1
|
Kotsyurbenko OR, Kompanichenko VN, Brouchkov AV, Khrunyk YY, Karlov SP, Sorokin VV, Skladnev DA. Different Scenarios for the Origin and the Subsequent Succession of a Hypothetical Microbial Community in the Cloud Layer of Venus. ASTROBIOLOGY 2024; 24:423-441. [PMID: 38563825 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2022.0117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
The possible existence of a microbial community in the venusian clouds is one of the most intriguing hypotheses in modern astrobiology. Such a community must be characterized by a high survivability potential under severe environmental conditions, the most extreme of which are very low pH levels and water activity. Considering different scenarios for the origin of life and geological history of our planet, a few of these scenarios are discussed in the context of the origin of hypothetical microbial life within the venusian cloud layer. The existence of liquid water on the surface of ancient Venus is one of the key outstanding questions influencing this possibility. We link the inherent attributes of microbial life as we know it that favor the persistence of life in such an environment and review the possible scenarios of life's origin and its evolution under a strong greenhouse effect and loss of water on Venus. We also propose a roadmap and describe a novel methodological approach for astrobiological research in the framework of future missions to Venus with the intent to reveal whether life exists today on the planet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg R Kotsyurbenko
- Higher School of Ecology, Yugra State University, Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia
- Network of Researchers on the Chemical Evolution of Life, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Vladimir N Kompanichenko
- Network of Researchers on the Chemical Evolution of Life, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Institute for Complex Analysis of Regional Problems RAS, Birobidzhan, Russia
| | | | - Yuliya Y Khrunyk
- Department of Heat Treatment and Physics of Metal, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia
| | - Sergey P Karlov
- Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir V Sorokin
- Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry A Skladnev
- Network of Researchers on the Chemical Evolution of Life, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schaible MJ, Szeinbaum N, Bozdag GO, Chou L, Grefenstette N, Colón-Santos S, Rodriguez LE, Styczinski MJ, Thweatt JL, Todd ZR, Vázquez-Salazar A, Adams A, Araújo MN, Altair T, Borges S, Burton D, Campillo-Balderas JA, Cangi EM, Caro T, Catalano E, Chen K, Conlin PL, Cooper ZS, Fisher TM, Fos SM, Garcia A, Glaser DM, Harman CE, Hermis NY, Hooks M, Johnson-Finn K, Lehmer O, Hernández-Morales R, Hughson KHG, Jácome R, Jia TZ, Marlow JJ, McKaig J, Mierzejewski V, Muñoz-Velasco I, Nural C, Oliver GC, Penev PI, Raj CG, Roche TP, Sabuda MC, Schaible GA, Sevgen S, Sinhadc P, Steller LH, Stelmach K, Tarnas J, Tavares F, Trubl G, Vidaurri M, Vincent L, Weber JM, Weng MM, Wilpiszeki RL, Young A. Chapter 1: The Astrobiology Primer 3.0. ASTROBIOLOGY 2024; 24:S4-S39. [PMID: 38498816 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2021.0129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
The Astrobiology Primer 3.0 (ABP3.0) is a concise introduction to the field of astrobiology for students and others who are new to the field of astrobiology. It provides an entry into the broader materials in this supplementary issue of Astrobiology and an overview of the investigations and driving hypotheses that make up this interdisciplinary field. The content of this chapter was adapted from the other 10 articles in this supplementary issue and thus represents the contribution of all the authors who worked on these introductory articles. The content of this chapter is not exhaustive and represents the topics that the authors found to be the most important and compelling in a dynamic and changing field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah J Schaible
- School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nadia Szeinbaum
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - G Ozan Bozdag
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Luoth Chou
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
- Center for Space Sciences and Technology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA
| | - Natalie Grefenstette
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Stephanie Colón-Santos
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Laura E Rodriguez
- Lunar and Planetary Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Houston, Texas, USA
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - M J Styczinski
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jennifer L Thweatt
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zoe R Todd
- Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Alberto Vázquez-Salazar
- Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alyssa Adams
- Center for Space Sciences and Technology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - M N Araújo
- Biochemistry Department, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil
| | - Thiago Altair
- Institute of Chemistry of São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil
- Department of Chemistry, College of the Atlantic, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA
| | | | - Dana Burton
- Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
| | | | - Eryn M Cangi
- Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Tristan Caro
- Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Enrico Catalano
- Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, The BioRobotics Institute, Pisa, Italy
| | - Kimberly Chen
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Peter L Conlin
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Z S Cooper
- Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Theresa M Fisher
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Santiago Mestre Fos
- School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amanda Garcia
- Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - D M Glaser
- Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Chester E Harman
- Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ninos Y Hermis
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
- Department of Physics and Space Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - M Hooks
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - K Johnson-Finn
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
| | - Owen Lehmer
- Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ricardo Hernández-Morales
- Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Kynan H G Hughson
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rodrigo Jácome
- Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Tony Z Jia
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jeffrey J Marlow
- Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jordan McKaig
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Veronica Mierzejewski
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Israel Muñoz-Velasco
- Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
- Departamento de Biología Celular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ceren Nural
- Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gina C Oliver
- Department of Geology, San Bernardino Valley College, San Bernardino, California, USA
| | - Petar I Penev
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Chinmayee Govinda Raj
- School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tyler P Roche
