Human T-cell leukemia virus infection in non-intravenous drug using HIV seropositive men in Los Angeles

HTLV-1 Transmission and HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: A Scoping Review

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (HIV-PrEP) is effective in reducing the likelihood of HIV acquisition in HIV-negative people at high risk of exposure. Guidelines recommend testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) before starting, and periodically on PrEP, including bacterial infections, HIV, hepatitis C virus, and, for those who are non-immune, hepatitis B virus. Diagnosed infections can be promptly treated to reduce onward transmission. HTLV-1 is not mentioned; however, it is predominantly sexually transmitted, causes adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma (ATL) or myelopathy in 10% of those infected, and is associated with an increased risk of death in those without any classically HTLV-associated condition. The 2021 WHO Technical Report on HTLV-1 called for the strengthening of global public health measures against its spread. In this scoping review, we, therefore, (1) discuss the epidemiological context of HIV-PrEP and HTLV-1 transmission; (2) present current knowledge of antiretrovirals in relation to HTLV-1 transmission prevention, including nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs); and (3) identify knowledge gaps where data are urgently required to inform global public health measures to protect HIV-PrEP users from HTLV-1 acquisition. We suggest that systematic seroprevalence studies among PrEP-using groups, including men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWIDs), and female sex workers (FSWs), are needed. Further data are required to evaluate antiretroviral efficacy in preventing HTLV-1 transmission from in vitro studies, animal models, and clinical cohorts. PrEP delivery programmes should consider prioritizing the long-acting injectable INSTI, cabotegravir, in HTLV-1 endemic settings.

HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections among HIV-1 seropositive patients in Sao Paulo, Brazil

To estimate the presence of, and the risk factors for HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections among HIV-1 infected subjects in Sao Paulo, Brazil, a serosurvey was performed in 471 HIV-1 infected patients, including 216 intravenous drug addicts (IVDA), 229 homosexual/bisexual men, and 26 with other risk factors. Serum samples were screened for HTLV seroreactivity by ELISA; reactive samples were analyzed by Western Blot (WB), using whole HTLV-I lysate as antigen. To confirm and discriminate HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections, sera presenting any bands on WB were further analyzed by a WB containing recombinant HTLV-I and HTLV-II proteins (WB 2.3), and by enzyme immunoassays using synthetic peptides specific for envelope proteins (Synth-EIA). In 22 cases, cell samples were available for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies. On WB, 114 sera were reactive and, of these, 37 and 25 were concordantly positive on both WB 2.3 and Synth-EIA procedures for HTLV-I and HTLV-II specific antibodies, respectively; 37 specimens were negative on both assays, and 15 gave discordant or indeterminate results. PCR findings confirmed concordant results obtained in the discriminatory serological assays. The prevalence rates of HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections were 15.3% and 11.1% in IVDA, and 0.9% and 0.4% in homosexual/bisexual men, respectively. No case of HTLV-I/HTLV-II co-infection was found.

Human T cell leukemia virus (HTLV-I/II) serodiagnostic testing: disparate results among a cohort of intravenous drug users

Three hundred and forty-six sera collected over a 2-year period from 154 San Francisco IV drug users were subjected to HTLV-I/II RIPA, Western blot (WB), Du Pont ELISA, and p24 radioimmunoassay (RIA). Tests were performed at separate sites and code not broken until study end. RIPA-positive and -negative controls consisted of Japanese adult T cell leukemia patients, healthy blood donors, and non-IV drug-using HIV-positive men. RIPA identified HTLV-I/II-positive sera not identified by the other tests. Positive RIPAs were noted in 43% of negative ELISAs (n = 279), 34% of negative WBs (n = 243), and 40% of negative RIAs (n = 270). Seventy-two sera were negative by all 3 assays, but were RIPA positive. All sera positive by RIA (n = 76) and WB (n = 67), and 66 of 67 by ELISA, were positive by RIPA. Thirty-five of 36 indeterminate WBs were RIPA positive. Seven samples indeterminate by RIPA were negative by WB and RIA; one of seven was positive by ELISA. In all instances, samples negative by RIPA (n = 154) were ELISA, p24 RIA, and WB negative or indeterminate. We conclude that when studying HTLV-I/II-endemic cohorts, screening ELISA or RIA followed by confirmatory WB or RIPA only of seropositive samples may result in a substantial number of undetected cases. Additional studies focusing on performance characteristics of serodiagnostic tests are needed to ensure accurate inferences are made in assessing HTLV-I/II prevalence rates among high-risk groups. The RIPA may be a uniquely sensitive assay to detect HTLV-I/II gene-encoded products.

Human T-cell leukemia virus type-I/II (HTLV-I/II) serologic testing: the importance of assaying for the full complement of viral antigens

Seventy-one Japanese adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) patients and 411 Japanese asymptomatic patients from HTLV-I endemic regions of southern Japan were found to be seropositive by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA). Of these 482 positive controls, 62% of ATL patients and 67% of the asymptomatic seropositive patients were found to harbor antibodies to p40x. Additionally, 333 preselected Japanese blood donors who were identified as seropositive by particle agglutination (PA) assay were further tested for antibodies to HTLV-I/II gene encoded envelope (env) or group specific antigens (gag) by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and RIPA. Concordance between ELISA and RIPA was noted in 318 samples (92.5%). Discordance between ELISA and RIPA was observed in 15 sera (7.5%)--2 were seropositive by ELISA and seronegative by RIPA and 13 were seronegative by ELISA and seropositive by RIPA. Seven of these 13 samples (53.8%) contained antibodies to p40x by RIPA and may represent ELISA false negatives on the basis of both clinical and laboratory data. Current HTLV-I/II ELISA kits may yield false negative results. Additional research into the development of rapid detection cost-efficient assays that test for the full compliment of viral antigens is needed.