Engineering of brain-like tissue constructs via 3D Cell-printing technology

Biomimetic design and integrated biofabrication of an in-vitro three-dimensional multi-scale multilayer cortical model

The lack of accurate and reliable in vitro brain models hinders the development of brain science and research on brain diseases. Owing to the complex structure of the brain tissue and its highly nonlinear characteristics, the construction of brain-like in vitro tissue models remains one of the most challenging research fields in the construction of living tissues. This study proposes a multi-scale design of a brain-like model with a biomimetic cortical structure, which includes the macroscopic structural features of six layers of different cellular components, as well as micrometer-scale continuous fiber structures running through all layers vertically. To achieve integrated biomanufacturing of such a complex multi-scale brain-like model, a multi-material composite printing/culturing integrated bioprinting platform was developed in-house by integrating cell-laden hydrogel ink direct writing printing and electrohydrodynamic fiber 3D printing technologies. Through integrated bioprinting, multi-scale models with different cellular components and fiber structural parameters were prepared to study the effects of macroscopic and microscopic structural features on the directionality of neural cells, as well as the interaction between glial cells and neurons within the tissue model in a three-dimensional manner. The results revealed that the manufactured in vitro biomimetic cortical model achieved morphological connections between the layers of neurons, reflecting the structure and cellular morphology of the natural cortex. Micrometer-scale (10 μm) cross-layer fibers effectively guided and controlled the extension length and direction of the neurites of surrounding neural cells but had no significant effect on the migration of neurons. In contrast, glial cells significantly promoted the migration of surrounding PC12 cells towards the glial layer but did not contribute to the extension of neurites. This study provides a basis for the design and manufacture of accurate brain-like models for the functionalization of neuronal tissues.

Two-step method fabricating a 3D nerve cell model with brain-like mechanical properties and tunable porosity vascular structures via coaxial printing

Three-dimensional (3D) nerve cell models have been widely developed to understand the mechanisms and discover treatment methods of ischemic stroke and neurodegenerative disease. However, there is a contradiction in the production of 3D models that they should possess high modulus to ensure mechanical stability while low modulus to provide mechanical stimuli for nerve cells. In addition, it is challenging to maintain the long-term viability of 3D models when lacking vascular structures. Here, a 3D nerve cell model with brain-like mechanical properties and tunable porosity vascular structures has been fabricated. The matrix materials with brain-like low mechanical properties were favorable for promoting HT22 proliferation. The nerve cells could exchange nutrients and waste with the cultural environment through vascular structures. The vascular structures also played a supporting role, and model stability was enhanced by combining matrix materials with vascular structures. Furthermore, the porosity of vascular structure walls was adjusted by adding sacrificial materials to the tube walls during 3D coaxial printing and removing them after preparation, resulting in tunable porosity vascular structures. Finally, HT22 cells showed better cell viability and proliferation performance after culturing 7 days in the 3D models with vascular structures than in the 3D models with solid structures. All these results suggest that this 3D nerve cell model possesses good mechanical stability and long-term viability, which is expected to be used in pathological studies and drug screening for ischemic stroke and neurodegenerative diseases.

Recent progresses in novel in vitro models of primary neurons: A biomaterial perspective

Central nervous system (CNS) diseases have been a growing threat to the health of humanity, emphasizing the urgent need of exploring the pathogenesis and therapeutic approaches of various CNS diseases. Primary neurons are directly obtained from animals or humans, which have wide applications including disease modeling, mechanism exploration and drug development. However, traditional two-dimensional (2D) monoculture cannot resemble the native microenvironment of CNS. With the increasing understanding of the complexity of the CNS and the remarkable development of novel biomaterials, in vitro models have experienced great innovation from 2D monoculture toward three-dimensional (3D) multicellular culture. The scope of this review includes the progress of various in vitro models of primary neurons in recent years to provide a holistic view of the modalities and applications of primary neuron models and how they have been connected with the revolution of biofabrication techniques. Special attention has been paid to the interaction between primary neurons and biomaterials. First, a brief introduction on the history of CNS modeling and primary neuron culture was conducted. Next, detailed progress in novel in vitro models were discussed ranging from 2D culture, ex vivo model, spheroid, scaffold-based model, 3D bioprinting model, and microfluidic chip. Modalities, applications, advantages, and limitations of the aforementioned models were described separately. Finally, we explored future prospects, providing new insights into how basic science research methodologies have advanced our understanding of the CNS, and highlighted some future directions of primary neuron culture in the next few decades.

