Endoscopic management of symptomatic caliceal diverticula: a retrospective comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ureteroscopy

Percutaneous treatment of stone containing calyceal diverticula: Strategies and outcomes from a University teaching hospital in a developing country

INTRODUCTION

There is a dearth of research available on the outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of the modalities employed in treatment of diverticula after stone clearance by PCNL. We present our experience of various approaches employed in our institute for treatment of caliceal diverticulum after stone clearance by PCNL. We aimed to review the outcomes, complications, and recurrence rates of these procedures which can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of these techniques in the treatment of stone containing caliceal diverticulum.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients diagnosed with caliceal diverticular stone was conducted. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) at the time of hospital discharge, determined by a combined nephroscopic/fluoroscopic assessment, and the obliteration of the diverticular sac. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of operative time, duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were evaluated. The mean diverticulum size was 23.2 mm, most common location was the superior calyx (30 (56.7%)). Group 1 (diverticular neck treatment + DJ stent) included 27 patients, group 2 (diverticular wall fulguration + PCN) included 18 patients and group 3 (PCN alone) included 8 patients. Mean operating time was highest in group 1 (80 min). Stone clearance was 100% in group 1, 91% in group 2 and 88% in group 3. Obliteration of caliceal diverticulum was highest in group 1 (90%). Mean duration of hospital stay was lowest in group 1 (3.2 days). Overall complications were lowest in group 2 (3/18).

CONCLUSION

PCNL followed by combination of diverticular wall fulguration and PCN or treatment of diverticular neck and DJ stenting is safe and effective in causing diverticular obliteration. Placement of nephrostomy tube alone was not found to be effective in causing diverticular obliteration in our study.

Efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in the management of calyceal diverticular calculi

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy in the management of calyceal diverticular calculi. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 27 patients with calyceal diverticular calculi admitted to the Department of Urology of the Zigong First People's Hospital from May 2018 to May 2021. Intraoperatively, the diverticular neck was found in all 27 patients, but flexible ureterorenoscopy lithotripsy was not performed in 2 cases because of the slender diverticular neck, and the success rate of the operation was 92.6%. Of the 25 patients with successful lithotripsy, the mean operative time was 76.9 ± 35.5 (43-200) min. There were no serious intraoperative complications such as ureteral perforation, mucosal avulsion, or hemorrhage. Postoperative minor complications (Clavien classification I-II) occurred in 4 (16%) patients. The mean hospital stay was 4.4 ± 1.7 (3-12) days. The stone-free rate was 80% at the 1-month postoperative follow-up. After the second-stage treatment, the stone-free rate was 88%. In 22 cases with complete stone clearance, no stone recurrence was observed at 5.3 ± 2.6 (3-12) months follow-up. This retrospective study demonstrated that flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser is a safe and effective choice for the treatment of calyceal diverticular calculi, because it utilizes the natural lumen of the human body and has the advantages of less trauma, fewer complications, and a higher stone-free rate.

PCNL vs RIRS in management of stones in calyceal diverticulum: outcomes from a global multicentre match paired study that reflects real world practice

INTRODUCTION

Calyceal diverticulum (CD) is the outpouching of a calyx into the renal parenchyma, connected by an infundibulum. Often associated with recurrent stones, common surgical options include percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). We aim to present the real-world practises and outcomes comparing both approaches and the technical choices made.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data including 313 patients from 11 countries were evaluated. One hundred and twenty-seven underwent mini-PCNL and one hundred and eighty-six underwent RIRS. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and outcomes were analysed using either T test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data between groups were analysed using the Chi-squared test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed matching for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses for anomalous/malrotated kidneys and difficult diverticulum access were performed.

RESULTS

After PSM, 123 patients in each arm were included, with similar outcomes for stone-free rate (SFR) and complications (p < 0.001). Hospitalisation was significantly longer in PCNL. Re-intervention rate for residual fragments (any fragment > 4 mm) was similar. RIRS was the preferred re-intervention for both groups. Intraoperative bleeding was significantly higher in PCNL (p < 0.032) but none required transfusion. Two patients with malrotated anatomy in RIRS group required transfusion. Lower pole presented most difficult access for both groups, and SFR was significantly higher in difficult CD accessed by RIRS (p < 0.031). Laser infundibulotomy was preferred for improving diverticular access in both. Fulguration post-intervention was not practised.

CONCLUSION

The crux lies in identification of the opening and safe access. Urologists may consider a step-up personalised approach with a view of endoscopic combined approach where required.

The treatment option for calyceal diverticulum stones: flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL) or all-seeing needle-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL) and all-seeing needle-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of calyceal diverticula (CD) stones. From June 2012 to November 2020, 24 patients, including 14 females and 10 males, with an average age of 45.6 ± 17.4 years were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Among these patients, 14 were treated with FURL, and 10 underwent all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL. The demographic data, perioperative parameters and complications, as well as follow-up data, were recorded. In the FURL group, the ostium of CD was not identified in two patients, and these patients were finally treated with all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL. The stone clearance rate (SCR) was 64.3%, and the mean blood loss was 0.9 ± 0.8 g/dL. The average operation time was 57.5 ± 17.4 min, and the mean hospital stay was 3.5 ± 1.4 days. A complete resolution of CD was observed in five (41.7%) patients over the average follow-up of 10.8 months. In terms of the all-seeing needle-assisted PCNL, the average operation time was 83.5 ± 32.4 min, and the mean hospital stay was 4.38 ± 2.25 days. The SCR reached 91.7%, and the blood loss was 1.7 ± 1.1 g/dL. Nine patients (75%) were observed to have complete CD resolution over an average of 12.2 months of follow-up. All complications were grade I and II in both the groups. CD stones can be treated minimally invasive and effectively by FURL and PCNL. The effect of FURL greatly depends on the location and anatomy of the diverticula. PCNL is more efficient, and its safety was improved with the help of the all-seeing needle assistance.

Factors Impacting Stone-Free Rate After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Calyceal Diverticular Calculi

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) treatment of calyceal diverticular calculi and identify the associated factors affecting post-operative stone-free rate.

