The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: a registry of 558 patients

Therapeutic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)-Is There Something Between PPI and Fundoplication? An Overview

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects millions globally, with traditional treatments like proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and surgical fundoplication presenting challenges such as long-term medication dependency and disturbing long term side effects following surgery. This review explores emerging, alternative therapies that offer less invasive, personalized alternatives for GERD management. Endoscopic approaches, including Stretta therapy, transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and endoscopic full-thickness plication (EFTP), demonstrate promising but also controversial outcomes in symptom relief and reduced acid exposure. Laparoscopic electrical stimulation therapy (EndoStim®) and the LINX® magnetic sphincter augmentation system address LES dysfunction, while endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy and/or ablation techniques aim to construct a sufficient acid barrier. The RefluxStop™ device offers structural solutions to GERD pathophysiology with intriguing results in initial studies. Despite promising results, further research is required to establish long-term efficacy, safety, and optimal patient selection criteria for these novel interventions. This review underscores the importance of integrating emerging therapies into a tailored, multidisciplinary approach to GERD treatment.

Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease using radiofrequency ablation (Stretta procedure): An interim analysis of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common chronic gastrointestinal disorder, affecting one third of the population worldwide. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in Stretta therapy in view of potential long-term side effects of PPIs and the durability of relief with fundoplication.

METHOD

Prospective randomized study comparing the Stretta treatment with controls receiving PPIs. Patient (> 18 years, n = 20) with symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, abnormal esophageal acid exposure (≥ 4%), and endoscopically confirmed esophagitis were included into the study. The primary measure was improvement in quality of life (QOL) and decrease in the frequency and severity of GERD symptoms.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 39 (± 15) years and controls were 34 (± 11) years. Three months after Stretta, 80% reported improvement in QOL compared to 40% in the control group. At the end of 3 months, significant (p < 0.05) improvement in GERD symptom score for heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, and cough compared with the control group was observed. After Stretta treatment, 60% of the patients were free of PPIs whereas there was no change in the control group. Almost 80% of the patients on Stretta treatment were satisfied with the treatment compared to 30% of the patients in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Stretta was effective in the short-term for the management of GERD.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and prospective cohort efficacy studies of endoscopic radiofrequency for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic radiofrequency procedure (Stretta) has been used for more than a decade to treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the efficacy of the procedure in improving objective and subjective clinical endpoints needs to be further established.

AIM

To determine the efficacy of the Stretta procedure in treating patients with GERD, using a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and cohort studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases for English language clinical studies of the Stretta procedure, published from inception until May 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that included the use of the Stretta procedure in GERD patients were included. A generalized inverse weighting was used for all outcomes. Results were calculated by both fixed effects and random effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies (4 RCTs, 23 cohort studies, and 1 registry) representing 2468 unique Stretta patients were included in the meta-analysis. The (unweighted) mean follow-up time for the 28 studies was 25.4 [14.0, 36.7] months. The pooled results showed that the Stretta reduced (improved) the health-related quality of life score by -14.6 [-16.48, -12.73] (P < 0.001). Stretta also reduced (improved) the pooled heartburn standardized score by -1.53 [-1.97, -1.09] (P < 0.001). After Stretta treatment, only 49% of the patients using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at baseline required PPIs at follow-up (P < 0.001). The Stretta treatment reduced the incidence of erosive esophagitis by 24% (P < 0.001) and reduced esophageal acid exposure by a mean of -3.01 [-3.72, -2.30] (P < 0.001). Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure was increased post Stretta therapy by a mean of 1.73 [-0.29, 3.74] mmHg (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The Stretta procedure significantly improves subjective and objective clinical endpoints, except LES basal pressure, and therefore should be considered as a viable alternative in managing GERD.

Sleeve gastrectomy and anti-reflux procedures

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an epidemic in the USA that continues to grow, becoming a leading cause of premature avoidable death. Bariatric surgery has become an effective solution for obesity and its comorbidities, and one of the most commonly utilized procedures, the sleeve gastrectomy, can lead to an increase in gastroesophageal reflux following the operation. While these data are controversial, sometimes operative intervention can be necessary to provide durable relief for this problem.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature review examining the different methods of anti-reflux procedures that are available both before and after a sleeve gastrectomy.

RESULTS

We reviewed several different types of anti-reflux procedures, including those that supplement the lower esophageal sphincter anatomy, such as magnetic sphincter augmentation and radiofrequency ablation procedures. Re-operation was also discussed as a possible treatment of reflux in sleeve gastrectomy, especially if the original sleeve becomes dilated or if a conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion is deemed necessary. Sleeve gastrectomy with concomitant anti-reflux procedure was also reviewed, including the anti-reflux gastroplasty, hiatal hernia repair, and limited fundoplication.

CONCLUSION

A number of techniques can be used to mitigate the severity of reflux, either by maintaining the normal anatomic structures that limit reflux or by supplementing these structures with a plication or gastroplasty. Individuals with existing severe reflux should not be considered for a sleeve gastrectomy. New techniques that incorporate plication at the time of the index sleeve gastrectomy show some improvement, but these are in small series that will need to be further evaluated. The only proven method of treating intractable reflux after sleeve gastrectomy is conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

2014 SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference: advances in diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease affects at least 10 % of people in Western societies and produces troublesome symptoms and impairs patients' quality of life. The effective management of GERD is imperative as the diagnosis places a significant cost burden on the United States healthcare system with annual direct cost estimates exceeding 9 billion dollars annually. While effective for many patients, 30-40 % of patients receiving medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors experience troublesome breakthrough symptoms, and recent evidence suggests that this therapy subjects patients to increased risk of complications. Given the high cost of PPI therapy, patients are showing a decrease in willingness to continue with a therapy that provides incomplete relief; however, due to inconsistent outcomes and concern for procedure-related side effects following surgery, only 1 % of the GERD population undergoes anti-reflux surgery annually. The discrepancy between the number of patients who experience suboptimal medical treatment and the number considered for anti-reflux surgery indicates a large therapeutic gap in the management of GERD. The objective of the SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference was to examine technologic advances in the diagnosis and treatment of GERD and to evaluate the ways in which we assess the outcomes of these therapies to provide optimal patient care.

