Drug therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis

Graft versus host disease: clinical evaluation, diagnosis and management

Graft versus H\host disease (GVHD) can be a devastating complication following bone marrow transplantation. Acute or chronic systemic GVHD can be lethal, and severe damage of different organs and tissues can occur with both types of GVHD. Ocular involvement, either in an acute or chronic presentation, may range from mild to severe with accompanying vision loss present in 60-90 % of patients. Chronic ocular GVHD, the most common form of GVHD, affects mainly the lacrimal gland, meibomian glands, cornea and conjunctiva, mimicking other immunologically mediated inflammatory diseases of the ocular surface without specific symptoms or signs. However, dry eye disease is the main manifestation of GVHD. The long-term treatment of ocular GVHD continues to be challenging and involves a multidisciplinary approach wherein the ophthalmologist plays a major role. Besides systemic immunosuppression and ocular lubricants, topical steroids and topical cyclosporine are commonly prescribed. Newer therapeutic interventions for moderate and severe ocular GVHD include the use of serum eye drops and scleral contact lenses. In this manuscript, we review the mechanisms, clinical findings, and treatment of ocular GVHD.

An overview of stem cell-based clinical trials in China

Adult human stem cells are capable of maintaining, generating, and replacing terminally differentiated cells within their own specific tissue. Data suggest that adult stem cells (ASCs) generate differentiated cells beyond their own tissue boundaries, a process termed "developmental plasticity." Since early reports of developmental plasticity in animal models, researchers have made enormous advances in moving toward clinically applicable treatment options with stem cells from both bone marrow and peripheral blood. It seems China is entering this new therapeutic era more rapidly than other countries around the world. In this review, we focus on therapeutic applications of ASCs derived from bone marrow and peripheral blood. Furthermore, we also discuss concerns related to regulations monitoring stem cell-based clinical trials.

Tailored strategy for AML patients receiving allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Considering the heterogeneity of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), along with the pros and cons of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), a tailored strategy is needed to minimize the transplant-related mortality and maximize the transplant outcomes in AML patients exhibiting certain factors that have an impact on the post-transplant quality of life and outcomes. The factors that need to be considered when tailoring a strategy in an allogeneic PBSCT setting include the recipient's performance status and co-morbid disease include AML risk stratification, disease status, expected severity of graft-versus-host disease, and the necessity of a graft-versus-leukemia effect. Accordingly, this review article describes a possible tailoring strategy for AML patients receiving allogeneic PBSCT based on certain factors influencing the transplant outcome.

Proliferation-based T-cell selection for immunotherapy and graft-versus-host-disease prophylaxis in the context of bone marrow transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) caused by alloreactive T cells within the graft is a major drawback of allogeneic BMT, but depletion of T cells leads to higher rates of relapse, opportunistic infections and graft failure. Therefore, selective removal of GvHD-inducing alloreactive T cells might be beneficial. We describe here the separation of alloresponsive T cells, based on carboxyfluorescein succimidyl ester labeling, in vitro allostimulation and FACS-sorting. In vivo effects of the separated cell populations were investigated in the context of allogeneic BMT in murine models: in vitro resting T cells were shown to survive in the allogeneic host and retain immunoreactivity against 'third-party' antigens. As demonstrated in two different transplantation models, elimination of proliferating cells significantly reduces GvHD but offers no advantages to using T-cell-depleted bone marrow alone concerning engraftment and tumor control. Transplanting T cells that proliferate in response to tumor antigens in vitro may narrow down the spectrum of antigens recognized by T cells and therefore reduce GvHD while maintaining graft-facilitating function and tumor control. Therefore, selecting tumor-reactive T cells on the basis of their proliferative response in vitro may be beneficial for the recipient, less time consuming than T-cell cloning and still reduce the extent of GvHD.

Assessment of converting from intravenous to oral administration of cyclosporin A in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

We studied the administration method during a transition period from continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion to oral administration of cyclosporin A (CsA). Thirty-two pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, between the ages of 8 months and 15.6 years (median 7.1 years) participated in this study. The pharmacokinetic properties of CsA was evaluated during the transition period from i.v. to oral CsA. The daily oral dose of CsA was three times higher than the i.v. dose. Oral dosing began immediately after the continuous infusion was discontinued. Whole-blood CsA concentrations were measured by a monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). The mean+/-s.d. value of bioavailability (F), maximum concentration (C(max)), half-life (t(1/2)) of CsA were 43.1+/-14.4%, 1135.3+/-340.6 ng/ml and 3.1+/-1.2 h, respectively. Mean clearance (CL)+/-s.d. was 480.9+/-103.7, 414.9+/-137.1 and 320+/-51.8 ml/h/kg in patients <20, 20-40 and >40 kg of body weight, respectively. The CsA CL of younger children was significantly greater than for older children (P=0.044). CsA trough levels were maintained within the therapeutic range throughout the transition period. Therefore, our findings suggest that the immediate administration of an oral formulation, after discontinuation of the continuous infusion, would be practical and effective for routine clinical use.