Materials and Methods

From August 2015 to May 2019, data of 32 patients with calyceal diverticular calculi who were treated by RIRS in a Siriraj Hospital were retrospectively studied. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) and holmium YAG laser lithotripsy. Calyceal diverticula were identified by our refluxing technique and from the collected demographic, diverticular and stone data. Operative outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Data were analysed to identify the factors associated with stone-free outcomes. Stone-free was defined as no residual stones remaining after surgery.

Results

Mean age of the patients was 55.7 years. Stone locations were non-lower pole in 81.2% of cases and lower pole for the remaining 18.8% of cases. Median stone size was 1.2 cm with three as the median number of stones per patient. Calcium oxalate was the most common stone composition (56.3%). Positions of the diverticulum were anterior calyx (34.4%) and posterior calyx (50%), while the remainder were undetermined (incomplete data). Average length of the diverticular neck was 0.4 cm. Mean operative time was 46 minutes and mean hospital stay was 2.9 days. Complications included fever in three patients (9.3%) and sepsis in two patients (6.3%), with overall post-operative stone-free rate at 75%. Factors significantly affecting stone-free status were stone size (P=0.003) and length of diverticular neck (P=0.038). Multivariate analysis determined that only stone size had a statistically significant effect on post-operative stone-free status (P=0.015). Cut off point for stone size that increased the chances of a post-operative stone-free outcome was less than 1.5 cm, as determined by the ROC curve.

Conclusion

RIRS was found to be an effective and safe treatment option for the removal of calyceal diverticular calculi. Stone size of less than 1.5 cm offered a better chance of post-operative stone-free condition.

Systematic Review of Caliceal Diverticulum

PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review of the literature regarding the diagnosis and treatment of caliceal diverticulum (CD).

METHODS

The search strategy was conducted according to the Cochrane review guidelines for systematic reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist.

RESULTS

In total 1189 titles and abstracts were reviewed, of which 101 were selected for article evaluation. Of these 101 articles, 40 were selected for inclusion after full article evaluations. In the extracted article, intravenous urography (IVU), rather than CT urography, was the main imaging tool for diagnosis, although many articles had failed to provide any imaging modality information. The extracted articles included 88, 153, and 487 patients who underwent shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), flexible ureteroscopy/retrograde intrarenal surgery (fURS/RIRS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), respectively. Stone-free rates were 21.3% (SWL), 61.4% (fURS/RIRS), and 83.0% (PCNL). The complication rates were 8.0% (SWL), 3.3% (fURS/RIRS), and 11.9% (PCNL). There was incomplete and inconsistent reporting of even basic clinical parameters, such as the size and location of the CD, number of stones, outcomes, and complications. There was a striking lack of follow-up data, despite a known high recurrence rate. The literature on laparoscopic management was too sparse to analyze.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed that there are not enough high-quality studies to evaluate the ideal strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of CDs. This systematic review emphasizes (a) the importance of contrast imaging for CD diagnosis, (b) higher success rates but also higher complication rates in PCNL compared with SWL and FURS, and (c) the need for standardized reporting of outcomes to include complications, number of interventions, symptom resolution, stone clearance, and CD ablation.

Percutaneous Management of Stone Containing Calyceal Diverticula: Associated Factors and Outcomes

PURPOSE

We evaluated the outcomes of percutaneous treatment and metabolic evaluation of calyceal diverticula with associated stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 51 patients with a calyceal diverticulum in our prospectively maintained percutaneous nephrolithotomy database. Patients with complete data were separated into 14 with stones isolated to the diverticulum and 15 with renal stones in and outside the diverticulum. A total of 571 patients with renal stones but no diverticulum were used for comparison. Statistical differences were assessed using the chi-square test and the t-test.

RESULTS

Patients with stones isolated to the diverticulum were younger (44 vs 54 years, p = 0.024), had a lower body mass index (23.2 vs 27 kg/m², p = 0.032) and were more often female (71% vs 44%, p = 0.046) compared to patients with renal stones but no diverticulum. Calyceal diverticula were anterior in 19 of 29 cases and in the upper pole in 15. Average diverticular size was 2.5 cm with a 1.5 cm stone burden. Percutaneous treatment was successful in 96% of patients with a 4% complication rate. The diverticular neck was dilated in 22 of 51 patients (43%). During 5-year followup in the 51 patients there was 1 stone recurrence, which was managed by ureteroscopy, while 46 and 5 patients showed complete absence and reduction of the diverticulum, respectively. Of the calyceal diverticular stones 82% contained calcium phosphate compared to only 33% in patients with renal stones but no diverticulum. All patients with a diverticulum had at least 1 metabolic derangement.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous treatment of calyceal diverticula is safe and effective regardless of size or location, including anterior diverticula. Infundibular neck dilation does not appear to be necessary. There are metabolic abnormalities in a significant proportion of patients with a calyceal diverticulum.

Management of renal caliceal diverticular stones: A decade of experience

Objective:

The objective of this study is to evaluate our methods for management of renal caliceal diverticular stones (CDS).

Materials and Methods:

We conducted a retrospective study from January 2005 to July 2015 and included patients who were treated for renal CDS. Patients were evaluated for treatment modality, puncture site (in case percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL] attempted), operative time, stone clearance rate, and complications. During PCNL, if the infundibulum was found to connect the diverticulum to the calyx, then a double J stent was placed. No attempt was made to dilate the diverticular neck or to create a neoinfundibulum.

Results:

Twenty-four patients were treated for CDS during the study period. Two patients underwent shockwave lithotripsy, and 22 were managed by PCNL. Mean stone size was 16.37 mm (range: 6–35 mm) and mean diverticulum size was 20.62 mm (range: 12–37 mm). No fulguration was done in initial 17 patients, while fulguration by Holmium Laser was performed in the last five cases treated with PCNL. Mean operative time was 70.31 min (range: 47–90 min). Mean follow-up was 34 months, diverticulum resolved in 14 patients and reduced in size in 7 patients.

