The need for multicomponent gas standards for breath biomarker analysis

The optimization and comparison of two high-throughput faecal headspace sampling platforms: the microchamber/thermal extractor and hi-capacity sorptive extraction probes (HiSorb)

Disease detection and monitoring using volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is becoming increasingly popular. For a variety of (gastrointestinal) diseases the microbiome should be considered. As its output is to large extent volatile, faecal volatilomics carries great potential. One technical limitation is that current faecal headspace analysis requires specialized instrumentation which is costly and typically does not work in harmony with thermal desorption units often utilized in e.g. exhaled breath studies. This lack of harmonization hinders uptake of such analyses by the Volatilomics community. Therefore, this study optimized and compared two recently harmonized faecal headspace sampling platforms:High-capacity Sorptive extraction (HiSorb) probesand theMicrochamber thermal extractor (Microchamber). Statistical design of experiment was applied to find optimal sampling conditions by maximizing reproducibility, the number of VOCs detected, and between subject variation. To foster general applicability those factors were defined using semi-targeted as well as untargeted metabolic profiles. HiSorb probes were found to result in a faster sampling procedure, higher number of detected VOCs, and higher stability. The headspace collection using the Microchamber resulted in a lower number of detected VOCs, longer sampling times and decreased stability despite a smaller number of interfering VOCs and no background signals. Based on the observed profiles, recommendations are provided on pre-processing and study design when using either one of both platforms. Both can be used to perform faecal headspace collection, but altogether HiSorb is recommended.

A gas-phase standard delivery system for direct breath analysis

Applications for direct breath analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) are rapidly expanding. One of the more recent mass spectrometry-based approaches is secondary electrospray ionization coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (SESI-HRMS). Despite increasing usage, the SESI methodology still lacks standardization procedures for quality control and absolute quantification. In this study, we designed and evaluated a custom-built standard delivery system tailored for direct breath analysis. The system enables the simultaneous introduction of multiple gas-phase standard compounds into ambient MS setups in the lower parts-per-million (ppm) to parts-per-billion (ppb) range. To best mimic exhaled breath, the gas flow can be heated (37 °C-40 °C) and humidified (up to 98% relative humidity). Inter-laboratory comparison of the system included various SESI-HRMS setups, i.e. an Orbitrap and a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (QTOF), and using both single- as well as multi-component standards. This revealed highly stable and reproducible performances with between-run variation <19% and within-run variation <20%. Independent calibration runs demonstrated high accuracy (96%-111%) and precision (>95%) for the single-compound standard acetone, while compound-specific performances were obtained for the multi-component standard. Similarly, the sensitivity varied for different compounds within the multi-component standard across all SESI-Orbitrap and -QTOF setups, yielding limits of detections from 3.1 ppb (forp-xylene) to 0.05 ppb (for 1,8-cineol). Routinely applying the standard system throughout several weeks, allowed us to monitor instrument stability and to identify technical outliers in exhaled breath measurements. Such routine deployment of standards would significantly improve data quality and comparability, which is especially important in longitudinal and multi-center studies. Furthermore, performance validation of the system demonstrated its suitability for reliable absolute quantification while it illustrated compound-dependent behavior for SESI.