Virological outcome of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in HIV-coinfected patients receiving anti-HBV active antiretroviral therapy

Incidence of hepatitis B virus infection among human immunodeficiency virus-infected treatment naïve adults in Botswana

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection is highest in sub-Saharan Africa and results in accelerated clinical outcomes compared with HBV or HIV mono-infection. HBV clearance rates are higher in healthy adults; however, in sub-Saharan Africa, there are limited data on clearance of incident HBV in HIV-infected adults. Therefore, we sought to estimate HBV incidence and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance in HIV-infected adults in Botswana.This was a retrospective longitudinal study of 442 HIV-1C infected treatment naïve patients enrolled in a previous Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership study. Archived plasma samples from 435 HIV-infected treatment naïve participants were screened for HBsAg and HBV core antibody (anti-HBc). HBsAg was evaluated annually over a 4-year period, and HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels of HBsAg-positive chronic and incident patients were quantified.Baseline median CD4+ T-cell count was 458 cells/μL [Q1, Q3: 373, 593], and median HIV viral load was 4.15 copies/mL [Q1, Q3: 3.46, 4.64]. Twenty two HBV incident cases occurred, representing an incidence of 3.6/100 person-years [95% CI: 2.2-5.6]. All incident HBV cases with a follow-up sample available for screening (13/22) cleared HBsAg. Detectable HBV viral loads among chronic and incident cases ranged between 5.15 × 10 to 1.4 × 10 IU/L and 1.80 × 10 to 1.7 × 10 IU/mL, respectively.We report high HBV incidence associated with elevated HBV DNA levels despite high CD4+ T-cell counts in HIV-infected patients in Botswana. These incidence cases represent a potential source of HBV transmission in the population. Scaling-up of HIV treatment strategies utilizing antiretroviral therapy regimens with anti-HBV activity coupled with screening for HBV infections in households of the HBsAg-positive cases is recommended.

Evolution of hepatitis B serological markers in HIV coinfected patients: a case study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the evolution of serological markers among HIV and hepatitis B coinfected patients, with emphasis on evaluating the reactivation or seroreversion of these markers.

METHODS

The study population consisted of patients met in an AIDS Outpatient Clinic in São Paulo State, Brazil. We included in the analysis all HIV-infected and who underwent at least two positive hepatitis B surface antigen serological testing during clinical follow up, with tests taken six months apart. Patients were tested with commercial kits available for hepatitis B serological markers by microparticle enzyme immunoassay. Clinical variables were collected: age, sex, CD4+ T-cell count, HIV viral load, alanine aminotransferase level, exposure to antiretroviral drugs including lamivudine and/or tenofovir.

RESULTS

Among 2,242 HIV positive patients, we identified 105 (4.7%) patients with chronic hepatitis B. Follow up time for these patients varied from six months to 20.5 years. All patients underwent antiretroviral therapy during follow-up. Among patients with chronic hepatitis B, 58% were hepatitis B "e" antigen positive at the first assessment. Clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen occurred in 15% (16/105) of patients with chronic hepatitis B, and 50% (8/16) of these patients presented subsequent reactivation or seroreversion of hepatitis B surface antigen. Among hepatitis B "e" antigen positive patients, 57% (35/61) presented clearance of this serologic marker. During clinical follow up, 28.5% (10/35) of those who initially cleared hepatitis B "e" antigen presented seroreversion or reactivation of this marker.

CONCLUSIONS

Among HIV coinfected patients under antiretroviral therapy, changes of HBV serological markers were frequently observed. These results suggest that frequent monitoring of these serum markers should be recommended.

Slow CD4+ T-Cell Recovery in Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis B Virus-Coinfected Patients Initiating Truvada-Based Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in Botswana

Background.  Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality. We determined the response to Truvada-based first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in HIV/HBV-coinfected verus HIV-monoinfected patients in Botswana. Methods.  Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV e antigen (HBeAg), and HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) load were determined from baseline and follow-up visits in a longitudinal cART cohort of Truvada-based regimen. We assessed predictors of HBV serostatus and viral suppression (undetectable HBV DNA) using logistic regression techniques. Results.  Of 300 participants, 28 were HBsAg positive, giving an HIV/HBV prevalence of 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-13.2), and 5 of these, 17.9% (95% CI, 6.1-36.9), were HBeAg positive. There was a reduced CD4+ T-cell gain in HIV/HBV-coinfected compared with HIV-monoinfected patients. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen and HBeAg loss was 38% and 60%, respectively, at 24 months post-cART initiation. The HBV DNA suppression rates increased with time on cART from 54% to 75% in 6 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions.  Human immunodeficiency virus/HBV coinfection negatively affected immunologic recovery compared with HIV-1C monoinfection. Hepatitis B virus screening before cART initiation could help improve HBV/HIV treatment outcomes and help determine treatment options when there is a need to switch regimens.

HBV genotypes and response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV/HBV-coinfected persons

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes can influence treatment outcome in HBV-monoinfected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HBV-coinfected patients. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plays a pivotal role in antiretroviral therapy (ART) of HIV/HBV-coinfected patients. The influence of HBV genotypes on the response to antiviral drugs, particularly TDF, is poorly understood.

Methods

HIV/HBV-co-infected participants with detectable HBV DNA prior to TDF therapy were selected from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. HBV genotypes were identified and resistance testing was performed prior to antiviral therapy, and in patients with delayed treatment response (>6 months). The efficacy of TDF to suppress HBV (HBV DNA <20 IU/mL) and the influence of HBV genotypes were determined.

Results

143 HIV/HBV-coinfected participants with detectable HBV DNA were identified. The predominant HBV genotypes were A (82 patients, 57 %); and D (35 patients, 24 %); 20 patients (14 %) were infected with multiple genotypes (3 % A + D and 11 % A + G); and genotypes B, C and E were each present in two patients (1 %). TDF completely suppressed HBV DNA in 131 patients (92 %) within 6 months; and in 12 patients (8 %), HBV DNA suppression was delayed. No HBV resistance mutations to TDF were found in patients with delayed response, but all were infected with HBV genotype A (among these, 5 patients with genotype A + G), and all had previously been exposed to lamivudine.