Conclusion:

Caliceal diverticular calculi can be treated most efficiently by PCNL. Stone-guided puncture and no attempt to dilate or create neoinfundibulum reduces operative time and morbidity while yielding high stone-free rate.

Retrospective Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Management of Calyceal Diverticular Calculi

Background:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the most widely recommended treatment for calyceal diverticular calculi, providing excellent stone-free results. However, its invasiveness is not negligible considering its major complication rates. Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) is currently used to treat calyceal diverticula. However, the greatest drawback of FURS is locating the diverticulum since its neck is narrow and concealed. In such a case, the FURS procedure must be converted to PCNL. The aim of this study was to evaluate ultrasound-guided flexible ureteroscopy (UFURS) identifying diverticulum and the management of calyceal diverticular calculi.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 24 patients who had calyceal diverticular calculi. In all 12 patients in the UFURS group, direct FURS failed to find evidence of calyceal diverticula but were confirmed with imaging. The other 12 patients in the PCNL group received PCNL plus fulguration of the diverticular walls.

Results:

Puncture of calyceal diverticulum was successful in all 12 UFURS patients. Two patients in this group had postoperative residual calculi and two patients developed fever. In the PCNL group, percutaneous renal access and lithotomy were successful in all 12 patients. One patient in this group had residual calculi, one had perirenal hematoma, and two patients developed fever. No significant difference was found in the operating time (UFURS vs. PCNL, 91.8 ± 24.2 vs. 86.3 ± 18.7 min), stone-free rate (UFURS vs. PCNL, 9/12 vs. 10/12), and rate of successful lithotripsy (UFURS vs. PCNL, 10/12 vs. 11/12) between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Postoperative pain scores in the FURS group were significantly lower than that in the PCNL group (2.7 ± 1.2 vs. 6.2 ± 1.5, P < 0.05). Hospital stay in the UFURS group was significantly shorter than that in the PCNL group (3.4 ± 0.8 vs. 5.4 ± 1.0 days, P < 0.05). All patients were symptom-free following surgery (UFURS vs. PCNL, 10/10 vs. 12/12).

Conclusion:

Ultrasound-guided puncture facilitates identification of calyceal diverticula during FURS and improves the success rate of FURS surgery.

Stones in special situations

There are several special situations in which urinary lithiasis presents management challenges to the urologist. An in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiology, unique anatomy, and treatment options is crucial in order to maintain good health in these patients. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the management of the following scenarios: bladder stones, stones in bowel disease, during pregnancy, in association with renal anomalies, with skeletal deformities, in urinary diversions, and in children.

Management of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi, by comparing the therapeutic outcomes for those undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS).

Methods

From March 2009 to May 2014, 36 consecutive patients with caliceal diverticular calculi were divided into 2 groups: 21 patients underwent MPCNL, and 15 were treated by F-URS. All procedures were performed by one surgical group, which ensured relatively constant parameters. Patient characteristics, operative time, hospital stay after surgery, stone-free rate, symptomatic improvement rate, complications, diverticular obliteration, and stone composition were analyzed retrospectively in the 2 groups.

Results

Patient preoperative variables were comparable between the two groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mean operative time was 136.9 ± 22.8 min in the MPCNL group and 117.3 ± 24.3 min in the F-URS group (P = 0.019). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the MPCNL group than in the F-URS group (9.4 ± 3.1 vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 days, P = 0.010). The stone-free rates after MPCNL and F-URS were 90.5% (19/21) and 60.0% (9/15), respectively (P = 0.046). Additionally, 71.4% (15/21) of patients in the MPCNL group and 46.7% (7/15) of patients in the F-URS group had symptomatic improvement at the 6-month follow-up (P = 0.175); the rates of complications in the 2 groups were 19.0% (4/21) and 13.3% (2/15), respectively (P = 0.650). Complete diverticular obliteration was achieved in 16 (76.2%) cases in the MPCNL group and 5 (33.3%) cases in the F-URS group (P = 0.017). The distributions of calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite in the stones were 66.7% (14/21) and 33.3% (7/21), respectively, in the MPCNL group; however, the distributions in the F-URS group were 46.7% (7/15) and 53.3% (8/15), respectively (P = 0.310).

Conclusion

MPCNL is an effective method for the treatment of caliceal diverticular calculi. However, F-URS is an alternative technique in selected patients with a patent infundibulum, despite lower stone-free rates than with MPCNL. Fulguration of the diverticular lining with a high-power holmium laser and permitting the cavity to collapse are useful to increase the chance of diverticular obliteration.

Pediatric calyceal diverticulum treatment: An experience with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches

INTRODUCTION

The symptomatic calyceal diverticulum is a rare event in the pediatric population. In adults, surgical options include ureteroscopy, percutaneous ablation, and laparoscopic decortication but there is a lack of experience in the literature with these techniques.

OBJECTIVE

We present our experience with both the ureteroscopic and laparoscopic approach to treating the pediatric calyceal diverticulum.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective case series looking at patients who underwent treatment for calyceal diverticulum at our institution from January 2009 to May 2014. We reviewed patient demographics, indications for intervention, radiographic appearance, type of intervention, and perioperative outcomes. Ureteroscopic approach included dilation of infundibulum and ablation of diverticular cavity. Laparoscopic approach included ablation of the diverticulum with argon diathermy with or without surgical closure of the ostium.

RESULTS

There were 13 patients who underwent 15 procedures for symptomatic calyceal diverticulum (Table). Median age was 11 years. Indications for intervention were: pain and increasing size of diverticulum (8/15, 55%), hematuria (3/15, 20%), UTI (3/15, 20%), and calculi (1/15, 5%). 11/15 (73%) procedures were managed endoscopically and 4/15 (27%) were managed with laparoscopic decortication. Ureteral stent was left in all patients for a mean duration of 51 days (15-120 days). Follow up imaging at median of 2.1 years (0.5-4 years) revealed an initial success rate of 85% (11/13 patients). Two patients failed initial intervention (persistent pain/increasing size) necessitating successful secondary minimally invasive procedures. There were 2 (13%) complications: a perinephric hematoma post endoscopic ablation which resolved spontaneously and a deep venous thrombosis in a patient with a coagulation disorder in the laparoscopic group.

