hallett M, Paulus W. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 164:57-99. [PMID: 38852434 PMCID: PMC11418354 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
In this review, different aspects of the use of clinical neurophysiology techniques for the treatment of movement disorders are addressed. First of all, these techniques can be used to guide neuromodulation techniques or to perform therapeutic neuromodulation as such. Neuromodulation includes invasive techniques based on the surgical implantation of electrodes and a pulse generator, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the one hand, and non-invasive techniques aimed at modulating or even lesioning neural structures by transcranial application. Movement disorders are one of the main areas of indication for the various neuromodulation techniques. This review focuses on the following techniques: DBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and focused ultrasound (FUS), including high-intensity magnetic resonance-guided FUS (MRgFUS), and pulsed mode low-intensity transcranial FUS stimulation (TUS). The main clinical conditions in which neuromodulation has proven its efficacy are Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, mainly using DBS or MRgFUS. There is also some evidence for Tourette syndrome (DBS), Huntington's disease (DBS), cerebellar ataxia (tDCS), and axial signs (SCS) and depression (rTMS) in PD. The development of non-invasive transcranial neuromodulation techniques is limited by the short-term clinical impact of these techniques, especially rTMS, in the context of very chronic diseases. However, at-home use (tDCS) or current advances in the design of closed-loop stimulation (tACS) may open new perspectives for the application of these techniques in patients, favored by their easier use and lower rate of adverse effects compared to invasive or lesioning methods. Finally, this review summarizes the evidence for keeping the use of electromyography to optimize the identification of muscles to be treated with botulinum toxin injection, which is indicated and widely performed for the treatment of various movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France; EA 4391, ENT Team, Paris-Est Créteil University, Créteil, France.
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Grenoble, France
| | - Yuichiro Shirota
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Talyta Grippe
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Neuroscience Graduate Program, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Chen
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David H Benninger
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bahman Jabbari
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sanaz Attaripour
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bocci T, Ferrara R, Albizzati T, Averna A, Guidetti M, Marceglia S, Priori A. Asymmetries of the subthalamic activity in Parkinson's disease: phase-amplitude coupling among local field potentials. Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae201. [PMID: 38894949 PMCID: PMC11184348 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The role of brain asymmetries of dopaminergic neurons in motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease is still undefined. Local field recordings from the subthalamic nucleus revealed some neurophysiological biomarkers of the disease: increased beta activity, increased low-frequency activity and high-frequency oscillations. Phase-amplitude coupling coordinates the timing of neuronal activity and allows determining the mechanism for communication within distinct regions of the brain. In this study, we discuss the use of phase-amplitude coupling to assess the differences between the two hemispheres in a cohort of 24 patients with Parkinson's disease before and after levodopa administration. Subthalamic low- (12-20 Hz) and high-beta (20-30 Hz) oscillations were compared with low- (30-45 Hz), medium- (70-100 Hz) and high-frequency (260-360 Hz) bands. We found a significant beta-phase-amplitude coupling asymmetry between left and right and an opposite-side-dependent effect of the pharmacological treatment, which is associated with the reduction of motor symptoms. In particular, high coupling between high frequencies and high-beta oscillations was found during the OFF condition (P < 0.01) and a low coupling during the ON state (P < 0.0001) when the right subthalamus was assessed; exactly the opposite happened when the left subthalamus was considered in the analysis, showing a lower coupling between high frequencies and high-beta oscillations during the OFF condition (P < 0.01), followed by a higher one during the ON state (P < 0.01). Interestingly, these asymmetries are independent of the motor onset side, either left or right. These findings have important implications for neural signals that may be used to trigger adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's and could provide more exhaustive insights into subthalamic dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Bocci
- ‘Aldo Ravelli’ Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
- III Neurology Clinic, ASST-Santi Paolo e Carlo University Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Ferrara
- ‘Aldo Ravelli’ Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Albizzati
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, 34127 Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
