Short Communication: No Significant Changes in Weight and Body Fat Mass in Suppressed HIV-Infected Patients Switched to Dual Combination Lamivudine Plus Dolutegravir or Raltegravir

Efficacy, durability, and tolerability of dolutegravir/lamivudine and dolutegravir/rilpivirine for the treatment of HIV in a real-world setting in Belgium

OBJECTIVES

A paradigm shift from three-drug regimens to two-drug regimens (2DRs) is currently taking place in real-world clinical practice. This study aimed to describe the efficacy, durability, and tolerability of dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC) and DTG/rilpivirine (RPV) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, multicentre (ten centres in Belgium) study involving adult treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced people living with HIV on DTG/3TC or DTG/RPV between 1 January 2019 and 30 September 2020. The primary endpoint was rate of virological suppression (VS; plasma HIV-1 viral load [VL] <50 copies/ml) using an on-treatment analysis. Main secondary endpoints included the proportion of people that experienced loss of VS (LVS; defined as two consecutive HIV-1 VLs of >200 copies/ml after initially achieving VS) and a resistance analysis at the time of LVS; rate, incidence, and reasons for discontinuation of treatment (stopping treatment or changing any component of the 2DR); and change in weight, along with the proportion of people reporting a >10% weight gain. Ordinal logistic regression analysis examined associations between baseline variables and >10% on-treatment weight gain.

RESULTS

Overall, 948 people were included, of whom 734 (77%) were on DTG/3TC and 214 (23%) were on DTG/RPV. Baseline characteristics included 54% aged ≥50 years, 31% female, 31% Black sub-Saharan African, 95% treatment-experienced, and 8% with HIV-1 VL ≥50 copies/ml. Through 48 weeks, the rate of VS for the overall cohort was 98.3% (99.1% with 3TC; 96.2% with RPV). LVS was observed in 0.5% (n = 5) of the overall population (n = 1 [3TC group], n = 4 [RPV group]). There were 40 treatment discontinuations (4.2%, n = 27 [3TC group]; n = 13 [RPV group]), corresponding to an incidence of 4.7 per 100 patient-years. The most common reason for discontinuation was an adverse event (1.4%), with neurotoxicity the most frequent (0.5%). Median on-treatment weight gain at week 48 was 1 kg (interquartile range [IQR] -1-3) overall, 1 kg (IQR -1-3) in the 3TC group, and 2 kg (IQR 0-4) in the RPV group. A >10% weight increase was observed in 6.3% of people. Regression analysis showed that being on a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimen prior to 2DR initiation was the only variable associated with a >10% increase in weight from baseline (odds ratio 3.48; 95% confidence interval 1.13-10.68; p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world analysis, the 2DRs analysed were effective, durable, and safe for those who were treatment-naive and treatment-experienced. A slight increase in weight was associated with these regimens.

Effects of Initiating Raltegravir-Based Versus Efavirenz-Based Antiretroviral Regimens During Pregnancy on Weight Changes and Perinatal Outcomes: NICHD P1081

BACKGROUND

Integrase inhibitors have been associated with excess gestational weight gain that may lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). This post hoc analysis of NICHD P1081 compared antepartum changes in weight and body mass index (BMI) in pregnant women initiating raltegravir- or efavirenz-based combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) and examined associations between rates of weight gain and APOs.

SETTING

NICHD P1081 enrolled antiretroviral-naive pregnant women living with HIV in the second and third trimester in Brazil, Tanzania, South Africa, Thailand, Argentina, and the United States.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-one women enrolled between 20 and 31 gestational weeks were randomized to raltegravir- or efavirenz-based cART and followed for ≥4 weeks. A low rate of weight gain was defined as <0.18 kg/wk and high as >0.59 kg/wk. We compared weight gain and BMI increase between treatment arms using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between weight gain and APOs.

RESULTS

Raltegravir-based cART was associated with significantly higher antepartum weight gain (median 0.36 kg/wk versus 0.29 kg/wk, P = 0.01) and BMI increase (median 0.14 kg/m 2 /wk versus 0.11 kg/m 2 /wk, P = 0.01) compared with efavirenz-based treatment. Women on raltegravir had less low weight gain (18% versus 36%) and more high weight gain (21% versus 12%) ( P = 0.001). Women with low weight gain were more likely than those with normal weight gain to have small for gestational age infants or a composite of APOs.

CONCLUSIONS

A raltegravir-based antiretroviral regimen was associated with significantly higher antepartum rate of weight gain and BMI increase compared with efavirenz-based treatment in antiretroviral-naive pregnant women.

HIV Treatment with the Two-Drug Regimen Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Systematic Literature Review

The two-drug regimen dolutegravir plus lamivudine demonstrated durable efficacy for up to 3 years in phase III studies and a high barrier to resistance in treatment-naive and virologically suppressed people with HIV (PWH). This systematic literature review summarizes real-world evidence evaluating effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir plus lamivudine. We searched Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase®, PubMed, Cochrane library, and relevant international conference proceedings from 2013 to 2020. Qualitative synthesis of virologic suppression at Week 48, treatment-emergent resistance, discontinuation rates, and comorbidities was undertaken, with no statistical analyses conducted. Linked publications and potential for duplication in reporting of outcomes for cohorts and populations were identified, and the publication reporting the highest number of PWH receiving dolutegravir plus lamivudine was included in the analysis. Thirty-four studies reporting on cohorts of PWH not suspected to be linked or to include duplicate data receiving dolutegravir plus lamivudine were identified (N = 5017). Of 3744 virologically suppressed PWH who switched to dolutegravir plus lamivudine, 603 (16%) reported history of virologic failure. Nineteen studies included effectiveness data (n = 3558), four of which included data from treatment-naive PWH (n = 69). In studies with > 100 PWH, high rates of virologic suppression (Week 48, 97-100%) were maintained with dolutegravir plus lamivudine, with low rates of virologic failure (0-3.3 per 100 person-years of follow-up); one instance of emergent integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance was reported in a complex treatment-experienced individual. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were low and consistent with previously observed trial data. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine minimally impacted renal function and had minimal impact on or improved lipid profiles and bone mineral density. This systematic review demonstrates that effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in clinical practice support data from randomized controlled trials with regard to high rates of virologic response, low rates of discontinuation, and a high barrier to resistance.

Comparison of weight gain after antiretroviral switch to integrase strand transfer inhibitor or tenofovir alafenamide-based therapy

PURPOSE

Several studies have reported weight gain after switching to integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). Debate persists if weight gain also occurs when switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based ART.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of virally suppressed HIV-infected patients who were switched from non INSTI- to INSTI-based ART (INSTI switch group) as well as patients switched from TDF- to TAF-based ART (TAF switch group), and compared the mean weight change in these groups to the mean change in weight in patients maintained on NNRTI-based regimens (control group).

RESULTS

329 patients were identified. 256 patients in the INSTI switch group gained a mean 2.4 kg over 17 months compared to 0.5 kg in 54 patients in the control group over the same period (p = 0.008). 161 patients in the TAF switch group gained a mean 2.8 kg over 17 months compared to 0.5 kg in the control group (p = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in weight gain between the INSTI and TAF switch groups. Although the highest mean weight gain of 3.2 kg was seen in those 90 patients switched from both TDF- to TAF-based and non INSTI- to INSTI-based ART (TAF/INSTI switch group), this weight gain was not statistically different compared with the INSTI switch or TAF switch groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that weight gain is associated with both switching HIV regimens from non INSTI- to INSTI-based ART and TDF- to TAF-based ART.