DISCUSSION

Limitations of our study include its retrospective design, lack of standardization of the treatment approach amongst the four treating surgeons, and the small number of patients requiring intervention for this relatively rare diagnosis. Our study is the largest to date in the pediatric population and is the first to report outcomes with ureteroscopic management of the calyceal diverticulum.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the pediatric calyceal diverticulum can be successfully treated in a minimally invasive manner. The endoscopic approach should be the first line option for patients with small, endophytic diverticula, particularly those located in the upper and mid pole. The laparoscopic approach is more invasive but should be considered for large diverticula that are exophytic with thin overlying parenchyma.

Management of stones associated with intrarenal stenosis: infundibular stenosis and caliceal diverticulum

PURPOSE

To review our experience with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for management of conditions associated with intrarenal stricture and present a treatment algorithm based on the series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

RIRS was offered to all patients with symptomatic intrarenal stenosis regardless of location if stone burden was 2 cm or less. With a combined endourology and lithotripsy table, patients with stones between 2 and 3 cm were also offered RIRS using a combined approach of RIRS and shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). A total of 108 patients with symptomatic stones and caliceal diverticulum or infundibular stenosis were included in the data analysis. A standard technique was used in all cases. Failures or patients not suitable for RIRS were treated with either percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

Successful identification and dilation/incision of the stenotic opening was accomplished in 94% of cases. Seventy-five percent of stones were managed with basketing and/or holmium laser ablation. In these patients, 90% were stone free (<2 mm stone fragments). For stones between 2 and 3 cm, the use of holmium laser in combination with SWL provided stone-free rates of 75%. Five percent of patients needed PCNL because of larger stone burden and posterior location.

CONCLUSIONS

With the appropriate equipment, RIRS provides a valid treatment option for patients with intrarenal strictures. While upper pole and midrenal lesions are ideal, lower pole segments may be approached as well. A treatment algorithm based on the results provides a simplified approach for the minimally invasive management of intrarenal stenosis.

Percutaneous management of renal caliceal diverticular stones: Ten-year experience of a tertiary care center with different techniques to deal with diverticula after stone extraction

Introduction:

Caliceal diverticulae are a frequent surgical problem. We present our experience with caliceal diverticular stones (CDS) managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and describe the two different techniques to deal with diverticula after stone retrieval.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 10-year data of 44 consecutive patients who underwent PCNL for CDS. During PCNL, if the guide wire could be negoted through the neck of the diverticula, we dilated and stented it. If we couldnot find the neck, we fulgurated the diverticular walls. Follow-up included intravenous urogram at 3 months and annual plain films thereafter. We analyzed the outcome, complications, and recurrence rate.

Results:

Total stone clearance was obtained in 40 (90.90%) patients. We dilated and stented the diverticula in 35 (79.5%) patients and fulgurated the walls in nine (20.5%) patients. Complications occurred in three patients. The postoperative intravenous urogram showed obliteration of diverticula in seven patients and the improved drainage in 37 patients. At the average follow-up of 2 years, 41 (93.18%) patients were asymptomatic and two (4.5%) patients showed the recurrence of stone.

Conclusions:

PCNL can clear calculi from caliceal diverticula in most cases with minimal morbidity. After stone retrieval, the diverticula may be drained into the pyelocaliceal system, if the neck is negotiable and fulgurated if the neck cannot be dilated.

[Endoscopic treatment of renal diverticular stone (Single Centre Study of 45 cases)]

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the outcome of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser in treating renal diverticular stone as a minimal invasive option.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively the records of 45 patients who underwent F-URS using holmium laser from 2004 to 2011 for symptomatic renal diverticular stone. The presenting symptoms were renal colic, urinary tract infection or hematuria. The F-URS used after the Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) failure in 30 (66.7 %) patients. The repeated treatment by F-URS was carried out twice for four patients; in three patients, it was correlated to the size of the stone and it was because of failure to identify the diverticulum in one patient. The follow up visit range were between 4 to 6 weeks with plain radiograph (KUB) and renal ultrasound or non-contrast CT scan (NCCT).

RESULTS

Of our data, there were 45 patients, 22 women and 23 men (mean age of 46.3 years, range 18-72). We found 28 patients (62.2 %) who had stone free (SF), 10 patients (22.2 %) with clinically insignificant residual fragments (less than 3mm in size) and residual fragments (RF) in seven patients (15.6 %). Success rate was considered as stone free or insignificant residual fragment, which was obtained in 38 patients (84.4 %). The symptom-free was in 42 patients (93.3 %).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, F-URS using holmium laser was very effective minimally-invasive technique that could be the best option for the treatment of renal diverticular stone especially for those who resist the treatment with the SWL. It showed an excellent stone clearance rate, minimal morbidity rate and brief hospital stay.

Management of stones in abnormal situations

Stones in abnormal situations present a management conundrum to the urologist. Many of these situations are relatively rare and literature is scanty on the appropriate management. We review the current literature on the management of stones in the setting of pregnancy, calyceal diverticulum, urinary diversions, pelvic kidneys, transplant kidneys, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, horseshoe kidneys, and other renal anomalies. The aims of treatment are complete stone-free status. The modality of treatment should be individualized to the size and location of stone and type of abnormal situation confronted.

