1
|
Burton A, Gaudreault M, Hardcastle N, Lye J, Beveridge S, Kry SF, Franich R. Optimized scoring of end-to-end dosimetry audits for passive motion management - A simulation study using the IROC thorax phantom. Phys Med 2024; 121:103363. [PMID: 38653119 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Dosimetry audits for passive motion management require dynamically-acquired measurements in a moving phantom to be compared to statically calculated planned doses. This study aimed to characterise the relationship between planning and delivery errors, and the measured dose in the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) thorax phantom, to assess different audit scoring approaches. Treatment plans were created using a 4DCT scan of the IROC phantom, equipped with film and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Plans were created on the average intensity projection from all bins. Three levels of aperture complexity were explored: dynamic conformal arcs (DCAT), low-, and high-complexity volumetric modulated arcs (VMATLo, VMATHi). Simulated-measured doses were generated by modelling motion using isocenter shifts. Various errors were introduced including incorrect setup position and target delineation. Simulated-measured film doses were scored using gamma analysis and compared within specific regions of interest (ROIs) as well as the entire film plane. Positional offsets were estimated based on isodoses on the film planes, and point doses within TLD contours were compared. Motion-induced differences between planned and simulated-measured doses were evident even without introduced errors Gamma passing rates within target-centred ROIs correlated well with error-induced dose differences, while whole film passing rates did not. Isodose-based setup position measurements demonstrated high sensitivity to errors. Simulated point doses at TLD locations yielded erratic responses to introduced errors. ROI gamma analysis demonstrated enhanced sensitivity to simulated errors compared to whole film analysis. Gamma results may be further contextualized by other metrics such as setup position or maximum gamma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Burton
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Yallambie, Victoria 3085, Australia; Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
| | - Mathieu Gaudreault
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Jessica Lye
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research and Wellness Centre, Heidelberg 3084, Australia
| | - Sabeena Beveridge
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Yallambie, Victoria 3085, Australia
| | - Stephen F Kry
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Rick Franich
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burton A, Beveridge S, Hardcastle N, Lye J, Sanagou M, Franich R. Adoption of respiratory motion management in radiation therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 24:21-29. [PMID: 36148153 PMCID: PMC9485913 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose A survey on the patterns of practice of respiratory motion management (MM) was distributed to 111 radiation therapy facilities to inform the development of an end-to-end dosimetry audit including respiratory motion. Materials and methods The survey (distributed via REDCap) asked facilities to provide information specific to the combinations of MM techniques (breath-hold gating – BHG, internal target volume – ITV, free-breathing gating – FBG, mid-ventilation – MidV, tumour tracking – TT), sites treated (thorax, upper abdomen, lower abdomen), and fractionation regimes (conventional, stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy – SABR) used in their clinic. Results The survey was completed by 78% of facilities, with 98% of respondents indicating that they used at least one form of MM. The ITV approach was common to all MM-users, used for thoracic treatments by 89% of respondents, and upper and lower abdominal treatments by 38%. BHG was the next most prevalent (41% of MM users), with applications in upper abdominal and thoracic treatment sites (28% vs 25% respectively), but minimal use in the lower abdomen (9%). FBG and TT were utilised sparingly (17%, 7% respectively), and MidV was not selected at all. Conclusions Two distinct treatment workflows (including use of motion limitation, imaging used for motion assessment, dose calculation, and image guidance procedures) were identified for the ITV and BHG MM techniques, to form the basis of the initial audit. Thoracic SABR with the ITV approach was common to nearly all respondents, while upper abdominal SABR using BHG stood out as more technically challenging. Other MM techniques were sparsely used, but may be considered for future audit development.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lehmann J, Hussein M, Barry M, Siva S, Moore A, Chu M, Díez P, Eaton DJ, Harwood J, Lonski P, Claridge Mackonis E, Meehan C, Patel R, Ray X, Shaw M, Shepherd J, Smyth G, Standen TS, Subramanian B, Greer P, Clark CH. SEAFARER – A new concept for validating radiotherapy patient specific QA for clinical trials and clinical practice. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:121-128. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
4
|