- School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mary C Sabuda
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Biotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - George A Schaible
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
| | - Serhat Sevgen
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Institute of Marine Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Erdemli, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Pritvik Sinhadc
- BEYOND: Center For Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Arizona, USA
- Dubai College, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Luke H Steller
- Australian Centre for Astrobiology, and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Kamil Stelmach
- Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - J Tarnas
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Frank Tavares
- Space Enabled Research Group, MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gareth Trubl
- Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
| | - Monica Vidaurri
- Center for Space Sciences and Technology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Howard University, Washington DC, USA
| | - Lena Vincent
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jessica M Weber
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | | | | | - Amber Young
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
- Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grefenstette N, Chou L, Colón-Santos S, Fisher TM, Mierzejewski V, Nural C, Sinhadc P, Vidaurri M, Vincent L, Weng MM. Chapter 9: Life as We Don't Know It. ASTROBIOLOGY 2024; 24:S186-S201. [PMID: 38498819 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2021.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
While Earth contains the only known example of life in the universe, it is possible that life elsewhere is fundamentally different from what we are familiar with. There is an increased recognition in the astrobiology community that the search for life should steer away from terran-specific biosignatures to those that are more inclusive to all life-forms. To start exploring the space of possibilities that life could occupy, we can try to dissociate life from the chemistry that composes it on Earth by envisioning how different life elsewhere could be in composition, lifestyle, medium, and form, and by exploring how the general principles that govern living systems on Earth might be found in different forms and environments across the Solar System. Exotic life-forms could exist on Mars or Venus, or icy moons like Europa and Enceladus, or even as a shadow biosphere on Earth. New perspectives on agnostic biosignature detection have also begun to emerge, allowing for a broader and more inclusive approach to seeking exotic life with unknown chemistry that is distinct from life as we know it on Earth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Grefenstette
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Luoth Chou
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Theresa M Fisher
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Ceren Nural
- Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pritvik Sinhadc
- BEYOND: Center For Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Arizona, USA
- Dubai College, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Monica Vidaurri
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
- Howard University, DC, USA
| | - Lena Vincent
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maggiori C, Fernández-Martínez MA, Bourdages LJ, Sánchez-García L, Moreno-Paz M, Sobrado JM, Carrizo D, Vicente-Retortillo Á, Goordial J, Whyte LG. Biosignature Detection and MinION Sequencing of Antarctic Cryptoendoliths After Exposure to Mars Simulation Conditions. ASTROBIOLOGY 2024; 24:44-60. [PMID: 38153386 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2023.0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
In the search for life in our Solar System, Mars remains a promising target based on its proximity and similarity to Earth. When Mars transitioned from a warmer, wetter climate to its current dry and freezing conditions, any putative extant life probably retreated into habitable refugia such as the subsurface or the interior of rocks. Terrestrial cryptoendolithic microorganisms (i.e., those inhabiting rock interiors) thus represent possible modern-day Mars analogs, particularly those from the hyperarid McMurdo Dry Valleys in Antarctica. As DNA is a strong definitive biosignature, given that there is no known abiotic chemistry that can polymerize nucleobases, we investigated DNA detection with MinION sequencing in Antarctic cryptoendoliths after an ∼58-sol exposure in MARTE, a Mars environmental chamber capable of simulating martian temperature, pressure, humidity, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and atmospheric composition, in conjunction with protein and lipid detection. The MARTE conditions resulted in changes in community composition and DNA, proteins, and cell membrane-derived lipids remained detectable postexposure. Of the multitude of extreme environmental conditions on Mars, UV radiation (specifically UVC) is the most destructive to both cells and DNA. As such, we further investigated if a UVC exposure corresponding to ∼278 martian years would impede DNA detection via MinION sequencing. The MinION was able to successfully detect and sequence DNA after this UVC radiation exposure, suggesting its utility for life detection in future astrobiology missions focused on finding relatively recently exposed biomarkers inside possible martian refugia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Maggiori
- Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Miguel Angel Fernández-Martínez
- Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Ste. Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain
| | - Louis-Jacques Bourdages
- Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Ste. Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jacqueline Goordial
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lyle G Whyte
- Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Ste. Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cleaves HJ, Hystad G, Prabhu A, Wong ML, Cody GD, Economon S, Hazen RM. A robust, agnostic molecular biosignature based on machine learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2307149120. [PMID: 37748080 PMCID: PMC10576141 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2307149120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The search for definitive biosignatures-unambiguous markers of past or present life-is a central goal of paleobiology and astrobiology. We used pyrolysis-gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry to analyze chemically disparate samples, including living cells, geologically processed fossil organic material, carbon-rich meteorites, and laboratory-synthesized organic compounds and mixtures. Data from each sample were employed as training and test subsets for machine-learning methods, which resulted in a model that can identify the biogenicity of both contemporary and ancient geologically processed samples with ~90% accuracy. These machine-learning methods do not rely on precise compound identification: Rather, the relational aspects of chromatographic and mass peaks provide the needed information, which underscores this method's utility for detecting alien biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. James Cleaves
- Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC20015