Conclusion

In HIV/HBV-coinfected patients, infection with multiple HBV genotypes was more frequent than previously reported. The large majority of patients had an undetectable HBV viral load at six months of TDF-containing ART. In patients without viral suppression, no TDF-related resistance mutations were found. The role of specific genotypes and prior lamivudine treatment in the delayed response to TDF warrant further investigation.

Outcomes in HIV/HBV-Coinfected Patients in the Tenofovir Era Are Greatly Affected by Immune Suppression

OBJECTIVES

HIV-infected patients have higher mortality when coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). With potent highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and the use of tenofovir (TDF), outcomes may improve. Our objective was to determine the clinical and virological outcomes of a HIV/HBV-Coinfected cohort at our center since TDF became available.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied all HIV/HBV-Coinfected adults followed between 2002 and 2012 for ≥3 months. Outcome measurements included HBV DNA suppression, HBV e-antigen (HBeAg) and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance, cirrhosis diagnosis, development of liver complications, and overall and liver-related mortality. Predicting factors were assessed with log-rank test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Median time to follow-up of the 99 patients included was 5 years. Undetectable HBV DNA and HBsAg loss were achieved by 65% and 18%, respectively. Overall and liver-related mortality rates were 4.58 and 0.91 per 100 person-years, respectively. Most patients died of causes unrelated to the liver. Four patients died from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and one, hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected, from liver failure. Higher CD4 counts at last follow-up were associated with HBV suppression (odds ratio [OR] 1.004, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001-1.006, P=.007), HBeAg loss (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1-1.005, P=.02), HBsAg loss (CD4 count>700 cells/mm3, OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.06-13.58, P=.04), and survival (OR .994, 95% CI 0.990-0.997, P<.0001). HCV coinfection was associated with higher overall mortality (OR 7.74, 95% CI 1.47-40.81, P=.02).

CONCLUSION

Mortality was high and most often unrelated to liver disease in this HIV/HBV-Coinfected cohort treated predominantly with TDF-containing HAART. Optimal CD4 counts predicted survival and the achievement of HBV virological end points. Tenofovir prevented liver decompensation but not HCC, which was the predominant cause of liver death.

Virologic and serologic outcomes of mono versus dual HBV therapy and characterization of HIV/HBV coinfection in a US cohort

OBJECTIVES

To characterize HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Longitudinal Linked Randomized Trials cohort and compare long-term HBV outcomes between regimens with 1 (MONO) or 2 (DUAL) anti-HBV agents.

DESIGN

A retrospective study of coinfected AIDS Clinical Trials Group Longitudinal Linked Randomized Trials subjects who received regimens containing anti-HBV agent(s).

METHODS

Stored samples at baseline and weeks 16, 32, 48, 144, and 240 were tested for HBV DNA, HBV e antigen (HBeAg), HBV e antibody (HBeAb), and hepatitis D virus (HDV) antibody. Resistance and genotype were tested in samples with HBV DNA >600 IU/mL. MONO versus DUAL analyses were limited to HBV treatment-naive subjects (Naive-MONO, Naive-DUAL).

RESULTS

Of 150 study subjects, median age was 40 years, 96% were male; 57% white, 26% black, 13% Hispanic. Baseline median CD4 was 224 cells per cubic millimeter, HIV RNA 4.48 log10 copies/mL, HBV DNA 6.30 log10 IU/mL; 59% HBeAg positive and 65% HBeAb negative; HBV genotypes A = 69%, G = 18%, D = 7%, <2% for A/G, B, C, F, H. Coinfection with HDV was 2%. There were 49 Naive-MONO (lamivudine) and 22 Naive-DUAL (11 lamivudine + tenofovir, 11 emtricitabine + tenofovir) with detectable HBV DNA. In the 240-week follow-up, HBV DNA suppression was not significantly higher in Naive-DUAL (P = 0.14); lower baseline HBV DNA (P < 0.01) was associated with suppression. Among 32 Naive-MONO subjects with detectable HBV DNA at baseline and results at week 48, 41% suppressed; among such 15 Naive-DUAL subjects, 53% suppressed. HBeAg and HBeAb analyses showed similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

While consistent trends toward increased HBV DNA suppression, HBeAg loss and HBeAb seroconversion were observed in Naive-DUAL compared with Naive-MONO, they were not statistically significant. Overall, HDV coinfection was low.

Factors associated with delayed hepatitis B viral suppression on tenofovir among patients coinfected with HBV-HIV in the CNICS cohort

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread use in HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the effectiveness of tenofovir (TDF) has not been studied extensively outside of small cohorts of coinfected patients with HBV-HIV. We examined the effect of prior lamivudine (3TC) treatment and other factors on HBV DNA suppression with TDF in a multisite clinical cohort of coinfected patients.

METHODS

We studied all patients enrolled in the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems cohort from 1996 to 2011 who had chronic HBV and HIV infection, initiated a TDF-based regimen continued for ≥ 3 months and had on-treatment HBV DNA measurements. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-proportional hazards to estimate time to suppression (HBV DNA level <200 IU/mL or <1000 copies/mL) by selected covariates.

RESULTS

Among 397 coinfected patients on TDF, 91% were also on emtricitabine or 3TC concurrently, 92% of those tested were hepatitis B e antigen positive, 196 (49%) had prior 3TC exposure; 192 (48%) achieved HBV DNA suppression over a median of 28 months (interquartile range: 13-71). Median time to HBV DNA suppression was 17 months for those who were 3TC-naive and 50 months for those who were 3TC exposed. After controlling for other factors, prior 3TC exposure, baseline HBV DNA level >10,000 IU/mL, and lower nadir CD4 count were independently associated with decreased likelihood of HBV DNA suppression on TDF.

CONCLUSIONS

These results emphasize the role of prior 3TC exposure and immune response on delayed HBV suppression on TDF.