| | - Alberto Averna
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Guidetti
- ‘Aldo Ravelli’ Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Marceglia
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, 34127 Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
- Newronika S.r.l., 20093 Cologno Monzese, Italy
| | - Alberto Priori
- ‘Aldo Ravelli’ Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
- III Neurology Clinic, ASST-Santi Paolo e Carlo University Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiao L, Kang H, Geng Y, Liu X, Wang M, Shu K. The role of the nucleus basalis of Meynert in neuromodulation therapy: a systematic review from the perspective of neural network oscillations. Front Aging Neurosci 2024; 16:1376764. [PMID: 38650866 PMCID: PMC11033491 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1376764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
As a crucial component of the cerebral cholinergic system and the Papez circuit in the basal forebrain, dysfunction of the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) is associated with various neurodegenerative disorders. However, no drugs, including existing cholinesterase inhibitors, have been shown to reverse this dysfunction. Due to advancements in neuromodulation technology, researchers are exploring the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy targeting the NBM (NBM-DBS) to treat mental and neurological disorders as well as the related mechanisms. Herein, we provided an update on the research progress on cognition-related neural network oscillations and complex anatomical and projective relationships between the NBM and other cognitive structures and circuits. Furthermore, we reviewed previous animal studies of NBM lesions, NBM-DBS models, and clinical case studies to summarize the important functions of the NBM in neuromodulation. In addition to elucidating the mechanism of the NBM neural network, future research should focus on to other types of neurons in the NBM, despite the fact that cholinergic neurons are still the key target for cell type-specific activation by DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liwu Jiao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Huicong Kang
- Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yumei Geng
- Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xuyang Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Mengying Wang
- Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Kai Shu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ng PR, Bush A, Vissani M, McIntyre CC, Richardson RM. Biophysical Principles and Computational Modeling of Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:422-439. [PMID: 37204360 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.04.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has revolutionized the treatment of neurological disorders, yet the mechanisms of DBS are still under investigation. Computational models are important in silico tools for elucidating these underlying principles and potentially for personalizing DBS therapy to individual patients. The basic principles underlying neurostimulation computational models, however, are not well known in the clinical neuromodulation community. OBJECTIVE In this study, we present a tutorial on the derivation of computational models of DBS and outline the biophysical contributions of electrodes, stimulation parameters, and tissue substrates to the effects of DBS. RESULTS Given that many aspects of DBS are difficult to characterize experimentally, computational models have played an important role in understanding how material, size, shape, and contact segmentation influence device biocompatibility, energy efficiency, the spatial spread of the electric field, and the specificity of neural activation. Neural activation is dictated by stimulation parameters including frequency, current vs voltage control, amplitude, pulse width, polarity configurations, and waveform. These parameters also affect the potential for tissue damage, energy efficiency, the spatial spread of the electric field, and the specificity of neural activation. Activation of the neural substrate also is influenced by the encapsulation layer surrounding the electrode, the conductivity of the surrounding tissue, and the size and orientation of white matter fibers. These properties modulate the effects of the electric field and determine the ultimate therapeutic response. CONCLUSION This article describes biophysical principles that are useful for understanding the mechanisms of neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Bush
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matteo Vissani