- Earth Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo152-8550, Japan
- Blue Marble Space Institute for Science, Seattle, WA98104
| | - Grethe Hystad
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, IN46323
| | - Anirudh Prabhu
- Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC20015
| | - Michael L. Wong
- Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC20015
- Sagan Fellow, NASA Hubble Fellowship Program, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD21218
| | - George D. Cody
- Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC20015
| | - Sophia Economon
- Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD21218
| | - Robert M. Hazen
- Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC20015
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Georgiou CD, McKay C, Reymond JL. Organic Catalytic Activity as a Method for Agnostic Life Detection. ASTROBIOLOGY 2023; 23:1118-1127. [PMID: 37523279 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2023.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
An ideal life detection instrument would have high sensitivity but be insensitive to abiotic processes and would be capable of detecting life with alternate molecular structures. In this study, we propose that catalytic activity can be the basis of a nearly ideal life detection instrument. There are several advantages to catalysis as an agnostic life detection method. Demonstrating catalysis does not necessarily require culturing/growing the alien life and in fact may persist even in dead biomass for some time, and the amplification by catalysis is large even by minute amounts of catalysts and, hence, can be readily detected against abiotic background rates. In specific, we propose a hydrolytic catalysis detection instrument that could detect activity in samples of extraterrestrial organic material from unknown life. The instrument uses chromogenic assay-based detection of various hydrolytic catalytic activities, which are matched to corresponding artificial substrates having the same, chromogenic (preferably fluorescent) upon release, group; D- and L-enantiomers of these substrates can be used to also answer the question whether unknown life is chiral. Since catalysis is a time-proportional product-concentration amplification process, hydrolytic catalytic activity can be measured on a sample of even a minute size, and with instruments based on, for example, optofluidic chip technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jean-Louis Reymond
- Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Theiling BP, Chou L, Da Poian V, Battler M, Raimalwala K, Arevalo R, Neveu M, Ni Z, Graham H, Elsila J, Thompson B. Science Autonomy for Ocean Worlds Astrobiology: A Perspective. ASTROBIOLOGY 2022; 22:901-913. [PMID: 35507950 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2021.0062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Astrobiology missions to ocean worlds in our solar system must overcome both scientific and technological challenges due to extreme temperature and radiation conditions, long communication times, and limited bandwidth. While such tools could not replace ground-based analysis by science and engineering teams, machine learning algorithms could enhance the science return of these missions through development of autonomous science capabilities. Examples of science autonomy include onboard data analysis and subsequent instrument optimization, data prioritization (for transmission), and real-time decision-making based on data analysis. Similar advances could be made to develop streamlined data processing software for rapid ground-based analyses. Here we discuss several ways machine learning and autonomy could be used for astrobiology missions, including landing site selection, prioritization and targeting of samples, classification of "features" (e.g., proposed biosignatures) and novelties (uncharacterized, "new" features, which may be of most interest to agnostic astrobiological investigations), and data transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luoth Chou
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Victoria Da Poian
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
- Microtell LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Ricardo Arevalo
- Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Marc Neveu
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
- Center for Research and Exploration in Space Sciences and Technology II (CRESST II), USA
- Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Ziqin Ni
- Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Heather Graham
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - Jamie Elsila
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kminek G, Benardini JN, Brenker FE, Brooks T, Burton AS, Dhaniyala S, Dworkin JP, Fortman JL, Glamoclija M, Grady MM, Graham HV, Haruyama J, Kieft TL, Koopmans M, McCubbin FM, Meyer MA, Mustin C, Onstott TC, Pearce N, Pratt LM, Sephton MA, Siljeström S, Sugahara H, Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, van Zuilen M, Viso M. COSPAR Sample Safety Assessment Framework (SSAF). ASTROBIOLOGY 2022; 22:S186-S216. [PMID: 35653292 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2022.0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) Sample Safety Assessment Framework (SSAF) has been developed by a COSPAR appointed Working Group. The objective of the sample safety assessment would be to evaluate whether samples returned from Mars could be harmful for Earth's systems (e.g., environment, biosphere, geochemical cycles). During the Working Group's deliberations, it became clear that a comprehensive assessment to predict the effects of introducing life in new environments or ecologies is difficult and practically impossible, even for terrestrial life and certainly more so for unknown extraterrestrial life. To manage expectations, the scope of the SSAF was adjusted to evaluate only whether the presence of martian life can be excluded in samples returned from Mars. If the presence of martian life cannot be excluded, a Hold & Critical Review must be established to evaluate the risk management measures and decide on the next steps. The SSAF starts from a positive hypothesis (there is martian life in the samples), which is complementary to the null-hypothesis (there is no martian life in the samples) typically used for science. Testing the positive hypothesis includes four elements: (1) Bayesian statistics, (2) subsampling strategy, (3) test sequence, and (4) decision criteria. The test sequence capability covers self-replicating and non-self-replicating biology and biologically active molecules. Most of the investigations associated with the SSAF would need to be carried out within biological containment. The SSAF is described in sufficient detail to support planning activities for a Sample Receiving Facility (SRF) and for preparing science announcements, while at the same time acknowledging that further work is required before a detailed Sample Safety Assessment Protocol (SSAP) can be developed. The three major open issues to be addressed to optimize and implement the SSAF are (1) setting a value for the level of assurance to effectively exclude the presence of martian life in the samples, (2) carrying out an analogue test program, and (3) acquiring relevant contamination knowledge from all Mars Sample Return (MSR) flight and ground elements. Although the SSAF was developed specifically for assessing samples from Mars in the context of the currently planned NASA-ESA MSR Campaign, this framework and the basic safety approach are applicable to any other Mars sample return mission concept, with minor adjustments in the execution part related to the specific nature of the samples to be returned. The SSAF is also considered a sound basis for other COSPAR Planetary Protection Category V, restricted Earth return missions beyond Mars. It is anticipated that the SSAF will be subject to future review by the various MSR stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Kminek
