The Clinical Effects of Manipulative Therapy in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Physiotherapy interventions on chest wall mobility in obstructive lung diseases: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on chest mobility in obstructive lung diseases.

METHODS

Searches were performed in PEDro, Pubmed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases without language restrictions between 2010 and 25th December 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating physiotherapy interventions on chest wall mobility were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. The assessment of risk of bias was conducted using the PEDro scale for RCTs. The articles were excluded if they have less than 5 out of 10 score.

RESULTS

Five studies included had good to excellent quality. A total of 139 patients were included in all RCTs. Intervention duration ranged from a single session to 12 weeks and the intervention schedules varied, consisting of 1-24 sessions, lasting 5-45 min per sessions. Three studies used respiratory muscle stretching and releasing techniques, one study combined respiratory muscle stretching with aerobic training, and one study planned diaphragmatic breathing. Four studies assessed chest wall mobility with optoelectronic plethysmography, whereas one study used measuring tape.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of this first systematic review that investigates the effects of physiotherapy interventions on chest wall mobility in obstructive lung diseases suggests that more and better quality RCTs with objective measurement tools are required.

The effectiveness and safety of Chuna manual therapy adjuvant to Western medicine in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Study protocol for a randomized, single-blind, investigator-initiated, pilot trial

BACKGROUND

In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, greater emphasis has been placed on symptomatic improvement and enhanced quality of life in patients. Manual therapy among respiratory rehabilitation programs has received much attention recently, with the publication of numerous studies. In South Korea, a method known as Chuna Manual Therapy (CMT) has been applied in the management of COPD patients and in clinical practice, but the clinical basis for safety and effectiveness is yet to be established. Therefore, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials are required. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of assessing the add-on effect and safety of CMT administered with standard Western medicine therapy for the treatment of COPD.

METHODS

This is a randomized, single-blind, single-center clinical pilot trial. Patients with COPD receiving standard drug therapy are randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 20) and a control group (n = 20) at a 1:1 ratio. The experimental group receives CMT adding to the standard medical therapy once a week for 8 weeks. The control group receives only the standard drug treatment. The trial is conducted with an outcome assessor and statistician blinding. The primary outcome is the 6-minute walk test. The secondary outcomes include the pulmonary function test, the Modified Medical Research Council, visual analog scale for dyspnea, COPD assessment test, quality of life using the St. George's respiratory questionnaire, EuroQOL five dimensions questionnaire, and Korean pattern identification questionnaire. Adverse events are also be evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study will provide the feasibility of a large-scale clinical trial to establish high-quality clinical evidence of CMT for COPD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Korean Clinical Trial Registry (http://cris.nih.go.kr; registration number: KCT0006119).

The efficacy of manual therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review

Background

Manual therapy (MT) can be beneficial in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, evidence of the efficacy of MT for COPD is not clear. Therefore, we aimed to review the effects of MT, including Chuna, in people diagnosed with COPD.

Methods

MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Database (CNKI), KoreaMed, Korean Medical Database (KMbase), and Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS) were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and crossover RCTs were included. The main inclusion criteria were COPD diagnosis (forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV₁]/forced vital capacity [FVC] < 0.70). The primary outcomes were lung function and exercise capacity. The secondary outcomes were symptoms, quality of life (QoL), and adverse event (AE)s. Studies reporting one or both of the primary outcomes were included. The Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Data synthesis and analysis were conducted according to the trial design.

Results

Of the 2564 searched articles, 13 studies were included. For the primary outcomes, the effect of MT on pulmonary function and exercise capacity in COPD was partly significant but could not be confirmed due to the limited number of studies included in the subgroups. For the secondary outcomes, no definitive evidence regarding the improvement of symptoms and QoL was found, and some minor adverse effects were reported.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to support the role of MT in the management of COPD. High-quality studies are needed to thoroughly evaluate the effect of MT on COPD.

Spinal Manipulation and Select Manual Therapies: Current Perspectives

Touch is fundamental to the doctor-patient relationship. Touch can produce neuromodulatory effects that mitigate pain and put patients at ease. Touch begins with a confident handshake and continues throughout the physical examination. Touching patients where they hurt is a clear indication that a provider understands their complaint. Touch often continues as a function of treatment. This article updates evidence surrounding human touch and addresses mechanisms of action for manual therapy, the impact of manual therapy on pain management, health care conditions for which manual therapy may be beneficial, treatment plans with dose-response evidence, and the impact of manual therapy on the health care system.

The efficacy of manual therapy (Chuna) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a challenging disease whose prevalence has increased over the last decades. Non-pharmacological therapies such as pulmonary rehabilitation occupy a core position in patient management. Among these therapies, manual therapy reduces symptoms and increases exercise capacity targeting musculoskeletal problems. Chuna, a traditional Korean manual therapy, has improved pulmonary disorders in clinical practice but unfortunately has not had its effects reported. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of manual therapy, focused on the use of Chuna in the management of COPD patients.

METHODS

The following databases will be used in this study: MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Database (CNKI), KoreaMed, Korean Medical Database (KMbase), and Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS). The primary outcome comprises lung function and exercise capacity. Secondary outcomes included symptoms, quality of life, and adverse events. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and crossover studies. Two independent reviewers will screen the searched studies, determine if they are suitable for inclusion, and perform data extraction. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. When appropriate, data will be pooled across studies for meta-analysis using a fixed or random effects model. When quantitative synthesis is not appropriate, the evidence will be summarized qualitatively.

RESULTS

This study will provide a comprehensive review of the available evidence to assess the efficacy of Chuna for COPD patients. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will provide high-quality current evidence for evaluation the efficacy of Chuna for patients with COPD. Clinicians, patients and policy makers may find this review useful in making decisions regarding the use of Chuna for patients with COPD.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019141150.

Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

Background

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an increasingly prevalent respiratory disease that impacts on daily living. In addition to difficulty breathing, many people experience extrapulmonary comorbidities such as musculoskeletal disorders. Pulmonary rehabilitation can improve fitness and strength but may be difficult for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Recent research indicates promising benefits of adding manual therapy to standard care to improve clinical outcomes.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) for people with COPD.

Methods

Ten databases were searched from inceptions to May 2018. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials assessing MET compared to any control for COPD. Outcomes included lung function, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.

Results

Three randomised controlled trials assessing 90 participants were included. The quality of the research was limited by reporting of outcome measures and results, varying treatment protocols, and small sample sizes. Results from one study showed that pulmonary function was not statistically different between groups at end of treatment (FEV1% MD 4.87%; 95% CI - 0.79 to 10.53). Exercise capacity and perceived dyspnoea ratings were improved in single studies. Adverse events were unrelated to the MET intervention.

Conclusions

The use of MET for COPD is an emerging field of research, with few studies evaluating its efficacy and safety. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of MET in the management of COPD. Rigorously designed studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better understand the role of MET for COPD.