1
|
Stolz R, Klocke C, Mahler C, Valentini J, Joos S. Integrative nursing interventions: knowledge, attitudes and practice in home nursing services in Germany-a quantitative and qualitative online survey. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1438035. [PMID: 39421868 PMCID: PMC11484039 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Integrative nursing interventions (INI) play a significant role in healthcare, particularly in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. Integrating evidence-based INI into healthcare aligns with global initiatives such as the WHO's Decade of Healthy Aging 2020-2030. Many INI are low-threshold practices, empowering patients to independently manage health. However, the extent to which INI are used by home-care nursing-services (HNS) remains largely unknown. This study aims to explore the field of INI in German HNS regarding nurses' use of INI as well as attitudes, subjective knowledge, and information needs on the subject. Methods A cross-sectional anonymous online survey with 29 Likert scale items and two open-ended questions was conducted between April 2023 and July 2023. The survey targeted nurse managers of HNS in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Descriptive analysis was performed for quantitative data, while content analysis according to Kuckartz was applied to analyze open-ended text responses. Results In total, n = 68 out of n = 1,331 HNS took part in the survey yielding a response rate of 5.1%. Their overall attitude toward INI was clearly positive (10-point Likert scale M ± SD: 8.37 ± 2.22). The average self-assessed knowledge level about INI was moderate (M ± SD: 5.39 ± 2.76). Almost half of the participants (45.6%) declared to incorporate INI in patient care. Most participants (84.2%) lacked employees with additional qualifications in INI. The INI used most were medicinal herbal teas (61%), compresses (57%), and aromatherapy (48%). Acupressure showed the greatest disparity between actual use in participating HNS (4.3%) and interest in further education (61%). The most common symptoms for which INI are used are pain, respiratory problems, anxiety, and palliative care. The main challenges reported for the use of INI in HNS are financial aspects, qualification and limited resources (staff and time). Discussion This exploratory study provides the first insights into nurses' attitudes, self-assessed knowledge, and utilization of INI in German HNS. Overall response rate was low (5.1%), therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution. Urgent action is needed to address financial aspects and further education on INI, to promote integration of INI in HNS to the best possible extent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Stolz
- Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carina Klocke
- Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Department of Nursing Science, Institute for Health Sciences, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jan Valentini
- Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Joos
- Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klafke N, Bossert J, Kröger B, Neuberger P, Heyder U, Layer M, Winkler M, Idler C, Kaschdailewitsch E, Heine R, John H, Zielke T, Schmeling B, Joy S, Mertens I, Babadag-Savas B, Kohler S, Mahler C, Witt CM, Steinmann D, Voiss P, Stolz R. Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) with Non-Pharmacological Interventions: Clinical Recommendations from a Systematic Scoping Review and an Expert Consensus Process. Med Sci (Basel) 2023; 11:15. [PMID: 36810482 PMCID: PMC9944490 DOI: 10.3390/medsci11010015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Most individuals affected by cancer who are treated with certain chemotherapies suffer of CIPN. Therefore, there is a high patient and provider interest in complementary non-pharmacological therapies, but its evidence base has not yet been clearly pointed out in the context of CIPN. Methods: The results of a scoping review overviewing the published clinical evidence on the application of complementary therapies for improving the complex CIPN symptomatology are synthesized with the recommendations of an expert consensus process aiming to draw attention to supportive strategies for CIPN. The scoping review, registered at PROSPERO 2020 (CRD 42020165851), followed the PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines. Relevant studies published in Pubmed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL between 2000 and 2021 were included. CASP was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the studies. Results: Seventy-five studies with mixed study quality met the inclusion criteria. Manipulative therapies (including massage, reflexology, therapeutic touch), rhythmical embrocations, movement and mind-body therapies, acupuncture/acupressure, and TENS/Scrambler therapy were the most frequently analyzed in research and may be effective treatment options for CIPN. The expert panel approved 17 supportive interventions, most of them were phytotherapeutic interventions including external applications and cryotherapy, hydrotherapy, and tactile stimulation. More than two-thirds of the consented interventions were rated with moderate to high perceived clinical effectiveness in therapeutic use. Conclusions: The evidence of both the review and the expert panel supports a variety of complementary procedures regarding the supportive treatment of CIPN; however, the application on patients should be individually weighed in each case. Based on this meta-synthesis, interprofessional healthcare teams may open up a dialogue with patients interested in non-pharmacological treatment options to tailor complementary counselling and treatments to their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadja Klafke
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jasmin Bossert
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Kröger
- Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Petra Neuberger
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Heyder
- Women’s Clinic, Community Hospital Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Monika Layer
- Center for Integrative Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Marcela Winkler
- Department of Naturopathy and Integrative Medicine, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christel Idler
- Department of Naturopathy and Integrative Medicine, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Elke Kaschdailewitsch
- Center for Integrative Oncology, Die Filderklinik, 70794 Filderstadt-Bonlanden, Germany
| | - Rolf Heine
- Anthroposophic Nursing Network in Germany, Academy for Nursing Professions at the Filderklinik, Die Filderklinik, 70794 Filderstadt-Bonlanden, Germany
| | - Heike John
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Tatjana Zielke
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Beeke Schmeling
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Sosamma Joy
- Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Isabel Mertens
- Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Burcu Babadag-Savas
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Sara Kohler
- Department of Health, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health Sciences, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claudia M. Witt
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Diana Steinmann
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Petra Voiss
- Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Regina Stolz
- Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|