A triplex-mediated knot between separated polypurine-polypyrimidine tracts in circular DNA blocks transcription by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Molecular Knots

The first synthetic molecular trefoil knot was prepared in the late 1980s. However, it is only in the last few years that more complex small-molecule knot topologies have been realized through chemical synthesis. The steric restrictions imposed on molecular strands by knotting can impart significant physical and chemical properties, including chirality, strong and selective ion binding, and catalytic activity. As the number and complexity of accessible molecular knot topologies increases, it will become increasingly useful for chemists to adopt the knot terminology employed by other disciplines. Here we give an overview of synthetic strategies towards molecular knots and outline the principles of knot, braid, and tangle theory appropriate to chemistry and molecular structure.

Molecular knots in biology and chemistry

Knots and entanglements are ubiquitous. Beyond their aesthetic appeal, these fascinating topological entities can be either useful or cumbersome. In recent decades, the importance and prevalence of molecular knots have been increasingly recognised by scientists from different disciplines. In this review, we provide an overview on the various molecular knots found in naturally occurring biological systems (DNA, RNA and proteins), and those created by synthetic chemists. We discuss the current knowledge in these fields, including recent developments in experimental and, in some cases, computational studies which are beginning to shed light into the complex interplay between the structure, formation and properties of these topologically intricate molecules.

Topo IV is the topoisomerase that knots and unknots sister duplexes during DNA replication

DNA topology plays a crucial role in all living cells. In prokaryotes, negative supercoiling is required to initiate replication and either negative or positive supercoiling assists decatenation. The role of DNA knots, however, remains a mystery. Knots are very harmful for cells if not removed efficiently, but DNA molecules become knotted in vivo. If knots are deleterious, why then does DNA become knotted? Here, we used classical genetics, high-resolution 2D agarose gel electrophoresis and atomic force microscopy to show that topoisomerase IV (Topo IV), one of the two type-II DNA topoisomerases in bacteria, is responsible for the knotting and unknotting of sister duplexes during DNA replication. We propose that when progression of the replication forks is impaired, sister duplexes become loosely intertwined. Under these conditions, Topo IV inadvertently makes the strand passages that lead to the formation of knots and removes them later on to allow their correct segregation.

Analysis of distribution and significance of simple sequence repeats in enteric bacteria Shigella dysenteriae SD197

We have explored the possible role of SSR density in genome to generate biological information. In our study, we have checked the SSR (simple sequence repeats) status in virulent and non virulent genes of enteric bacteria to see whether the SSRs distribution contributes to virulence. The genome, plasmid and virulent genes sequences in fasta format were downloaded from NCBI GenBank and VFDB. The sequences were subjected to SSR analysis using software tool ssr.exe. The resulting data was pasted in excel sheet and further analyzed for percentage of each type of SSR. Higher nucleotide repeats have been observed in our study. Overall high density of SSRs can enhance antigenic variance of the pathogen population in a strategy that counteracts the host immune response. Frequency of A and T repeats is higher in the chromosome, plasmid and the virulence genes. However, in dinucleotide repeats the frequencies of GC/CG repeats are higher in genome, whereas plasmid has more of AT/TA repeats. Genome has trinucleotide repeats having predominantly G and C whereas plasmid has trinucleotide repeats having predominantly A and T. The repeat number obtained and percentage of repeats is higher in virulence genes as compared to other gene families. Due to the presence of this large number of SSRs, the organism has an enormous potential for generating this genomic and phenotypic diversity.

The c-MYC NHE III(1): function and regulation

c-MYC is an important regulator of a wide array of cellular processes necessary for normal cell growth and differentiation, and its dysregulation is one of the hallmarks of many cancers. Consequently, understanding c-MYC transcriptional activation is critical for understanding developmental and cancer biology, as well as for the development of new anticancer drugs. The nuclease hypersensitive element (NHE) III(1) region of the c-MYC promoter has been shown to be particularly important in regulating c-MYC expression. Specifically, the formation of a G-quadruplex structure appears to promote repression of c-MYC transcription. This review focuses on what is known about the formation of a G-quadruplex in the NHE III(1) region of the c-MYC promoter, as well as on those factors that are known to modulate its formation. Last, we discuss the development of small molecules that stabilize or induce the formation of G-quadruplex structures and could potentially be used as anticancer agents.

The importance of negative superhelicity in inducing the formation of G-quadruplex and i-motif structures in the c-Myc promoter: implications for drug targeting and control of gene expression

The importance of DNA supercoiling in transcriptional regulation has been known for many years, and more recently, transcription itself has been shown to be a source of this superhelicity. To mimic the effect of transcriptionally induced negative superhelicity, the G-quadruplex/i-motif-forming region in the c-Myc promoter was incorporated into a supercoiled plasmid. We show, using enzymatic and chemical footprinting, that negative superhelicity facilitates the formation of secondary DNA structures under physiological conditions. Significantly, these structures are not the same as those formed in single-stranded DNA templates. Together with the recently demonstrated role of transcriptionally induced superhelicity in maintaining a mechanosensor mechanism for controlling the firing rate of the c-Myc promoter, we provide a more complete picture of how c-Myc transcription is likely controlled. Last, these physiologically relevant G-quadruplex and i-motif structures, along with the mechanosensor mechanism for control of gene expression, are proposed as novel mechanisms for small molecule targeting of transcriptional control of c-Myc.

Sticky DNA, a self-associated complex formed at long GAA*TTC repeats in intron 1 of the frataxin gene, inhibits transcription

Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease caused by the expansion of GAA.TTC repeats in the first intron of the frataxin (X25) gene. FRDA patients carrying two expanded GAA.TTC repeats show very low levels of mature frataxin mRNA and protein. A novel type of unusual DNA structure, sticky DNA, was previously found in the expanded GAA.TTC repeats from FRDA patients. To evaluate the effect of sticky DNA on transcription, in vitro transcription studies of (GAA.TTC)(n) repeats (where n = 9-150) were carried out using T7 or SP6 RNA polymerase. When a gel-isolated sticky DNA template was transcribed, the amount of full-length RNA synthesized was significantly reduced compared with the transcription of the linear template. Surprisingly, transcriptional inhibition was observed not only for the sticky DNA template but also another DNA molecule used as an internal control in an orientation-independent manner. The molecular mechanism of transcriptional inhibition by sticky DNA was a sequestration of the RNA polymerases by direct binding to the complex DNA structure. Moreover, plasmids containing the (GAAGGA.TCCTTC)(65) repeat, which does not form sticky DNA, did not inhibit in vitro transcription, as expected. These results suggest that the role of sticky DNA in FRDA may be the sequestration of transcription factors.