Kron T, Fox C, Ebert MA, Thwaites D. Quality management in radiotherapy treatment delivery. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:279-290. [PMID: 35243785 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Radiation Oncology continues to rely on accurate delivery of radiation, in particular where patients can benefit from more modulated and hypofractioned treatments that can deliver higher dose to the target while optimising dose to normal structures. These deliveries are more complex, and the treatment units are more computerised, leading to a re-evaluation of quality assurance (QA) to test a larger range of options with more stringent criteria without becoming too time and resource consuming. This review explores how modern approaches of risk management and automation can be used to develop and maintain an effective and efficient QA programme. It considers various tools to control and guide radiation delivery including image guidance and motion management. Links with typical maintenance and repair activities are discussed, as well as patient-specific quality control activities. It is demonstrated that a quality management programme applied to treatment delivery can have an impact on individual patients but also on the quality of treatment techniques and future planning. Developing and customising a QA programme for treatment delivery is an important part of radiotherapy. Using modern multidisciplinary approaches can make this also a useful tool for department management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Institute of Oncology, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Fox
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,5D Clinics, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Physics Group, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taprogge J, Wadsley J, Miles E, Flux GD. Recommendations for Multicentre Clinical Trials Involving Dosimetry for Molecular Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:131-136. [PMID: 33342617 PMCID: PMC7818526 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Multicentre clinical trials involving a dosimetry component are becoming more prevalent in molecular radiotherapy and are essential to generate the evidence to support individualised approaches to treatment planning and to ensure that sufficient patients are recruited to achieve the statistical significance required. Quality assurance programmes should be considered to support the standardisation required to achieve meaningful results. Trials should be designed to ensure that dosimetry results from image acquisition systems across centres are comparable by incorporating steps to standardise the methodologies used for the quantification of images and dosimetry. Furthermore, it is essential to assess the expertise and resources available at each participating site prior to trial commencement. A quality assurance plan should be drawn up and training provided if necessary. Standardisation of quantification and dosimetry methodologies used in a trial are essential to ensure that results from different centres may be collated. In addition, appropriate uncertainty analysis should be carried out to correct for differences in methodologies between centres. Recommendations are provided to support dosimetry studies based on the experience of several previous and ongoing multicentre trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Taprogge
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) Group, Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | | | - E Miles
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) Group, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Northwood, UK
| | - G D Flux
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kron T, Lonski P, Yukihara EG. THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY (TLD) IN MEDICINE: FIVE 'W'S AND ONE HOW. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2020; 192:139-151. [PMID: 33429435 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) has a long history of applications in medicine. However, despite its versatility and sensitivity its use is anecdotally diminishing, at least in part due to the complexity and work intensity of a quality TLD service. The present paper explores the role of TLD in medicine using a common inquiry methodology (5W1H) which systematically asks 'Who, What, When, Where, Why and How' to identify what role TLD could and should play in medical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue Gwynneville, NSW 2500, Australia
| | - Peta Lonski
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Eduardo G Yukihara
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5200 Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Taprogge J, Leek F, Schurrat T, Tran-Gia J, Vallot D, Bardiès M, Eberlein U, Lassmann M, Schlögl S, Vergara Gil A, Flux GD. Setting up a quantitative SPECT imaging network for a European multi-centre dosimetry study of radioiodine treatment for thyroid cancer as part of the MEDIRAD project. EJNMMI Phys 2020; 7:61. [PMID: 33030702 PMCID: PMC7544799 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00332-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Differentiated thyroid cancer has been treated with radioiodine for almost 80 years, although controversial questions regarding radiation-related risks and the optimisation of treatment regimens remain unresolved. Multi-centre clinical studies are required to ensure recruitment of sufficient patients to achieve the statistical significance required to address these issues. Optimisation and standardisation of data acquisition and processing are necessary to ensure quantitative imaging and patient-specific dosimetry. Material and methods A European network of centres able to perform standardised quantitative imaging of radioiodine therapy of thyroid cancer patients was set-up within the EU consortium MEDIRAD. This network will support a concurrent series of clinical studies to determine accurately absorbed doses for thyroid cancer patients treated with radioiodine. Five SPECT(/CT) systems at four European centres were characterised with respect to their system volume sensitivity, recovery coefficients and dead time. Results System volume sensitivities of the Siemens Intevo systems (crystal thickness 3/8″) ranged from 62.1 to 73.5 cps/MBq. For a GE Discovery 670 (crystal thickness 5/8″) a system volume sensitivity of 92.2 cps/MBq was measured. Recovery coefficients measured on three Siemens Intevo systems show good agreement. For volumes larger than 10 ml, the maximum observed difference between recovery coefficients was found to be ± 0.02. Furthermore, dead-time coefficients measured on two Siemens Intevo systems agreed well with previously published dead-time values. Conclusions Results presented here provide additional support for the proposal to use global calibration parameters for cameras of the same make and model. This could potentially facilitate the extension of the imaging network for further dosimetry-based studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Taprogge
