1
|
Liou KT, Ashare R, Worster B, Jones KF, Yeager KA, Acevedo AM, Ferrer R, Meghani SH. SIO-ASCO guideline on integrative medicine for cancer pain management: implications for racial and ethnic pain disparities. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad042. [PMID: 37307074 PMCID: PMC10336300 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Racial and ethnic disparities in pain management pose major challenges to equitable cancer care delivery. These disparities are driven by complex interactions between patient-, provider-, and system-related factors that resist reductionistic solutions and require innovative, holistic approaches. On September 19, 2022, the Society for Integrative Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology published a joint guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations on integrative medicine for cancer pain management. Integrative medicine, which combines conventional treatments with complementary modalities from cultures and traditions around the world, are uniquely equipped to resonate with diverse cancer populations and fill existing gaps in pain management. Although some complementary modalities, such as music therapy and yoga, lack sufficient evidence to make a specific recommendation, other modalities, such as acupuncture, massage, and hypnosis, demonstrated an intermediate level of evidence, resulting in moderate strength recommendations for their use in cancer pain management. However, several factors may hinder real-world implementation of the Society for Integrative Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline and must be addressed to ensure equitable pain management for all communities. These barriers include, but are not limited to, the lack of insurance coverage for many complementary therapies, the limited diversity and availability of complementary therapy providers, the negative social norms surrounding complementary therapies, the underrepresentation of racial and ethnic subgroups in the clinical research of complementary therapies, and the paucity of culturally attuned interventions tailored to diverse individuals. This commentary examines both the challenges and the opportunities for addressing racial and ethnic disparities in cancer pain management through integrative medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin T Liou
- Integrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Ashare
- Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Brooke Worster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katie F Jones
- Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine A Yeager
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amanda M Acevedo
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca Ferrer
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Salimah H Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mascaro JS, Catic A, Srivastava M, Diller M, Rana S, Escoffery C, Master V. Examination of Provider and Patient Knowledge, Beliefs, and Preferences in Integrative Oncology at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE REPORTS 2022; 1:66-75. [PMID: 35966884 PMCID: PMC9372903 DOI: 10.1089/imr.2021.0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The use of integrative approaches for symptom management is highly prevalent among patients undergoing cancer treatment and among cancer survivors and is increasingly endorsed by clinical practice guidelines. However, access to and implementation of integrative oncology (IO) approaches are hindered by barriers at multiple levels, including logistic, geographic, financial, organizational, and cultural barriers. The goal of this mixed-method study was to examine oncology provider and patient knowledge, beliefs, and preferences in IO to identify facilitators, barriers, and recommendations for implementation of IO modalities. Materials and Methods Data sources included patient surveys and provider semistructured interviews. Patients were in active treatment (n = 100) and survivors (n = 100) of heterogeneous cancer types. Patient and survivor surveys interrogated: (1) interest in types of IO approaches; and (2) preferences for delivery modality, frequency, and location. Providers (n = 18) were oncologists and nurse navigators working with diverse cancer types. Interviews queried their knowledge of and attitudes about IO, about their patients' needs for symptom management, and for recommendations for implementation of IO approaches in their clinic. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to systematically analyze provider interviews. Results The primary interests reported among actively treated patients and survivors were massage therapy, acupuncture, and wellness/exercise. Most patients expressed interest in both group and individual sessions and in telehealth or virtual reality options. Emergent themes from provider interviews identified barriers and facilitators to implementing IO approaches in both the internal and external settings, as well as for the implementation process. Conclusion The emphasis on mind-body interventions as integrative rather than alternative highlights the importance of interventions as evidence-based, comprehensive, and integrated into health care. Gaining simultaneous perspectives from both patients and physicians generated insights for the implementation of IO care into complex clinical systems within a comprehensive cancer center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S. Mascaro
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Almira Catic
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Meha Srivastava
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maggie Diller
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shaheen Rana
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Behavioral, Social, Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Viraj Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Desai K, Bao T, Li QS, Raghunathan NJ, Trevino K, Green A, Xiao H, Mao JJ. Understanding interest, barriers, and preferences related to yoga practice among cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:5313-5321. [PMID: 33660077 PMCID: PMC9364436 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06083-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite growing evidence supporting the benefits of yoga for cancer-related symptom management, yoga usage among cancer survivors is low. To translate the evidence of yoga benefits into community practice, it is critical to understand interest in yoga as well as barriers and preferences that influence yoga usage among cancer survivors. METHOD We conducted a cross-sectional survey study among cancer survivors, 18 years or older, with a primary diagnosis of cancer, and receiving treatment or follow-up care at outpatient clinics at five regional academic cancer center sites. We collected data and performed bivariate and multivariable analyses on self-reported yoga usage and interest in and barriers to practicing yoga, as well as preferred location and time for yoga practice. RESULTS Of 857 participants, 70.0% had never practiced yoga and 52.3% were interested in practicing yoga. Among those interested, 52.5% had never practiced yoga. Lower interest was independently associated with being male (odds ratio [OR] = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20-0.44, p < 0.001), unemployed (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.39-0.91, p = 0.016), and white (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.23-0.78, p = 0.005). Commonly cited barriers among those who were interested but had never practiced were not aware of yoga benefits (36.3%), difficulty motivating (28.7%), experiencing symptoms (22.9%), and not enough time (22.0%). Participants indicated "on-site and at a studio near home" (41.5%) as preferred location and evenings (3-8 pm, 34.0%) as preferred time for yoga practice. CONCLUSION Although more than 50% of patients indicated interest in practicing yoga, use of yoga is low among cancer survivors. Barriers and patient preferences for yoga practice need to be addressed to design effective yoga programs for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krupali Desai
- Integrative Medicine Services, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| | - Ting Bao
- Integrative Medicine Services, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Qing S Li
- Integrative Medicine Services, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Nirupa J Raghunathan
- Integrative Medicine Services, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Kelly Trevino
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Angela Green
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Han Xiao
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Regional Network Site, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA
| | - Jun J Mao
- Integrative Medicine Services, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|