Laparoscopic management of caliceal diverticulum: our experience, literature review, and pooling analysis

Caliceal diverticulum management has been performed using various modalities, including ureteroscopy, percutaneous treatment, and laparoscopy. We present our experience with laparoscopic management of caliceal diverticulum in two patients with large caliceal diverticulum and a history of failed open surgery because of the incorrect diagnosis of a simple renal cyst. In laparoscopy, both patients had an uneventful intraoperative and postoperative course. On follow-up, both of them were symptom free without any evidence of diverticulum in imaging. We reviewed the literature and found that laparoscopic management of caliceal diverticulum has been reported in 37 adult patients other than our cases. We performed a pooling analysis and discussed different aspects of the approach.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of caliceal diverticular calculi: a single center experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Caliceal diverticula are rare renal anomalies present in approximately 0.6% of the population. They are associated with calculi in 50% of cases. Therapeutic options include several minimally invasive techniques. We report a retrospective review of outcomes and complications from our series of patients who were treated with a percutaneous approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A database of outcomes related to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been maintained at our institution since 1992. Data on all patients with caliceal diverticular stones who underwent PCNL during a 17-year period from 1992 to 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. Our preferred approach to PCNL in these patients is to puncture directly into the diverticulum and to try to advance a guidewire through the infundibular neck. In cases where the caliceal neck could not be intubated, we performed a transdiverticular approach with creation of a neoinfundibulum as a salvage procedure. We evaluated the two techniques with regard to stone-free rates and early postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Seventy-six procedures were performed. The mean age was 43 years (range 17-72 y). The mean stone area was 583 mm(2). The surgical approach was direct puncture in 47, transdiverticular in 20, retrograde in 8, and unknown in 1 patient. Eight patients underwent lining fulguration. The average duration of surgery was 75 minutes (23-169 min) with an average hospital stay of 4.7 days. There were a total of 23 complications, of which 11 necessitated additional intervention. The overall stone-free rates were 77% and 89% for direct puncture and transdiverticular approaches, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The percutaneous management of caliceal diverticular calculi is highly effective and can be accomplished with low morbidity.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Current concepts

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the procedure of choice for large renal stones. Since its introduction in 1976, many aspects of the operative technique and the endoscopic equipments have had constant evolution, increasing the success rates of the procedure. We performed a literature search using Entrez Pubmed from January 2000 to July 2007 concerning PNL and many aspects related to all steps of the procedure.

We could verify that PNL in supine position has been proved as an acceptable option, but more worldwide experience is necessary. Urologists must be trained to gain their own renal tract access. Minipercutaneous PNL still needs equipments improvements for better results. Tubeless PNL is increasing in popularity and different tract sealants have been studied. Medical prevention is proved to be effective against stone recurrence and should be always used after PNL.

Although the evolution of the technique in the last 20 years, urologists must continue to improve their skills and develop new technologies to offer to the patients more and more a safe and effective option to treat large renal stones.

Percutaneous management of caliceal diverticuli

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Caliceal diverticula are rare congenital abnormalities that can become symptomatic if associated with a calculus or infection. We review percutaneous management of caliceal diverticula.

METHODS

Pathogenesis, clinical evaluation, management options, and recommended follow-up for symptomatic caliceal diverticula are reviewed. We present our single-stage and prepercutaneous nephrolithotomy opacification techniques for the management of caliceal diverticula. This involves complete extraction of all stone particles and ablation of the diverticular cavity without infundibular identification or dilation. Comparison of outcomes between our current ablative technique and our previous dilation technique is evaluated.

RESULTS

Percutaneous management of caliceal diverticula offers the highest symptomatic relief and stone-free rate of available management options. We identified 106 patients with caliceal diverticula who were treated with a percutaneous approach. Review of 85 of these patients demonstrated that most procedures can be performed with a small nephrostomy tube in place for 24 hours and an overnight hospital stay. Minimal complication and stone recurrence rates were observed. Patients treated with caliceal diverticular ablation experienced a shorter hospital stay, fewer complications, and a higher stone-free status than those patients who were treated with dilation of the diverticular infundibulum.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous management of caliceal diverticula using cavity ablation is a minimally invasive technique that offers long-term symptomatic relief with minimal complications.

Preoperative indications for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in 2009

Abstract Since the first description of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL) over 30 years ago, the indications for this procedure in the management of upper tract urinary stones has greatly expanded. Despite recent advances in shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic technologies, PNL maintains a dominant role in the management of complex and large volume upper tract stones. The contemporary indications for PNL are reviewed herein.

Lasers in percutaneous renal procedures

INTRODUCTION

Since the invention of lasers in 1960, they have been increasingly used in medicine. In this review paper, the types of lasers used in urology, in addition to their applications to percutaneous renal surgery will be reviewed. Specifically, use of lasers in the percutaneous management of renal stones, upper tract transitional cell carcinoma and stricture will be reviewed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed was searched for citations since 1966. The following terms were used: "lasers", "calculi", "endopyelotomy", and "transitional cell carcinoma".

RESULTS

Due to its minimal depth of penetration, holmium laser has proven to be safe and efficacious. It is currently the primary energy source for flexible instrumentation, and also has demonstrated efficacy in percutaneous lithotripsy (faster than ultrasonic lithotripsy and safer than electrohydraulic lithotripsy). Holmium laser been used for antegrade endopyelotomy and percutaneous resection of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Holmium laser is safer than other lasers and has become the gold standard for laser lithotripsy for flexible instrumentation. It has been used successfully in the percutaneous management of renal stones, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, and upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Holmium laser is an alternative energy source to conventional lithotripters and electrocautery for endopyelotomy and resection of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.

[PCNL: special indications]

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has sometimes particular indications related to the patient, his anatomy or the stone itself. These situations will be described.

Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome

OBJECTIVE

To review patients with an extended follow-up after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for calyceal diverticular stones (CDS), over a 15-year period, assessing the long-term outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 56 patients were treated for symptomatic CDS disease by ESWL (38) or PCNL (18). The stone-bearing diverticula were in the upper calyces in 26, middle calyces in 24 and lower calyces in six patients, and in the right kidney in 22 and in the left in 34. The most frequent symptom was ipsilateral flank pain (84%) and 32% of patients presented with associated chronic urinary tract infections. In a retrospective analysis, we assessed stone size, diverticulum location, stone-free rate, symptom-free rate, complications and extended follow-up.

RESULTS

In the short-term in the ESWL group, 21% of patients were stone-free and 61% were asymptomatic; 8% developed symptoms and 8% developed recurrence or stone-growth in the long term. There were six minor complications. In the PCNL group, 15 patients (83%) were stone-free in the short term; two had a recurrence (11%) and two had stone growth (11) in the long term. There were three complications after PCNL.