Emerging therapies for graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD remain the major barriers to successful haematopoietic cell transplantation. The induction of GVHD may be divided into three phases: (i) recipient conditioning, (ii) donor T cell activation, and (iii) effector cells mediating GVHD. Standard agents and agents under development to prevent and treat GVHD are discussed. The various pharmacological agents impact on different phases of the GVHD cascade. Sirolimus is a new immunophilin binding agent that appears to be synergistic with tacrolimus and cyclosporin. It also seems to promote allograft tolerance. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an antimetabolite that is currently under study for prophylaxis and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD; results are encouraging. Other agents such as the purine analogue pentostatin and the monoclonal antibodies alemtuzumab, daclizumab and infliximab are discussed at length within the GVHD context. The most effective approach to GVHD prevention will likely be a combination regimen where the three phases of the GVHD cascade are disrupted. Once GVHD has occurred, all three phases of the cascade are activated. Developments of combination therapy for the treatment of both acute and chronic GVHD will likely yield better results than monotherapy. The numerous new treatment modalities presented should improve the outlook for acute and chronic GVHD.

ADVANCES IN THE PREVENTION OF GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE AFTER HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANTATION

A brief historic review of bone-marrow transplantation, human leukocyte antigen matching, pretransplant conditioning, and the use of peripheral blood stem cells in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is presented. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the primary challenges to successful HCT. GVHD, its clinical impact and traditional prophylactic therapies, as well as recent advances in GVHD prevention, are discussed.

Randomized, open-label preference study of two cyclosporine capsule formulations (usp modified) in stable solid-organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Prior research has indicated patient dissatisfaction with the odor, size, and taste of cyclosporine capsules, as well as the halitosis and body odor the capsules can cause.

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this investigation were to (1) compare the overall cyclosporine capsule preference (Gengraf vs Neoral) in stable, solid-organ transplant recipients, (2) assess patient preference based on specific capsule attributes, and (3) determine the reliability of the Cyclosporine Capsule SatiSfaCtion Survey (original to this study).

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, preference study, patients were recruited from 144 centers in North America with established transplant programs. Solid-organ transplant recipients who had taken stable doses of cyclosporine (Neoral) for >/=2 consecutive months were randomized in a 9:1 ratio to receive another cyclosporine formulation (Gengraf) or to remain on Neoral therapy. Patients completed the Cyclosporine Capsule Satisfaction Survey prior to randomization (baseline survey) and after taking the study drug for 4 weeks (final survey). The survey consisted of multiple attribute items with high face validity in assessing patients' perceptions and preferences with regard to their overall experience, as well as specific attributes of cyclosporine capsules known to affect patient acceptance.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population included 1906 patients (1211 men, 693 women [sex unknown in 2 patients]; mean [SD] age, 50.2 [12.4] years). A total of 1708 patients were switched to Gengraf; 198 continued on Neoral. Based on their overall experience with both capsule formulations, the majority of patients switched to Gengraf (61.9%) responded that they preferred the Gengraf capsule, compared with 13.7% who preferred the Neoral capsule and 24.4% who indicated no preference (P < 0.001). A similar preference for Gengraf was observed based on capsule odor (66.3%), ease of swallowing (51.5%), taste (57.1%), and impact on breath odor (52.5%) and body odor (48.4%) (P < 0.001 for each test). The results of internal consistency and reproducibility calculations were high for the Cyclosporine Capsule Satisfaction Survey. Internal consistency ranged from alpha = 0.84 to 0.95 for the subscales and was alpha = 0.95 for the overall score. Ranges for reproducibility in the subscales were r = 0.75 to 0.79, with an overall reproducibility of r = 0.85. Guyatt's responsiveness statistics for the subscale and overall scores were moderately high to very high, indicating that the survey is capable of measuring change in response to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the transplant recipients receiving Gengraf in this study, most preferred Gengraf to Neoral based on overall experience, capsule odor, difficulty swallowing, taste, breath odor, and body odor. Among all study patients, fewer patients receiving Gengraf were bothered by capsule odor, difficulty in swallowing, taste, or the impact on breath or body odor compared with patients who continued to receive Neoral. Internal consistency, reproducibility, and responsiveness results show that the Cyclosporine Capsule Satisfaction Survey is a psychometrically valid instrument that is appropriate for use in clinical trials.

