Randomized trial of sequential administration of G-CSF and GM-CSF vs. G-CSF alone following peripheral blood progenitor cell autograft in solid tumors

High-risk early breast cancer in patients under 40 years of age: Improved clinical outcome with total estrogen blockade and tailored chemotherapy

This multicenter prospective trial assessed the outcome in 63 patients, 40 years of age or younger, with high-risk early breast cancer (HREBC), included in an ovarian protection study. The patients were treated with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) analogue administered for 5 years, tailored chemotherapy and an aromatase inhibitor, in estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) patients. T-regulatory cells (T-regs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured at baseline and yearly. The mean age of the patients was 36 years (range 26-40). Sixty-five percent had ER(+) tumors, 24% had negative axillary nodes with tumors >1 cm and high histological grade with lymphovascular invasion, while 76% had a mean of 3.6 positive axillary nodes (range 1-21). Serum estradiol was maintained at values <40 pg/ml in all of the patients. A statistically significant decrease in VEGF (P<0.0001) and T-regs (P<0.0001), with respect to baseline values, was observed after LH-RH administration. After a median follow-up of 110 months, the 10-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 86.1 and 89.7%, respectively. These data revealed that the administration of an LH-RH analogue to HREBC patients, followed by chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, decreased VEGF and T-regs and improved the expected clinical outcome.

2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline

PURPOSE

To update the 2000 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF).

UPDATE METHODOLOGY

The Update Committee completed a review and analysis of pertinent data published from 1999 through September 2005. Guided by the 1996 ASCO clinical outcomes criteria, the Update Committee formulated recommendations based on improvements in survival, quality of life, toxicity reduction and cost-effectiveness.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The 2005 Update Committee agreed unanimously that reduction in febrile neutropenia (FN) is an important clinical outcome that justifies the use of CSFs, regardless of impact on other factors, when the risk of FN is approximately 20% and no other equally effective regimen that does not require CSFs is available. Primary prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of FN in patients who are at high risk based on age, medical history, disease characteristics, and myelotoxicity of the chemotherapy regimen. CSF use allows a modest to moderate increase in dose-density and/or dose-intensity of chemotherapy regimens. Dose-dense regimens should only be used within an appropriately designed clinical trial or if supported by convincing efficacy data. Prophylactic CSF for patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma aged 65 years and older treated with curative chemotherapy (CHOP or more aggressive regimens) should be given to reduce the incidence of FN and infections. Current recommendations for the management of patients exposed to lethal doses of total body radiotherapy, but not doses high enough to lead to certain death due to injury to other organs, includes the prompt administration of CSF or pegylated G-CSF.

GM-CSF versus G-CSF: engraftment characteristics, resource utilization, and cost following autologous PBSC transplantation

BACKGROUND

G-CSF and GM-CSF have both been shown to decrease the time to hematopoietic recovery when administered after autologous BM or peripheral stem cell re-infusion. However, few studies have compared G-CSF and GM-CSF to determine which is the preferred myeloid growth factor.

METHODS

This study compares a prospectively accrued cohort of 22 patients receiving GM-CSF with a historical cohort of patients who received G-CSF commencing Day + 6 after autologous PBSC transplantation. Patients were matched based on disease type and stage, CD34(+) cell dose/kg, conditioning regimen, and prior treatment. Time to myeloid engraftment, growth factor utilization, antibiotic utilization, fever incidence, and cost were compared.

RESULTS

The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was similar in the two groups (ANC > 500 /mm(3), GM-CSF 12 versus G-CSF 11, P = 0.69). There was a trend towards more days of temperature > 38.0 masculine C (six versus three, P = 0.05) and febrile neutropenia (three versus two, P = 0.06) in the GM-CSF arm. There was a trend towards increased use of i.v. antibiotics in the GM-CSF cohort (7.6 days versus 5.5 days, P = 0.06). More chest X-rays (1.5 versus 1.0, P = 0.03) were ordered, and more blood cultures drawn (4.2 versus 2.7, P = 0.05) as part of fever evaluation in the group treated with GM-CSF. Resource utilization based on actual wholesale pricing (AWP) favored the G-CSF cohort. Applying a sensitivity analysis, GM-CSF became cost-effective when priced below $94 per 250 micro g, despite greater resource utilization.

DISCUSSION

This study suggests that engraftment characteristics are similar with GM-CSF and G-CSF following PBSC transplantation. Resource utilization for fever treatment and evaluation may be greater with GM-CSF. Determination of which agent is more cost-effective depends on institutional acquisition costs.