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK. .,The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
| | - Francesca Leek
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.,The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Tino Schurrat
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Tran-Gia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Delphine Vallot
- IUCT Oncopole, Av. Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100, Toulouse, France
| | - Manuel Bardiès
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037, INSERM, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Uta Eberlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Schlögl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Alex Vergara Gil
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037, INSERM, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Glenn D Flux
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.,The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giaddui T, Geng H, Chen Q, Linnemann N, Radden M, Lee NY, Xia P, Xiao Y. Offline Quality Assurance for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans for NRG-HN001 Head and Neck Clinical Trial Using Knowledge-Based Planning. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1342-1349. [PMID: 33305097 PMCID: PMC7718499 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether a disease site–specific, multi-institutional knowledge based-planning (KBP) model can improve the quality of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for patients enrolled in the head and neck NRG-HN001clinical trial and to establish a threshold of improvements of treatment plans submitted to the clinical trial. Methods and Materials Fifty treatment plans for patients enrolled in the NRG-HN001 clinical trial were used to build a KBP model; the model was then used to reoptimize 50 other plans. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the submitted and KBP reoptimized plans. We compared differences between KBP and submitted plans for single- and multi-institutional treatment plans. Results Mean values for the dose received by 95% of the planning target volume (PTV_6996) and for the maximum dose (D0.03cc) of PTV_6996 were 0.5 Gy and 2.1 Gy higher in KBP plans than in the submitted plans, respectively. Mean values for D0.03cc to the brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerve_R, optic nerve_L, and chiasm were 2.5 Gy, 1.9 Gy, 6.4 Gy, 6.6 Gy, and 5.7 Gy lower in the KBP plans than in the submitted plans. Mean values for Dmean to parotid_R and parotid_L glands were 2.2 Gy and 3.8 Gy lower in KBP plans, respectively. In 33 out of 50 KBP plans, we observed improvements in sparing of at least 7 organs at risk (OARs) (brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerves (R & L), chiasm, and parotid glands [R & L]). A threshold of improvement of OARs sparing of 5% of the prescription dose was established for providing the quality assurance results back to the treating institution. Conclusions A disease site–specific, multi-institutional, clinical trial-based KBP model improved sparing of OARs in a large number of reoptimized plans submitted to the NRG-HN001 clinical trial, and the model is being used as an offline quality assurance tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tawfik Giaddui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Huaizhi Geng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Quan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania
| | - Nancy Linnemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NRG Oncology/Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Marsha Radden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NRG Oncology/Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ping Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lye J, Kry S, Shaw M, Gibbons F, Keehan S, Lehmann J, Kron T, Followill D, Williams I. A comparison of IROC and ACDS on-site audits of reference and non-reference dosimetry. Med Phys 2019; 46:5878-5887. [PMID: 31494941 PMCID: PMC6916618 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Consistency between different international quality assurance groups is important in the progress toward similar standards and expectations in radiotherapy dosimetry around the world, and in the context of consistent clinical trial data from international trial participants. This study compares the dosimetry audit methodology and results of two international quality assurance groups performing a side-by-side comparison at the same radiotherapy department, and interrogates the ability of the audits to detect deliberately introduced errors. METHODS A comparison of the core dosimetry components of reference and non-reference audits was conducted by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC, Houston, USA) and the Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS, Melbourne, Australia). A set of measurements were conducted over 2 days at an Australian radiation therapy facility in Melbourne. Each group evaluated the reference dosimetry, output factors, small field output factors, percentage depth dose (PDD), wedge, and off-axis factors according to their standard protocols. IROC additionally investigated the Electron PDD and the ACDS investigated the effect of heterogeneities. In order to evaluate and compare the performance of these audits under suboptimal conditions, artificial errors in percentage depth dose (PDD), EDW, and small field output