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert Mark Richardson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Todorov D, Schnitzler A, Hirschmann J. Parkinsonian rest tremor can be distinguished from voluntary hand movements based on subthalamic and cortical activity. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 157:146-155. [PMID: 38030516 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To distinguish Parkinsonian rest tremor and different voluntary hand movements by analyzing brain activity. METHODS We re-analyzed magnetoencephalography and local field potential recordings from the subthalamic nucleus of six patients with Parkinson's disease. Data were obtained after withdrawal from dopaminergic medication (Med Off) and after administration of levodopa (Med On). Using gradient-boosted tree learning, we classified epochs as tremor, fist-clenching, forearm extension or tremor-free rest. RESULTS Subthalamic activity alone was insufficient for distinguishing the four different motor states (balanced accuracy mean: 38%, std: 7%). The combination of cortical and subthalamic features, in contrast, allowed for a much more accurate classification (balanced accuracy mean: 75%, std: 17%). Adding a single cortical area improved balanced accuracy by 17% on average, as compared to classification based on subthalamic activity alone. In most patients, the most informative cortical areas were sensorimotor cortical regions. Decoding performance was similar in Med On and Med Off. CONCLUSIONS Electrophysiological recordings allow for distinguishing several motor states, provided that cortical signals are monitored in addition to subthalamic activity. SIGNIFICANCE By combining cortical recordings, subcortical recordings and machine learning, adaptive deep brain stimulation systems might be able to detect tremor specifically and to respond adequately to several motor states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitrii Todorov
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon - Inserm U1028, 69675 Bron, France; Centre de Recerca Matemática, Campus UAB edifici C, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Department of Neurology Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jan Hirschmann
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oehrn CR, Cernera S, Hammer LH, Shcherbakova M, Yao J, Hahn A, Wang S, Ostrem JL, Little S, Starr PA. Personalized chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation outperforms conventional stimulation in Parkinson's disease. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.08.03.23293450. [PMID: 37649907 PMCID: PMC10463549 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.03.23293450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is a widely used therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but currently lacks dynamic responsiveness to changing clinical and neural states. Feedback control has the potential to improve therapeutic effectiveness, but optimal control strategy and additional benefits of "adaptive" neurostimulation are unclear. We implemented adaptive subthalamic nucleus stimulation, controlled by subthalamic or cortical signals, in three PD patients (five hemispheres) during normal daily life. We identified neurophysiological biomarkers of residual motor fluctuations using data-driven analyses of field potentials over a wide frequency range and varying stimulation amplitudes. Narrowband gamma oscillations (65-70 Hz) at either site emerged as the best control signal for sensing during stimulation. A blinded, randomized trial demonstrated improved motor symptoms and quality of life compared to clinically optimized standard stimulation. Our approach highlights the promise of personalized adaptive neurostimulation based on data-driven selection of control signals and may be applied to other neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina R Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren H Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maria Shcherbakova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jiaang Yao
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ronchini M, Rezaeiyan Y, Zamani M, Panuccio G, Moradi F. NET-TEN: a silicon neuromorphic network for low-latency detection of seizures in local field potentials. J Neural Eng 2023; 20. [PMID: 37144338 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acd029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Therapeutic intervention in neurological disorders still relies heavily on pharmacological solutions, while the treatment of patients with drug resistance remains an unresolved issue. This is particularly true for patients with epilepsy, 30% of whom are refractory to medications. Implantable devices for chronic recording and electrical modulation of brain activity have proved a viable alternative in such cases. To operate, the device should detect the relevant electrographic biomarkers from local field potentials (LFPs) and determine the right time for stimulation. To enable timely interventions, the ideal device should attain biomarker detection with low latency while operating under low power consumption to prolong battery life.Approach. Here we introduce a fully-analog neuromorphic device implemented in CMOS technology for analyzing LFP signals in anin vitromodel of acute ictogenesis. Neuromorphic networks have progressively gained a reputation as low-latency low-power computing systems, which makes them a promising candidate as processing core of next-generation implantable neural interfaces.Main results. The developed system can detect ictal and interictal events with ms-latency and with high precision, consuming on average 3.50 nW during the task.Significance. The work presented in this paper paves the way to a new generation of brain implantable devices for personalized closed-loop stimulation for epilepsy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Ronchini
- Integrated Circuits & Electronics Laboratory, Institut for Elektro- og Computerteknologi, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Yasser Rezaeiyan