Long-term outcomes of patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease following a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common digestive disease, affecting one third of the world's population. The minimally invasive endoscopic Stretta procedure is being increasingly used as an alternative strategy to manage refractory GERD. However, long-term benefits of this procedure have to be further evaluated in clinical settings. This prospective observational study was therefore conducted to evaluate the outcome of patients with refractory GERD 5 years after the Stretta procedure.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients with refractory GERD underwent the Stretta procedure in our department between April 2007 and September 2008. They were followed up for 5 years, during which the primary outcome measures including symptom scores of heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, cough and asthma and the secondary outcome measures including proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and patients' satisfaction were analysed at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 152 patients, 138 completed the designated 5-year follow-up and were included in the final analysis. At the end of the 5-year follow-up, the symptom scores of heartburn (2.47 ± 1.22 vs. 5.86 ± 1.52), regurgitation (2.23 ± 1.30 vs. 5.56 ± 1.65), chest pain (2.31 ± 0.76 vs. 4.79 ± 1.59), cough (3.14 ± 1.43 vs. 6.62 ± 1.73) and asthma (3.26 ± 1.53 vs. 6.83 ± 1.46) were all significantly decreased as compared with the corresponding values before the procedure (P < 0.001). After the Stretta procedure, 59 (42.8%) patients achieved complete PPI therapy independence and 104 (75.4%) patients were completely or partially satisfied with the GERD symptom control. Moreover, no severe complications were observed except for complaint of abdominal distention in 12 (8.7%) patients after the Stretta procedure.

CONCLUSION

The Stretta procedure may achieve an effective and satisfactory long-term symptom control and considerably reduce the reliance on medication without significant adverse effects in adult patients with refractory GERD, thereby having profound clinical implications.

Long-term outcomes of patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease following a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common digestive disease, affecting one third of the world's population. The minimally invasive endoscopic Stretta procedure is being increasingly used as an alternative strategy to manage refractory GERD. However, long-term benefits of this procedure have to be further evaluated in clinical settings. This prospective observational study was therefore conducted to evaluate the outcome of patients with refractory GERD 5 years after the Stretta procedure.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients with refractory GERD underwent the Stretta procedure in our department between April 2007 and September 2008. They were followed up for 5 years, during which the primary outcome measures including symptom scores of heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, cough and asthma and the secondary outcome measures including proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and patients' satisfaction were analysed at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 152 patients, 138 completed the designated 5-year follow-up and were included in the final analysis. At the end of the 5-year follow-up, the symptom scores of heartburn (2.47 ± 1.22 vs. 5.86 ± 1.52), regurgitation (2.23 ± 1.30 vs. 5.56 ± 1.65), chest pain (2.31 ± 0.76 vs. 4.79 ± 1.59), cough (3.14 ± 1.43 vs. 6.62 ± 1.73) and asthma (3.26 ± 1.53 vs. 6.83 ± 1.46) were all significantly decreased as compared with the corresponding values before the procedure (P < 0.001). After the Stretta procedure, 59 (42.8%) patients achieved complete PPI therapy independence and 104 (75.4%) patients were completely or partially satisfied with the GERD symptom control. Moreover, no severe complications were observed except for complaint of abdominal distention in 12 (8.7%) patients after the Stretta procedure.

CONCLUSION

The Stretta procedure may achieve an effective and satisfactory long-term symptom control and considerably reduce the reliance on medication without significant adverse effects in adult patients with refractory GERD, thereby having profound clinical implications.

Long-term cost-effectiveness of medical, endoscopic and surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The long-term cost effectiveness of medical, endoscopic, and operative treatments for adults with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains unclear. We sought to estimate the cost effectiveness of medical, endoscopic, and operative treatments for adults with GERD who require daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy.

METHODS

A Markov model was generated from the payer's perspective using a 6-month cycle and 30-year time horizon. The base-case patient was a 45-year-old man with symptomatic GERD taking 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily. Four treatment strategies were analyzed: PPI therapy, transoral incisionless fundoplication (EsophyX), radiofrequency energy application to the lower esophageal sphincter (Stretta) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. The model parameters were selected using the published literature and institutional billing data. The main outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained) for each therapy.

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, which assumed a PPI cost of $234 over 6 months ($39 per month), Stretta and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication were the most cost-effective options over a 30-year time period ($2,470.66 and $5,579.28 per QALY gained, respectively). If the cost of PPI therapy exceeded $90.63 per month over 30 years, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication became the dominant treatment option. EsophyX was dominated by laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at all points in time.

CONCLUSION

Low-cost PPIs, Stretta, and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication all represent cost-effective treatment strategies. In this model, when PPIs exceed $90 per month, medical therapy is no longer cost effective. Procedural GERD therapy should be considered for patients who require high-dose or expensive PPIs.

Durability of Stretta Radiofrequency Treatment for GERD: Results of an 8-Year Follow-Up

From June 2002 to March 2013 26 patients that underwent Stretta procedure (16 females, 10 males) reached to date an eight-year follow-up. Primary end point of the study was to verify the durability of the procedure at this time. All patients underwent clinical evaluation by upper endoscopy, oesophageal pressure, and pH studies. For each patient 8-year data were compared to those recorded at baseline and at 4 years. There was a significant decrease in both heartburn and GERD HRQL scores at 4 years (P = 0.001) and at 8 years (P = 0.003) as well as a significant increase of QoL scores at each control time (mental SF-36 and physical SF-36, P = 0.001). After 4 and 8 years, 21 patients (80.7%, P = 0.0001) and 20 patients (76.9%, P = 0.0001) were completely off PPIs. Median LES pressure did not show significant amelioration at 4 and 8 years and mean oesophageal acid exposure significantly improved at 4 years (P = 0.001) but returned to baseline values after 8 years. This further follow-up study of ours from four to eight years confirms that RF energy delivery for GERD provides durable improvement in symptoms and in quality of life and reduces antireflux drugs consumption.

Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter reduces esophageal acid exposure and improves GERD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Studies of endoscopic application of radiofrequency energy to the lower esophageal sphincter for gastroesophageal reflux control have produced conflicting reports of its effectiveness. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies to assess the impact of this treatment.

METHODS

Twenty studies were included. Outcomes analyzed included gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptom assessment, quality of life, esophageal pH, and esophageal manometry.

RESULTS

A total of 1441 patients from 18 studies were included. Radiofrequency treatment improved heartburn scores (P=0.001), and produced improvements in quality of life as measured by GERD-health-related quality-of-life scale (P=0.001) and quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia score (P=0.001). Esophageal acid exposure decreased from a preprocedure Johnson-DeMeester score of 44.4 to 28.5 (P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation of the lower esophageal sphincter produces significant improvement in reflux symptoms and may represent an alternative to medical treatment and surgical fundoplication in select patients.

Long-Term Results of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery for the Treatment of GERD: Results of a Prospective 48-Month Study

Since 2000, radiofrequency (RF) energy treatment has been increasingly offered as an alternative option to invasive surgical procedures for selected patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Out of 69 patients treated since June 2002 to December 2007 with the Stretta procedure, 56 of them reached by the end of 2010 a 48-month followup. RF treatment significantly improved heartburn scores, GERD-specific quality of life scores, and general quality of life scores at 24 and 48 months in 52 out of 56 patients (92,8%). At each control time both mean heartburn and GERD HRQL scores decreased (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003, resp.) and both mental SF-36 and physical SF-36 ameliorated (P = 0.001 and 0.05, resp.). At 48 months, 41 out of 56 patients (72,3%) were completely off PPIs. Morbidity was minimal, with only one relevant but transient complication. According to other literature data, this study shows that RF delivery to LES is safe and durably improves symptoms and quality of life in well-selected GERD patients.