- European Space Agency, Mars Exploration Group, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
| | - James N Benardini
- NASA Headquarters, Office of Planetary Protection, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Frank E Brenker
- Goethe University, Department of Geoscience, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Timothy Brooks
- UK Health Security Agency, Rare & Imported Pathogens Laboratory, Salisbury, UK
| | - Aaron S Burton
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Suresh Dhaniyala
- Clarkson University, Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Potsdam, New York, USA
| | - Jason P Dworkin
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar System Exploration Division, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Fortman
- Security Programs, Engineering Biology Research Consortium, Emeryville, USA
| | - Mihaela Glamoclija
- Rutgers University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Monica M Grady
- The Open University, Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Heather V Graham
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Astrochemistry Laboratory, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - Junichi Haruyama
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Chofu, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Thomas L Kieft
- New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Biology Department, Socorro, New Mexico, USA
| | - Marion Koopmans
- Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Viroscience, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francis M McCubbin
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael A Meyer
- NASA Headquarters, Planetary Science Division, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Tullis C Onstott
- Princeton University, Department of Geosciences, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Neil Pearce
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Department of Medical Statistics, London, UK
| | - Lisa M Pratt
- Indiana University Bloomington, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Emeritus, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Mark A Sephton
- Imperial College London, Department of Earth Science & Engineering, London, UK
| | - Sandra Siljeström
- RISE, Research Institutes of Sweden, Department of Methodology, Textiles and Medical Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Haruna Sugahara
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Sagamihara Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shino Suzuki
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Sagamihara Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yohey Suzuki
- University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark van Zuilen
- Université de Paris, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France
- European Institute for Marine Studies (IUEM), CNRS-UMR6538 Laboratoire Geo-Ocean, Plouzané, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wong ML, Bartlett S, Chen S, Tierney L. Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe's Possibilities. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:783. [PMID: 35743813 PMCID: PMC9225093 DOI: 10.3390/life12060783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We are embarking on a new age of astrobiology, one in which numerous interplanetary missions and telescopes will be designed, built, and launched with the explicit goal of finding evidence for life beyond Earth. Such a profound aim warrants caution and responsibility when interpreting and disseminating results. Scientists must take care not to overstate (or over-imply) confidence in life detection when evidence is lacking, or only incremental advances have been made. Recently, there has been a call for the community to create standards of evidence for the detection and reporting of biosignatures. In this perspective, we wish to highlight a critical but often understated element to the discussion of biosignatures: Life detection studies are deeply entwined with and rely upon our (often preconceived) notions of what life is, the origins of life, and habitability. Where biosignatures are concerned, these three highly related questions are frequently relegated to a low priority, assumed to be already solved or irrelevant to the question of life detection. Therefore, our aim is to bring to the fore how these other major astrobiological frontiers are central to searching for life elsewhere and encourage astrobiologists to embrace the reality that all of these science questions are interrelated and must be furthered together rather than separately. Finally, in an effort to be more inclusive of life as we do not know it, we propose tentative criteria for a more general and expansive characterization of habitability that we call genesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L. Wong
- Earth & Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015, USA
| | - Stuart Bartlett
- Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sihe Chen
- Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Louisa Tierney
- The Potomac School, Science Engineering & Research Center, McLean, VA 22101, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rivera-Valentín EG, Filiberto J, Lynch KL, Mamajanov I, Lyons TW, Schulte M, Méndez A. Introduction-First Billion Years: Habitability. ASTROBIOLOGY 2021; 21:893-905. [PMID: 34406807 PMCID: PMC8403211 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2020.2314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The physical processes active during the first billion years (FBY) of Earth's history, such as accretion, differentiation, and impact cratering, provide constraints on the initial conditions that were conducive to the formation and establishment of life on Earth. This motivated the Lunar and Planetary Institute's FBY topical initiative, which was a four-part conference series intended to look at each of these physical processes to study the basic structure and composition of our Solar System that was set during the FBY. The FBY Habitability conference, held in September 2019, was the last in this series and was intended to synthesize the initiative; specifically, to further our understanding of the origins of life, planetary and environmental habitability, and the search for life beyond Earth. The conference included discussions of planetary habitability and the potential emergence of life on bodies within our Solar System, as well as extrasolar systems by applying our knowledge of the Solar System's FBY, and in particular Earth's early history. To introduce this Special Collection, which resulted from work discussed at the conference, we provide a review of the main themes and a synopsis of the FBY Habitability conference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Justin Filiberto
- Lunar and Planetary Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kennda L. Lynch
- Lunar and Planetary Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Irena Mamajanov
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy W. Lyons
- Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
| | - Mitch Schulte
- Planetary Science Division, NASA Headquarters, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Abel Méndez
