Rapid In Vitro Evaluation of Antiretroviral Barrier to Resistance at Therapeutic Drug Levels

Comprehensive database of HIV mutations selected during antiretroviral in vitro passage experiments

BACKGROUND

In vitro passage experiments are crucial to the development of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs.

METHODS

We created an online database containing data from 102 published studies in which HIV-1 or HIV-2 was cultured with increasing concentrations of the FDA-approved nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs), nonnucleoside RT inhibitors (NNRTIs), integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), capsid inhibitor (CAI) lenacapavir, and nucleoside RT translocation inhibitor (NRTTI) islatravir. We summarized the mutations selected in the subset of passage experiments with NRTIs lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC), abacavir (ABC), tenofovir (TFV), and zidovudine (AZT), NNRTIs doravirine (DOR), efavirenz (EFV), and rilpivirine (RPV), INSTIs bictegravir (BIC), cabotegravir (CAB), and dolutegravir (DTG), and PIs atazanavir (ATV), darunavir (DRV), and lopinavir (LPV). Mutations selected in vitro were compared with those selected in persons receiving the same ARV.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies described 89 experiments of wildtype isolates passaged with 3TC, FTC, ABC, TFV, or AZT; sixteen studies described 89 experiments passaged with EFV, RPV, or DOR; eleven studies described 76 experiments passaged with the INSTIs BIC, CAB, or DTG; six studies described 33 experiments passaged with ATV, LPV, or DRV. With several exceptions, mutations selected in two or more experiments were among the most common mutations selected in persons receiving the same ARV.

CONCLUSIONS

We created a database of published ARV in vitro selection experiments. Mutations emerging from these experiments generally predict those observed in persons receiving the same ARV. However, there are notable differences in mutation frequencies between in vitro and in vivo settings.

New designs for HIV-1 integrase inhibitors: a patent review (2018-present)

INTRODUCTION

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has dramatically reduced morbidity and mortality of HIV-1-infected patients. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) play an important role as a key drug in cART. The second-generation INSTIs are very potent, but due to the emergence of highly resistant viruses and the demand for more conveniently usable drugs, the development of 'third-generation' INSTIs and mechanistically different inhibitors is actively being pursued.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the patents (from 2018 to the present) for two classes of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors of INSTIs and integrase-LEDGF/p75 allosteric inhibitors (INLAIs).

EXPERT OPINION

Since the approval of the second-generation INSTI dolutegravir, the design of new INSTIs has been mostly focused on its scaffold, carbamoylpyridone (CAP). This CAP scaffold is used not only for HIV-1 INSTIs but also for drug discoveries targeting other viral enzymes. With the approval of cabotegravir as a regimen of long-acting injection in combination with rilpivirine, there is a growing need for longer-acting agents. INLAIs have been intensely studied by many groups but have yet to reach the market. However, INLAIs have recently been reported to also function as a latency promoting agent (LPA), indicating further development possibilities.

Forgiveness of INSTI-Containing Regimens at Drug Concentrations Simulating Variable Adherence In Vitro

The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF), dolutegravir (DTG)+FTC/TAF, DTG/lamivudine (3TC), and DTG/rilpivirine (RPV) are all approved for treatment of HIV-infected patients, with various limitations. Here, time to in vitro viral breakthrough (VB) and resistance barrier using simulated human drug exposures at either full or suboptimal treatment adherence to each regimen were compared. At drug concentrations corresponding to full adherence and 1 missed dose (Cmin and Cmin-1), no VB occurred with any regimen. At Cmin-2, VB occurred only with DTG+3TC, with emergent resistance to both drugs. At Cmin-3, VB occurred with all regimens: 100% of DTG+3TC cultures had VB by day 12, and <15% of BIC+FTC+TAF, DTG+FTC+TAF, and DTG+RPV cultures had VB. Emergent reverse transcriptase (RT) or integrase (IN) resistance was seen with DTG+RPV and DTG+3TC but not with BIC+FTC+TAF or DTG+FTC+TAF. At Cmin-4, 100% VB occurred with DTG+3TC and DTG+FTC+TAF by day 12, while 94% VB occurred with DTG+RPV by day 25 and only 50% VB occurred with BIC+FTC+TAF by day 35. Emergent Cmin-4 drug resistance was seen with all regimens but at differing frequencies; DTG+RPV had the most cultures with resistance. Emergent resistance was consistent with clinical observations. Overall, under high adherence conditions, no in vitro VB or resistance development occurred with these INSTI-based regimens. However, when multiple missed doses were simulated in vitro, BIC+FTC+TAF had the highest forgiveness and barrier to resistance of all tested regimens. Compared to DTG+3TC and DTG+FTC+TAF, DTG+RPV had higher forgiveness but lower resistance barrier after several simulated missed doses.

Simulating HIV Breakthrough and Resistance Development During Variable Adherence to Antiretroviral Treatment

BACKGROUND

Barriers to lifelong HIV-1 suppression by antiretrovirals include poor adherence and drug resistance; regimens with higher tolerance to missed doses (forgiveness) would be beneficial to patients. To model short-term nonadherence, in vitro experiments monitoring viral breakthrough (VB) and resistance development were conducted.

METHODS

HIV breakthrough experiments simulated drug exposures at full adherence or suboptimal adherence to bictegravir+emtricitabine+tenofovir alafenamide (BIC+FTC+TAF) or dolutegravir + lamivudine (DTG+3TC). MT-2 cells were infected with wild-type or low frequency M184V HIV-1, exposed to drug combinations, monitored for VB, and rebound virus was deep sequenced. Drug concentrations were determined using human plasma-free adjusted clinical trough concentrations (Cmin), at simulated Cmin after missing 1 to 3 consecutive doses (Cmin - 1 or Cmin - 2, and Cmin - 3) based on drug or active metabolite half-lives.

RESULTS

Cultures infected with wild-type or low frequency M184V HIV-1 showed no VB with BIC+FTC+TAF at drug concentrations corresponding to Cmin, Cmin - 1, or Cmin - 2 but breakthrough did occur in 26 of 36 cultures at Cmin - 3, where the M184V variant emerged in one culture. Experiments using DTG + 3TC prevented most breakthrough at Cmin concentrations (9/60 had breakthrough) but showed more breakthroughs as drug concentrations decreased (up to 36/36) and variants associated with resistance to both drugs emerged in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

These in vitro VB results suggest that the high potency, long half-lives, and antiviral synergy provided by the BIC/FTC/TAF triple therapy regimen may protect from viral rebound and resistance development after short-term lapses in drug adherence.