Percutaneous Endoscopic Colostomy of the Left Colon: A New Technique for the Management of Intractable Chronic Constipation

How do we define therapy-resistant constipation in children aged 4-18 years old? A systematic review with meta-narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Therapy-resistant constipation often is a frustrating clinical entity recognised by the persistence of infrequent and painful bowel movements faecal incontinence and abdominal pain despite intensive treatment. It is important to clearly define therapy-resistant constipation before children are subjected to invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

AIM

To conduct a systematic review determining how paediatric interventional studies define therapy-resistant constipation.

METHOD

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, WHO ICTR and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies that included patients with therapy-resistant constipation were identified. Data were extracted on criteria used for defining therapy-resistant constipation and reported using a meta-narrative approach highlighting areas of convergence and divergence in the findings.

RESULTS

A total of 1553 abstracts were screened in duplicate, and 47 studies were included in the review. There were at least seven definitions used in the paediatric literature to define medically resistant constipation. The term intractable was used in 24 articles and 21 used the term refractory to describe therapy-resistant constipation. Out of them, only 14 articles have attempted to provide an explicit definition including a predefined time and prior therapy. There were 10 studies without a clear definition for therapy-resistant constipation. The duration before being diagnosed as therapy-resistant constipation varied from 1 months to 2 years among studies. Seven studies employed the Rome criteria (Rome III or Rome IV) to characterising constipation while five adopted the Rome III and European and North American paediatric societies definition of paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition guideline of management of constipation in children.

CONCLUSION

The current literature has no explicit definition for therapy-resistant constipation in children. There is a need for a detailed consensus definition to ensure consistency of future research and to avoid unnecessary and maybe even harmful, invasive diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

The first 5-year follow up of distal antegrade continence enema stomas

AIM

We investigated 5-year results of distal sites for antegrade continence enemas (DACE).

METHODS

Patients with DACE sites placed more than 5 years previously were identified. Details of procedures were obtained. Parents, and patients over 18, were telephoned and asked to answer a standardised questionnaire.

RESULTS

31 patients were identified. Median age at DACE placement was 7 years (range 3-20). Median follow up was 92 months (range 66-145). 22 tubes were placed endoscopically, 7 were placed at open surgery and 2 at laparoscopic surgery. 28 responses to the telephone questionnaire were obtained. Of these, 15 were still using their DACE and 13 had stopped. Of those who had ceased washouts: 7 reported resolution of symptoms, 4 had a colostomy, 1 an ileostomy and 1 patient had abandoned their DACE. In patients using their stoma, washouts took a median of 5 min, with a median time to result of 25 min. 10 patients reported no soiling, 4 monthly and 1 daily soiling. Median satisfaction score was 8/10 (range 1-10/10). 24 (85%) said that they would recommend a DACE.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of 5-year follow up of a series of patients performing DACE washouts. The results are encouraging.

Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy of the left colon: a new technique for management of intractable constipation in children

BACKGROUND

The antegrade colonic enema is accepted as effective for management of intractable constipation in children when conventional bowel management has failed. This study describes experience with a new, minimally invasive technique, the distal antegrade colonic enema, which involves percutaneous endoscopic colostomy of the left colon.

METHODS

Fifteen children with refractory constipation and soiling who had radiographic evidence of megarectum and/or distal colonic delay were selected for the procedure. The junction of the descending and the sigmoid colon was identified colonoscopically, and the percutaneous endoscopic colostomy tube, through which antegrade distal colonic enema are administered, was inserted.

RESULTS

Fourteen children underwent distal percutaneous endoscopic colostomy insertion. The median time required for the procedure was 30 minutes (20-50 minutes). Excluding one child (technical difficulties with percutaneous endoscopic colostomy placement), median post-procedural hospital stay was 4 days (2-27 days). Thirteen children were no longer soiling, and improvement in quality of life was reported at 2 months' follow-up. At 6 months' follow-up, 90% of children were clean during intervals between enemas. All children evaluated at 12 months' follow-up remained clean. Median duration of follow-up was 12.5 months (2-51 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The distal percutaneous endoscopic colostomy is a simple alternative to established methods for delivery of antegrade enemas. It is less invasive and on reversal leaves only minor scarring.