HIV-HBV coinfection in Southern Africa and the effect of lamivudine- versus tenofovir-containing cART on HBV outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study assessed HIV-hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection in southern Africa in terms of prevalence, viral characteristics, occult HBV, and the effect of lamivudine- versus tenofovir-containing first-line combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) on HBV-related outcomes.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort of HIV-infected adults in Zambia and South Africa who initiated cART. Outcomes by month 12 on cART were immunological recovery, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, viral suppression, and drug resistance. We used descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Of the 1087 participants, 92 were HBsAg seropositive, yielding a sample-weighted prevalence of 7.4% (95% confidence interval: 5.6 to 9.2), with 76% genotype HBV-A1. The estimated CD4 recovery on cART was similar between HIV monoinfection and HIV-HBV coinfection groups and between lamivudine- and tenofovir-treated participants. HBsAg loss was documented in 20% (4/20) of lamivudine-treated and 18% (3/17) of tenofovir-treated participants (P = 0.305). Viral suppression (HBV-DNA < 20 IU/mL) was achieved in 61.5% (16/26) of lamivudine-treated and 71.4% (15/21) of tenofovir-treated participants (P = 0.477). HBV pol sequencing demonstrated M204I (n = 3) and N236T (n = 1) resistance-associated mutations in 4 of 8 (50%) lamivudine-treated participants and none in tenofovir-treated participants. Occult HBV infection was present in 13.3% before cART, but by month 12, HBV-DNA was below the limit of detection (<15 IU/mL) in 90.5% (19/21) of lamivudine-treated and 100% (18/18) of tenofovir-treated participants (P = 0.179).

CONCLUSIONS

Tenofovir-containing first-line cART is preferred for HIV-HBV coinfection in Africa because of a superior resistance profile relative to lamivudine monotherapy. Extended follow-up will be needed to determine long-term complications of occult HBV coinfection. Improved access to HBsAg screening and tenofovir is needed.

High seroprevalence of HBV and HCV infection in HIV-infected adults in Kigali, Rwanda

BACKGROUND

Data on prevalence and incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Rwanda are scarce.

METHODS

HBV status was assessed at baseline and Month 12, and anti-HCV antibodies at baseline, in a prospective cohort study of HIV-infected patients in Kigali, Rwanda: 104 men and 114 women initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) at baseline, and 200 women not yet eligible for ART.

RESULTS

Baseline prevalence of active HBV infection (HBsAg positive), past or occult HBV infection (anti-HBc positive and HBsAg negative) and anti-HCV was 5.2%, 42.9%, and 5.7%, respectively. The active HBV incidence rate was 4.2/1,000 person years (PY). In a multivariable logistic regression model using baseline data, participants with WHO stage 3 or 4 HIV disease were 4.19 times (95% CI 1.21-14.47) more likely to have active HBV infection, and older patients were more likely to have evidence of past exposure to HBV (aRR 1.03 per year; 95%CI 1.01-1.06). Older age was also positively associated with having anti-HCV antibodies (aOR 1.09; 95%CI 1.04-1.14) while having a higher baseline HIV viral load was negatively associated with HCV (aOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.40-0.98). The median CD4 increase during the first 12 months of ART was lower for those with active HBV infection or anti-HCV at baseline. Almost all participants (88%) with active HBV infection who were on ART were receiving lamivudine monotherapy for HBV.

CONCLUSION

HBV and HCV are common in HIV-infected patients in Rwanda. Regular HBsAg screening is needed to ensure that HIV-HBV co-infected patients receive an HBV-active ART regimen, and the prevalence of occult HBV infection should be determined. Improved access to HBV vaccination is recommended. Active HCV prevalence and incidence should be investigated further to determine whether HCV RNA PCR testing should be introduced in Rwanda.

Development of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in hepatitis B surface antigen negative HIV/HBV co-infected adults: a rare opportunistic illness

Changes in serologic status in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infected individuals with either isolated anti-HBc or resolved HBV infection have been reported, but the frequency of clinically meaningful long-term serologic changes is not well-defined. This study therefore, examined longitudinal serologic status for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative HIV/HBV co-infected participants in a large cohort. Among 5,222 cohort participants, 347 (7%) were initially isolated anti-HBc positive, and 1,073 (21%) had resolved HBV infection (concurrently reactive for anti-HBc and anti-HBs). Thirty-three (10%) of the 347 participants with isolated anti-HBc were later positive for HBsAg at least once, compared with 3 (0.3%) of those with resolved HBV (P < 0.001). A total of 14 participants became persistently positive for HBsAg and were thus classified as having late-onset chronic HBV infection at a median of 3.7 years after initial HBV diagnosis. For those initially with HBsAg-negative HIV/HBV co-infection, the rate of late-onset chronic HBV infection was 1.39/1,000 person-years. Those with late-onset chronic HBV infection experienced significant decreases in CD4 cell counts (P = 0.002) with a mean of 132 cells/µl at the time of late-onset chronic HBV infection, but no factor distinguished those who were positive for HBsAg only once from those that developed late-onset chronic HBV infection. Over a median of 2.9 years following late-onset chronic HBV infection, 3 of 14 subsequently lost HBsAg. The occurrence of late-onset chronic HBV infection in HBsAg negative HIV/HBV co-infected adults appears to be one important, albeit rare, clinical event seen almost exclusively in those with isolated anti-HBc and low CD4 cell count.

HIV/HBV Co-Infections: Epidemiology, Natural History, and Treatment: A Review Article

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, one of the major health priorities, accounts approximately for 350 million chronic cases and a global total of 33 million people were living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the world.Co-infection with HIV and the HBV presents a significant challenge to health care providers, with different prevalence rates in different parts of the world. It is important to screen all HIV infected individuals for HBV infection and reverse. Infection with HBV becomes more violent in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency syndrome. HIV/HBV co-infected individuals are at increased risk of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and of experiencing HAART toxicity. In this review, the latest statistics on epidemiology of HIV, HBV and their co-infection has been presented along with prominent characteristics of HBV. Transmission routes which are the common between HBV and HIV are described and the most important ones are described according to the regional and age features. Also, there is a series of actions being performed once HBV infections occur to prevent HIV or to diagnose if the HBV-infected individuals are also infected with HIV. As in treatment case, some of the frequent treatment methods including applying interferon and using nucleoside and nucleotide analogues have been discussed. Finally, we would explain the new recommendations for treating patients who were co-infected with HBV and HIV, including staging HBV and HIV treatment, based on the stage of each disease. It also outlines the optimal treatment options, whether the patient is treated for HBV first, HIV first, or HIV and HBV together.