factors were introduced into the 6 MV beam model to simulate potential commissioning/modeling errors and both audits were tested for their sensitivity in detecting these errors. RESULTS With the plans from the clinical beam model, almost all results were within tolerance and at an optimal pass level. Good consistency was found between the two audits as almost all findings were consistent between them. Only two results were different between the results of IROC and the ACDS. The measurements of reference FFF photons showed a discrepancy of 0.7% between ACDS and IROC due to the inclusion of a 0.5% nonuniformity correction by the ACDS. The second difference between IROC and the ACDS was seen with the lung phantom. The asymmetric field behind lung measured by the ACDS was slightly (0.3%) above the ACDS's pass (optimal) level of 3.3%. IROC did not detect this issue because their measurements were all assessed in a homogeneous phantom. When errors were deliberately introduced neither audit was sensitive enough to pick up a 2% change to the small field output factors. The introduced PDD change was flagged by both audits. Similarly, the introduced error of using 25° wedge instead of 30° wedge was detectible in both audits as out of tolerance. CONCLUSIONS Despite different equipment, approach, and scope of measurements in on-site audits, there were clear similarities between the results from the two groups. This finding is encouraging in the context of a global harmonized approach to radiotherapy quality assurance and dosimetry audit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Lye
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry ServiceARPANSAMelbourneAustralia
| | - Stephen Kry
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston QA CenterMD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | - Maddison Shaw
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry ServiceARPANSAMelbourneAustralia
| | - Francis Gibbons
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry ServiceARPANSAMelbourneAustralia
- Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health ServiceBirtinyaQldAustralia
| | | | - Joerg Lehmann
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry ServiceARPANSAMelbourneAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneAustralia
| | - David Followill
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston QA CenterMD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | - Ivan Williams
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry ServiceARPANSAMelbourneAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Taprogge J, Leek F, Flux GD. Physics aspects of setting up a multicenter clinical trial involving internal dosimetry of radioiodine treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2019; 63:271-277. [PMID: 31315346 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.19.03202-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2024]
Abstract
The field of molecular radiotherapy is expanding rapidly, with the advent of many new radiotherapeutics for the treatment of common as well as for rare cancers. Treatment outcome is dependent on the absorbed doses delivered to target volumes and to healthy organs-at-risk, which are shown to vary widely from fixed administrations of activity. There have been significant developments in quantitative imaging and internal dosimetry in recent years, although clinical implementation of these methods has been slow in comparison with external beam radiotherapy, partly due to there being relatively few patients treated at single centers. Multicenter clinical trials are therefore essential to acquire the data required to ensure best practice and to develop the personalized treatment planning that this area is well suited to, due to the unrivalled opportunity to image the therapeutic drug in vivo. Initial preparation for such trials requires a significant effort in terms of resources and trial design. Imaging systems in participating centers must be characterized and set up for quantitative imaging to allow for collation of data. Data transfer for centralized processing is usually necessary but is hindered in some cases by data protection regulations and local logistics. Recent multicenter clinical trials involving radioiodine therapy have begun to establish the procedures necessary for quantitative SPECT imaging in a multicenter setting using standard and anthropomorphic phantoms. The establishment of national and international multicenter imaging and dosimetry networks will provide frameworks to develop and harmonize best practice with existing therapeutic procedures and to ensure rapid and optimized clinical implementation of new radiotherapeutics across all centers of excellence that offer molecular radiotherapy. This will promote networks and collaborations that can provide a sound basis for further developments and will ensure that nuclear medicine maintains a key role in future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Taprogge
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK -
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK -
| | - Francesca Leek
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Glenn D Flux
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kron T, Hardcastle N. SABR in clinical trials: what quality assurance (QA) is required and how can it be done? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1154/1/012014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
12
|
