Estimation of the prevalence of AIDS, opportunistic infections, and standard of care among patients with HIV/AIDS receiving care along the U.S.-Mexico border through the Special Projects of National Significance: a cross-sectional study

Patterns of geographic mobility predict barriers to engagement in HIV care and antiretroviral treatment adherence

Migration and geographic mobility increase risk for HIV infection and may influence engagement in HIV care and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Our goal is to use the migration-linked communities of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and New York City, New York, to determine the impact of geographic mobility on HIV care engagement and adherence to treatment. In-depth interviews were conducted with HIV+Dominicans receiving antiretroviral therapy, reporting travel or migration in the past 6 months and key informants (n=45). Mobility maps, visual representations of individual migration histories, including lifetime residence(s) and all trips over the past 2 years, were generated for all HIV+ Dominicans. Data from interviews and field observation were iteratively reviewed for themes. Mobility mapping revealed five distinct mobility patterns: travel for care, work-related travel, transnational travel (nuclear family at both sites), frequent long-stay travel, and vacation. Mobility patterns, including distance, duration, and complexity, varied by motivation for travel. There were two dominant barriers to care. First, a fear of HIV-related stigma at the destination led to delays seeking care and poor adherence. Second, longer trips led to treatment interruptions due to limited medication supply (30-day maximum dictated by programs or insurers). There was a notable discordance between what patients and providers perceived as mobility-induced barriers to care and the most common barriers found in the analysis. Interventions to improve HIV care for mobile populations should consider motivation for travel and address structural barriers to engagement in care and adherence.

A systematic review of HIV/AIDS survival and delayed diagnosis among Hispanics in the United States

HIV/AIDS disproportionately affects Hispanics. Our objective was to determine the risk of late diagnosis and rate of survival after HIV/AIDS diagnosis among Hispanics compared to other racial/ethnic groups. We performed a systematic review of the PubMed database for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2000 and September 2010. Primary outcomes included survival after HIV/AIDS diagnosis and delayed diagnoses. The definition of delayed diagnosis varied by study, ranging from concurrent HIV/AIDS diagnosis to diagnosis of AIDS within 3 years of HIV diagnosis. We found that Hispanics are at significantly greater risk for delayed diagnosis than non-Hispanic whites. Hispanic males and foreign-born Hispanics had the highest risk of late diagnosis. Available data on survival were heterogeneous, with better outcomes in some Hispanic subgroups than in others. Survival after antiretroviral initiation was similar between Hispanics and Whites. These findings emphasize the need for culturally-sensitive strategies to promote timely diagnosis of HIV infection among Hispanics and to examine the health outcomes and needs of high risk Hispanic subgroups.

Late entry to HIV care among Latinos compared with non-Latinos in a southeastern US cohort

BACKGROUND

Late diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains common despite advances in therapy and prognosis. The southeastern United States is a rapidly growing Latino settlement area where ethnic disparities may contribute to late presentation to care.

METHODS

We assessed demographic and clinical factors between racial/ethnic groups at the time of HIV care initiation in the University of North Carolina Center for AIDS Research Clinical Cohort. We identified independent predictors of late presentation, defined as a CD4(+) T lymphocyte (CD4) count <350 cells/mm(3) or an AIDS-defining event (ADE), using log-linear binomial regression.

RESULTS

During the period 1999-2009, 853 patients initiated HIV care, of whom 11% were Latino, 28% were white, and 61% were black. Median initial CD4 counts were lower for Latino patients (186 cells/mm(3)) than white patients (292 cells/mm(3); P = .006) and black patients (302 cells/mm(3); P = .02). Latino persons were more likely to be late presenters than white or black persons (76% vs 58%; P < .001) and accounted for 86%, 75%, and 50% of all presenting cases of active tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, and toxoplasmosis, respectively. Latino ethnicity, older age, male sex, and earlier entry year were independently associated with late presentation (P < .05 for all). In multivariable analyses, Latino persons were 1.29 times more likely to present to care late than white or black persons (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Latinos are more likely to initiate HIV care later in the course of illness than are black and white persons and account for a majority of several ADEs. Strategies to improve earlier HIV testing among Latinos in new settlement areas are needed.