CONCLUSIONS

This series shows that PCNL is an effective and durable means of treating CDS, regardless of stone size or location of the diverticulum. Despite low stone-free rates with ESWL, most patients were rendered symptom-free with minimal complications. The long-term recurrence rates, 8% for ESWL and 11% for PCNL, were comparable.

Treatment Selection and Outcomes: Renal Calculi

This article summarizes the history of how renal stones have been treated over the centuries and reviews current treatments and outcomes for renal stones. The authors provide an algorithm based on available outcome data for shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Optimizing Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the 21st Century

OBJECTIVE

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has radically changed treatment of stone disease and appears to be the first option for the majority of patients. This review of current literature focused on suggestions for optimising technique, patient selection, results, and lithotriptor comparison for SWL.

METHODS

Literature search for SWL was performed for recently published papers in English language. Topics of interest were treatment protocols; patient evaluation; pre-SWL prediction of outcome; lithotriptor technology; efficacy; and methods to assess the effects, decrease complications, and compare lithotriptors. Earlier classic papers on SWL and guidelines for stone disease were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Recent literature contained important recommendations about SWL concerning (1) methods to predict stone fragmentation; (2) identification of factors contributing to treatment failure for lower pole and ureteric calculi; (3) guidelines from urological associations; (4) manoeuvres and changes in SWL delivery (slower rate, twin-pulse technique) to increase efficacy and decrease complications; (5) clarification of the role of medical treatment (antibiotics, alpha-blockers); (6) role of SWL in calyceal stones, CIRF, and abnormal kidneys; (7) obesity and SWL; and (8) methods to evaluate and compare lithotriptors.

CONCLUSIONS

SWL delivered in an outpatient setting as an anaesthesia-free treatment is still considered the first option for the majority of stones with a minimal number of complications. Better understanding of the physics of shockwave delivery is required, together with treatment optimisation by limiting renal damage and better selection of patients because this approach will offer maximum benefit to patients and physicians, as well as more cost-effective treatment.

Management of stones in calyceal diverticulum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Congenital abnormities in urology are very common. These abnormalities include calyceal diverticula, which are frequently diagnosed as an incidental finding. Once symptomatic, calyceal diverticula have to be located by accurate imaging and then treated in an appropriate manner.

RECENT FINDINGS

Possible methods of treatment in calyceal diverticula are generally the same as in other abnormalities of the kidney: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, endoscopic procedures, percutaneous procedures, laparoscopy and open surgery. It is important to find the exact location of the stone-bearing diverticulum and various imaging techniques may be used for this purpose. Metabolic work-up remains important.

SUMMARY

There is a strong trend towards endoscopical and laparoscopical treatment in renal abnormalities such as calyceal diverticula. A combination of these two methods seems to be appropriate in some cases.

Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access

PURPOSE

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has undergone considerable evolution since its introduction in the 1970s, which has been driven by advances in access techniques, instrumentation and endoscopic technology. Recent reports suggest an increase in the number of percutaneous stone treatments being performed. However, despite the increasing use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy a minority of urologists obtain their own access. We reviewed the techniques for performing safe and effective percutaneous renal access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search using Entrez PubMed was performed. All relevant literature concerning techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access published within the last 20 years was reviewed.

RESULTS

The success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy is critically dependent on achieving suitable percutaneous access. The ideal site of percutaneous puncture should be selected to maximize the use of rigid instruments, minimize the risk of complications and attain stone-free status. Familiarity with basic renal anatomy is essential to obtain access safely. Adherence to basic principles allows the establishment of percutaneous access in a straightforward and efficient manner. Certain clinical situations may require special access techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the treatment of choice for complex stone disease. While the efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy relies on the establishment of effective percutaneous access, there are considerable advantages for the urologist able to achieve access.

Quality of Life after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Caliceal Diverticulum and Secluded Lower-Pole Renal Stones

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The treatment of caliceal diverticulum and deeply secluded lower-pole stones is challenging, and the indications are controversial. This study assessed the changes in the quality of life (QoL) of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for symptomatic caliceal diverticula and deep lower-pole calculi to determine whether there is a change in the "bother factor" in order to improve treatment strategies for this group of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients undergoing PCNL were evaluated prospectively using the SF36 QoL questionnaire before and 6 weeks after PCNL. The results before and after PCNL were compared individually and by group and analyzed statistically. A P value <or=0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Most (87%) of the patients were completely stone free after the procedure. Significant QoL findings were a reduction in symptoms interfering with performance at work (40%) and improved general health (33%). Although there was an overall improvement in QoL across the entire group, this reached statistical significance for only two of the seven domains of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of a high stone-free rate, fewer than half of patients benefited subjectively from the procedure in terms of improvement of QoL. Therefore, patients should be made aware of the limited impact of surgical treatment on QoL, and asymptomatic patients can be given the option of further watchful waiting.

Endourological re-establishment of a disrupted infundibulum after renal laceration

We report a case of severe urinary extravasation after renal contusion and its successful management by endoscopic creation of a neoinfundibulum. When the stenotic infundibulum cannot be traversed with a guide wire, creation of a new infundibulum will offer a secure alternative for accessing the collecting system.

Pre-percutaneous nephrolithotomy opacification for caliceal diverticular calculi

Caliceal diverticula harbor calculi in as many as 50% of cases. Such stones rarely pass spontaneously. Various stone-removal techniques have been used, with percutaneous techniques generally having the best results. In patients with nonradiopaque stones or in whom the diverticulum does not opacify when contrast is instilled retrograde or by intravenous urogram, contrast can be instilled directly into the cavity with CT or ultrasound guidance. Three such cases are described, with good results.

Ureteroscopy for Symptomatic Hydrocalices: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Hydrocalix is an uncommon condition that typically is treated with percutaneous dilation of the stenotic infundibulum. Ureteroscopy has the advantage of minimizing invasiveness.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with 12 retrograde ureteroscopies for hydrocalix in 10 patients.