Lehmann J, Alves A, Dunn L, Shaw M, Kenny J, Keehan S, Supple J, Gibbons F, Manktelow S, Oliver C, Kron T, Williams I, Lye J. Dosimetric end-to-end tests in a national audit of 3D conformal radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 6:5-11. [PMID: 33458381 PMCID: PMC7807562 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Independent dosimetry audits improve quality and safety of radiation therapy. This work reports on design and findings of a comprehensive 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) Level III audit. MATERIALS AND METHODS The audit was conducted as onsite audit using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom in an end-to-end test by the Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS). Absolute dose point measurements were performed with Farmer-type ionization chambers. The audited treatment plans included open and half blocked fields, wedges and lung inhomogeneities. Audit results were determined as Pass Optimal Level (deviations within 3.3%), Pass Action Level (greater than 3.3% but within 5%) and Out of Tolerance (beyond 5%), as well as Reported Not Scored (RNS). The audit has been performed between July 2012 and January 2018 on 94 occasions, covering approximately 90% of all Australian facilities. RESULTS The audit pass rate was 87% (53% optimal). Fifty recommendations were given, mainly related to planning system commissioning. Dose overestimation behind low density inhomogeneities by the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) was identified across facilities and found to extend to beam setups which resemble a typical breast cancer treatment beam placement. RNS measurements inside lung showed a variation in the opposite direction: AAA under-dosed a target beyond lung and over-dosed the lung upstream and downstream of the target. Results also highlighted shortcomings of some superposition and convolution algorithms in modelling large angle wedges. CONCLUSIONS This audit showed that 3D-CRT dosimetry audits remain relevant and can identify fundamental global and local problems that also affect advanced treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joerg Lehmann
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics A28, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
- School of Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Andrew Alves
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| | - Leon Dunn
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| | - Maddison Shaw
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
- School of Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - John Kenny
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| | - Stephanie Keehan
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
- School of Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Jeremy Supple
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| | - Francis Gibbons
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| | - Sophie Manktelow
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| | - Chris Oliver
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
- School of Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Ivan Williams
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| | - Jessica Lye
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and National Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, VIC 3085, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Catharine H. Clark
- Medical Physics Department, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford Surrey, UK
- Metrology for Medical Physics, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middx, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Seravalli E, Houweling AC, Van Battum L, Raaben TA, Kuik M, de Pooter JA, Van Gellekom MP, Kaas J, de Vries W, Loeff EA, Van de Kamer JB. Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 5:19-25. [PMID: 33458364 PMCID: PMC7807668 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Revised: 01/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Local implementation of plan-specific quality assurance (QA) methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans may vary because of dissimilarities in procedures, equipment and software. The purpose of this work is detecting possible differences between local QA findings and those of an audit, using the same set of treatment plans. METHODS A pre-defined set of clinical plans was devised and imported in the participating institute's treatment planning system for dose computation. The dose distribution was measured using an ionisation chamber, radiochromic film and an ionisation chamber array. The centres performed their own QA, which was compared to the audit findings. The agreement/disagreement between the audit and the institute QA results were assessed along with the differences between the dose distributions measured by the audit team and computed by the institute. RESULTS For the majority of the cases the results of the audit were in agreement with the institute QA findings: ionisation chamber: 92%, array: 88%, film: 76% of the total measurements. In only a few of these cases the evaluated measurements failed for both: ionisation chamber: 2%, array: 4%, film: 0% of the total measurements. CONCLUSION Using predefined treatment plans, we found that in approximately 80% of the evaluated measurements the results of local QA of IMRT and VMAT plans were in line with the findings of the audit. However, the percentage of agreement/disagreement depended on the characteristics of the measurement equipment used and on the analysis metric.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Antonetta C. Houweling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leo Van Battum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc Kuik
- Department of Radiotherapy, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jochem Kaas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilfred de Vries
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A. Loeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen B. Van de Kamer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pasler M, Hernandez V, Jornet N, Clark CH. Novel methodologies for dosimetry audits: Adapting to advanced radiotherapy techniques. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 5:76-84. [PMID: 33458373 PMCID: PMC7807589 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