Traction of 3D and 4D Printing in the Healthcare Industry: From Drug Delivery and Analysis to Regenerative Medicine

Three-dimensional (3D) printing and 3D bioprinting are promising technologies for a broad range of healthcare applications from frontier regenerative medicine and tissue engineering therapies to pharmaceutical advancements yet must overcome the challenges of biocompatibility and resolution. Through comparison of traditional biofabrication methods with 3D (bio)printing, this review highlights the promise of 3D printing for the production of on-demand, personalized, and complex products that enhance the accessibility, effectiveness, and safety of drug therapies and delivery systems. In addition, this review describes the capacity of 3D bioprinting to fabricate patient-specific tissues and living cell systems (e.g., vascular networks, organs, muscles, and skeletal systems) as well as its applications in the delivery of cells and genes, microfluidics, and organ-on-chip constructs. This review summarizes how tailoring selected parameters (i.e., accurately selecting the appropriate printing method, materials, and printing parameters based on the desired application and behavior) can better facilitate the development of optimized 3D-printed products and how dynamic 4D-printed strategies (printing materials designed to change with time or stimulus) may be deployed to overcome many of the inherent limitations of conventional 3D-printed technologies. Comprehensive insights into a critical perspective of the future of 4D bioprinting, crucial requirements for 4D printing including the programmability of a material, multimaterial printing methods, and precise designs for meticulous transformations or even clinical applications are also given.

An injectable bioink with rapid prototyping in the air andin-situmild polymerization for 3D bioprinting

Bioprinting is an attractive technology for building tissues from scratch to explore entire new cell configurations, which brings numerous opportunities for biochemical research such as engineering tissues for therapeutic tissue repair or drug screening. However, bioprinting is faced with the limited number of suitable bioinks that enable bioprinting with excellent printability, high structural fidelity, physiological stability, and good biocompatibility, particularly in the case of extrusion-based bioprinting. Herein, we demonstrate a composite bioink based on gelatin, bacterial cellulose (BC), and microbial transglutaminase (mTG enzyme) with outstanding printing controllability and durable architectural integrity. BC, as a rheology modifier and mechanical enhancer component, endows the bioink with shear-thinning behavior. Moreover, the printed structure becomes robust under physiological conditions owing to thein situchemical crosslinking catalyzed by mTG enzyme. Lattice, bowl, meniscus, and ear structures are printed to demonstrate the printing feasibility of such a composite bioink. Furthermore, the 3D-printed cell-laden constructs are proved to be a conducive biochemical environment that supports growth and proliferation of the encapsulated cellsin vitro. In addition, thein vivostudies convince that the composite bioink possesses excellent biocompatibility and biodegradation. It is believed that the innovation of this new composite bioink will push forward the bioprinting technology onto a new stage.

Tackling Current Biomedical Challenges With Frontier Biofabrication and Organ-On-A-Chip Technologies

In the last decades, biomedical research has significantly boomed in the academia and industrial sectors, and it is expected to continue to grow at a rapid pace in the future. An in-depth analysis of such growth is not trivial, given the intrinsic multidisciplinary nature of biomedical research. Nevertheless, technological advances are among the main factors which have enabled such progress. In this review, we discuss the contribution of two state-of-the-art technologies-namely biofabrication and organ-on-a-chip-in a selection of biomedical research areas. We start by providing an overview of these technologies and their capacities in fabricating advanced in vitro tissue/organ models. We then analyze their impact on addressing a range of current biomedical challenges. Ultimately, we speculate about their future developments by integrating these technologies with other cutting-edge research fields such as artificial intelligence and big data analysis.