- Planetary Habitability Laboratory, University of Puerto Rico Arecibo, Arecibo, Puerto Rico
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Astrobiology is focused on the study of life in the universe. However, lifeless planetary environments yield biological information on the variety of ways in which physical and chemical conditions in the universe preclude the possibility of the origin or persistence of life, and in turn this will help explain the distribution and abundance of life, or lack of it, in the universe. Furthermore, many places that humans wish to explore and settle in space are lifeless, and studying the fate of life in these environments will aid our own success in thriving in them. In this synthetic review, I have three objectives, as follows: (1) To discuss the biological value and use of lifeless environments, (2) To explore the diverse planetary bodies and environments that can be lifeless and to categorize them, and (3) To propose sets of biological experiments that can be undertaken in different categories of lifeless worlds and environments and suggest concepts for mission ideas to realize these goals. They include origin of life and microbial inoculation experiments in lifeless but habitable environments. I suggest that the biological study of lifelessness is an underappreciated area in planetary sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles S Cockell
- UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Classification of the Biogenicity of Complex Organic Mixtures for the Detection of Extraterrestrial Life. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11030234. [PMID: 33809046 PMCID: PMC8001260 DOI: 10.3390/life11030234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Searching for life in the Universe depends on unambiguously distinguishing biological features from background signals, which could take the form of chemical, morphological, or spectral signatures. The discovery and direct measurement of organic compounds unambiguously indicative of extraterrestrial (ET) life is a major goal of Solar System exploration. Biology processes matter and energy differently from abiological systems, and materials produced by biological systems may become enriched in planetary environments where biology is operative. However, ET biology might be composed of different components than terrestrial life. As ET sample return is difficult, in situ methods for identifying biology will be useful. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a potentially versatile life detection technique, which will be used to analyze numerous Solar System environments in the near future. We show here that simple algorithmic analysis of MS data from abiotic synthesis (natural and synthetic), microbial cells, and thermally processed biological materials (lab-grown organisms and petroleum) easily identifies relational organic compound distributions that distinguish pristine and aged biological and abiological materials, which likely can be attributed to the types of compounds these processes produce, as well as how they are formed and decompose. To our knowledge this is the first comprehensive demonstration of the utility of this analytical technique for the detection of biology. This method is independent of the detection of particular masses or molecular species samples may contain. This suggests a general method to agnostically detect evidence of biology using MS given a sufficiently strong signal in which the majority of the material in a sample has either a biological or abiological origin. Such metrics are also likely to be useful for studies of possible emergent living phenomena, and paleobiological samples.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kacar B, Garcia AK, Anbar AD. Evolutionary History of Bioessential Elements Can Guide the Search for Life in the Universe. Chembiochem 2020; 22:114-119. [PMID: 33136319 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202000500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of life in the universe comes from one sample, life on Earth. Current and next-generation space missions will target exoplanets as well as planets and moons in our own solar system with the primary goal of detecting, interpreting and characterizing indications of possible biological activity. Thus, understanding life's fundamental characteristics is increasingly critical for detecting and interpreting potential biological signatures elsewhere in the universe. Astrobiologists have outlined the essential roles of carbon and water for life, but we have yet to decipher the rules governing the evolution of how living organisms use bioessential elements. Does the suite of life's essential chemical elements on Earth constitute only one possible evolutionary outcome? Are some elements so essential for biological functions that evolution will select for them despite low availability? How would this play out on other worlds that have different relative element abundances? When we look for life in the universe, or the conditions that could give rise to life, we must learn how to recognize it in extremely different chemical and environmental conditions from those on Earth. We argue that by exposing self-organizing biotic chemistries to different combinations of abiotic materials, and by mapping the evolutionary history of metalloenzyme biochemistry onto geological availabilities of metals, alternative element choices that are very different from life's present-day molecular structure might result. A greater understanding of the paleomolecular evolutionary history of life on Earth will create a predictive capacity for detecting and assessing life's existence on worlds where alternate evolutionary paths might have been taken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betul Kacar
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, 1007 E Lowell St, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.,Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.,Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, 1629 E University Blvd, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.,Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 1 Chome-31 Ishikawacho, Ota City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Amanda K Garcia
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, 1007 E Lowell St, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA
| | - Ariel D Anbar
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, E Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Seyler L, Kujawinski EB, Azua-Bustos A, Lee MD, Marlow J, Perl SM, Cleaves II HJ. Metabolomics as an Emerging Tool in the Search for Astrobiologically Relevant Biomarkers. ASTROBIOLOGY 2020; 20:1251-1261. [PMID: 32551936 PMCID: PMC7116171 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2019.2135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
It is now routinely possible to sequence and recover microbial genomes from environmental samples. To the degree it is feasible to assign transcriptional and translational functions to these genomes, it should be possible, in principle, to largely understand the complete molecular inputs and outputs of a microbial community. However, gene-based tools alone are presently insufficient to describe the full suite of chemical reactions and small molecules that compose a living cell. Metabolomic tools have developed quickly and now enable rapid detection and identification of small molecules within biological and environmental samples. The convergence of these technologies will soon facilitate the detection of novel enzymatic activities, novel organisms, and potentially extraterrestrial life-forms on solar system bodies. This review explores the methodological problems and scientific opportunities facing researchers who hope to apply metabolomic methods in astrobiology-related fields, and how present challenges might be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Seyler
- Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Address correspondence to: Lauren Seyler, Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 86 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
| | - Elizabeth B. Kujawinski
- Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Armando Azua-Bustos
- Department of Planetology and Habitability, Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Michael D. Lee
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Exobiology Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey Marlow
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Scott M. Perl
- Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology/NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA
- Mineral Sciences, Los Angeles Natural History Museum, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Henderson James Cleaves II
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
- School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
- Geographical Research Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pohorille A, Sokolowska J. Evaluating Biosignatures for Life Detection. ASTROBIOLOGY 2020; 20:1236-1250. [PMID: 32808814 PMCID: PMC7591378 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2019.2151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Conceptual frameworks are developed for evaluating the ability of different biosignatures to provide evidence for the presence of life in planned missions or observational studies. The focus is on intrinsic characteristics of biosignatures in space environments rather than on their detection, which depends on technology. Evaluation procedures are drawn from extensive studies in decision theory on related problems in business, engineering, medical fields, and the social arena. Three approaches are particularly useful. Two of them, Signal Detection Theory and Bayesian hypothesis testing, are based on probabilities. The third approach is based on utility theory. In all the frameworks, knowledge about a subject matter has to be translated into probabilities and/or utilities in a multistep process called elicitation. We present the first attempt to cover all steps, from acquiring knowledge about biosignatures to assigning probabilities or utilities to global quantities, such as false positives and false negatives. Since elicitation involves human judgment that is always prone to perceptual and cognitive biases, the relevant biases are discussed and illustrated in examples. We further discuss at which stage of elicitation human judgment should be involved to ensure the most reliable outcomes. An example, how evaluating biosignatures might be implemented, is given in the Supplementary Information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Pohorille
- Exobiology Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fairén AG, Gómez-Elvira J, Briones C, Prieto-Ballesteros O, Rodríguez-Manfredi JA, López Heredero R, Belenguer T, Moral AG, Moreno-Paz M, Parro V. The Complex Molecules Detector (CMOLD): A Fluidic-Based Instrument Suite to Search for (Bio)chemical Complexity on Mars and Icy Moons. ASTROBIOLOGY 2020; 20:1076-1096. [PMID: 32856927 PMCID: PMC7116096 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2019.2167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Organic chemistry is ubiquitous in the Solar System, and both Mars and a number of icy satellites of the outer Solar System show substantial promise for having hosted or hosting life. Here, we propose a novel astrobiologically focused instrument suite that could be included as scientific payload in future missions to Mars or the icy moons: the Complex Molecules Detector, or CMOLD. CMOLD is devoted to determining different levels of prebiotic/biotic chemical and structural targets following a chemically general approach (i.e., valid for both terrestrial and nonterrestrial life), as well as their compatibility with terrestrial life. CMOLD is based on a microfluidic block that distributes a liquid suspension sample to three instruments by using complementary technologies: (1) novel microscopic techniques for identifying ultrastructures and cell-like morphologies, (2) Raman spectroscopy for detecting universal intramolecular complexity that leads to biochemical functionality, and (3) bioaffinity-based systems (including antibodies and aptamers as capture probes) for finding life-related and nonlife-related molecular structures. We highlight our current developments to make this type of instruments flight-ready for upcoming Mars missions: the Raman spectrometer included in the science payload of the ESAs Rosalind Franklin rover (Raman Laser Spectrometer instrument) to be launched in 2022, and the biomarker detector that was included as payload in the NASA Icebreaker lander mission proposal (SOLID instrument). CMOLD is a robust solution that builds on the combination of three complementary, existing techniques to cover a wide spectrum of targets in the search for (bio)chemical complexity in the Solar System.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto G. Fairén
- Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca New York, USA
| | - Javier Gómez-Elvira
- Payload & Space Science Department, Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Raquel López Heredero
- Payload & Space Science Department, Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA), Madrid, Spain
| | - Tomás Belenguer
- Payload & Space Science Department, Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA), Madrid, Spain
| | - Andoni G. Moral
- Payload & Space Science Department, Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Víctor Parro
- Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Carrier B, Beaty D, Meyer M, Blank J, Chou L, DasSarma S, Des Marais D, Eigenbrode J, Grefenstette N, Lanza N, Schuerger A, Schwendner P, Smith H, Stoker C, Tarnas J, Webster K, Bakermans C, Baxter B, Bell M, Benner S, Bolivar Torres H, Boston P, Bruner R, Clark B, DasSarma P, Engelhart A, Gallegos Z, Garvin Z, Gasda P, Green J, Harris R, Hoffman M, Kieft T, Koeppel A, Lee P, Li X, Lynch K, Mackelprang R, Mahaffy P, Matthies L, Nellessen M, Newsom H, Northup D, O'Connor B, Perl S, Quinn R, Rowe L, Sauterey B, Schneegurt M, Schulze-Makuch D, Scuderi L, Spilde M, Stamenković V, Torres Celis J, Viola D, Wade B, Walker C, Wiens R, Williams A, Williams J, Xu J. Mars Extant Life: What's Next? Conference Report. ASTROBIOLOGY 2020; 20:785-814. [PMID: 32466662 PMCID: PMC7307687 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2020.2237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