With new radiotherapy techniques, treatment delivery is becoming more complex and accordingly, these treatment techniques require dosimetry audits to test advanced aspects of the delivery to ensure best practice and safe patient treatment. This review of novel methodologies for dosimetry audits for advanced radiotherapy techniques includes recent developments and future techniques to be applied in dosimetry audits. Phantom-based methods (i.e. phantom-detector combinations) including independent audit equipment and local measurement equipment as well as phantom-less methods (i.e. portal dosimetry, transmission detectors and log files) are presented and discussed. Methodologies for both conventional linear accelerator (linacs) and new types of delivery units, i.e. Tomotherapy, stereotactic devices and MR-linacs, are reviewed. Novel dosimetry audit techniques such as portal dosimetry or log file evaluation have the potential to allow parallel auditing (i.e. performing an audit at multiple institutions at the same time), automation of data analysis and evaluation of multiple steps of the radiotherapy treatment chain. These methods could also significantly reduce the time needed for audit and increase the information gained. However, to maximise the potential, further development and harmonisation of dosimetry audit techniques are required before these novel methodologies can be applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlies Pasler
- Lake Constance Radiation Oncology Center Singen-Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Núria Jornet
- Servei de RadiofísicaiRadioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa CreuiSant Pau, Spain
| | - Catharine H. Clark
- Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK
- Metrology for Medical Physics (MEMPHYS), National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kunst J, Kopeć R, Kukołowicz P, Mojżeszek N, Sadowski B, Stolarczyk L, Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk W, Toboła A, Olko P. Mailed dosimetric audit of therapeutic proton beams using thermoluminescence MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) powder – First results. RADIAT MEAS 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
17
|
Dimitriadis A, Palmer AL, Thomas RAS, Nisbet A, Clark CH. Adaptation and validation of a commercial head phantom for cranial radiosurgery dosimetry end-to-end audit. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170053. [PMID: 28452563 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To adapt and validate an anthropomorphic head phantom for use in a cranial radiosurgery audit. METHODS Two bespoke inserts were produced for the phantom: one for providing the target and organ at risk for delineation and the other for performing dose measurements. The inserts were tested to assess their positional accuracy. A basic treatment plan dose verification with an ionization chamber was performed to establish a baseline accuracy for the phantom and beam model. The phantom and inserts were then used to perform dose verification measurements of a radiosurgery plan. The dose was measured with alanine pellets, EBT extended dose film and a plastic scintillation detector (PSD). RESULTS Both inserts showed reproducible positioning (±0.5 mm) and good positional agreement between them (±0.6 mm). The basic treatment plan measurements showed agreement to the treatment planning system (TPS) within 0.5%. Repeated film measurements showed consistent gamma passing rates with good agreement to the TPS. For 2%-2 mm global gamma, the mean passing rate was 96.7% and the variation in passing rates did not exceed 2.1%. The alanine pellets and PSD showed good agreement with the TPS (-0.1% and 0.3% dose difference in the target) and good agreement with each other (within 1%). CONCLUSION The adaptations to the phantom showed acceptable accuracies. The presence of alanine and PSD do not affect film measurements significantly, enabling simultaneous measurements by all three detectors. Advances in knowledge: A novel method for thorough end-to-end test of radiosurgery, with capability to incorporate all steps of the clinical pathway in a time-efficient and reproducible manner, suitable for a national audit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Dimitriadis
- 1 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.,2 Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.,3 Radiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Antony L Palmer
- 1 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.,4 Medical Physics Department, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Russell A S Thomas
- 3 Radiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Andrew Nisbet
- 1 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.,2 Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Catharine H Clark
- 1 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.,3 Radiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Clark CH, Aird EGA, Bolton S, Miles EA, Nisbet A, Snaith JAD, Thomas RAS, Venables K, Thwaites DI. Radiotherapy dosimetry audit: three decades of improving standards and accuracy in UK clinical practice and trials. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20150251. [PMID: 26329469 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Dosimetry audit plays an important role in the development and safety of radiotherapy. National and large scale audits are able to set, maintain and improve standards, as well as having the potential to identify issues which may cause harm to patients. They can support implementation of complex techniques and can facilitate awareness and understanding of any issues which may exist by benchmarking centres with similar equipment. This review examines the development of dosimetry audit in the UK over the past 30 years, including the involvement of the UK in international audits. A summary of audit results is given, with an overview of methodologies employed and lessons learnt. Recent and forthcoming more complex audits are considered, with a focus on future needs including the arrival of proton therapy in the UK and other advanced techniques such as four-dimensional radiotherapy delivery and verification, stereotactic radiotherapy and MR linear accelerators. The work of the main quality assurance and auditing bodies is discussed, including how they are working together to streamline audit and to ensure that all radiotherapy centres are involved. Undertaking regular external audit motivates centres to modernize and develop techniques and provides assurance, not only that radiotherapy is planned and delivered accurately but also that the patient dose delivered is as prescribed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharine H Clark