RESULTS

Access to the hydrocalix could not be achieved in one. Of the remaining 11, the original infundibulum was dilated in all but one, in whom neoinfundibulotomy was performed with a laser. The laser was used in eight cases, balloon dilation with cautery in two, and cautery alone in one. Of the seven hydrocalices bearing stones, four were rendered stone free. Immediate symptomatic success was achieved after 6 of the 11 evaluable procedures (one patient was lost to follow-up after a technically successful procedure). Of the five symptomatic failures, three went on to additional treatment (one ureteroscopy and two percutaneous), one elected against treatment despite recurrence of stenosis, and one had persistent pain owing to stones even though the hydrocalix was cured. Of the six symptomatic successes, three were without symptoms at a mean 25 months of follow-up, two have had recurrences necessitating additional treatment (both percutaneous) a mean of 51 months later, and one did not have adequate imaging follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Ureteroscopy for hydrocalix achieved technical success in most patients, but relief of symptoms followed only about half of the procedures. A trial of ureteroscopy does not preclude subsequent success with a percutaneous approach. Ureteroscopy is a reasonable option for hydrocalix for patients who wish to avoid percutaneous surgery.

Metabolic abnormalities associated with calyceal diverticular stones

OBJECTIVE

To review the metabolic analyses of patients with calyceal diverticular stones who had surgical treatment of their calculi and to examine the effect of selective medical therapy on stone recurrence, as recent reports suggest that metabolic abnormalities contribute to stone development.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 37 patients who had endoscopic treatment of symptomatic calyceal diverticular calculi were retrospectively reviewed. Stone composition and initial 24-h urine collections (24-h urinary volumes, pH, calcium, sodium, uric acid, oxalate, citrate, and the number of abnormalities/patient per collection) were compared with 20 randomly selected stone-forming patients (controls) with no known anatomical abnormalities. Stone formation rates before and after the start of medical therapy were calculated in the patients available for follow-up.

RESULTS

Twelve of the diverticulum patients (five men and seven women) had complete 24-h urine collections, all of whom had at least one metabolic abnormality. Seven patients had hypercalciuria, four had hyperuricosuria and three had mild hyperoxaluria. The most common abnormality was a low urine volume; 11 of the 12 patients had urine volumes of <2000 mL/day (range 350-1950). Ten patients had hypocitraturia in at least one of the two 24-h urine samples; seven had low urinary citrate levels (172-553 mg/day) on both samples. The findings were similar in the control group. The diverticulum patients had 3.1 abnormalities/patient, and the controls had 2.9 abnormalities/patient (P > 0.05). No patients had gouty diathesis and none developed cystine stones. Stone analyses were similar in the two groups; both developed either calcium oxalate or mixed calcium oxalate/calcium phosphate stones. Six patients were followed for a mean of 23.1 months while on selective medical therapy; only one passed any additional stones, thought to be existing calculi, for a remission rate of five of six (83%).

CONCLUSIONS

All patients with symptomatic calyceal diverticular stones who had comprehensive metabolic evaluation had metabolic abnormalities. There were similar abnormalities in the control random stone-formers. The abnormalities were corrected with selective medical therapy, as shown by the high remission rate. We recommend that, for patients with symptomatic calyceal diverticular calculi, a metabolic evaluation should be considered to determine stone forming risk factors.

Evaluation of the mechanisms of damage to flexible ureteroscopes and suggestions for ureteroscope preservation

AIM

To investigate the causes and costs of flexible ureteroscope damage, and to develop recommendations to limit damage.

METHODS

The authors analysed repair figures and possible causes of damage to 35 instruments sent for repair to a leading UK supplier over a 1-year period, and calculated cost figures for maintenance of the instruments as opposed to repair and replacement costs.

RESULTS

All damages were handling-induced and therefore did not fall under the manufacturer's warranty: 28 % were damaged by misfiring of the laser inside the instrument; 72 %, mainly crushing and stripping of the ureteroscope shaft tube, were likely to have occurred during out-of-surgery handling, washing and disinfection. Seventeen (4 %) instruments were not repaired and consequently taken out of service due to the extensive costs involved. Eighteen (51 %) ureteroscopes were repaired at an average cost of 10 833 USD.

CONCLUSION

Damages to flexible ureteroscopes bear considerable costs. Most damages occur during handling between surgical procedures. Thorough adherence to handling procedures, and courses for theater staff and surgeons on handling flexible instruments may help to reduce these damages and prove a cost-saving investment. The authors provide a list of recommended procedural measures that may help to prevent such damages.

Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of ureteral access sheaths (UASs) on stone-free rates (SFRs) during ureteroscopic treatment of renal calculi. Several advantages of UASs during flexible ureteroscopy have been documented. However, no study has evaluated their impact on SFRs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all ureteroscopic cases for the management of renal stones performed at our Stone Center. Data were stratified according to the use or lack of use of the UAS. The groups were stratified by stone location within the kidney. Stone-free status was determined at 2 months postoperatively by either intravenous urography with tomograms or noncontrast renal computed tomography in patients with contrast allergies.

RESULTS

A total of 256 ureteroscopic procedures for the removal of renal calculi were performed between 1997 and 2003 (173 with UAS and 83 without). The groups were similar in age, sex, and stone burden. Stents were placed in nearly 80% of patients. The lower renal pole represented the most common presenting location. Stone displacement with a ureteroscopic basket for efficient fragmentation was necessary in 34%. The overall SFR in the UAS group and non-UAS group was 79% and 67%, respectively (P = 0.042). The SFRs were improved for calculi in all portions of the kidney.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to facilitating ureteroscopic access, reducing costs, and lowering intrarenal pressures, the results of the current study suggest that UASs improve SFRs during the management of renal calculi. It is now our current practice to use the UAS routinely during ureteroscopic treatment of renal and upper ureteral calculi.

Laparoscopy-Assisted Transperitoneal Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Caliceal Diverticular Calculi

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are a variety of options for the management of symptomatic calculi in caliceal diverticula, each with utility in particular situations. Herein, we describe a laparoscopy-assisted transperitoneal percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) technique to address the unusual combination of an anterior caliceal diverticulum together with multiple branched calculi having segments both within and proximal to the diverticulum.

