Serum cytokines in metastatic melanoma patients treated with an autologous tumor vaccine

In vivo profiling reveals immunomodulatory effects of sorafenib and dacarbazine on melanoma

Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor used alone or in combination with dacarbazine to treat metastasized melanoma. Our study investigated the relationship between metabolic response assessed by PET-CT and global transcriptome changes during sorafenib and dacarbazine therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. We conducted an open-label, investigator-initiated study that enrolled 13 sorafenib-naïve Stage IV melanoma patients, whose metastases were accessible for repeated biopsies. Treatment regimen included orally administered sorafenib and intravenous dacarbazine. Biopsies of skin or superficial lymph node metastases were taken before treatment (baseline), during sorafenib and after dacarbazine therapy and used for transcriptional profiling and validation experiments. Serum samples were evaluated for cytokine production. Metabolic response to therapy was observed in 45.5% of patients. The study drugs were well tolerated. We observed a clear upregulation of interferon (IFN)-stimulated immune response genes in profiled metastases. The IFNγ-induced gene signature seemed to be enhanced after addition of dacarbazine to sorafenib. Serum IFNγ also increased during therapy, particularly after addition of dacarbazine. Induction of IFNγ stimulated genes correlating with increased serum IFNγ was predictive of better clinical outcome and responders who had significantly higher serum IFNγ levels lived longer. Our data reveal in situ changes in melanoma metastases during treatment with sorafenib and dacarbazine and suggest an additional mechanism of action through immunomodulation.

Immune-related biomarkers for diagnosis/prognosis and therapy monitoring of cutaneous melanoma

Skin melanoma, a life-threatening disease, has a recently reported worldwide increase in incidence, despite primary prevention. Skin melanoma statistics emphasize the need for finding markers related to the immune response of the host. The mechanisms that are able to over-power the local immune surveillance comprise molecules that can be valuable markers for diagnosis and prognosis. This article summarizes the immune markers that can monitor the disease stage and evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Recent data regarding immunotherapy are presented in the context of tumor escape from immune surveillance and the immune molecules that are both targets and a means of monitoring. Perspectives for developing immune interventions for skin melanoma management and the position of tissue or soluble immune markers as a diagnostic/prognostic panel are evaluated. State-of-the-art technology is emphasized for developing immune molecular signatures for a complex characterization of the patient's immunological status.

Patient-Specific Vaccines Derived from Autologous Tumor Cell Lines as Active Specific Immunotherapy: Results of Exploratory Phase I/II Trials in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Seventy-four (74) patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with patient-specific vaccines derived from autologous tumor cell lines. Cryopreserved irradiated tumor cells were injected weekly for 3 weeks, then monthly for 5 months. At a median follow up >6 years, the median event-free survival (EFS) was 4.5 months, with 13 patients alive and progression free 6-12 years later. Median overall survival (OS) was 20.5 months, with 29% 5-year OS. Tumor response rate was 9% among the 35 patients with evaluable disease who received at least 3 injections. Better survival was observed for patients who had minimal rather than clinically evident metastatic disease at the time vaccine therapy was initiated (5-yr OS 47% vs. 13%; p < 0.0001), received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and/or interferon gamma as an adjuvant (5-yr EFS 26% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001) or received an average of <7 million cells for each of the first 3 injections, compared to those who received 7-11.9 million or >12 million cells per injection (5-yr EFS OS 35% vs. 24%; p = 0.041 and p = 0.034). There was a trend toward better EFS for those who had a positive delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction to an intradermal injection of 1 million irradiated tumor cells at baseline, or converted to positive after 3 injections, compared to those whose DTH remained negative (5-yr EFS 39% vs. 18%; p = 0.159). This treatment approach is feasible, produces minimal toxicity, and is associated with longterm survival in a significant proportion of patients.