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK.,2 Radiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK
| | - Edwin G A Aird
- 3 RTTQA Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Steve Bolton
- 4 Medical Physics and Engineering Department, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,5 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York, UK
| | | | - Andrew Nisbet
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, UK.,6 Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Julia A D Snaith
- 2 Radiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK
| | - Russell A S Thomas
- 2 Radiation Dosimetry Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK
| | - Karen Venables
- 3 RTTQA Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - David I Thwaites
- 7 Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Awunor O, Berger D, Kirisits C. A multicenter study to quantify systematic variations and associated uncertainties in source positioning with commonly used HDR afterloaders and ring applicators for the treatment of cervical carcinomas. Med Phys 2015; 42:4472-83. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4923173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
20
|
Lee JH, Chang LT, Shiau AC, Chen CW, Liao YJ, Li WJ, Lee MS, Hsu SM. A novel simple phantom for verifying the dose of radiation therapy. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:934387. [PMID: 25883980 PMCID: PMC4391650 DOI: 10.1155/2015/934387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2014] [Revised: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 10/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
A standard protocol of dosimetric measurements is used by the organizations responsible for verifying that the doses delivered in radiation-therapy institutions are within authorized limits. This study evaluated a self-designed simple auditing phantom for use in verifying the dose of radiation therapy; the phantom design, dose audit system, and clinical tests are described. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used as postal dosimeters, and mailable phantoms were produced for use in postal audits. Correction factors are important for converting TLD readout values from phantoms into the absorbed dose in water. The phantom scatter correction factor was used to quantify the difference in the scattered dose between a solid water phantom and homemade phantoms; its value ranged from 1.084 to 1.031. The energy-dependence correction factor was used to compare the TLD readout of the unit dose irradiated by audit beam energies with (60)Co in the solid water phantom; its value was 0.99 to 1.01. The setup-condition factor was used to correct for differences in dose-output calibration conditions. Clinical tests of the device calibrating the dose output revealed that the dose deviation was within 3%. Therefore, our homemade phantoms and dosimetric system can be applied for accurately verifying the doses applied in radiation-therapy institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. H. Lee
- Health Physics Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Longtan 325, Taiwan
| | - L. T. Chang
- Health Physics Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Longtan 325, Taiwan
| | - A. C. Shiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei 112, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - C. W. Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Y. J. Liao
- School of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - W. J. Li
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - M. S. Lee
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - S. M. Hsu
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
- Biophotonics and Molecular Imaging Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Abstract
Dosimetric audit is required for the improvement of patient safety in radiotherapy and to aid optimization of treatment. The reassurance that treatment is being delivered in line with accepted standards, that delivered doses are as prescribed and that quality improvement is enabled is as essential for brachytherapy as it is for the more commonly audited external beam radiotherapy. Dose measurement in brachytherapy is challenging owing to steep dose gradients and small scales, especially in the context of an audit. Several different approaches have been taken for audit measurement to date: thimble and well-type ionization chambers, thermoluminescent detectors, optically stimulated luminescence detectors, radiochromic film and alanine. In this work, we review all of the dosimetric brachytherapy audits that have been conducted in recent years, look at current audits in progress and propose required directions for brachytherapy dosimetric audit in the future. The concern over accurate source strength measurement may be essentially resolved with modern equipment and calibration methods, but brachytherapy is a rapidly developing field and dosimetric audit must keep pace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Palmer
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Science, University of Surrey, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|