- Integrated Circuits & Electronics Laboratory, Institut for Elektro- og Computerteknologi, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Milad Zamani
- Integrated Circuits & Electronics Laboratory, Institut for Elektro- og Computerteknologi, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Gabriella Panuccio
- Enhanced Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy
| | - Farshad Moradi
- Integrated Circuits & Electronics Laboratory, Institut for Elektro- og Computerteknologi, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wiest C, Torrecillos F, Pogosyan A, Bange M, Muthuraman M, Groppa S, Hulse N, Hasegawa H, Ashkan K, Baig F, Morgante F, Pereira EA, Mallet N, Magill PJ, Brown P, Sharott A, Tan H. The aperiodic exponent of subthalamic field potentials reflects excitation/inhibition balance in Parkinsonism. eLife 2023; 12:e82467. [PMID: 36810199 PMCID: PMC10005762 DOI: 10.7554/elife.82467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Periodic features of neural time-series data, such as local field potentials (LFPs), are often quantified using power spectra. While the aperiodic exponent of spectra is typically disregarded, it is nevertheless modulated in a physiologically relevant manner and was recently hypothesised to reflect excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance in neuronal populations. Here, we used a cross-species in vivo electrophysiological approach to test the E/I hypothesis in the context of experimental and idiopathic Parkinsonism. We demonstrate in dopamine-depleted rats that aperiodic exponents and power at 30-100 Hz in subthalamic nucleus (STN) LFPs reflect defined changes in basal ganglia network activity; higher aperiodic exponents tally with lower levels of STN neuron firing and a balance tipped towards inhibition. Using STN-LFPs recorded from awake Parkinson's patients, we show that higher exponents accompany dopaminergic medication and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of STN, consistent with untreated Parkinson's manifesting as reduced inhibition and hyperactivity of STN. These results suggest that the aperiodic exponent of STN-LFPs in Parkinsonism reflects E/I balance and might be a candidate biomarker for adaptive DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Wiest
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Flavie Torrecillos
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Alek Pogosyan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Manuel Bange
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany
| | - Natasha Hulse
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Harutomo Hasegawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Fahd Baig
- Neurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St. George' s, University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Francesca Morgante
- Neurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St. George' s, University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Erlick A Pereira
- Neurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St. George' s, University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Nicolas Mallet
- Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, CNRS UMR5293, Université de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Peter J Magill
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Peter Brown
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Andrew Sharott
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhao ZP, Nie C, Jiang CT, Cao SH, Tian KX, Yu S, Gu JW. Modulating Brain Activity with Invasive Brain-Computer Interface: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci 2023; 13:brainsci13010134. [PMID: 36672115 PMCID: PMC9856340 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13010134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) can be used as a real-time bidirectional information gateway between the brain and machines. In particular, rapid progress in invasive BCI, propelled by recent developments in electrode materials, miniature and power-efficient electronics, and neural signal decoding technologies has attracted wide attention. In this review, we first introduce the concepts of neuronal signal decoding and encoding that are fundamental for information exchanges in BCI. Then, we review the history and recent advances in invasive BCI, particularly through studies using neural signals for controlling external devices on one hand, and modulating brain activity on the other hand. Specifically, regarding modulating brain activity, we focus on two types of techniques, applying electrical stimulation to cortical and deep brain tissues, respectively. Finally, we discuss the related ethical issues concerning the clinical application of this emerging technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Ping Zhao
- School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Chuang Nie
- Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Cheng-Teng Jiang
- Savaid Medical School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Sheng-Hao Cao
- Brainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Kai-Xi Tian
- Brainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Shan Yu
- Brainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
- Correspondence: (S.Y.); (J.-W.G.); Tel.: +86-010-8254-4786 (S.Y.); +86-010-6635-6729 (J.-W.G.)