Improvement of clinical parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease after radiofrequency energy delivery

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of Stretta procedure with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) based on symptom control, medication changes and oesophagitis grade.

METHODS: Ninety patients with a history of GERD underwent Stretta procedure from June 2007 to March 2010. All patients with GERD diagnosed by the presence of endoscopically evidenced oesophagitis or abnormal esophageal pH testing. We evaluated GERD-health-related quality of life, satisfaction, medication use and endoscopy at baseline, 6, 12 mo after treatment. Complications of the procedure were analyzed.

RESULTS: We found that patients experienced significant changes in symptoms of GERD after Stretta procedure. The onset of GERD symptom relief was less than 2 mo (70.0%) or 2 to 6 mo (16.7%). The mean GERD-HRQL score was 25.6 (baseline), 7.3 (6 mo, P < 0.01), and 8.1 (12 mo, P < 0.01).The mean heartburn score was 3.3 (baseline), and 1.2 (12 mo, P < 0.05). The percentage of patients with satisfactory GERD control improved from 31.1% at baseline to 86.7% after treatment, and patient satisfaction improved from 1.4 at baseline to 4.0 at 12 mo (P < 0.01). Medication usage decreased significantly from 100% of patients on proton pump inhibitors therapy at baseline to 76.7% of patients showing elimination of medications or only as needed use of antacids/H2-RA at 12 mo. An improvement in endoscopic grade of oesophagitis was seen in 33 of the 41 patients. All patients had either no erosions or only mild erosive disease (grade A) at 6 mo.

CONCLUSION: The experience with Stretta procedure confirms that it is well tolerated, safe, effective and durable in the treatment of GERD. The Stretta procedure provides the drug-refractory patients with a new minimally invasive method.

Ensocopic-endoluminal therapies. A critical appraisal

Due to its large prevalence, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is an ideal target for companies developing medical devices designed to cure reflux. Indeed, because medications leave part of the patients unsatisfied, there is a potential place for alternative therapies, capable of restoring an efficacious anti-reflux barrier, but without the drawbacks of surgery. For more than a decade, several novel endoluminal therapies were developed, clinically evaluated, put on the market and, for many of them, withdrawn due to economic considerations, lack of efficacy or complications. These therapies were designed to act on the gastro-oesophageal junction and reinforce mechanically the anti-reflux barrier by three different ways: suturing, radiofrequency energy application, or implantation of foreign materials. Most of the published data come from open uncontrolled studies with short-term enthusiastic results. There are a few randomized control trials assessing the true efficacy of these modalities, showing often less impressive results than the open studies did, due to a high placebo effect in mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Although endoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal disease is still an interesting topic of investigation, one can draw some lessons from the recent experiences and foresee which place these techniques could find in the management of patients suffering from reflux.

Initial experience with new intraluminal devices for GERD, Barrett's esophagus, and obesity

BACKGROUND

Transoral intraluminal surgery is less painful. However, endoscopic antireflux procedures have been unsuccessful, endoscopic foregut mucosal excision procedures are often difficult to perform, and endoscopic intra-luminal suturing is both imprecise and too shallow. We have endeavored to correct these deficiencies and report here new devices for GERD, obesity, and Barrett's mucosal excision.

METHOD

A retrospective review of ex vivo and in vivo animal experiments using sharp blade mucosal excision for esophageal and gastric mucosa and a suturing device with transverse needles designed to full thickness penetrate the gastric wall were completed. A total of 338 excisions were performed in 134 ex vivo tissue experiments and in 119 in vivo attempts. Suture needle testing was performed in ex vivo human stomachs and porcine stomachs and in in vivo canine and baboon stomachs.

RESULTS

One excision perforation (0.9%) occurred in a live animal. Satisfactory mucosal excision depth for the Barrett's device was reproducible. Progressive suture actuation reliability improved from 83% during ex vivo testing to 96.7% in in vivo experiments.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate feasibility, reliability, and safety for gastric and esophageal mucosal excision. Suturing reliability improved and further studies will be performed to finalize the instrument designs, the operative techniques, and the other device applications.

What is left of the endoscopic antireflux devices?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We critically analyze existing endoscopy-based interventions for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The focus is on the effectiveness of available procedures and to delineate goals for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evaluations of the EndoCinch system reveal poor long-term results and no significant improvement over sham therapy due to poor apposition of mucosa with stitches. Recent studies with transoral incisionless fundoplication demonstrate improvement in GERD symptoms, quality of life, esophageal acid exposure, esophagitis, resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure and medication use. The SRS endoscopic stapling system creates a partial fundoplication wrap, and a preliminary study demonstrated improved symptoms and acid exposure. The Stretta system delivers radiofrequency energy to the gastroesophageal junction. A large prospective series demonstrates sustained improvement in GERD symptoms, quality of life and proton pump inhibitor therapy elimination after radiofrequency ablation at the gastroesophageal junction. A sham-controlled study showed improvement in symptoms at 6 months.

SUMMARY

EndoCinch plication requires further study and modification of technique before it can be recommended for general clinical use. Transoral incisionless fundoplication is a very promising procedure in its early stages of development. Further evaluation of procedure safety and durability is needed. Radiofrequency ablation therapy has been reintroduced and may have potential in patients with refractory GERD.

The Stretta procedure versus proton pump inhibitors and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

The Stretta procedure is an endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Stretta procedure and that of competing strategies in the long-term management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

A Markov model was designed to estimate costs and health outcomes in Canadian patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease over five years, from a Ministry of Health perspective. Strategies included the use of daily proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and the Stretta procedure. Probabilities and utilities were derived from the literature. Costs are expressed in 2006 Canadian dollars. Units of effectiveness were symptom-free months (SFMs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), using a five-year time horizon.

RESULTS

In the analysis that used SFMs, the strategy using PPIs exhibited the lowest costs ($40 per SFM) and the greatest number of SFMs, thus dominating both the LNF and Stretta systems. But the cost-effectiveness analysis using QALYs as the measure of effectiveness showed that PPIs presented the lowest cost-effectiveness ratio, while both the LNF and Stretta strategies were associated with very high incremental costs (approximately $353,000 and $393,000, respectively) to achieve an additional QALY. However, the PPI strategy did not dominate the two other strategies, which were associated with better effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

If SFMs are used as the measure of effectiveness, PPIs dominate the Stretta and LNF strategies. However, if QALYs are used, the PPIs still present the lowest cost and LNF gives the best effectiveness. Regardless of the units of effectiveness or utility used in the present cost analysis, an approach of prescribing PPIs appears to be the preferred strategy.