Treatment induced seroconversion to HBsAb following HBV reactivation in the immunosuppressed haematology and oncology patient: a clinical survey of 5 cases in Catania, Italy

BACKGROUND

In onco-haematological patients inactive or occult HBV infection may be reactivated as a result of disease-related immuno-suppression and/or chemotherapy with rituximab.

OBJECTIVES

This study reports the clinical features of five patients affected by onco-haematological disorders who experienced hepatitis B reactivation.

STUDY DESIGN

From 2005 to 2010, five onco-haematological patients with hepatitis B reactivation were admitted to the department of Infectious Diseases, Ferrarotto Hospital, Catania, Italy.

RESULTS

At the time of onco-haematological disease diagnosis, 3 patients were HBcAb positive; 1 HBsAb and HBcAb positive; and 1 HBsAg positive, HBV DNA negative. None of the patients received hepatitis B prophylaxis. Reactivation was observed following chemotherapy. One patient was treated with lamivudine, 2 with tenofovir and 2 with telbivudine. Following treatment all patients achieved undetectable HBV DNA and normalization of transaminases. Three patients, those treated with lamivudine and tenofovir, cleared HBsAg and developed protective titres of HBsAb. The remaining patients, who were treated with telbivudine, were HBV DNA negative and HBsAg positive one at 27 months and the other at 5 months of therapy. Treatment thus continued in these patients.

CONCLUSION

HBV reactivation can be a severe complication in onco-haematological patients undergoing chemotherapy with rituximab. In our experience all nucleos(t)ide analogues were safe and effective. Three patients seroconverted to HBsAb. This may be as a result of the antivirals enhancing the immune response to HBV. A similar role may also be played by immune recovery following the withdrawal of immune-suppressive treatment. This report confirms the importance of anti-viral prophylaxis in patients with a high risk of HBV reactivation.

Virologic Outcome of Using Tenofovir/Emtricitabine to Treat Hepatitis B in HIV-Coinfected Patients

Goal. To study the effect of combination antiviral therapy with tenofovir and emtricitabine or lamivudine with and without prior monotherapy with lamivudine. Study. We reviewed charts of 31 HIV-/HBV-coinfected patients. Twelve 3TC-naïve patients initially received tenofovir plus emtricitabine. Nineteen epivir experienced patients who had previously failed epivir were given tenofovir plus emtricitabine. Results. Baseline median HBV DNA was similar in the epivir-naïve (5.8×10⁷ copies/mL) and experienced group (7.3×10⁷ copies/mL, P = .65). The median time to complete suppression of HBV was 466 days in the naïve group and 877 days in the experienced (P = .001). After 12 months, 6/10 (60%) naïve patients and 3/14 (21%) experienced patients had HBV DNA below the detectionlimit (P = .067). After 24 months, 5/5 (100%) naïve patients and 4/13 (31%) experienced patients had an undetectable HBV DNA level (P = .015). Conclusions. The median time to suppression of HBV DNA was significantly shorter among treatment naïve patients. There was a significantly greater proportion of naïve patients with suppressed HBV DNA at 24 months. Our results support using initial dual therapy in those with HIV/HBV coinfection.

Management and treatment of hepatitis B virus in patients with HIV infection: A practical guide for health care professionals

The management and treatment of HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients present specific challenges for clinicians. The morbidity and mortality related to these concomitant infections are growing concerns, while the use of antiviral drugs effective against both viruses complicates therapeutic decision making. The present document provides guidelines for physicians regarding care and treatment of patients coinfected with HIV and HBV. Primary prevention of HBV in HIV-positive patients is achieved through appropriate vaccination schedules. Follow-up before treatment of HBV may include liver biopsy, screening for hepatocellular carcinoma and testing for esophageal varicies in cases of cirrhosis. In HBV-infected patients requiring treatment, recommendations regarding initiation, duration and choice of first-line drugs are made. Finally, in the case of resistance, appropriate alternative therapies are necessary.

Management and treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in HIV positive and negative patients: the EPIB 2008 study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To compare the management and the virological and serological efficacy of treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in HIV positive and negative patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-six HIV positive and 205 HIV negative consecutive patients with past or present CHB, seen in October 2008 in participating departments, were included in a multicenter study. All the data were retrospectively collected from the first visit to October 2008 through a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

Compared to HIV negative patients, HIV positive patients more often presented positive HBeAg (46.4% vs. 32.8%, p=0.01), HBV genotype A (54.8% vs. 17.1%, p<0.0001), co-infection with HCV (12.4% vs. 5.9%, p=0.0002) or HDV (12.6% vs. 2.9%, p=0.04). HIV positive patients were more often on HBV therapy (92.7% vs. 57.1%, p<0.0001), leading to undetectable serum HBV DNA levels (71.0% vs. 44.1%, p<0.0001). In HIV positive patients, multivariate analysis showed that older age, lower initial HBV DNA levels, and longer time on HBV therapy significantly correlated with undetectable HBV DNA. No difference in efficacy was observed between tenofovir used alone or in combination. HBsAg (but not HBe) loss was more often observed in HIV positive patients, sometimes followed by HBsAg re-appearance after withdrawal of HBV treatment. Excluding the 37 HBV-HCV-co-infected patients, the last clinical presentation and liver fibrosis scores were similar in HIV positive and negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of CHB and the efficacy of HBV therapy have improved in HIV positive patients. HIV infection did not have a negative impact on the likelihood of HBV therapeutic success.