| | - Jian-Wen Gu
- School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
- Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China
- Correspondence: (S.Y.); (J.-W.G.); Tel.: +86-010-8254-4786 (S.Y.); +86-010-6635-6729 (J.-W.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sui Y, Yu H, Zhang C, Chen Y, Jiang C, Li L. Deep brain-machine interfaces: sensing and modulating the human deep brain. Natl Sci Rev 2022; 9:nwac212. [PMID: 36644311 PMCID: PMC9834907 DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Different from conventional brain-machine interfaces that focus more on decoding the cerebral cortex, deep brain-machine interfaces enable interactions between external machines and deep brain structures. They sense and modulate deep brain neural activities, aiming at function restoration, device control and therapeutic improvements. In this article, we provide an overview of multiple deep brain recording and stimulation techniques that can serve as deep brain-machine interfaces. We highlight two widely used interface technologies, namely deep brain stimulation and stereotactic electroencephalography, for technical trends, clinical applications and brain connectivity research. We discuss the potential to develop closed-loop deep brain-machine interfaces and achieve more effective and applicable systems for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanan Sui
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Huiling Yu
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Chen Zhang
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Yue Chen
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Changqing Jiang
- National Engineering Research Center of Neuromodulation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guidetti M, Arlotti M, Bocci T, Bianchi AM, Parazzini M, Ferrucci R, Priori A. Electric Fields Induced in the Brain by Transcranial Electric Stimulation: A Review of In Vivo Recordings. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102333. [PMID: 36289595 PMCID: PMC9598743 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques, such as direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), cause neurophysiological and behavioral modifications as responses to the electric field are induced in the brain. Estimations of such electric fields are based mainly on computational studies, and in vivo measurements have been used to expand the current knowledge. Here, we review the current tDCS- and tACS-induced electric fields estimations as they are recorded in humans and non-human primates using intracerebral electrodes. Direct currents and alternating currents were applied with heterogeneous protocols, and the recording procedures were characterized by a tentative methodology. However, for the clinical stimulation protocols, an injected current seems to reach the brain, even at deep structures. The stimulation parameters (e.g., intensity, frequency and phase), the electrodes’ positions and personal anatomy determine whether the intensities might be high enough to affect both neuronal and non-neuronal cell activity, also deep brain structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Guidetti
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Tommaso Bocci
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- III Neurology Clinic, ASST-Santi Paolo e Carlo University Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Bianchi
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Parazzini
- Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell’Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni (IEIIT), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Ferrucci
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- III Neurology Clinic, ASST-Santi Paolo e Carlo University Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Priori
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- III Neurology Clinic, ASST-Santi Paolo e Carlo University Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Potel SR, Marceglia S, Meoni S, Kalia SK, Cury RG, Moro E. Advances in DBS Technology and Novel Applications: Focus on Movement Disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2022; 22:577-588. [PMID: 35838898 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01221-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment in several movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, tremor, and Tourette syndrome. In this review, we will review and discuss the most recent findings including but not limited to clinical evidence. RECENT FINDINGS New DBS technologies include novel hardware design (electrodes, cables, implanted pulse generators) enabling new stimulation patterns and adaptive DBS which delivers potential stimulation tailored to moment-to-moment changes in the patient's condition. Better understanding of movement disorders pathophysiology and functional anatomy has been pivotal for studying the effects of DBS on the mesencephalic locomotor region, the nucleus basalis of Meynert, the substantia nigra, and the spinal cord. Eventually, neurosurgical practice has improved with more accurate target visualization or combined targeting. A rising research domain emphasizes bridging neuromodulation and neuroprotection. Recent advances in DBS therapy bring more possibilities to effectively treat people with movement disorders. Future research would focus on improving adaptive DBS, leading more clinical trials on novel targets, and exploring neuromodulation effects on neuroprotection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina R Potel
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Sara Marceglia
- Dipartimento Di Ingegneria E Architettura, Università Degli Studi Di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Sara Meoni
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, INSERM U1416, Grenoble, France
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rubens G Cury
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Center, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Elena Moro
- Service de Neurologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, INSERM U1416, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|