Use of endoluminal antireflux therapies for obese patients with GERD

BACKGROUND

Obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to medical therapy are a challenging patient population as obesity is a preoperative predictor of failure after antireflux surgery. We therefore sought to evaluate outcomes using one of two commercially available endoluminal therapies in this population.

METHODS

Consecutive obese patients (body mass index (BMI)>30) with GERD (DeMeester>14.5) undergoing either Plicator (NDO) or Stretta (Curon) were identified in our single-institution prospective database. Outcomes assessed were: (1) failure rate (absolutely no symptomatic improvement after procedure and/or need for subsequent antireflux surgery), (2) postoperative vs. preoperative symptom (heartburn, chest pain, regurgitation, dysphagia, cough, hoarseness, and asthma) scores, and (3) proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) medication use.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients each underwent an endoluminal therapy (ten Plicator patients and 12 Stretta patients) with mean follow-up of 1.5 years. There were no treatment-associated complications. Mean BMI was not different between Plicator and Stretta groups (39.6 vs. 38.6, respectively, p=0.33). The failure rate for the entire cohort was 28% (10% Plicator vs. 42% Stretta, p=0.11). The proportion of patients reporting moderate/severe symptoms postop was significantly less than preop: chest pain 9% vs. 13% (p=0.04), cough 22% vs. 36% preop (p=0.025), voice changes 9% vs. 36% preop (p=0.012), and dysphagia 9% vs. 32% preop (p=0.04). The proportion of patients on PPI medications postop was also less than preop (45% vs. 81%, p=0.1)

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal treatment can provide a safe means of improving GERD symptoms for some obese patients, though many will continue to require medication therapy also. Further work aimed at understanding optimal candidates for endoluminal therapy in this patient population is warranted.

Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter (Stretta procedure) does not provide long-term symptom control

The Stretta procedure (radiofrequency energy application to the lower esophageal sphincter) is a unique endoluminal technique for the management of gastroesophageal reflux. This article reports on the long-term effectiveness of the Stretta procedure in patients with significant gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) referred to a surgical practice. Patients who underwent Stretta with a minimum of 36 months follow-up were included. Thirty-two patients with an average follow-up of 53 months were included; 19 proceeded to anti-reflux surgery. Those not undergoing surgery showed a significant improvement in their GERD satisfaction from 3.14 to 1.46 (P = .0006) but had significantly lower preprocedure heartburn scores (2.43) than those who proceeded to surgery (3.66, P = .0401). The Stretta procedure was effective in reducing symptoms in 40% of patients. Responders had less severe preoperative heartburn. Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter may be effective in selected patients for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux.

Endoscopic therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease: outcomes of the randomized-controlled trials done to date

Endoscopic therapies to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease have been developed as another option for patients with reflux symptoms who do not want to continue medications indefinitely or are unwilling to undergo surgical intervention. The endoscopic treatments can be divided into those that pleat or plicate the upper stomach, deliver thermal energy into the lower esophageal sphincter, or inject or implant biopolymers into the gastroesophageal junction. Although capable to improve reflux symptoms for the majority of treated patients for a short while, durability has been variable among the various treatments, and there have been safety issues with some of the therapies. Although symptom improvement has been universally shown in short-term follow-up, there has been variable outcome for reduced need of antisecretory medications and pH studies show normalization of the distal esophageal acid exposure for only the minority of treated patients. Patients with significant reflux esophagitis or Barrett esophagus are not typically candidates for this antireflux intervention. Except for the NDO Plicator, in sham-controlled studies, there have been no significant differences between treated and sham-treated individuals for ability to discontinue medications or normalize pH. One issue in interpreting the results of these preliminary studies is the influence of the learning curve of a new technology. Another is that the devices and techniques have not been optimized. Currently, only the Davol/Bard EndoCinch and the NDO Plicator are available for commercial use. There are several newer devices under study or in development, and further testing and experience will demonstrate their capabilities in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Review article: The endoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Over the last 10 years a number of endoscopic procedures for treating gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) have been developed (suturing, injections, implants and radiofrequency ablation), thus obviating the need for long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and the potential morbidity of laparoscopic fundoplication.

AIM

To present an update of the literature studying the clinical efficacy of endoscopic antireflux procedures, and to discuss further developments.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for endoscopic suturing, antireflux treatment, endoscopic gastroplication, polymer injection, radiofrequency ablation of GORD. Own recent research was compared with existing data. Information concerning GORD endotherapy were gathered.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled studies have reported promising clinical results on the short to intermediate term for most endoscopic GORD procedures, but the placebo effect remained unknown. It is, therefore, commendable that the three main procedures (Endocinch, Stretta and Enteryx) have now all been tested against a sham procedure. Although all three techniques were able to improve symptoms, quality of life and PPI use, oesophageal acid reduction was unremarkable. Endocinch and Stretta are safe outpatient procedures. Concerns about the durability of Endocinch have risen. Polymer injection (Enteryx) and gel prosthesis implantation (Gatekeeper) were recalled for severe complications and lack of efficacy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endotherapy has shown the potential to treat (uncomplicated) GORD. However, some early procedures have failed or proven unsafe. Further developments and studies are necessary to determine what modifications to these techniques are required to produce optimal efficacy and durability. Until then, widespread clinical use of endotherapy for GORD should probably be avoided.

Systematic review: endoluminal therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: evidence from clinical trials

During the last few decades many endoscopic interventions have been developed as an alternative for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). In many countries, these interventions are thus being performed in the general clinical setting. The aim of this study is to systematically review the evidence on the effect of endoscopic therapies for GORD. A systematic search of the literature on this subject in English, indexed in MEDLINE (1966 to May 2007) and in the Cochrane Library, was carried out. For the study selection, retrospective and prospective open-label and randomized, sham-controlled trials were taken into account. The exclusion criteria included the following: case series that included fewer than 10 patients, abstracts, studies involving children or those with a follow-up shorter than 3 months. For data extraction, two reviewers, using standardized forms, independently abstracted data on study design and methods, population, sample size, function studies (e.g. pH-metry), type of endoscopic treatment, follow-up, health-related and quality of life scores, outcomes and complications. Data synthesis involved the following: 43 studies, including four randomized, sham-controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria, out of 4182 citations. The primary end point in most studies was the reduction of the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) by more than 50%. In view of these findings, the majority of studies suggested the efficacy of endoluminal therapies for the control of symptoms in GORD. In the sham-controlled studies, the effect of placebo was, nevertheless, as high as 50%. Most studies were small feasibility studies, with follow-ups of less than 1 year. No study comparing endoscopic techniques with other established treatment options such as PPIs existed. All endoscopic therapies were associated with a small but important percentage of mild to severe complications, which included perforation, abscess and death. In conclusion, the data from most of the short-term follow-up and the few sham-controlled studies demonstrate that subgroups of patients experienced improvement or resolution of typical GORD symptoms and decreased PPI usage. Currently, however, there are not enough scientific and clinical data on safety, efficacy and durability to support the use of endoluminal therapies for GORD in routine clinical practice.