High frequency of lamivudine resistance mutations in Brazilian patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis B

This study analyzed the genotype distribution and frequency of lamivudine (LAM) and tenofovir (TDF) resistance mutations in a group of patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV). A cross-sectional study of 847 patients with HIV was conducted. Patients provided blood samples for HBsAg detection. The load of HBV was determined using an "in-house" real-time polymerase chain reaction. HBV genotypes/subgenotypes, antiviral resistance, basal core promoter (BCP), and precore mutations were detected by DNA sequencing. Twenty-eight patients with co-infection were identified. The distribution of HBV genotypes among these patients was A (n = 9; 50%), D (n = 4; 22.2%), G (n = 3; 16.7%), and F (n = 2; 11.1%). Eighteen patients were treated with LAM and six patients were treated with LAM plus TDF. The length of exposure to LAM and TDF varied from 4 to 216 months. LAM resistance substitutions (rtL180M + rtM204V) were detected in 10 (50%) of the 20 patients with viremia. This pattern and an accompanying rtV173L mutation was found in four patients. Three patients with the triple polymerase substitution pattern (rtV173L + rtL180M + rtM204V) had associated changes in the envelope gene (sE164D + sI195M). Mutations in the BCP region (A1762T, G1764A) and in the precore region (G1896A, G1899A) were also found. No putative TDF resistance substitution was detected. The data suggest that prolonged LAM use is associated with the emergence of particular changes in the HBV genome, including substitutions that may elicit a vaccine escape phenotype. No putative TDF resistance change was detected after prolonged use of TDF.

Liver transplantation in HIV-positive patients

Death from end-stage liver disease (ESLD) because of chronic hepatitis B and C has become an increasing problem in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients in the last years. This is mainly because of the dramatic decrease of HIV-related morbidity and mortality since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Although the data on the outcome of liver transplantation in HIV-infected recipients with ESLD is limited, overall results seem comparable to non-HIV-infected recipients. Therefore, liver transplant centres around the world are increasingly accepting HIV-infected individuals as organ recipients. Post-transplantation control of HIV replication is achieved by continuing HAART. As in non-HIV-infected patients, hepatitis B virus recurrence is efficiently prevented by hepatitis B immunoglobulin and antiviral therapy. Re-infection of the allograft with hepatitis C virus, however, remains an important problem, and progress to allograft cirrhosis may even be more rapid than in HIV-negative patients. Interactions in drug metabolism between the HAART components and the immunosuppressive drugs are difficult to predict and require close monitoring of drug levels and dose adjustments. The complexity in this setting makes close cooperation between transplant surgeons, hepatologists, HIV-clinicians and pharmacologists mandatory. As experience on liver transplantation in HIV-infected individuals is still limited, to date results from large prospective trials addressing key issues are needed.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is prevalent worldwide. It may cause cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment for this condition may need to be lifelong, thus the drugs used must be both efficacious and safe. Clinical trials of tenofovir have demonstrated a good safety profile for this drug and it has potent antiviral properties. However, to better characterize the safety of this drug, the postmarketing surveillance must be taken into account. Clinicians need to be vigilant, as infrequent adverse events may be revealed during this phase. The current review presents a detailed exposé of preclinical and clinical data on tenofovir to increase awareness of possible adverse events and drug-drug interactions, based on the large experience of this drug in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment (and to date in patients with CHB). Several recommendations that may help the clinician to prevent the development of adverse events associated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment are outlined, along with a suggested surveillance protocol for the timely and proper identification of possible renal and bone toxicity.

The effect of human immunodeficiency virus on hepatitis B virus serologic status in co-infected adults

BACKGROUND

Factors associated with serologic hepatitis B virus (HBV) outcomes in HIV-infected individuals remain incompletely understood, yet such knowledge may lead to improvements in the prevention and treatment of chronic HBV infection.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

HBV-HIV co-infected cohort participants were retrospectively analyzed. HBV serologic outcomes were classified as chronic, resolved, and isolated-HBcAb. Chronic HBV (CHBV) was defined as the presence of HBsAg on two or more occasions at least six months apart. Risk factors for HBV serologic outcome were assessed using logistic regression. Of 2037 participants with HBV infection, 281 (14%) had CHBV. Overall the proportions of HBV infections classified as CHBV were 11%, 16%, and 19% for CD4 cell count strata of > or =500, 200-499, and <200, respectively (p<0.0001). Risk of CHBV was increased for those with HBV infection occurring after HIV diagnosis (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.78-3.85). This included the subset with CD4 count > or =500 cells/microL where 21% of those with HBV after HIV diagnosis had CHBV compared with 9% for all other cases of HBV infection in this stratum (p = 0.0004). Prior receipt of HAART was associated with improved HBV serologic outcome overall (p = 0.012), and specifically among those with HBV after HIV (p = 0.002). In those with HBV after HIV, HAART was associated with reduced risk of CHBV overall (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.04-0.79); including reduced risk in the subsets with CD4 > or =350 cells/microL (p<0.001) and CD4 > or =500 cells/microL (p = 0.01) where no cases of CHBV were seen in those with a recent history of HAART use.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical indicators of immunologic status in HIV-infected individuals, such as CD4 cell count, are associated with HBV serologic outcome. These data suggest that immunologic preservation through the increased use of HAART to improve functional anti-HBV immunity, whether by improved access to care or earlier initiation of therapy, would likely improve HBV infection outcomes in HIV-infected individuals.

Longer duration of HBV-active antiretroviral therapy is linked to favorable virological outcome in HIV-HBV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND

HBV-HIV co-infection is associated with increased liver-related morbidity and mortality. Herein we analyzed HBV-related virologic and clinical outcomes in HBV-HIV patients in the HAART era.

METHODS

HBsAg positive HIV-infected patients followed at a US academic center between 1990 and 2008 were assessed in a retrospective and longitudinal study. Factors associated with HBsAg and/or HBeAg clearance and with advanced liver disease were evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

72 patients were evaluated. Their median time of follow-up and of adherence to HBV-active HAART were 3 and 1 years, respectively. HBeAg and HBsAg cleared in 17.6% and 5.5% of patients, respectively. More prolonged use of HBV-active HAART predicted clearance of HBeAg (odds ratio [OR] 2.66, 95% CI 1.15-6.16, p = .02) and of HBsAg (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.02-2.31, p = .04). Patients clearing HBsAg tended to have higher baseline CD4 (mean CD4 counts: 550 vs. 246 cells/mm3; p = .06). Rate of diagnosis of liver-related complications and death were 24.6/1,000 and 10.5/1,000 patient-years, respectively. Higher ALT levels before HAART initiation were associated with the diagnosis of cirrhosis during follow-up (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.002-1.03, p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged use of HBV-active HAART favors HBsAg and HBeAg clearance in HIV-HBV co-infected patients. Those with higher ALT levels at presentation have higher risk of being diagnosed with cirrhosis during the first few years of follow-up.

