Shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones in patients with urinary diversion after radical cystectomy

The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis

Aims

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines are a set of recommendations for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating urolithiasis in the Saudi population. These guidelines are based on the latest evidence and expert consensus to improve patient outcomes and optimize care delivery. They cover the various aspects of urolithiasis, including risk factors, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatments, and prevention strategies. By following these guidelines, health-care professionals can improve care quality for individuals with urolithiasis in Saudi Arabia.

Panel

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel consists of urologists specialized in endourology with expertise in urolithiasis and consultation with a guideline methodologist. All panelists involved in this document have submitted statements disclosing any potential conflicts of interest.

Methods

The Saudi Guidelines on Urolithiasis were developed by relying primarily on established international guidelines to adopt or adapt the most appropriate guidance for the Saudi context. When necessary, the panel modified the phrasing of recommendations from different sources to ensure consistency within the document. To address areas less well covered in existing guidelines, the panel conducted a directed literature search for high quality evidence published in English, including meta analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective nonrandomized comparative studies. The panel also searched for locally relevant studies containing information unique to the Saudi Arabian population. The recommendations are formulated with a direction and strength of recommendation based on GRADE terminology and interpretation while relying on existing summaries of evidence from the existing guidelines.

Stones in special situations

There are several special situations in which urinary lithiasis presents management challenges to the urologist. An in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiology, unique anatomy, and treatment options is crucial in order to maintain good health in these patients. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the management of the following scenarios: bladder stones, stones in bowel disease, during pregnancy, in association with renal anomalies, with skeletal deformities, in urinary diversions, and in children.

Management of stones in abnormal situations

Stones in abnormal situations present a management conundrum to the urologist. Many of these situations are relatively rare and literature is scanty on the appropriate management. We review the current literature on the management of stones in the setting of pregnancy, calyceal diverticulum, urinary diversions, pelvic kidneys, transplant kidneys, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, horseshoe kidneys, and other renal anomalies. The aims of treatment are complete stone-free status. The modality of treatment should be individualized to the size and location of stone and type of abnormal situation confronted.

Treatment of upper urinary lithiasis in patients who have undergone urinary diversion

Patients undergoing urinary diversion are at high risk for developing stone disease due to the metabolic and structural features intrinsic to the creation of a urinary reservoir. The utilization of shockwave lithotripsy as well as antegrade and retrograde endoscopic techniques in appropriately selected patients affords a relatively safe and effective means of stone removal. This review focuses on the etiology of stone formation in patients with urinary diversion and examines the most relevant and current reports on expulsive techniques and their associated outcomes for patients within this population who develop upper urinary tract calculi.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and urinary diversion

OBJECTIVES

To present our experience with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with urinary diversion.

METHODS

Between March 1989 and June 2004, 27 patients with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion were treated using ESWL for upper urinary tract calculi using the Dornier MFL 5000 lithotripter. The mean length of the stones was 11 +/- 3.1 mm and the mean width was 8.8 +/- 3.5 mm. The follow-up protocol included plain abdominal x-ray and renal ultrasonography every 2 weeks until complete stone clearance. All follow-up data were collected and analyzed after 3 months. Success was defined as the absence of residual stones or the presence of insignificant gravel less than 4 mm.

RESULTS

Retreatment was required in 12 patients (44.4%). Failure to disintegrate the stones was recorded in 2 cases (7.4%) and significant residual stones were recorded in 1 (3.7%). Post-ESWL renal obstruction was observed in 2 cases (7.4%). Secondary procedures were needed in 5 cases (18.5%). Two percutaneous nephrolithotomy and one antegrade ureteroscopy were performed for treatment of ESWL failure. One open ureterolithotomy and one antegrade ureteroscopy were performed for treatment of post-ESWL renal obstruction. Thus, the overall success rate of ESWL monotherapy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones was 81.5% (22 of 27).

CONCLUSIONS

ESWL monotherapy proved to be a valuable option in the treatment of upper tract lithiasis in patients with urinary diversion. However, it may cause renal obstruction, and antegrade endoscopic maneuvers should be available.

Litotricia extracorpórea en litiasis en pacientes con derivación urinaria

We evaluate the efficacy of ESWL in the management of calculi in patients with urinary diversion. We treated 5 patients who suffered from urinary lithiasis after urinary diversion post cistectomy. We managed the patients with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in monotherapy with a Siemens Lithostar Modularis device. Mean stone size (long axis) was 1.95 cm (range 1 to 3.5 cm). The mean shockwave number per session was 2.6 per patient. Stone free result was 100%. We conclude that ESWL technique can provide acceptable results in patients with urinary diversion and can be used as first choice treatment in these type of patients due to its minimal morbidity and excellent results, equivalent to those achieved in patients without urinary diversion.