On November 5-8, 2019, the "Mars Extant Life: What's Next?" conference was convened in Carlsbad, New Mexico. The conference gathered a community of actively publishing experts in disciplines related to habitability and astrobiology. Primary conclusions are as follows: A significant subset of conference attendees concluded that there is a realistic possibility that Mars hosts indigenous microbial life. A powerful theme that permeated the conference is that the key to the search for martian extant life lies in identifying and exploring refugia ("oases"), where conditions are either permanently or episodically significantly more hospitable than average. Based on our existing knowledge of Mars, conference participants highlighted four potential martian refugium (not listed in priority order): Caves, Deep Subsurface, Ices, and Salts. The conference group did not attempt to reach a consensus prioritization of these candidate environments, but instead felt that a defensible prioritization would require a future competitive process. Within the context of these candidate environments, we identified a variety of geological search strategies that could narrow the search space. Additionally, we summarized a number of measurement techniques that could be used to detect evidence of extant life (if present). Again, it was not within the scope of the conference to prioritize these measurement techniques-that is best left for the competitive process. We specifically note that the number and sensitivity of detection methods that could be implemented if samples were returned to Earth greatly exceed the methodologies that could be used at Mars. Finally, important lessons to guide extant life search processes can be derived both from experiments carried out in terrestrial laboratories and analog field sites and from theoretical modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B.L. Carrier
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - D.W. Beaty
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | | | - J.G. Blank
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - L. Chou
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - S. DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | - N.L. Lanza
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
| | - A.C. Schuerger
- University of Florida/Space Life Sciences Laboratory, Kennedy Space Center, Florida, USA
| | - P. Schwendner
- University of Florida/Space Life Sciences Laboratory, Kennedy Space Center, Florida, USA
| | - H.D. Smith
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - C.R. Stoker
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - J.D. Tarnas
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - K.D. Webster
- Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - C. Bakermans
- Pennsylvania State University, Altoona, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - B.K. Baxter
- Westminster College, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - M.S. Bell
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - S.A. Benner
- Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Alachua, Florida, USA
| | - H.H. Bolivar Torres
- Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, Distrito Federal Mexico, Mexico
| | - P.J. Boston
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - R. Bruner
- Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - B.C. Clark
- Space Science Institute, Littleton, Colorado, USA
| | - P. DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Z.E. Gallegos
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Z.K. Garvin
- Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - P.J. Gasda
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
| | - J.H. Green
- Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - R.L. Harris
- Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - M.E. Hoffman
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - T. Kieft
- New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - P.A. Lee
- College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - X. Li
- University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - K.L. Lynch
- Lunar and Planetary Institute/USRA, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - R. Mackelprang
- California State University Northridge, Northridge, California, USA
| | - P.R. Mahaffy
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - L.H. Matthies
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | | | - H.E. Newsom
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - D.E. Northup
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - S.M. Perl
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - R.C. Quinn
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - L.A. Rowe
- Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | | | - L.A. Scuderi
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - M.N. Spilde
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - V. Stamenković
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - J.A. Torres Celis
- Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, Distrito Federal Mexico, Mexico
| | - D. Viola
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - B.D. Wade
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - C.J. Walker
- Delaware State University, Dover, Delaware, USA
| | - R.C. Wiens
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - J.M. Williams
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - J. Xu
- University of Texas, El Paso, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Arevalo R, Ni Z, Danell RM. Mass spectrometry and planetary exploration: A brief review and future projection. JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY : JMS 2020; 55:e4454. [PMID: 31663201 PMCID: PMC7050511 DOI: 10.1002/jms.4454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Since the inception of mass spectrometry more than a century ago, the field has matured as analytical capabilities have progressed, instrument configurations multiplied, and applications proliferated. Modern systems are able to characterize volatile and nonvolatile sample materials, quantitatively measure abundances of molecular and elemental species with low limits of detection, and determine isotopic compositions with high degrees of precision and accuracy. Consequently, mass spectrometers have a rich history and promising future in planetary exploration. Here, we provide a short review on the development of mass analyzers and supporting subsystems (eg, ionization sources and detector assemblies) that have significant heritage in spaceflight applications, and we introduce a selection of emerging technologies that may enable new and/or augmented mission concepts in the coming decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Arevalo
- Department of GeologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMaryland
| | - Ziqin Ni
- Department of GeologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMaryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Waller SE, Belousov A, Kidd RD, Nikolić D, Madzunkov SM, Wiley JS, Darrach MR. Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Applications for the In Situ Measurement of Nonvolatile Organics at Ocean Worlds. ASTROBIOLOGY 2019; 19:1196-1210. [PMID: 31347911 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2018.1961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
A new technique that has applications for the detection of nonvolatile organics on Ocean Worlds has been developed. Here, liquid mixtures of fatty acids (FAs) and/or amino acids (AAs) are introduced directly into a miniature quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer (QITMS) developed at Jet Propulsion Laboratory and analyzed. Two ionization methods, electron impact and chemical ionization (EI and CI, respectively), are compared and contrasted. Further, multiple CI reagents are tested to explore their potential to "soften" ionization of FAs and AAs. Both EI and CI yield mass spectra that bear signatures of FAs or AAs; however, soft CI yields significantly cleaner mass spectra that are easier to interpret. The combination of soft CI with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has also been demonstrated for AAs, generating "fingerprint" mass spectra of fragments from protonated parent ions. To mimic potential Ocean World conditions, water is used as the primary collision gas in MS/MS experiments. This technique has the potential for the in situ analysis of molecules in the cryogenic plumes of Ocean Worlds (e.g., Enceladus) and comets with the ultimate goal of detecting potential biosignatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Waller
