Radioimmunotherapy with 186Re-labeled monoclonal antibody to treat liver metastases of colon cancer cells in nude mice

Optimizing the pharmacokinetics of an 211At-labeled RGD peptide with an albumin-binding moiety via the administration of an albumin-binding inhibitor

PURPOSE

A probe for targeted alpha therapy (TAT) using the RGD peptide (Ga-DOTA-K([211At]APBA)-c(RGDfK) ([211At]1)) with albumin-binding moiety (ABM) was recently developed. [211At]1 highly accumulated in tumors and significantly inhibited tumor growth in U-87 MG tumor-bearing mice. However, high [211At]1 retention in blood may cause critical adverse events, such as hematotoxicity. Therefore, we attempted to accelerate the blood clearance of [211At]1 by competitively inhibiting the binding of [211At]1 to albumin to modulate the pharmacokinetics of the former.

METHODS

To evaluate the effects of albumin-binding inhibitors in normal mice, sodium 4-(4-iodophenyl)butanoate at 2, 5, or 10 molar equivalents of blood albumin was administered at 1-h postinjection of [211At]1. The biodistribution of [211At]1, SPECT/CT imaging of [67Ga]Ga-DOTA-K(IPBA)-c(RGDfK) ([67Ga]2), and the therapeutic effects of [211At]1 were compared with or without IPBA administration in U-87 MG tumor-bearing mice.

RESULTS

Blood radioactivity of [211At]1 was decreased in a dose-dependent manner with IPBA in normal mice. In U-87 MG tumor-bearing mice, the blood radioactivity and accumulation in nontarget tissues of [211At]1 were decreased by IPBA. Meanwhile, tumor [211At]1 accumulation was not changed at 3-h postinjection of IPBA. In SPECT/CT imaging of [67Ga]2, IPBA administration dramatically decreased radioactivity in nontarget tissues, and only tumor tissue was visualized. In therapeutic experiments, [211At]1 with IPBA injected-group significantly inhibited tumor growth compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

IPBA administration (as an albumin-binding inhibitor) could modulate the pharmacokinetics and enhance the therapeutic effects of [211At]1.

Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Antibody-Drug Conjugates against Cancer

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are ushering in the next era of targeted therapy against cancer. An ADC for cancer therapy consists of a potent cytotoxic payload that is attached to a tumour-targeted antibody by a chemical linker, usually with an average drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 3.5-4. The theory is to deliver potent cytotoxic payloads directly to tumour cells while sparing healthy cells. However, practical application has proven to be more difficult. At present there are only two ADCs approved for clinical use. Nevertheless, in the last decade there has been an explosion of options for ADC engineering to optimize target selection, Fc receptor interactions, linker, payload and more. Evaluation of these strategies requires an understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of ADC pharmacokinetics. Development of ADCs for use in cancer further requires an understanding of tumour properties and kinetics within the tumour environment, and how the presence of cancer as a disease will impact distribution and elimination. Key pharmacokinetic considerations for the successful design and clinical application of ADCs in oncology are explored in this review, with a focus on the mechanistic determinants of distribution and elimination.

Localization of radiolabeled anti-CEA antibody in subcutaneous and intrahepatic colorectal xenografts: influence of tumor size and location within host organ on antibody uptake

INTRODUCTION

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has been shown to be more effective against solid tumor micrometastases, possibly due to an inverse relationship between tumor size and radiolabeled antibody uptake. In this study, the accretion of radiolabeled antibody in intrahepatic micrometastases in an experimental model was investigated using quantitative digital autoradiography, enabling the analysis of antibody uptake in microscopic tumors.

METHODS

Mice bearing subcutaneous or intrahepatic metastatic models of LS174T colorectal cancer were injected with radiolabeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody ([(125)I]A5B7). Tissues were taken to investigate distribution of radionuclide and tumor uptake. In a therapy study, mice bearing intrahepatic metastatic tumors were injected with [(131)I]A5B7.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous tumors and large metastatic deposits had similar uptake (e.g., approximately 15%ID/g at 24 h). Small metastatic deposits had higher uptake (e.g., approximately 80%ID/g at 24 h) and prolonged retention at later time points. Small deposit uptake was significantly reduced by accompanying large deposits in the same liver. RIT resulted in increased survival time (untreated mean survival of 21.6+/-12.9 vs. treated mean survival of 39.1+/-30.8 days), but there was a large range of response within groups, presumably due to variation in pattern and extent of tumor as observed in the biodistribution study. Liver function tests and body weight did not change with tumor growth or therapy response, strongly supporting the use of in vivo imaging in metastatic tumor therapy studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Radioimmunodetection and therapy might be greatly influenced by the size and distribution of intrahepatic tumor deposits.

Locoreginal radioimmunotherapy with Re-labeled monoclonal antibody in treating small peritoneal carcinomatosis of colon cancer in mice in comparison with I-counterpart

The efficacy of locoregional radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in treating peritoneal tumors of colon cancer of <2 mm in diameter was examined at maximum tolerated doses, focusing the comparison between 186Re and 131I labeled to an anti-colorectal cancer IgG1. Estimated radiation doses to tumors were considerably higher with 186Re-RIT than with 131I-RIT. The advantage of 186Re-RIT decreased with decreasing tumor size, but 186Re-RIT delivered 1.6-times higher radiation to tumors of 1 mm. Consequently, 186Re-RIT attained better survival of mice than 131I-RIT or chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil did. Therefore, locoregional 186Re-RIT may be an option in an adjuvant setting of colon cancer with high risk of peritoneal dissemination.

Intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis of colon cancer in mice compared with systemic radioimmunotherapy

Peritoneal spread is one of major causes of mortality in colorectal cancer patients. In the current investigation, the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with i.p. administration of an anti-colorectal cancer IgG1, 131I-A7, was compared to that with i.v. administration in BALB/c female mice bearing peritoneal nodules of LS180 human colon cancer cells, at the same toxicity level. Distribution of either i.p. or i.v. administered 131I-A7 and i.p. administered irrelevant 131I-HPMS-1 was assessed. Based on the results of toxicity determination at increments of 2 MBq and estimated dosimetry, an i.p. dose of 11 MBq and an i.v. dose of 9 MBq were chosen for treatment. Mice were monitored for long-term survival: untreated mice (n = 11), mice undergoing i.p. RIT with 131I-A7 (n = 11), mice undergoing i.v. RIT with 131I-A7 (n = 11) and mice undergoing non-specific i.p. RIT with 131I-HPMS-1 (n = 5). Intraperitoneal injection of 131I-A7 produced faster and greater tumor accumulation than i.v. injection: 34.2 +/- 16.5% of the injected dose per g (% ID/g) and 11.1 +/- 3.6% ID/g at 2 h, respectively (P < 0.0001). Consequently, cumulative radioactivity in tumors was 1.73-fold higher with i.p. injection. 131I-HPMS-1 did not show specific accumulation. Non-specific RIT with 131I-HPMS-1 (mean survival, 26.0 +/- 2.5 days) did not affect the survival as compared to no treatment (26.7 +/- 1.9 days). Intravenous RIT with 131I-A7 prolonged the survival of mice to 32.8 +/- 1.8 days (P < 0.01). Intraperitoneal RIT with 131I-A7 improved the survival more significantly and attained cure in 2 of 11 mice (P < 0.05 vs. i.v. RIT). In conclusion, i.p. RIT is more beneficial in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis of colon cancer than i.v. RIT in a murine model.