Endotherapy and surgery for GERD

Today, there are several modalities to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (medications, endoscopic therapies, surgery) and such therapies can be used either singly, or in tandem, or in combination with the others, aiming at "normalization" of the patient's GERD-related quality of life and, if possible, esophageal acid exposure. Several intermediate end points or clinically significant outcomes have not been reached by some therapeutic modalities and no single modality is or can be perfect. Statistically significant improvements in these intermediate end points have been shown in "some" but not all studies. Although healing of esophagitis can be accomplished with either medical or surgical therapy, there is inadequate data with endotherapies, because most patients treated with endotherapies have had prior trials of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and hence healed their esophagitis. Effective prevention of complications, such as esophageal adenocarcinoma, remains challenging for all modalities. Patients who have not normalized their GERD-related quality of life with once or twice daily PPI therapy should undergo functional esophageal evaluation with pH testing and esophageal motility study and they should be evaluated by both an endoscopist and a surgeon. The decision on how to proceed should be made on the basis of the criteria for endotherapy and surgery, availability of local endoscopic and surgical expertise and patients' preference. Such multimodality therapy model is in many ways similar to the long-term management of coronary artery disease where pharmacotherapy, angioplasty, and bypass surgery are frequently used in tandem or in combination. Multimodality therapy aiming at normalization of GERD-related quality of life is an option today, and should be available to all patients in need of therapy. The target population for GERD endotherapy currently consists of PPI-dependent GERD patients, who have a small (<2-cm-long) or no sliding hiatal hernia, and without severe esophagitis or Barrett esophagus. Thus far, only Stretta and the NDO plicator have been studied in sham-controlled trials. Registries of complications suggest that these techniques are relatively safe, but serious morbidity, including rare mortality have been reported (for a continuous update on complications related to endoscopic therapies see: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/maude.html). All can be performed on an outpatient basis, under intravenous sedation and local pharyngeal anesthesia. Future comparative studies with predetermined clinically significant end points, validated outcome measures, prolonged follow-up, and complete complication registries will eventually determine the precise role of endoscopic procedures for the patients with GERD.

Endoluminal fundoplication (ELF)--evolution of EsophyX, a new surgical device for transoral surgery

A novel endoluminal fundoplication (ELF) technique using a trans-oral and fastener-deploying device (EsophyX, EndoGastric Solutions) was developed and evaluated for feasibility, safety and the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in a series of bench, animal, human (phase 1, phase 2, commercial registry) studies. The studies verified biological compatibility, durability and non-toxicity of the polypropylene fasteners as well as the feasibility of the ELF technique. The results of the preclinical testing indicated that the EsophyX device was shown to be safe, and capable of deploying fasteners directly into tissue and forming an interrupted suture line at the base of the gastro-esophageal valve (GEV). Moreover, the studies demonstrated that the ELF technique performed using the EsophyX device resulted in the creation of new GEVs of 3-5 cm in length and a circumference of 200 degrees -310 degrees , which maintained their anatomical aspects at six months. The ELF-created GEVs appeared similar to those created by laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS). The ELF procedure also resulted in reduction of all small hiatal hernias (2 cm in size) and restoration of the angle of His. The ELF procedure provides an anatomical approach similar to that of LARS for the treatment of GERD.

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Stretta procedure in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: first report from Asia

BACKGROUND

In recent years, various endoscopic treatments have become available to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western countries. The Stretta procedure, which uses radiofrequency energy, is one type of safe and effective endoluminal treatment for GERD. However, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Stretta procedure in Japanese patients with GERD, who differ from Western peoples in their physiological characteristics, are not known. In 2006, we imported a Stretta system from the United States and investigated important clinical aspects of the system in Japanese patients with GERD.

METHODS

This study was an open-label trial that enrolled patients with GERD who desired to undergo the Stretta procedure. Heartburn scores, medication use, overall satisfaction with the procedure, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine patients received the Stretta treatment between February and September 2006. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy just after treatment revealed a remarkable reduction in the expansion of the gastric cardia and small erosions in all patients. At 3 or 6 months after treatment, heartburn scores were significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores (5.0 +/- 1.7 pretreatment vs. 0.7 +/- 1.4 posttreatment, P=0.007). In six of nine patients (66.7%), treatment significantly (P=0.009) decreased medication use. There were no major adverse events. All patients were satisfied with this treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The Stretta procedure safely reduced GERD symptoms and decreased medication use in Japanese patients with GERD. This treatment may thus be very useful for such patients, and it is hoped that a nationwide trial will be undertaken in Japan to obtain more extensive data.

Long-term results of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of GERD: sustained improvements in symptoms, quality of life, and drug use at 4-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The Stretta endoscopic antireflux procedure has effectively controlled symptoms of patients with GERD refractory to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication up to 1 year.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Stretta procedure for patients with GERD based on symptom control, quality of life (QOL), and medication use.

DESIGN

Prospective single-center case series.

SETTING

Academic endoscopy referral center.

PATIENTS

Adults with GERD symptoms and partial response to daily antisecretory medication.

INTERVENTION

We have used the Stretta procedure for patients with GERD diagnosed by endoscopic or pH testing since 2000. Our primary assessment was a validated health-related QOL score for heartburn and regurgitation and GERD symptoms index performed at baseline, 12, 36, and 48 months after treatment. A secondary outcome measure was the dose and the frequency of antisecretory pharmaceutical use.

RESULTS

We performed the Stretta procedure in 83 consecutive patients with persistent GERD symptoms. Complete matched data for follow-up evaluations are reported at 12, 36, and 48 months. The mean GERD QOL score was 2.4 (baseline), 4.6 (36 months), and 4.3 (48 months, P < .001). The mean GERD symptom score was 2.7 (baseline), 0.3 (36 months), and 0.6 (48 months P < .001). Daily medication usage was 100% (baseline) and 13.6% (48 months, P < .001).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized study design, lack of control arm, and lack of 24-hour pH.

CONCLUSIONS

For these GERD patients followed to 4 years, the Stretta procedure was a safe, effective, and durable treatment, with significant and sustained improvements in GERD symptoms, QOL, and PPI elimination.

Sustained improvement in symptoms of GERD and antisecretory drug use: 4-year follow-up of the Stretta procedure

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of patients with GERD do not respond to medical therapy. The Stretta radiofrequency antireflux procedure represents an alternative to failed drug therapy for GERD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess symptom and medication changes after the Stretta procedure during a 4-year follow-up period.

DESIGN

Prospective case series on intent-to-treat basis.

SETTING

Community practice.

PATIENTS

Patients with GERD with persistent symptoms despite twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medications.