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Anton Belousov
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Richard D Kidd
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Dragan Nikolić
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Stojan M Madzunkov
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Joshua S Wiley
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| | - Murray R Darrach
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chan MA, Hinman NW, Potter-McIntyre SL, Schubert KE, Gillams RJ, Awramik SM, Boston PJ, Bower DM, Des Marais DJ, Farmer JD, Jia TZ, King PL, Hazen RM, Léveillé RJ, Papineau D, Rempfert KR, Sánchez-Román M, Spear JR, Southam G, Stern JC, Cleaves HJ. Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts. ASTROBIOLOGY 2019; 19:1075-1102. [PMID: 31335163 PMCID: PMC6708275 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2018.1903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Microbial life permeates Earth's critical zone and has likely inhabited nearly all our planet's surface and near subsurface since before the beginning of the sedimentary rock record. Given the vast time that Earth has been teeming with life, do astrobiologists truly understand what geological features untouched by biological processes would look like? In the search for extraterrestrial life in the Universe, it is critical to determine what constitutes a biosignature across multiple scales, and how this compares with "abiosignatures" formed by nonliving processes. Developing standards for abiotic and biotic characteristics would provide quantitative metrics for comparison across different data types and observational time frames. The evidence for life detection falls into three categories of biosignatures: (1) substances, such as elemental abundances, isotopes, molecules, allotropes, enantiomers, minerals, and their associated properties; (2) objects that are physical features such as mats, fossils including trace-fossils and microbialites (stromatolites), and concretions; and (3) patterns, such as physical three-dimensional or conceptual n-dimensional relationships of physical or chemical phenomena, including patterns of intermolecular abundances of organic homologues, and patterns of stable isotopic abundances between and within compounds. Five key challenges that warrant future exploration by the astrobiology community include the following: (1) examining phenomena at the "right" spatial scales because biosignatures may elude us if not examined with the appropriate instrumentation or modeling approach at that specific scale; (2) identifying the precise context across multiple spatial and temporal scales to understand how tangible biosignatures may or may not be preserved; (3) increasing capability to mine big data sets to reveal relationships, for example, how Earth's mineral diversity may have evolved in conjunction with life; (4) leveraging cyberinfrastructure for data management of biosignature types, characteristics, and classifications; and (5) using three-dimensional to n-D representations of biotic and abiotic models overlain on multiple overlapping spatial and temporal relationships to provide new insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjorie A. Chan
- Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Nancy W. Hinman
- Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana
| | | | - Keith E. Schubert
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baylor University, Waco, Texas
| | - Richard J. Gillams
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
- Electronics and Computer Science, Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Stanley M. Awramik
- Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Penelope J. Boston
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California
| | - Dina M. Bower
- Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland College Park (CRESST), College Park, Maryland
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
| | | | - Jack D. Farmer
- School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Tony Z. Jia
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Penelope L. King
- Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Robert M. Hazen
- Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Richard J. Léveillé
- Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Geosciences Department, John Abbott College, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada
| | - Dominic Papineau
- London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Planetary Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- BioGeology and Environmental Geology State Key Laboratory, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Kaitlin R. Rempfert
- Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Mónica Sánchez-Román
- Earth Sciences Department, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John R. Spear
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado
| | - Gordon Southam
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Henderson James Cleaves
- Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
- Program in Interdisciplinary Studies, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sutton MA, Burton AS, Zaikova E, Sutton RE, Brinckerhoff WB, Bevilacqua JG, Weng MM, Mumma MJ, Johnson SS. Radiation Tolerance of Nanopore Sequencing Technology for Life Detection on Mars and Europa. Sci Rep 2019; 9:5370. [PMID: 30926841 PMCID: PMC6441015 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41488-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The search for life beyond Earth is a key motivator in space exploration. Informational polymers, like DNA and RNA, are key biosignatures for life as we know it. The MinION is a miniature DNA sequencer based on versatile nanopore technology that could be implemented on future planetary missions. A critical unanswered question is whether the MinION and its protein-based nanopores can withstand increased radiation exposure outside Earth's shielding magnetic field. We evaluated the effects of ionizing radiation on the MinION platform - including flow cells, reagents, and hardware - and discovered limited performance loss when exposed to ionizing doses comparable to a mission to Mars. Targets with harsher radiation environments, like Europa, would require improved radiation resistance via additional shielding or design refinements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Sutton
- Solar System Exploration Division and Goddard Center for Astrobiology, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA
- Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA
| | - Aaron S Burton
- Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, 77058, USA
| | - Elena Zaikova
- Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20057, USA
| | | | - William B Brinckerhoff
- Solar System Exploration Division and Goddard Center for Astrobiology, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA
| | - Julie G Bevilacqua
- Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20057, USA
| | - Margaret M Weng
- Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Michael J Mumma
- Solar System Exploration Division and Goddard Center for Astrobiology, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA
| | - Sarah Stewart Johnson
- Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
- Science, Technology, and International Affairs Program, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
| |
Collapse
|