1
|
Chonanant C, Chancharoen P, Kiatkulanusorn S, Luangpon N, Klarod K, Surakul P, Thamwiriyasati N, Singsanan S, Ngernyuang N. Biocomposite Scaffolds Based on Chitosan Extraction from Shrimp Shell Waste for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Application. ACS OMEGA 2024; 9:39419-39429. [PMID: 39346874 PMCID: PMC11425810 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c02910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 07/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
Chitosan-based scaffolding possesses unique properties that make it highly suitable for tissue engineering applications. Chitosan is derived from deacetylating chitin, which is particularly abundant in the shells of crustaceans. This study aimed to extract chitosan from shrimp shell waste (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) and produce biocomposite scaffolds using the extracted chitosan for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Chitinous material from shrimp shell waste was deproteinized and deacetylated. The extracted chitosan was characterized and compared to commercial chitosan through various physicochemical analyses. The findings revealed that the extracted chitosan shares similar trends in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectrum, energy dispersive X-ray mapping, and X-ray diffraction pattern to commercial chitosan. Despite differences in the degree of deacetylation, these results underscore its comparable quality. The extracted chitosan was mixed with agarose, collagen, and gelatin to produce the blending biocomposite AG-CH-COL-GEL scaffold by freeze-drying method. Results showed AG-CH-COL-GEL scaffolds have a 3D interconnected porous structure with pore size 88-278 μm, high water uptake capacity (>90%), and degradation percentages in 21 days between 5.08% and 30.29%. Mechanical compression testing revealed that the elastic modulus of AG-CH-COL-GEL scaffolds ranged from 44.91 to 201.77 KPa. Moreover, AG-CH-COL-GEL scaffolds have shown significant potential in effectively inducing human chondrocyte proliferation and enhancing aggrecan gene expression. In conclusion, AG-CH-COL-GEL scaffolds emerge as promising candidates for cartilage tissue engineering with their optimal physical properties and excellent biocompatibility. This study highlights the potential of using waste-derived chitosan and opens new avenues for sustainable and effective tissue engineering solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirapond Chonanant
- Department
of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Science, Burapha University, Chonburi, 20131, Thailand
| | - Pongrung Chancharoen
- Department
of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand
| | - Sirirat Kiatkulanusorn
- Department
of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand
| | - Nongnuch Luangpon
- Department
of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand
| | - Kultida Klarod
- Department
of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand
| | - Pornprom Surakul
- Department
of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand
| | - Niramon Thamwiriyasati
- Department
of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Science, Burapha University, Chonburi, 20131, Thailand
| | - Sanita Singsanan
- Department
of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Science, Burapha University, Chonburi, 20131, Thailand
| | - Nipaporn Ngernyuang
- Thammasat
University Research Unit in Biomedical Science, Thammasat University, Pathum
Thani 12120, Thailand
- Chulabhorn
International College of Medicine, Thammasat
University, Pathum
Thani 12120, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mizraji G, Davidzohn A, Gursoy M, Gursoy U, Shapira L, Wilensky A. Membrane barriers for guided bone regeneration: An overview of available biomaterials. Periodontol 2000 2023; 93:56-76. [PMID: 37855164 DOI: 10.1111/prd.12502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Dental implants revolutionized the treatment options for restoring form, function, and esthetics when one or more teeth are missing. At sites of insufficient bone, guided bone regeneration (GBR) is performed either prior to or in conjunction with implant placement to achieve a three-dimensional prosthetic-driven implant position. To date, GBR is well documented, widely used, and constitutes a predictable and successful approach for lateral and vertical bone augmentation of atrophic ridges. Evidence suggests that the use of barrier membranes maintains the major biological principles of GBR. Since the material used to construct barrier membranes ultimately dictates its characteristics and its ability to maintain the biological principles of GBR, several materials have been used over time. This review, summarizes the evolution of barrier membranes, focusing on the characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of available occlusive barrier membranes and presents results of updated meta-analyses focusing on the effects of these membranes on the overall outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Mizraji
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Mervi Gursoy
- Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Oral Health Care, Welfare Division, City of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Ulvi Gursoy
- Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Lior Shapira
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Asaf Wilensky
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Samadi A, Salati MA, Safari A, Jouyandeh M, Barani M, Singh Chauhan NP, Golab EG, Zarrintaj P, Kar S, Seidi F, Hejna A, Saeb MR. Comparative review of piezoelectric biomaterials approach for bone tissue engineering. JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE. POLYMER EDITION 2022; 33:1555-1594. [PMID: 35604896 DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2022.2065409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Bone as a minerals' reservoir and rigid tissue of the body generating red and white blood cells supports various organs. Although the self-regeneration property of bone, it cannot regenerate spontaneously in severe damages and still remains as a challenging issue. Tissue engineering offers several techniques for regenerating damaged bones, where various biomaterials are examined to fabricate scaffolds for bone repair. Piezoelectric characteristic plays a crucial role in repairing and regenerating damaged bone by mimicking the bone niche behavior. Piezoelectric biomaterials show significant potential for bone tissue engineering. Herein we try to have a comparative review on piezoelectric and non-piezoelectric biomaterials used in bone tissue engineering, classified them, and discussed their effects on implanted cells and manufacturing techniques. Especially, Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and its composites are the most practically used piezoelectric biomaterials for bone regeneration. PVDF and its composites have been summarized and discussed to repair damaged bone tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Samadi
- Department of Polymer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
| | | | - Amin Safari
- Faculty of Polymer Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Maryam Jouyandeh
- Center of Excellent in Electrochemistry, School of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahmood Barani
- Medical Mycology and Bacteriology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman 7616913555, Iran
| | - Narendra Pal Singh Chauhan
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Bhupal Nobles' University, Udaipur 313002, Rajasthan, India
| | - Elias Ghaleh Golab
- Department of Petroleum Engineering, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran
| | - Payam Zarrintaj
- Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
| | - Saptarshi Kar
- College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait
| | - Farzad Seidi
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources and International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
| | - Aleksander Hejna
- Department of Polymer Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza 11/12 80-233, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Mohammad Reza Saeb
- Department of Polymer Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza 11/12 80-233, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|