Immune response against the biomaterials used in 3D bioprinting of organs

Regenerative medicine has developed promising approaches for healing and replacing defective and damaged organs or tissues with functional ones. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting innovation has integrated a potential to design organs or tissues specific to the patient with the capability of rapid construction to fulfill the storage of organs and the need for transplantation. 3D bioprinting of organs has the main goal to develop a structural and functional organ or tissue mimic to the original one. The highly complex fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds containing biomaterials, tissue models, and biomedical devices has made it possible to print small blood vessels to mimic organs to reduce organ or tissue rejection. 3D bioprinting has the concept of bioinks containing biomaterials that may trigger the immune responses in the body. Nevertheless, foreign body response (FBR) is mediated by various cell types such as B-cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, natural killer cells, neutrophils, and T-cells, and molecular signals such as antibodies (Abs), cytokines, and reactive radical species. Typically, the biomaterial is shielded by the fibrous encapsulation that is regulated by molecular signals. This review explored the progress in 3D bioprinting of vital organs and basic immune response against the biomaterials used in this approach. Thus, evaluating immune response against biomaterials used in 3D printed organs is necessary to mitigate tissue rejection after the transplantation.

Bioink: a 3D-bioprinting tool for anticancer drug discovery and cancer management

'Bioinks' are important tools for the fabrication of artificial living-tissue constructs that are able to mimic all properties of native tissues via 3D bioprinting technologies. Bioinks are most commonly made by incorporating live cells of interest within a natural or synthetic biocompatible polymeric matrix. In oncology research, the ability to recreate a tumor microenvironment (TME) using by 3D bioprinting constitutes a promising approach for drug development, screening, and in vitro cancer modeling. Here, we review the different types of bioink used for 3D bioprinting, with a focus on its application in cancer management. In addition, we consider the fabrication of bioink using customized materials/cells and their properties in the field of cancer drug discovery.

3D bioprinting of bicellular liver lobule-mimetic structures via microextrusion of cellulose nanocrystal-incorporated shear-thinning bioink

3D bioprinting of living cellular constructs with heterogeneity in cell types and extra cellular matrices (ECMs) matching those of biological tissues remains challenging. Here, we demonstrate that, through bioink material design, microextrusion-based (ME) bioprinting techniques have the potential to address this challenge. A new bioink employing alginate (1%), cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) (3%), and gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) (5%) (namely 135ACG hybrid ink) was formulated for the direct printing of cell-laden and acellular architectures. The 135ACG ink displayed excellent shear-thinning behavior and solid-like properties, leading to high printability without cell damage. After crosslinking, the ACG gel can also provide a stiff ECM ideal for stromal cell growth. By controlling the degree of substitution and polymer concentration, a GelMA (4%) bioink was designed to encapsulate hepatoma cells (hepG2), as GelMA gel possesses the desired low mechanical stiffness matching that of human liver tissue. Four different versions of to-scale liver lobule-mimetic constructs were fabricated via ME bioprinting, with precise positioning of two different cell types (NIH/3T3 and hepG2) embedded in matching ECMs (135ACG and GelMA, respectively). The four versions allowed us to exam effects of mechanical cues and intercellular interactions on cell behaviors. Fibroblasts thrived in stiff 135ACG matrix and aligned at the 135ACG/GelMA boundary due to durotaxis, while hepG2 formed spheroids exclusively in the soft GelMA matrix. Elevated albumin production was observed in the bicellular 3D co-culture of hepG2 and NIH/3T3, both with and without direct intercellular contact, indicating that improved hepatic cell function can be attributed to soluble chemical factors. Overall, our results showed that complex constructs with multiple cell types and varying ECMs can be bioprinted and potentially useful for both fundamental biomedical research and translational tissue engineering.