Liver function disturbances following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and significance

Comparative evaluation of three laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques in rabbit's model

PURPOSE

The aim of this randomized study was to compare the complications and perioperative outcome of three different techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Changes in the liver function test after LC techniques were investigated. Also, we compared the degree of postoperative adhesions and histopathological changes of the liver bed.

METHODS

Thirty rabbits were divided into three groups: group A) Fundus-first technique by Hook dissecting instrument and Roeder Slipknot applied for cystic duct (CD) ligation; group B) conventional technique by Maryland dissecting forceps and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) for CD seal; group C) conventional technique by EBVS for gallbladder (GB) dissection and CD seal.

RESULTS

Group A presented a longer GB dissection time than groups B and C. GB perforation and bleeding from tissues adjacent to GB were similar among tested groups. Gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase levels increased (p ≤ 0.05) on day 3 postoperatively in group A. By the 15th postoperative day, the enzymes returned to the preoperative values. Transient elevation of hepatic transaminases occurred after LC in all groups. Group A had a higher adherence score than groups B and C and was associated with the least predictable technique.

CONCLUSIONS

LC can be performed using different techniques, although the use of EBVS is highly recommended.

Comparison of postoperative liver function between different dissection techniques during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Aim:

In this study, we investigated and compared the effect of different types of dissector (Maryland vs Hook) on changes in liver function tests (LFTs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Patients & methods:

The enrolled patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients underwent dissection by Maryland dissecting forceps, group B by Hook dissecting instrument. LFTs were measured preoperatively and at 1 day and 1 week, postoperatively.

Results:

For both Maryland and Hook dissection, the 1-day postoperative values for total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were significantly higher than the preoperative values. Also, there were no statistical differences between Hook and Maryland.

Conclusion:

The elevation of LFTs seems to be attributed to other factors.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is an alternative to laparotomy and has become the standard treatment of benign gallbladder diseases. However, it has been noted that (following LC) the serum level of certain liver function tests (LFT) raises markedly in patients who had preoperatively normal LFT. Pneumoperitoneum is the main contributing factor. This is the first study to evaluate the effect of different dissectors on alteration of LFTs after LC. As there were no statistical differences in the variation of LFTs between the Maryland and Hook, it seems that the dissector type has no effect on the alteration of LFTs.

What is the role of the abdominal perfusion pressure for subclinical hepatic dysfunction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND

Subclinical hepatic dysfunction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been described in the literature. However, this alteration is not encountered in all patients. In order to address this situation, a prospective study was conducted to investigate the effect of abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) on liver function tests after LC performed under constant intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 78 patients who underwent LC between May 2007 and October 2007, 40 patients were eligible for the study. In all the patients, six parameters of liver function (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase) were assessed before and 24 hours after surgery. Patients who showed more than a 100% increase in at least one parameter (group 1) were compared to those who did not (group 2) regarding age, sex, body weight, body height, operation time, pneumoperitoneum time, IAP, preoperative, and intraoperative APP.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 37.5% showed more than a 100% increase in at least one parameter of liver function. No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to age, sex, body weight, body height, operation time, pneumoperitoneum time, and IAP. There were significant increase in AST and ALT at 24 hours postoperatively in group 1, as compared with group 2 (P = 0.000, P = 0.001). In comparison of preoperative APP with intraoperative APP values, group 1 showed a statistically significant decrease (P = 0.000), while no difference was found in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Subclinical hepatic dysfunction after LC could mostly be attributed to the negative effects of the pneumoperitoneum on hepatic blood flow. For the evaluation of hepatic hypoperfusion, APP may be a new criterion as a determinant of interaction with mean arterial pressure (MAP) and IAP.

Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on liver function following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

It has been noted that following a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), liver function parameters were disturbed. The causes of this disturbance are still controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The serum levels of eight parameters of liver function were measured both before and 24 hours after surgery in 142 consecutive patients who underwent LC, 23 patients who underwent open cholecystectomy (OC), and in 25 patients who underwent a conventional hernial repair. The same anesthetic protocol was applied to all patients in the various groups and in the case of LC; the intra-abdominal pressure was maintained at 12 mmHg of CO2.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (24) hours after surgery, there was a statistically significant change of all the eight parameters studied, except alkaline phosphatase in patients who underwent LC, whereas there were only 3 patients from the OC group who had changes of alanine aminotransferase and aspartite aminotransferase and 2 patients who had raised levels of direct bilirubin, and no changes were observed among those who had conventional hernial repair. We found that 83% of the patients showed more than a 100% increase in at least one parameter, 43% showed an increase in two or more parameters, and 23% showed an increase in three or more parameters. We also observed a significant drop of total proteins and albumin levels in all patients who had LC.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the pneumoperitoneum plays a major role in these changes. Although these changes of liver function were of no clinical relevance in healthy patients, the safety of the procedure must nonetheless be assessed in those with underlying liver diseases.