Impaired quality of the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific T-cell response in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-HBV coinfection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific T cells play a key role both in the control of HBV replication and in the pathogenesis of liver disease. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) coinfection and the presence or absence of HBV e (precore) antigen (HBeAg) significantly alter the natural history of chronic HBV infection. We examined the HBV-specific T-cell responses in treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative HIV-1-HBV-coinfected (n = 24) and HBV-monoinfected (n = 39) Asian patients. Peripheral blood was stimulated with an overlapping peptide library for the whole HBV genome, and tumor necrosis factor alpha and gamma interferon cytokine expression in CD8+ T cells was measured by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. There was no difference in the overall magnitude of the HBV-specific T-cell responses, but the quality of the response was significantly impaired in HIV-1-HBV-coinfected patients compared with monoinfected patients. In coinfected patients, HBV-specific T cells rarely produced more than one cytokine and responded to fewer HBV proteins than in monoinfected patients. Overall, the frequency and quality of the HBV-specific T-cell responses increased with a higher CD4+ T-cell count (P = 0.018 and 0.032, respectively). There was no relationship between circulating HBV-specific T cells and liver damage as measured by activity and fibrosis scores, and the HBV-specific T-cell responses were not significantly different in patients with either HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative disease. The quality of the HBV-specific T-cell response is impaired in the setting of HIV-1-HBV coinfection and is related to the CD4+ T-cell count.

Emerging role of hepatocellular carcinoma among liver-related causes of deaths in HIV-infected patients: The French national Mortalité 2005 study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Longer exposure to hepatitis C (HCV) or B virus (HBV) and the increased use of hepatitis treatment might have an impact on liver-related deaths in patients co-infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). We describe the proportion of liver-related deaths among HIV-infected patients in 2005 compared with 2000.

METHODS

In a nationwide survey (341 hospital departments involved in HIV management), all deaths of HIV-infected patients were prospectively reported. Deaths from either cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma or fulminant hepatitis were defined as liver-related deaths.

RESULTS

Of the 898 deaths reported in 2005, liver-related causes accounted for 15.4%; this is compared to 13.4% in 2000. Among liver-related deaths, hepatocellular carcinoma increased from 15% to 25% (p=0.04). Among hepatocellular carcinoma-related deaths: in 2000, 10% were HCV-infected; in 2005, 25% were HCV-infected (p=0.03). Half of the HCV-related deaths had been treated for HCV but 98% remained HCV-RNA positive at time of death. The proportion of HBV-related deaths remained stable between 2000 and 2005.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver-related deaths, mainly liver cancers, have increased in HIV-infected patients in France despite wide access to HCV treatment. The stability of HBV-related deaths might be explained by the use of dually active antiretroviral drugs in co-infected patients.

Liver enzymes improve over twenty-four months of first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy in rural Uganda

We studied hepatic transaminases among rural Ugandans initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and assessed the impact of positive serology for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and coadministration of therapy for tuberculosis. From July 2003 to December 2004, persons with symptomatic HIV disease or a CD4 count less than 250 cells/mm(3) and who had alanine transferase (ALT) or aspartate transferase (AST) less than 5 times the upper limit of normal were started on HAART including nevirapine (96%) or efavirenz (4%). Repository sera from a subset of 596 participants were analyzed for hepatic transaminase levels. A transaminase elevation was present before therapy for 249 (42%) of 596, at 3 months for 140 (25%) of 553, 12 months for 59 (11%) of 520, and 24 months for 67 (13%) of 508. In multivariate analyses, a transaminase elevation at 3 months was associated with male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.35), body mass index less than 18 kg/m(2) (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.34-3.30), transaminase elevation at baseline (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.30-2.99), and treatment for tuberculosis (OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.28-9.59). HBsAg status was not associated with transaminase elevations at baseline or while on HAART. The prevalence of hepatic transaminase elevations decreased during non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based antiretroviral therapy in this cohort of HIV-infected persons in rural Uganda.

The use of molecular assays in the management of viral hepatitis

Molecular assays are instrumental in the clinical management of viral hepatitis. During the past years, a wide variety of molecular assays have been developed and implemented. This considerably improved the understanding of the natural history and pathogenesis of Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) hepatitis, but also caused uncertainties in the selection of the most appropriate assays for clinical requirements. Indeed, a rational choice and application of these assays requires adequate knowledge of the performance of the single test. Moreover, the choice of the most accurate assay for patients' needs and physicians' objectives, needs to be oriented to specific contexts, such as diagnosis, management or treatment. In the past, a hurdle in the routine use of assays for hepatitis viruses nucleic acid quantification was represented by the availability of only "home brew" methods which lacked standardization. Major improvement in addressing the use of molecular assays for viral hepatitis has been derived from recent standardization procedures that allowed a comparison between different tests after results were given as International Units. In addition, it should be reminded that, before getting into the market, molecular assays should be approved by European regulation authorities and validated using internationally recognized standards. A subsequent clinical validation should address the diagnostic accuracy of the assay. These proceedings have the aim of identifying which molecular tests, among those currently available, meet clinical requirements for each specific application.

