Outcomes of patients on dual-boosted PI regimens: experience of the Swiss HIV cohort study

Simplification of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and the brain-a real-life experience

Modern antiretroviral combination therapy (cART) has transformed HIV from a life-threatening infection into a chronic disease. However, the life-long treatment has side effects that frequently have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Thus, there are some efforts to "simplify" therapy, i.e. apply regimens with three or fewer antiretroviral substances. However, neurologists are relatively sceptical towards this cART "simplification", because the capacity of simplified regimens to access the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) might be too weak to effectively suppress viral load in this compartment. Thus, data of a big Neuro-AIDS cohort of 4992 HIV-positive patients consecutively recruited over three decades were retrospectively analysed in terms of neurocognitive performance of patients switched to simplified therapy regimens. To test whether simplified drug regimens result in new neuropsychological deficits or the worsening of pre-existing ones in HIV+ patients. Three groups of HIV+ patients were switched from triple therapy to three different two drug regimens (n = 177 to lamivudine/PI, n = 37 to INI/PI, and n = 303 to dual PI); three other groups of patients put from one to an alternative triple combination (n = 290 ABC/3TC/PI, n = 244 TDF/FTC/PI, and n = 158 TDF/FTC/NNRTI) for whatever reason served as controls. All patients were followed up over 4 years maximum. Every patient group improved immunologically and virologically after the switch. However, patients who switched to INI/PI combinations remained stable in neuropsychological tests, while a considerable percentage of patients who switched to other treatments demonstrated a decline. Remarkably, a high percentage of the patients switched to "simplified drug regimens" was not well-controlled virologically before the switch. HIV-positive patients with simplified therapy regimens show some benefit in terms of systemic infection surrogate markers (CD4 ± cell count and plasma viral load); however, neurocognitive deficits do not improve, but remain stable in most cases.

Epidemiological and Immunological Characteristics at the Time of HIV Diagnosis for HIV/AIDS Cohort Registrants Representative of HIV-Infected Populations in Korea

OBJECTIVES

The Korea HIV/AIDS cohort was constructed with 18 hospitals that care for HIV-infected individuals in 2006. We compared the epidemiological and immunological characteristics of the cohort registrants with those of the HIVinfected population at the time of HIV diagnosis.

METHODS

This study was conducted on 5717 people living with HIV/AIDS from 1985 to 2009, of which 789 individuals registered with the Korea HIV/AIDS cohort study. Individuals who had data from initial CD4+ T-cell counts measured within 6 months following HIV diagnosis were selected as study participants to predict the status of disease progression at the time of HIV diagnosis. A total of 2886 patients (50%) were selected from people living with HIV/AIDS, of whom 424 individuals (54%) were cohort registrants. The χ(2) test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The distributions of age, marital status, diagnosed regions, reason for HIV testing, and screening site were similar between the HIV-infected population and the cohort registrants. In 1985-2004, the male ratio for the cohort registrants (94.3%) was significantly higher than that measured for the HIV-infected population (89.5%) (p = 0.0339). With regard to transmission route, homosexual contact of cohort registrants (46.6%) was higher than that of the HIV-infected population (40.1%) (p = 0.022) in 2005-2009. No statistical difference in CD4+ T-cell counts at the time of HIV diagnosis was found between the HIVinfected population and cohort registrants (p = 0.2195).

CONCLUSION

The Korea HIV/AIDS cohort registrants represent the HIV-infected population, and the data collected from this cohort could be used as a foundation for national statistics.

HIV-Antiretroviral Therapy Induced Liver, Gastrointestinal, and Pancreatic Injury

The present paper describes possible connections between antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) encountered predominantly in the liver, including hypersensitivity syndrome reactions, as well as throughout the gastrointestinal system, including the pancreas. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has a positive influence on the quality of life and longevity in HIV patients, substantially reducing morbidity and mortality in this population. However, HAART produces a spectrum of ADRs. Alcohol consumption can interact with HAART as well as other pharmaceutical agents used for the prevention of opportunistic infections such as pneumonia and tuberculosis. Other coinfections that occur in HIV, such as hepatitis viruses B or C, cytomegalovirus, or herpes simplex virus, further complicate the etiology of HAART-induced ADRs. The aspect of liver pathology including liver structure and function has received little attention and deserves further evaluation. The materials used provide a data-supported approach. They are based on systematic review and analysis of recently published world literature (MedLine search) and the experience of the authors in the specified topic. We conclude that therapeutic and drug monitoring of ART, using laboratory identification of phenotypic susceptibilities, drug interactions with other medications, drug interactions with herbal medicines, and alcohol intake might enable a safer use of this medication.