Novel therapeutics for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD remain the major barriers to successful haematopoietic cell transplantation. The induction of GVHD may be divided into three phases: recipient conditioning, donor T cell activation and effector cells mediating GVHD. This review examines GVHD prevention and treatment using this conceptual model as framework. The various pharmacological agents discussed impact on different phases of the GVHD cascade. For example, keratinocyte growth factor and IL-11 are cytokines that may be useful in disrupting Phase I of the GVHD cascade by blocking gastrointestinal tract damage and lowering serum levels of lipopolysaccharide and TNF-alpha. Cyclosporin, FK506 and sirolimus are some of the main agents that disrupt Phase II (donor T cell activation). Mycophenolate mofetil likely acts on this phase as well. Other novel drugs that affect Phase II are tolerance-induction agents such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 Ig and anti-CD40 ligand, and preliminary results using CTLA-4 Ig in GVHD prevention are encouraging. Two exciting agents that appear to affect only activated lymphocytes are ABX-CBL and visilizumab. Examples of agents that disrupt Phase III are the IL-2 receptor antagonist daclizumab and the anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody infliximab. These anticytokine antibodies have shown promising results in early studies. The most effective approach to GVHD prevention will likely be a combination regimen where the three phases of the GVHD cascade are disrupted. Once GVHD has occurred, all three phases of the cascade are activated. Developments of combination therapy for treatment of both acute and chronic GVHD will likely yield better results than monotherapy. The numerous new treatment modalities presented should improve the outlook for acute and chronic GVHD.

Novel pharmacotherapeutic approaches to prevention and treatment of GVHD

Acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) remain the major barriers to successful hematopoietic cell transplantation. The induction of GVHD may be divided into three phases: recipient conditioning;donor T-cell activation; andeffector cells mediating GVHD. This review examines GVHD prevention and treatment using this conceptual model as framework. The various pharmacological agents discussed impact on different phases of the GVHD cascade. For example, keratinocyte growth factor and interleukin (IL)-11 are cytokines that may be useful in disrupting phase I of the GVHD cascade by blocking gastrointestinal tract damage, and lowering serum levels of lipopolysaccharide and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Cyclosporin, tacrolimus (FK-506) and sirolimus (rapamycin) are some of the main agents that disrupt phase II (donor T-cell activation). Mycophenolate mofetil and tresperimus probably act on this phase as well. Other novel drugs that affect phase II are tolerance-induction agents such as CTLA-4 and anti-CD40-ligand monoclonal antibodies, and preliminary results using CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody in GVHD prevention are encouraging. Examples of agents that disrupt phase III are the IL-2 receptor antagonist daclizumab and the anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody infliximab. These anti-cytokine antibodies have shown promising results in early studies. The most effective approach to GVHD prevention will probably be a combination regimen where the three phases of the GVHD cascade are disrupted. Once GVHD has occurred, all three phases of the cascade are activated. Developments of combination therapy for treatment of both acute and chronic GVHD are likely to yield better results than monotherapy. The numerous new treatment modalities presented should improve the outlook for patients with acute and chronic GVHD.

Extracorporeal photopheresis in chronic graft-versus-host disease

Despite significant advances in stem cell manipulation and post-transplant immunosuppression, chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a cause of major long-term morbidity in survivors of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a novel therapeutic intervention which has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory acute and chronic GVHD. Clinical responses have been reported in skin and visceral GVHD. While the long-term immunomodulatory effects of ECP in cGVHD are unknown, recent studies of patients undergoing a 6- to 12-month course of ECP treatment demonstrated an attenuation of Th1-mediated cytokine secretion by activated T-helper cells, a shift in the DC1/DC2 ratio favoring plasmacytoid rather than monocytoid dendritic cell profiles, and a decrease in antigen responsiveness by dendritic cells. The implications of these immunomodulatory effects of ECP on pathogenesis and clinical outcome remains a fertile area for future research.

Methotrexate exacerbates tumor progression in a murine model of chronic myeloid leukemia

Expression of drug-resistant forms of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) in hematopoietic cells confers substantial resistance of animals to antifolate administration. In this study, we tested whether the chemoprotection conferred by expression of the tyrosine-22 variant DHFR could be used for more effective therapy of the 32Dp210 murine model of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). 32Dp210 tumor cells were found to be sensitive to methotrexate (MTX) in vitro, whereas cells expressing the tyrosine-22 DHFR gene were protected from MTX at up to micromolar concentrations. MTX administered at low dose (2 mg/kg/day) did not protect normal C3H-He/J mice from 32Dp210 tumor infused intravenously, with drug toxicity limiting the administration of higher doses. Animals engrafted with transgenic tyrosine-22 DHFR marrow were protected from greater MTX doses (up to 6 mg/kg/day). However, the increased doses of MTX afforded by drug-resistance gene expression surprisingly resulted in decreased survival of the transplanted tumor-bearing animals, with increased levels of tumor detected in peripheral blood. This apparent exacerbation of tumor progression by MTX was not observed in DHFR transgenic mice in which all cells and tissues contain the drug-resistance gene. This suggests that increased tumor progression in MTX-administered animals resulted from MTX sensitivity of a nonhematopoietic host component, thus allowing tumor expansion. We conclude that MTX exacerbates tumor progression in the 32Dp210 model of CML, and that based on this model alternate DHFR inhibitors combined with drug-resistant DHFR or other chemotherapeutic agent/drug-resistance gene combinations may be required for the application of drug-resistance gene expression to the treatment of CML.