15 years of 106 Ru eye plaque dosimetry at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical Center using radiochromic film in a Solid Water phantom

Modified Geometry of 106Ru Asymmetric Eye Plaques to Improve Dosimetric Calculations in Ophthalmic Brachytherapy

Ru/Rh asymmetric plaques for ophthalmic brachytherapy have special geometric designs with a cutout intended to prevent irradiation of critical ocular structures proximal to the tumor. In this work, we present new geometric models for PENELOPE+PenEasy Monte Carlo simulations of these applicators, differing from the vendor-reported geometry, that better match their real geometry to assess their dosimetric impact. Simulation results were benchmarked to experimental dosimetric data from radiochromic film measurements, data provided by the manufacturer in the calibration certificates, and other experimental results published in the literature, obtaining, in all cases, better agreement with the modified geometries. The clinical impact of the new geometric models was evaluated by simulating real clinical cases using patient-specific eye models. The cases calculated using the modified geometries presented higher doses to the critical structures proximal to the cutout region. The modified geometric models presented in this work provide a more accurate representation of the asymmetric plaques, greatly improving the agreement between Monte Carlo calculations and experimental measurements. Lack of consideration of accurate geometric models has been shown to be translated into notable increases in dose to organs at risk in clinical cases.

Influence of tumor shape and location in eye plaque brachytherapy dosimetry

PURPOSE

A common treatment planning technique for eye plaque brachytherapy is to model the tumor as an ellipse. For posterior tumors near the optic disc and fovea, this approach may lead to overlap between tumor and the organ at risk (OAR). We hypothesized that a superior plan can be generated by modeling the actual tumor shape.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty eye plaque patients with tumors <1 cm from the optic disc and fovea were selected. Two treatment plans were generated for each patient: an elliptical tumor model plan and a true tumor model plan. Dosimetric data were collected for each plan, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to asses any statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

Equivalent tumor coverage was confirmed between the elliptical and true tumor plans for all patients. Qualitative analysis showed greater dosimetric differences between plans as the distance from the OARs increased from 0 to 2 mm but the largest differences were observed between 2 and 4 mm. Minimal differences between models were seen beyond 4 mm. Statistically significant dosimetric improvements were found for tumors <4 mm from the fovea and <2 mm from the optic disc.

CONCLUSIONS

Intuitively, accurate modeling of the tumor accounting for irregularities in the shape should result in a more conformal plan and an overall reduction in OAR dose. However, this technique is only beneficial for tumors that are within 4 mm of the fovea or optic disc. An elliptical tumor model allows for an acceptable plan unless the tumor is located posteriorly and has an irregular shape.

A convex windowless extrapolation chamber to measure surface dose rate from 106 Ru/106 Rh episcleral plaques

PURPOSE

A convex windowless extrapolation chamber was developed as a primary measurement device to determine surface dose rate from curved ¹⁰⁶ Ru/¹⁰⁶ Rh episcleral plaques.

METHODS

A convex extrapolation chamber without an entrance window was constructed for this work, and surface dose rate measurements were performed with two curved CCB-type ¹⁰⁶ Ru/¹⁰⁶ Rh plaques (S/N 2545 and 2596) manufactured by Eckert & Ziegler BEBIG. FARO ® Gage measurements were performed to verify the radius of curvature for the convex electrode and the concave plaque surface. Furthermore, the collecting electrode area was verified through capacitance measurements. Chamber correction factors for divergence and backscatter were generated using the EGSnrc cavity user code. For each source, surface dose rate was measured with the convex extrapolation chamber and compared with on-contact measurements made with curved un-laminated EBT3 film strips. A Monte Carlo correction was generated for radiochromic film measurements to account for volume averaging within the active layer and effects of phantom scatter. Additionally, extrapolation chamber results for each plaque were compared with scintillation detector measurements performed by the manufacturer. For the second source (S/N 2596), a comparison was also made with the Monte Carlo-corrected surface dose rate measured at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) using cylindrical alanine pellets. Finally, source measurements were performed using conventional ionization chambers (Exradin A26, A1SL, and A20) within a custom fixture to investigate the transfer of extrapolation chamber surface dose rate to clinics.

RESULTS

For the first ¹⁰⁶ Ru/¹⁰⁶ Rh plaque (S/N 2545), average surface dose rate from the convex windowless extrapolation chamber was found to be 1.5% higher than the corresponding value from curved un-laminated EBT3 film measurements and 5.6% lower than the manufacturer value. For the second source (S/N 2596), the extrapolation chamber surface dose rate was 2.5% higher than the un-laminated EBT3 film result, 4.5% lower than the manufacturer value, and 3.9% higher compared to corrected alanine measurements made at NPL. Total uncertainty in the extrapolation chamber measurement was estimated to be approximately  ± 7.0% (k = 2). For the plaque measurements made using conventional ionization chambers with a custom fixture, surface dose rate from the transfer technique was found to agree within 3.8% with the expected convex extrapolation chamber result for S/N 2596.

CONCLUSIONS

A convex windowless extrapolation chamber was developed as a primary measurement device for ¹⁰⁶ Ru/¹⁰⁶ Rh plaques. Through comparison with the extrapolation chamber, the accuracy of surface dose rate measurements from current dosimetry techniques was assessed and agreement was seen within 5.6%. Finally, it was found that conventional ionization chambers could be calibrated with a reference ¹⁰⁶ Ru/¹⁰⁶ Rh plaque in order to transfer the extrapolation chamber result for surface dose rate to clinics.