Role of tenofovir in the treatment of chronic HBV infection

Nucleoside analogues revolutionized the treatment of chronic HBV infection and have become the most important therapeutic option within the last decade. Currently, the nucleoside analogues lamivudine, telbivudine and entecavir, and the nucleotide analogue adefovir dipivoxil, are licensed. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is another acyclic nucleotide analogue that has been successfully used in the treatment of HIV-infected patients, but has demonstrated significant antiviral activity in wild-type and lamivudine-resistant HBV infections. The use of TDF 300 mg/day leads to marked suppression of HBV replication below the detection limit in different patients groups with HBV mono- or HIV/HBV co-infection in most instances, and a remarkably high rate of hepatitis B e antigen loss and even hepatitis B surface antigen loss was found in small, uncontrolled studies. Belonging to the substance class of acyclic nucleotide analogues, TDF is not cross-resistant to nucleoside analogue resistance-associated mutations. In equal dosages, TDF has comparable antiviral potency as compared with its congender adefovir dipivoxil, but in clinical studies exhibits higher antiviral efficacy and generates a higher genetic barrier against the development of genotypic HBV resistance due to its approximately 24-fold higher dosage. Owing to the numerous newly developed compounds and as a consequence of the emerging problem of drug resistance, treatment concepts for chronic hepatitis B will certainly be modified in the future. Because of its quite favorable antiviral and safety properties, TDF will likely be highly regarded in the management of HBV infections in the future.

Profile of patients triply infected with HIV and the hepatitis B and C viruses in the HAART era

HIV-HCV-HBV-coinfected patients were assessed to characterize the viral interactions in the setting of HIV coinfection and in the HAART era. All positive anti-HCV antibody and HBs antigen-positive HIV-infected patients were identified at five HIV clinics. Antihepatitis delta (HDV) antibody, serum HIV RNA, HCV RNA, and HBV DNA quantification and genotype determinations were performed. Out of 67 patients identified 47 (70%) were receiving anti-HBV therapy. HCV RNA and HBV DNA were detectable in 52.5% and 37% of patients, respectively. All possible patterns were found, regardless of anti-HBV therapy. HDV coinfection was associated with undetectable HCV RNA [RR 9.52 (95% CI 1.85-49.01); p = 0.007]. Independent factors predicting undetectable HBV DNA lacked HBeAg [RR 13.94 (95% CI 3.05-63.72); p = 0.001] and use of anti-HBV therapy [RR 11.42 (95% CI 2.43-53.54); p = 0.002]. Replication and genotypes of HCV or HBV had no impact on the replication of the other virus. In conclusion, in this cohort of triple infection (HBV/HCV/HIV) various viral patterns were identified. Spontaneous HCV clearance was frequent, and it was independently associated with HDV coinfection. In the absence of HBV therapy, HBV most often actively replicates. HBV/HCV replication or genotypes were not related to the replication of the other virus.

Liver cirrhosis in HIV-infected patients: prevalence, aetiology and clinical outcome

Liver disease is frequently seen in HIV+ patients as a result of coinfection with hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV) viruses, alcohol abuse and/or exposure to hepatotoxic drugs. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of liver cirrhosis, its main causes and clinical presentation in HIV+ patients. Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study of all HIV+ individuals followed at one reference HIV outpatient clinic in Madrid. Liver fibrosis was measured in all cases using transient elastometry (FibroScan). All 2168 HIV+ patients on regular follow-up (76% males, 46% injecting drug users) were successfully examined by FibroScan) between October 2004 and August 2006. Liver cirrhosis was recognized in 181 (overall prevalence, 8.3%), and the main aetiologies were HCV, 82.3%; HBV, 1.6%; dual HBV/HCV, 2.8%; and triple HBV/HCV/ hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection, 6.6%. The prevalence of cirrhosis differed among patients with distinct chronic viral hepatitis: HCV, 19.2%; HBV, 6.1%; HBV/HCV, 41.7%; and HBV/HCV/HDV, 66.7%. In 12 patients with cirrhosis (6.7%), no definite aetiology was recognized. Overall, cirrhotics had lower mean CD4 counts than noncirrhotics (408 vs 528 cells/microL respectively; P = 0.02), despite similar proportion of subjects with undetectable viraemia on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clinical manifestations of liver cirrhosis were: splenomegaly, 61.5%; oesophageal varices, 59.8%; ascites, 22.6%; encephalopathy, 12.1%; and variceal bleeding, 6.1%. Liver cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation events are relatively frequent in HIV+ individuals. Chronic HCV and alcohol abuse, but not chronic HBV, play a major role. Transient elastometry may allow the identification of a significant number of HIV+ individuals with asymptomatic liver cirrhosis.

Safety and tolerability of sequential pegylated IFN-alpha2a and tenofovir for hepatitis B infection in HIV(+) individuals

Chronic hepatitis B virus infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV co-infected patients. The standard of care for treating HCV co-infection has been guided by major clinical trials, but the treatment of HBV co-infection has not been as thoroughly studied and the standard of care remains largely untested. The single pill formulation of tenofovir with emtricitabine has become a standard treatment approach in HBV co-infected patients. WU114 was a phase 1 clinical trial that examined the safety and tolerability of sequential treatment of HBV with pegylated interferon-alpha2a plus delayed-initiation tenofovir in HIV co-infected individuals. We postulated that initial HBV viral load reduction with pegylated interferon prior to initiation of nucleoside/nucleotide therapy would increase seroconversion events and durability of HBV virologic suppression. No severe pegylated IFN-alpha2a drug toxicities were seen in either the monotherapy or delayed tenofovir arms. Sequential pegylated interferon and tenofovir-based therapy was tolerable and should be compared with dual nucleoside/nucleotide suppression to determine relative frequencies of seroconversion and durability of HBV suppression in co-infected patients.

Evolution of hepatitis B serological markers in HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Evolution of serological markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriage or infection has rarely been investigated among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

During the period 1997-2002, a total of 633 HIV-infected patients were tested for HBV serological markers at baseline, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs ), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (anti-HCV) antibody, HCV RNA level, and HBV DNA level, all of which were retested at least 1 year apart. Medical records were reviewed to identify clinical characteristics associated with evolution of these serological markers.