TECHNIQUE

With the patient in a modified lithotomy position, standard transperitoneal laparoscopy was performed utilizing three 10-mm trocars. After mobilization of the colon medially, the cystic diverticulum was opened. An additional 12-mm trocar was placed to allow transperitoneal PCNL within the diverticulum. Rigid nephroscopy, holmium laser lithotripsy, and stone extraction were performed, including laser enlargement of the diverticular neck and removal of the stone burden proximal to the neck. A double-pigtail ureteral stent and Jackson-Pratt drain were placed.

RESULTS

This procedure was successful in the only patient in whom it has been used to date. As far as we know, this is the first report of laparoscopy-assisted transperitoneal PCNL for the management of caliceal diverticular calculi.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy-assisted transperitoneal PCNL is a safe and effective alternative for the management of symptomatic stones in anterior cystic caliceal diverticula with a narrow neck and complex branched calculi.

PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY FOR CALICEAL DIVERTICULAR CALCULI: A NOVEL SINGLE STAGE APPROACH

PURPOSE

Current percutaneous treatment of symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculi involves renal access, stone removal, dilation of the diverticular communication, fulguration of the cavity and placement of a nephrostomy tube. We reviewed the outcomes of patients undergoing a novel single stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique for radiopaque caliceal diverticular stones that eliminates ureteral catheterization and entry into the renal collecting system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 21 patients (8 male and 13 female including 1 bilateral) with a mean age of 42.4 years underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticular stones from February 2001 to May 2003. Of the diverticula 12 were upper pole, 4 were interpolar and 6 were lower pole. Infracostal access was established by the urologist directly onto the radiopaque stones without the aid of a ureteral catheter. After balloon tract dilation a 30Fr Amplatz sheath was placed and following stone removal the diverticulum was fulgurated. The infundibulum was neither cannulated nor dilated. A 20Fr red rubber catheter or an 8.5Fr Cope loop was placed into the diverticulum. Stone-free status was assessed by noncontrast computerized tomography on postoperative day 1 (POD1). The drainage tube was removed if there was no urine drainage and the kidney was stone-free. Excretory urography was performed at 3 months to evaluate diverticular resolution.

RESULTS

Of 21 patients 20 were discharged home tubeless on POD1 and 18 of 21 (85.7%) renal units were stone- free on POD1 noncontrast computerized tomography. Mean operative time was 58.5 minutes and mean stone burden was 138.9 mm. Mean stone diameter was 11.6 mm and mean diverticular diameter was 15.3 mm. Of 22 renal units 16 had followup excretory urography. All diverticula decreased in size and 14 (87.5%) had complete resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with symptomatic radiopaque caliceal diverticular stones, a single stage procedure without the need for ureteral catheterization combined with direct infracostal diverticular puncture allows for a rapid procedure with little morbidity.

A large renal pelvic diverticulum, presenting incomplete excretion during tc-99m mag-3 scintigraphy and tracer accumulation on tc-99m dmsa scintigraphy; a case report

This case report illustrates the dynamic and static renal scintigraphic images of a patient with an unusual large diverticulum of the renal pelvis. The initial diagnosis by intravenous pyelography (IVP) and ultrasonographic (US) examination was a renal pelvic diverticulum of the left kidney, and the patient was referred to the nuclear medicine department for exploration of the effect of the pelvic diverticulum on renal functions. We performed dynamic renal scintigraphy with technetium-99m (Tc-99m) labeled mercaptoacetyl triglycine (MAG-3) and static renal scintigraphy with Tc-99m labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). In dynamic renal scintigraphy, bilaterally normal concentration function was observed. While right kidney excretion function was normal, an incomplete excretion pattern was seen on the left side. Complete urinary flow obstruction occurred approximately at the 10th minute of the acquisition, which did not seem to respond to the i.v. furosemide application. However, when only the renal cortex was included in the region of interest, the obstructive pattern disappeared. In static renal scintigraphy, a large renal pelvic diverticulum localized antero-medially was clearly visualized in the left-anterior oblique projection, most probably due to accumulation of radiopharmaceutical inside it. This case showed that a renal pelvic diverticulum should be thought of when an incomplete excretion pattern is seen on dynamic renal scintigraphy. Using only a cortical region of interest may also help to distinguish other types of obstructive pattern from diverticulum. Additionally, Tc-99m DMSA scintigraphy may show diverticulum localization with antero-oblique projections in addition to routine projections.

Management of Caliceal Diverticula

Although most caliceal diverticula are asymptomatic, they can be associated with pain, and concomitant calculi are common. When treatment is indicated, a variety of surgical options are available, although the management is often a challenge even to the most experienced surgeon. We review the indications, surgical options, and outcomes for the treatment of caliceal diverticula.

Advanced intrarenal ureteroscopic procedures

The role of flexible ureteroscopy in the management of intrarenal pathology has undergone a dramatic evolution, powered by improvements in flexible ureteroscope design; deflection and image quality; diversification of small, disposable instrumentation; and the use of holmium laser lithotripsy. This article reviews the application of flexible ureteroscopy for advanced intrarenal procedures.

Surgical management of the calyceal diverticulum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of calyceal diverticulum has evolved from an open surgical approach to a minimally invasive approach. Currently, the percutaneous, ureteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques are recommended by individual investigators. Recent studies have helped establish patient selection criteria for each of the above procedures. This review will discuss technique and results and suggest a treatment algorithm for the patient with a symptomatic calyceal diverticulum.

RECENT FINDINGS

Excellent long-term success has been reported with all three minimally invasive modalities. Percutaneous ablation of the calyceal diverticulum is the most established minimally invasive technique for this disorder. A direct puncture into the calyceal diverticulum is recommended. Limitations exist primarily for an anteriorly located diverticulum. In this situation, if the diverticulum is in a superior anterior calyx, a ureteroscopic approach is recommended while if the diverticulum is in a middle or lower pole calyx, a laparoscopic approach is recommended.

SUMMARY

This review suggests that experience and expertise in percutaneous, ureteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques provide the urologist with the best opportunity to individualize treatment approach based on location and size of the diverticulum. A treatment algorithm based on these parameters may be helpful in patient counseling and decision-making.