INTERVENTIONS

The Stretta procedure was performed in drug-refractory patients with GERD diagnosed by the presence of endoscopically evidenced esophagitis or abnormal esophageal pH testing. Symptom assessment was performed with a validated health-related quality-of-life questionnaire (with and without medication) at baseline and 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after treatment. Complications of the procedure and medication usage were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Significant changes in symptom scores, GERD quality-of-life parameters, and medication usage on the basis of clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We report on a series of 109 consecutive patients treated with the Stretta procedure who have reached 4-year follow-up. Complete long-term follow-up assessment was available in matched data for 109 patients at 12 months, 108 patients at 24 months, 102 patients at 36 months, and 96 patients at 48 months. A second procedure was performed in 13 patients. Heartburn scores decreased from 3.6 to 1.18 (P < .001), total heartburn score (GERD health-related quality-of-life questionnaire) decreased from 27.8 to 7.1 (P < .001), and patient satisfaction improved from 1.4 to 3.8 (P < .001) (see ). Medication usage decreased significantly from 100% of patients on twice-daily PPI therapy at baseline to 75% of patients showing elimination of medications or only as-needed use of antacids/over-the-counter PPIs at 48 months (P < 0.005). There were no serious complications of the procedure.

LIMITATIONS

This is an uncontrolled, nonrandomized case series in consecutive patients that does not include long-term pH or motility studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study in drug-refractory patients with GERD found the Stretta procedure to be a safe, effective, and durable treatment that produced significant improvements in heartburn and quality of life and decreased medication usage during a 4-year period of follow-up.

Endoscopic therapies of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western societies has accelerated the need for new modalities of treatment. Currently, medical and surgical therapies are widely accepted among patients and physicians. New potent antisecretory drugs and the development of minimally invasive surgery for the management of GERD are at present the pivotal and largely accepted approaches to treatment. The minimally invasive treatment revolution, however, has stimulated several new endoscopic techniques for GERD. Up to now, the data is limited and further studies are necessary to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various endoscopic techniques to medical and laparoscopic management of GERD. New journal articles and abstracts are continuously being published. The Food and Drug Administration has approved 3 modalities, thus gastroenterologists and surgeons are beginning to apply these techniques. Further trials and device refinements will assist clinicians. This article will present an overview of the various techniques that are currently on study. This review will report the efficacy and durability of various endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The potential for widespread use of these techniques will also be discussed. Articles and abstracts published in English on this topic were retrieved from Pubmed. Due to limited number of studies and remarkable differences between various trials, strict criteria were not used for the pooled data presented, however, an effort was made to avoid bias by including only studies that used off-PPI scoring as baseline and intent to treat.

A novel antireflux device based on magnets

BACKGROUND

The problem of eliminating gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with simple, effective and devoid of unpleasant side effects procedures is still unresolved. We tried to settle this problem with a magnetic device that should be applied to the distal end of the esophagus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two plastoferrite magnets of 2 x 4 x 0.5cm(1) were applied, on the opposite sides of a flaccid polyethylene tube mimicking the physical characteristics of the terminal esophagus. The two magnets attracting themselves compressed the tube, creating an artificial high-pressure zone that divided the tube in two segments. Both segments of the tube were connected to pressure transducers and a polygraph and one of them was connected to a hydraulic pump. The pressure was progressively increased in this segment up to a value sufficient to detach the magnets with consequent flowing of the water in the other segment of the tube.

RESULTS

The progressive increase of the pressure in a segment of the tube detached the magnets allowing a free flow into the other segment when the pressure reached an average value of 9.75+/-1.05 mmHg (mean+/-SD).

CONCLUSIONS

A couple of magnets clamping a tube with the characteristics of the distal esophagus is able to prevent the passage of liquid with a pressure value near to that of a normal lower esophageal sphincter. This magnetic device could be useful to maintain closed a sphincter unable to prevent gastroesophageal reflux.

Endoscopic Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Within the last 15 years, novel endoscopic therapies have been developed as options for patients who have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). These approaches can provide long-term relief of GERD, or can be used to "bridge" patients to future therapy, because undergoing treatment does not preclude one from future medical or surgical therapy. These therapies continue to bean active source of research and investigation. Although they are undergoing rapid development, there are only a few peer-reviewed articles detailing original studies with short-term follow-up. Future success in this arena will depend on sham-controlled trials, long-term outcome studies, and cost-effectiveness analyses. This article describes available endoscopic therapies, discusses their effectiveness and duration of response, and reviews their failures and complications.

Endoscopic approaches to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease represent a minimally invasive alternative to medical or surgical treatment. These devices include suturing, radiofrequency energy, and bulking agent technologies. Research into the use of these technologies in gastroesophageal reflux disease continues to accelerate, and the last 2 years have witnessed significant developments that may affect current and future clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Long-term data from nonrandomized clinical trials have become available in the last 2 years for many gastroesophageal reflux disease endotherapies, providing some insight into their durability. Furthermore, two multicenter and one single-center sham-controlled trials were published recently, allowing comparison between groups.

SUMMARY

Although it is premature to propose the superiority of any individual approach, emerging data in this rapidly evolving field may inform current and future directions in the research and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Endoscopic Antireflux Therapy: The Stretta Procedure

The Stretta procedure is safe and effective for the treatment of GERD. There are well-documented clinical trial data supporting its use, including a randomized sham-controlled study, single- and multi-center prospective trials, and community practice reports. The complication rate is within the acceptable range for therapeutic endoscopic procedures and less than the published complication rate for laparoscopic fundoplication. The durability of effect also is established beyond 2 years in several studies. Stretta should be added to the GERD management algorithm specifically for patients considering an antireflux surgical procedure but who are not accepting of the risks of surgery and anesthesia. These patients typically present with incomplete GERD control, despite optimal antisecretory drug therapy, or intolerance to medical therapy. Stretta should be considered only for patients who fit the anatomic inclusion criteria, whereas antireflux surgery should be reserved for those who do not. The decision to undergo antireflux surgery or Stretta must be based on the relative risks and benefits of each procedure. Although antireflux surgery provides better control of esophageal acid exposure than Stretta, the outcomes for GERD symptoms, quality of life, and reduction in PPI use are comparable. Stretta has a low risk of acute adverse events, has no reported cases of long-term dysphagia, and obviates general anesthesia and hospitalization, whereas antireflux surgery has a reported adverse event rate of approximately 2%, a considerable incidence of dysphagia, and requires general anesthesia and 1 to 2 days in the hospital. Another advantage of the Stretta procedure is that antireflux surgery still can be performed in the case of failures. In conclusion, the Stretta procedure offers a minimally invasive, safe, and effective alternative to antireflux surgery for those patients who have GERD who are controlled unsatisfactorily on antisecretory medications, who are considering surgery, and who meet the anatomic criteria that make the procedure technically feasible and safe.

