Sensitivity and specificity of narrow-band imaging nasoendoscopy compared to histopathology results in patients with suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Comparison of Narrowband Imaging and White-Light Endoscopy for Diagnosis and Screening of Nasopharyngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

We compared the diagnostic accuracies of narrowband imaging and white-light endoscopy in the detection of nasopharyngeal cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Six databases (PubMed, Cochrane Database, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar).

REVIEW METHODS

The 6 databases were thoroughly reviewed by 2 authors (working independently) from their dates of inception to December 2019. Nasopharyngeal mucosal or vascular changes detected by narrowband imaging were compared to those detected by white-light endoscopy. The authors extracted true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative parameters for each study. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2 tool. The extent of interrater agreement was assessed.

RESULTS

Eighteen prospective or retrospective studies were included. The diagnostic odds ratio of narrowband imaging was 77.560 (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.424-160.739). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.926. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 0.871 (95% CI, 0.808-0.915), 0.905 (95% CI, 0.816-0.953), and 0.955 (95% CI, 0.906-0.979), respectively. The correlation between sensitivity and the false-positive rate was 0.284, indicating that heterogeneity was absent. Narrowband imaging exhibited moderate interrater reliability (0.7037; 95% CI, 0.6558-0.746). Subgroup analysis showed that vascular patterns revealed by endoscopy in a screened subgroup were significantly more diagnostically accurate than mucosal patterns used for surveillance of a recurrent cancer subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Narrowband imaging exhibits high diagnostic accuracy and should be used in the diagnostic workup of nasopharyngeal cancer. However, further studies are necessary to confirm our results.

Efficacy of non-invasive diagnostic methods in the diagnosis and screening of oral cancer and precancer

INTRODUCTION

Traditional meta-analyses on the diagnostic accuracy of oral lesions have been conducted, but they were inherently limited to direct pairwise comparisons between a single method and a single alternative, while multiple diagnostic options and the ranking thereof were methodologically not possible.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic values of various methods in patients with oral potential malignant disease by performing a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched the databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Google scholar) up to June 2020 for studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of various tools (autofluorescence, chemiluminescence, cytology, narrow band imaging, and toluidine blue) with visual examination or other tools. The outcomes of interest for this analysis were sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy. Both a standard pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Treatment networks consisting of six interventions were defined for the network meta-analysis. The results of traditional meta-analysis showed that, among six methods, narrow band imaging showed higher sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy compared to visual examination. The results of network meta-analysis showed that autofluorescence, chemiluminescence, and narrow band imaging had higher sensitivity compared with visual examination, and that chemiluminescence and narrow band imaging had higher negative predictive value compared with visual examination. However, autofluorescence and chemiluminescence had lower specificity compared with visual examination. There were no significant differences in positive predictive value and accuracy among the six interventions.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that narrow banding imaging has superiority in terms of sensitivity and negative predictive value compared with the other five tested agents.