A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Anal Cancer Screenings in US Veterans Living with HIV

Access to High-Resolution Anoscopy and Colorectal Surgery Support Identified as Important Facilitators to Successful Veterans Affairs Anal Cancer Screening Programs

BACKGROUND

Anal cancer disproportionately affects people living with HIV. The Department of Veterans Affairs is the largest single provider of health care to people living with HIV in the United States and recommends all veterans living with HIV be screened for anal cancer annually. There are barriers to developing successful anal cancer screening programs, and screenings within Veterans Affairs have been underused.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify facilitators to anal cancer screening programs in Veterans Affairs.

DESIGN

This is a qualitative study involving semistructured virtual interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes in the interview data.

SETTINGS

Study participants included Veterans Affairs infectious disease providers and colorectal surgeons who care for veterans living with HIV. Participants were asked to discuss factors that influence anal cancer screenings in Veterans Affairs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Themes were mapped to theoretical constructs and domains related to behavioral change using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

RESULTS

A total of 23 Veterans Affairs providers from all major United States geographical regions were interviewed. Important facilitators identified included access to high-resolution anoscopy and colorectal surgery support. The themes for successful anal cancer screening programs were mapped to 15 behavior-influencing constructs and categorized into 6 domains: 1) knowledge, 2) skills, 3) professional role and identity, 4) goals, 5) environmental context and resources, and 6) social influences.

LIMITATIONS

This study involves health care providers who are invested in caring for veterans living with HIV, and their perspectives might not be representative of all Veterans Affairs providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to a clinician with high-resolution anoscopy training and colorectal surgery support were identified as integral components of a successful anal cancer screening program. This study provides a framework for improving anal cancer screenings in veterans living with HIV by use of evidence-based interventions that incorporate the identified facilitators. See Video Abstract .

Anal cancer prevention: A field in need of scientific Advancement

Despite the availability of several human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, the incidence of HPV-associated anal cancer is growing at a rate of 2.2% each year. As shown in results from the recent Phase III ANCHOR study, the treatment of high-grade anal lesions in people living with HIV (PLWH) can significantly reduce rates of anal cancer development compared to active surveillance alone. As a result, screening programs to identify and treat patients with anal precancers are recommended by recent guidelines. Intense resources are needed to perform screening tests and follow-up abnormal results. The lack of effective and well-tolerated therapies, the lack of understanding regarding therapeutic targets, the paucity of preclinical models to test therapies, and the lack of biomarkers to determine which patients will develop cancer or respond to therapies are the issues that need to be addressed. We provide an overview of cutting-edge research and propose additional research that is needed to help move the field of anal cancer prevention forward. This review highlights the most significant current areas of research, as defined by the authors, and is by no means comprehensive of all anal dysplasia/cancer research.

Identifying Motivators, Facilitators, and Barriers to Engagement and Retention in Anal Cancer Screening Among Men and Women with HIV in One Ryan White HIV/AIDS Clinic

Anal squamous cell carcinoma disproportionally affects people with HIV (PWH); however, engagement in anal cancer screening is low in many settings. This study was conducted to assess knowledge and perceptions of anal cancer screening to identify factors in the engagement and retention in prevention services among PWH. Semistructured interviews were conducted among adult PWH eligible for anal cancer screening in our Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program clinic. Descriptive statistics were tabulated; thematic analyses were performed to identify emerging motivators, facilitators, and barriers. Among 26 PWH, 9 had not been screened, 8 had undergone Papanicolaou (Pap) testing alone, and 9 had undergone anoscopy. The median age of the cohort was 55.2 years; 54% identified as men who have sex with men, and 54% identified as Black. In the unscreened cohort, participants were motivated by investing in their health and positive attitudes toward cancer prevention however were deterred by a lack of referral and low awareness about screening. Among those who had Pap testing, trust in healthcare providers and abnormal testing results were motivators to engagement, whereas lack of perceived risk of anal cancer and worry about pain of an anoscopy were prominent barriers. Among those who had anoscopy, perceived risk, positive experience with the procedure, and use of anxiolytics prior to anoscopy were motivators, whereas anxiety around a new cancer diagnosis and negative experience with anoscopy were barriers. Clinics seeking to build or strengthen their anal cancer screening programs can address the barriers described in this study to promote access to anal cancer screening among PWH.

Commonly Drawn Immunologic and Inflammatory Markers as Risk Predictors for Anal Cancer in Veterans Living With HIV

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine if immune inflammatory markers (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet lymphocyte ratio [PLR], and prognostic nutritional index [PNI]) correlate with anal cancer risk in people living with HIV and to compare these markers with the CD4/CD8 ratio.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a regional retrospective cohort study of veterans living with HIV who were screened for or diagnosed with anal neoplasia or cancer from 2001 to 2019. The NLR, PLR, PNI, and CD4/CD8 ratio within 1 year of anal pathology results were computed. Patients with anal cancer were compared to patients without anal cancer. Regression modeling was used to estimate the odds of developing anal cancer.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-four patients were included (37 with anal cancer, 297 without anal cancer). In patients with anal cancer, NLR and PLR were higher (2.17 vs 1.69, p = .04; 140 vs 110, p = .02, respectively), while PNI and CD4/CD8 ratio were lower (44.65 vs 50.01, p < .001; 0.35 vs 0.80, p < .001, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression modeling, only PNI (odds ratio, 0.90; p = .001) and CD4/CD8 ratio (odds ratio, 0.05; p < .001) were associated with increased anal cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Although NLR and PLR independently correlate with anal cancer risk, when controlling for other risk predictors, only PNI and CD4/CD8 ratio were statistically significant biomarkers for anal cancer. The CD4/CD8 ratio is the strongest immune inflammatory marker that predicts risk of anal cancer among veterans living with HIV.

Anal Dysplasia Screening in People Living with HIV: Long-Term Follow-Up in a Large Cohort from Northwest Spain

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is not a common disease in the general population, although its incidence is higher in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH). Anal SCC is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and arises from premalignant lesions termed squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). SIL surveillance programs are based on the early detection and treatment of SILs, especially those with a higher risk of transforming into cancer. An anal surveillance program has been under development in our institution since 2011. In this context, we performed a retrospective cohort study at the anal dysplasia unit of Álvaro-Cunqueiro Hospital (Spain). Epidemiological and clinical data were gathered from our Infectious Diseases Sample Collection (an open sample cohort including PLWH) from January 2011 to January 2022. A total of 493 PLWH were considered, 122 (24.7%) of whom were diagnosed with anal dysplasia at baseline, including 2 cases of anal SCC. Briefly, most of individuals were young men (median age, 38 years old) born in Spain (76%), whose vaccination rate before their inclusion in the program was scarce (<3%). Throughout the study period, 81 (16.4%) cases were diagnosed with high-grade squamous-intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) and 3 with anal SCC. At the baseline, severe immunosuppression (i.e., nadir CD4+ lymphocyte count below 200 cell/μL), and prior diagnosis of condyloma acuminata were more frequent within the group with SILs. Conversely, the baseline CD4+ lymphocyte count was similar among both groups. HPV-16 was related to a higher risk of HSILs (odds ratio: 2.76). At the end of the follow-up, 385 PLWH had been retained in care; one patient had died of anal cancer. Anal dysplasia was common (25% of cases), especially among patients infected by HPV-16, diagnosed with condyloma acuminata, and who were severely immunosuppressed. HPV-16 was the main risk factor for the presentation of HSILs.