Endoscopic Therapies For Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition affect-ing over 7% of the US population. The primary objective of therapy is symptom relief, with secondary goals to heal esophagitis, prevent reflux-related complications, and maintain remission. There are several new endoscopic therapies (ETs) for treatment of GERD, generating considerable interest. An outpatient procedure, performed without an incision and general anesthesia, is attractive to patients and these therapies are being rapidly introduced, despite lack of long-term follow-up and randomized trials. In this article, the authors review endoscopic procedures, including technical aspects, mechanisms of action, safety, efficacy, and tolerability. Patient selection and relevant human studies are reviewed to clarify advantages and disadvantages of ET compared with conventional procedures.

Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the gastroesophageal junction (Stretta procedure) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency (RF) energy treatment is increasingly offered before invasive surgical procedures for selected patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients undergoing the Stretta procedure were prospectively evaluated with upper endoscopy, manometry, 24-hour pH testing, SF-36 surveys, and GERD-specific questionnaires (GERD HRQL).

RESULTS

Significant clinical improvement was observed in 91% of patients (29/32). Mean heartburn and GERD HRQL scores decreased (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively), and physical SF-36 increased (p = 0.05). At a minimum follow-up of 12 months, median esophageal acid exposure decreased (p = 0.79) and was normalized in eight patients. Median lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was unchanged. Esophagitis healed in six of eight patients, but two patients with nonerosive disease developed asymptomatic grade A esophagitis during follow-up. At 12 months, 56% of patients were off proton pump inhibits. Morbidity was minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

RF delivery to LES is safe and significantly improves symptoms and quality of life in selected GERD patients.

Three year’s experience with the Stretta procedure: did it really make a difference?

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatment is merging as a new option for GERD treatment. Many modalities have been used with modest short-term success, but no long-term follow-ups have been published. We present our 3-yr experience at Vanderbilt University using endoscopic radiofrequency energy (Stretta procedure) for GERD treatment.

METHODS

Patients with follow-up >6 months were prospectively studied under IRB protocol. All were mailed SF-12 health status questionnaire and GERD specific quality-of-life (QOLRAD) questionnaires, queries about satisfaction with Stretta, and medication use. All were invited for 24-hour pH study.

RESULTS

Eighty-six Stretta procedures were performed between 8/2000 and 7/2003 on 85 patients; all were outpatients, 89% under conscious sedation. Seventy-seven patients qualified for the study; 61 completed the survey, 24 returned for pH study. Follow-up was 26.2 +/- 7.5 months (6-36). All were on daily PPIs, with proven GERD by pH study or endoscopy. Mean preoperative acid exposure time was 7.8+/-2.6%, mean DeMeester score was 40.2+/-17.6. Postoperative mean acid exposure time was 5.1+/-3.3 (p=0.001), DeMeester score was 29.5+/-20.5 (p=0.041). Normal postoperative acid exposure time (pH<4 in <4.2%) was achieved in 42% of patients tested. Patients were then divided according to medication use at the end of f/u in 2 groups: Responders (off or >50% decrease in PPI dose), and nonresponders (on >50% of original PPI dose, or had fundoplication). Response rate was 60% (39 patients), 8 nonresponders underwent fundoplication (12%). Satisfaction rate was 73%. Statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in all measurements; SF-12 physical and mental score for responders were 45.5+/-10.2, and 52.6+/-7.8; and for nonresponders were 37.8+/-11.2 and 40.9+/-11.3 (p=0.012, p=0.0001), respectively. Statistically significant difference was also found between responders and nonresponders in postoperative acid exposure (4.5+/-3.34 vs 7.2+/-2.3, p=0.034), and DeMeester score (26.3+/-20.4 vs 39.7+/-20.2, p=0.05). Paired T test was used to compare pre- and postoperative acid exposure in each group; statistically significant difference was found only among responders: total reflux time was 7.50+/-2.3 preop and 4.5+/-3.34 postop (p=0.0001), whereas for nonresponders it was 8.6+/-3.7 and 7.2+/-2.3 (p=0.8), DeMeester scores pre- and postop among responders were 40.0+/-19.7 and 26.3+/-20.4, respectively (p=0.016), whereas for nonresponders it was 40.5+/-14.3 and 39.7+/-20.2 (p=0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Stretta is a safe modestly effective, totally endoscopic treatment for GERD. Symptomatic improvement when achieved is often associated with correlating improvement in distal acid exposure. This exposure normalizes in nearly half the treated patients.

Endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux

The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) has improved dramatically in recent years. The new endoluminal treatments may bring a relatively simple, minimally invasive therapy that can be simultaneously applied in patients with GERD undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy. Although the initial results are promising, these new techniques are generating some controversy and require further evaluation with randomized studies and longer follow-ups to define their precise role in the long-term management of the gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Long-term follow-up study of the Stretta procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic delivery of temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy to the gastroesophageal junction (Stretta procedure) recently has been shown effective for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, its effectiveness has been assessed mainly over short periods (6-12 months). This study aimed to evaluate long-term results of the Stretta procedure.

METHODS

All patients undergoing the Stretta procedure since August 2000 were prospectively evaluated under an institutional review board-approved protocol. All patients with a follow-up period longer than 18 months were recruited for a 24-h pH study and mailed a follow-up survey, which included the following: Short Form 12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire, GERD-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (QOLRAD), and queries regarding long-term satisfaction and medication use.

RESULTS

The Stretta procedure was performed on 82 patients, and 41 patients with a follow-up period longer than 18 months qualified for the study. Follow-up surveys were completed by 36 patients (88%) during a mean follow-up period of 27.1 +/- 3.7 months. Of these 36 patients, 30 (83%) were highly satisfied with the procedure and would have it performed again. More than half of the Fifty Stretta patients (56%) had completely discontinued their use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and an additional 31% had reduced their dose significantly. The mean PPI equivalent doses were 37.8 +/- 22.2 mg/day before the Stretta procedure and 11.6 +/- 14.6 mg/day at 27-month follow-up assessment (p = 0.001). According to the patient outcomes for daily PPI use (yes/no), the patients were divided into two groups: responders (n = 20) and nonresponders (n = 16). The responder group scored higher in QOLRAD score (p = 0.0001), SF-12 physical score (p = 0.038), and SF-12 mental score (p = 0.003). In the 24-hour pH study, the responder group demonstrated a significant decrease in distal esophageal acid exposure time (6.4% +/- 1.5% to 3.1% +/- 1.4%; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The Stretta procedure results in a statistical significant long-term decrease in GERD symptoms and PPI use. The treatment effect is durable beyond 2 years, and 56% of patients had discontinued their user of all antisecretory drugs.

Changes in GERD symptom scores correlate with improvement in esophageal acid exposure after the Stretta procedure

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic radiofrequency energy delivery (Stretta) is effective for managing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in selected patients. One criticism, however, is a theory that a mechanism of action is partial desensitization of the esophageal body rather than a reduction in esophageal acid exposure. To resolve this question, this study sought to determine if there is a correlation between the improvement in GERD outcomes and esophageal acid exposure after Stretta.