RESULTS

After a median duration of follow-up for 4.96 years, 161 patients (25.4%) had changes in HBV serological markers. Of 119 patients (18.8%) who tested positive for HBsAg at baseline, 6 (5.0%) developed anti-HBs, and 9 (7.6%) developed isolated anti-HBc. Of 270 patients (42.7%) who tested positive for anti-HBs, 18 (6.7%) lost anti-HBs. Of 179 patients (28.3%) in whom isolated anti-HBc had been detected, 73 (40.8%) developed anti-HBs, 18 (10.1%) lost all HBV markers, and 7 (3.9%) developed HBsAg. Of 65 patients (10.2%) who tested negative for all HBV markers, 13 (20%) developed anti-HBs, 13 (20%) developed isolated anti-HBc, and 4 (6.2%) developed HBsAg, indicating a high risk of HBV exposure. Patients in whom anti-HBc was detected at baseline were more likely to have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (P=.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that an increase in the CD4 cell count after the commencement of HAART was significantly associated with persistence or subsequent development of anti-HBs in patients with anti-HBs or anti-HBc at baseline, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodic measurements of HBV serological markers in HIV-infected patients are recommended, because new HBV infections and changes of HBV serological markers are not uncommon in patients with improved immunity after commencement of HAART.

Impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on the natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV coinfection: relationship between prolonged efficacy of HAART and HBV surface and early antigen seroconversion

BACKGROUND

Coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is common. However, little is known about the natural history of chronic hepatitis B in HIV-infected populations, especially the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on the outcome of HBV early antigen (HBeAg) and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) status.

METHODS

The characteristics of 92 patients coinfected with HIV and HBV were retrospectively assessed before and after HAART and lamivudine treatment to determine the impact of treatment on chronic hepatitis B and factors associated with HBeAg and/or HBsAg seroconversion.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 82 patients received antiretroviral therapy, 79 of whom received HAART. Twenty-eight of the 76 patients who were administered lamivudine therapy developed lamivudine resistance mutations. While receiving antiretroviral therapy, 10 of 59 HBeAg-positive patients developed antibody to HBeAg, 3 of 10 cleared HBsAg, and 2 of 3 developed antibody to HBsAg. Two of 23 HBeAg-negative patients cleared HBsAg and developed antibody to HBsAg. HBeAg and/or HBsAg seroconversion combined with an undetectable HBV DNA level (i.e., an HBV response) correlated with a sustained HIV response (P=.001), shorter duration of antiretroviral therapy (P=.058), and more-severe disease, as evaluated by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention staging (for stage B vs. stage A, P=.029; for stage C vs. stage A, P=.069). For patients with elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase levels, the HBV response correlated significantly with a greater increase in CD4 cell count while receiving HAART.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-HBV-coinfected patients, HBV response correlated with a sustained HIV response to antiretroviral therapy, usually HAART including lamivudine.

Hepatitis B Virus Genotypes and Lamivudine Resistance Mutations in HIV/Hepatitis B Virus-Coinfected Patients

BACKGROUND

Differences in subtypes, hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg)-negative variants, and drug resistance mutations all seem to influence the clinical and therapeutic outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Information available on the prevalence and distribution of distinct HBV variants in HIV-positive patients is scarce.

METHODS

All HIV-infected patients with persistent serum hepatitis B surface antigen and detectable HBV viremia were identified in a reference HIV clinic located in Madrid, Spain. HBV load, subtypes, precore (PC) and basal core promoter (BCP) variants, and lamivudine (LAM) resistance mutations were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 81 HBV/HIV-coinfected patients (4.1%) were identified in a population of 1968 HIV-positive patients. Plasma specimens with detectable HBV viremia could be obtained from 62 subjects, and this was the study population that underwent further virologic characterization. HBV genotype distribution was as follows: A (n = 27), D (n = 27), E (n = 1), F (n = 2), and G (n = 3). Two patients had mixed HBV genotypes (A/E and A/F). HBV subtype A was predominant (74%) among patients infected through sexual contact, whereas HBV-D was most frequent (74%) among intravenous drug users (P < 0.001). PC/BCP mutants were more frequent in patients with HBV-D than in those with HBV-A (63% vs. 18%; P < 0.01). Median time on LAM was 40 months; patients with HBV-A tended to show LAM resistance mutations more often (53% vs. 44%) and to develop them earlier (35 vs. 45 months) than patients with HBV-D. The dual L180M + M204V/I mutant was the predominant resistance pattern, although a triple rt173V + 180M + 204V, which acts as a vaccine escape mutant, was found in 1 individual. In the multivariate analysis, patients with LAM resistance mutations were significantly more frequently HBeAg-positive and older than individuals with wild-type HBV. Hepatitis-delta was recognized in 13 (21%) of these 62 HBV viremic patients, with no association with specific HBV variants.

CONCLUSION

Risk transmission group, age, and positive serum HBeAg are the main determinants of distinct HBV virologic variants, including HBV genotypes and LAM-resistant mutants, in HBV/HIV-coinfected patients.

The Epidemiology, Natural History and Prevention of Hepatitis B: Implications of HIV Coinfection

Approximately 350 million people have chronic hepatitis B infection, a leading cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients who are infected through parenteral or sexual transmission are also at risk for acquisition of HIV. Concomitant HIV infection can lead to an increased risk of morbidity and mortality from hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and HCC. This review will focus on the epidemiology, natural history and prevention of HBV infection and the modulating effect of HIV on the clinical expression of HBV disease.

Liver fibrosis in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis B extensively exposed to antiretroviral therapy with anti-HBV activity

PURPOSE

The extent and predictors of liver fibrosis were examined in a HIV/HBVcoinfected cohort with extensive exposure to anti-HBV active HAART.

METHOD

Liver fibrosis was measured using transient elastography.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients of a median age of 43 were included in the study. All but 2 patients had received anti-HBV drugs for a median time of 40 months in the context of HAART. F0-F1 METAVIR fibrosis scores (minimal or no fibrosis) as measured by elastography were found in 21 (57%) patients. AST levels were significantly lower among F0-F1 patients (33 IU/L) compared to F2-F4 patients (48 IU/L) (p = .01). ALT levels were also lower in F0-F1 patients (38 IU/L) than in F2-F4 patients (54 IU/L) (p = .05).

CONCLUSION

In this HIV/HBV-coinfected cohort, with extensive HAART exposure including anti-HBV agents, more than half of the patients had no or minimal liver fibrosis. Higher transaminase levels were recognized in patients with higher degree of fibrosis.