New viral vectors for HIV vaccine delivery

Immune responses against SIV envelope glycoprotein, using recombinant SV40 as a vaccine delivery vector

Vaccination protocols using viral gene delivery vectors have often generated relatively weak responses, largely owing to difficulties in boosting immune responses effectively following the primary injection. Because recombinant gene delivery vectors derived from SV40 permit multiple inoculations, to yield incremental immune responses, we tested the use of rSV40s to deliver lentiviral envelope antigens for immunization. An rSV40 carrying SIVmac239 envelope glycoprotein gp130 cDNA (SV(gp130)) was given multiple times to BALB/c mice, with or without a prior priming inoculation using vaccinia virus carrying the same SIV envelope cDNA (VVenvSIV). Sera from these mice were tested for antibodies binding gp130, applying a novel cell-based ELISA protocol that used as targets cloned P815 cells stably transfected with plasmid-derived gp130 cDNA. The same gp130-expressing clone of P815 cells, labeled with 51Cr was used as targets for direct lymphocyte-mediated cytolytic assays using spleen and popliteal lymph node cells as effectors. After six inoculations with SV(gp130), mice made detectable anti-gp130 antibody responses, but high levels of splenic and popliteal lymph node cytotoxic activity were apparent after as few as three injections of SV(gp130) (>40% specific lysis). A single primary inoculation with VVenvSIV preceding SV(gp130) boosts significantly enhanced antibody responses against SIV gp130, but had little effect on cytotoxic lymphocyte responses. Thus, rSV40 vectors may be useful vehicles for delivering lentiviral envelope antigens to elicit protective humoral and cell-mediated immune responses.

Nucleic acid vaccines: tasks and tactics

There are no adequate vaccines against some of the new or reemerged infectious scourges such as HIV and TB. They may require strong and enduring cell-mediated immunity to be elicited. This is quite a task, as the only known basis of protection by current commercial vaccines is antibody. As DNA or RNA vaccines may induce both cell-mediated and humoral immunity, great interest has been shown in them. However, doubt remains whether their efficacy will suffice for their clinical realization. We look at the various tactics to increase the potency of nucleic acid vaccines and divided them broadly under those affecting delivery and those affecting immune induction. For delivery, we have considered ways of improving uptake and the use of bacterial, replicon or viral vectors. For immune induction, we considered aspects of immunostimulatory CpG motifs, coinjection of cytokines or costimulators and alterations of the antigen, its cellular localization and its anatomical localization including the use of ligand-targeting to lymphoid tissue. We also thought that mucosal application of DNA deserved a separate section. In this review, we have taken the liberty to discuss these enhancement methods, whenever possible, in the context of the underlying mechanisms that might argue for or against these strategies.

High avidity cytotoxic T lymphocytes to a foreign antigen are efficiently activated following immunization with a recombinant paramyxovirus, simian virus 5

Our previous work has shown that high avidity cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) are optimal for virus clearance in vivo and thus it is necessary that an effective vaccine is capable of eliciting high avidity CTL. To determine if vaccination with the paramyxovirus simian virus 5 (SV5) elicits a high avidity response to a model foreign antigen, a recombinant virus was engineered to express chicken ovalbumin (rSV5-Ova). To compare the CTL response elicited with rSV5-Ova and a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing ovalbumin (rVV-Ova), mice were vaccinated intranasally with various doses of each vector and the Ova-specific CTL response was determined by ELISPOT analysis. Here, it has been shown that rSV5 can be equally as effective as rVV in eliciting antigen-specific CTL, in terms of both the total number of CTL and the number of high avidity cells. This has implications for both the design of vaccine vectors and the route utilized for vaccine administration for the elicitation of high avidity CTL responses. The advantages and future potential use of rSV5 vaccine vectors are discussed.

Latest developments in gene transfer technology: achievements, perspectives, and controversies over therapeutic applications

Over the last decade, more than 300 phase I and phase II gene-based clinical trials have been conducted worldwide for the treatment of cancer and monogenic disorders. Lately, these trials have been extended to the treatment of AIDS and, to a lesser extent, cardiovascular diseases. There are 27 currently active gene therapy protocols for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in the USA. Preclinical studies are currently in progress to evaluate the possibility of increasing the number of gene therapy clinical trials for cardiopathies, and of beginning new gene therapy programs for neurologic illnesses, autoimmuno diseases, allergies, regeneration of tissues, and to implement procedures of allogeneic tissues or cell transplantation. In addition, gene transfer technology has allowed for the development of innovative vaccine design, known as genetic immunization. This technique has already been applied in the AIDS vaccine programs in the USA. These programs aim to confer protective immunity against HIV-1 transmission to individuals who are at risk of infection. Research programs have also been considered to develop therapeutic vaccines for patients with AIDS and generate either preventive or therapeutic vaccines against malaria, tuberculosis, hepatitis A, B and C viruses, influenza virus, La Crosse virus, and Ebola virus. The potential therapeutic applications of gene transfer technology are enormous. However, the effectiveness of gene therapy programs is still questioned. Furthermore, there is growing concern over the matter of safety of gene delivery and controversy has arisen over the proposal to begin in utero gene therapy clinical trials for the treatment of inherited genetic disorders. From this standpoint, despite the latest significant achievements reported in vector design, it is not possible to predict to what extent gene therapeutic interventions will be effective in patients, and in what time frame.