METHODS

Subgroup analyses were performed between "responder" and "nonresponder" groups from the U.S. Stretta open label trial ( n = 118), on the basis of posttreatment responses for GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) heartburn, satisfaction, and proton pump inhibitor use. Outcomes were analyzed within and between subgroups. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was performed comparing distal esophageal acid exposure with each of the continuous outcomes (GERD-HRQL, heartburn, satisfaction).

RESULTS

Responder subgroups had significant improvements in esophageal acid exposure, whereas nonresponders had no change or less improvement in the same. Changes in GERD-HRQL and heartburn severity were correlated with changes in acid exposure ( r = 0.16, p = 0.12 and r = 0.26, p = 0.01, respectively). Changes in satisfaction were negatively correlated with changes in esophageal acid exposure ( r = 0.23, p = 0.02) because satisfaction, as expected, increased as acid exposure decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Responders had significant improvement in esophageal acid exposure, whereas nonresponders had less or no change. There was a positive correlation between esophageal acid exposure and both GERD-HRQL and heartburn. This evidence suggests that symptomatic improvement after Stretta is attributable to a decrease in esophageal acid exposure and not to desensitization of the esophagus.

Stretta procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The Stretta procedure is a noninvasive alternative for individuals suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease, the most common disorder of the digestive tract. Over 40% of the population reports symptoms of reflux. Primary treatment is medication therapy with proton pump inhibitors and lifestyle changes. For patients whose symptoms have not been adequately controlled by proton-pump inhibitors or those unwilling to take medication indefinitely, surgery has been the only option. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is the most common surgery for reflux. Recently, noninvasive options have been studied. This article discusses the Stretta procedure, the application of radiofrequency energy to the lower esophageal sphincter. The Stretta procedure is performed in conjunction with an esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation in the endoscopy lab.

Endoluminal therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease

While medical therapy, particularly with proton pump inhibitors, is effective for the large majority of patients with reflux disease, there remains a subset of patients who are dissatisfied, due to cost, side effects of medications, or persistent symptoms such as regurgitation. For this population, surgical fundoplication has been, and remains, an appropriate option. A new class of endoluminal interventions, attempting to create a mechanical antireflux barrier, has emerged recently. Three such devices are currently approved and available, and a number of others are in various stages of evaluation. This article will review the approved technologies, as well as selected promising emerging ones. with particular emphasis on the scientific evidence available to date supporting their efficacy.

Review article: approaches to the long-term management of adults with GERD-proton pump inhibitor therapy, laparoscopic fundoplication or endoscopic therapy?

The goals of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment are to control symptoms, heal the injured oesophageal mucosa, and prevent complications. Pharmacological therapy is effective in producing acute symptom relief and mucosal healing, as well as the long-term maintenance of remission. Proton pump inhibitors are the mainstay of GERD therapy. However, the need for daily administration, failure to provide complete symptom relief and costs of these agents may limit their use in some patients, prompting a consideration of alternative treatment strategies. Laparoscopic fundoplication may achieve symptom relief and healing of the oesophagitis in these individuals, but its invasiveness, cost and inherent surgical risks have created an interest in endoscopic therapies for GERD, with several emerging during the past few years. These interventions may either be viewed as an alternative therapy or as 'bridge' therapy, with patients still choosing to be treated with acid anti-secretory drugs or fundoplication if the endoscopic procedure fails to provide adequate symptom relief or if symptoms recur. Patient selection is critical for the success of fundoplication as well as endoscopic procedures, with ideal candidates being those with well-established endoscopically documented GERD, abnormal pH monitoring, normal oesophageal motility studies, and who have experienced at least partial symptom relief with proton pump inhibitor therapy. Hiatal hernia is not a contra-indication to fundoplication, while endoscopic intervention is best suited for those with a hiatal hernia of less than 3 cm in length. The long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and impact of endoscopic procedures on extra-oesophageal manifestations of GERD and risk for GERD-related complications has not been determined.

GERD: the potential for endoscopic intervention

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Most patients with symptomatic GERD do not have erosive reflux disease. Frequent transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and the presence of hiatal hernia have emerged as major and interacting factors in GERD. Several endoscopic anti-reflux therapies aiming at creating an anti-reflux barrier and reducing or eliminating the need for chronic medical therapy or fundoplication have been introduced and validated as feasible, safe and effective. Today, it is possible to manage GERD patients with a multioption approach of medical, endoscopic or surgical therapies according to the size of hiatal hernia, the lower esophageal pressure profile and their clinical response to single-modality therapy.

Endoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD): a systematic review

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease represents an extremely common disorder which has a substantial impact on patients' quality of life and use of health care resources. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a chronic relapsing disease for which a lifelong solution is needed. Until now the two competing therapeutic modalities have been the medical and surgical therapies. Quite recently a third option has become available. A number of endoscopic anti-reflux procedures have been described, with the common goal of creating an anti-reflux barrier, thus obviating long-term proton pump inhibitors and the cost and potential risk of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. In this review the different techniques are thoroughly examined and the results are critically evaluated, giving special emphasis to efficacy, safety and durability of these new anti-reflux procedures. Available data show that these anti-reflux techniques produce significant improvement in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptomatology and quality of life as well as reduce the use of anti-reflux medication, without causing serious morbidity or mortality. However, the majority of these techniques have failed to adequately control oesophageal acid reflux. Endoscopic anti-reflux therapies therefore sound very attractive-being less invasive than surgery-and show a significant promise, but are still in the early stages of assessment. Large-scale randomized multi-centre trials comparing control groups with sham procedures are essential to confirm their efficacy. Further studies are also necessary to determine what modifications these techniques require in order to produce maximum clinical efficacy and durability. However, considering that current therapies (both medical and surgical) of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are highly effective, the need for such new endoscopic modalities may be questionable. Moreover, appropriate trials in dedicated centres should be carried out to assure that the enthusiasm commonly associated with new technology is justified and can be generalized to open-access endoscopists.

Transurethral delivery of radiofrequency energy for tissue micro-remodeling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

This initial human study was performed to determine the safety and quality of life impact of transurethral radiofrequency energy (RFe) tissue micro-remodeling of the proximal urethra and bladder outlet in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Forty-one patients with SUI were sequentially enrolled into four treatment groups and then underwent rapid outpatient treatment under conscious sedation using an investigational RFe delivery device. The device is passed through the urethra and palpably positioned by the anchoring of a balloon within the bladder outlet. Four small needle electrodes are deployed into the proximal urethra and/or bladder outlet submucosa, and RFe is delivered. No patient has suffered a serious adverse event in 6 months of follow-up. At 6 months, 75%-80% of patients in all four groups have demonstrated an improvement in quality of life. Two groups demonstrated statistical significance in both mean quality of life improvement and incontinence frequency reduction at 6 months.