Developing the Multidimensional Visual Scale Assessing Affect, Anxiety, Pride, and Energy Through a Research Partnership with Autistic Scholars

Promoting sleep health during pregnancy for enhancing women's health: a longitudinal randomized controlled trial combining biological, physiological and psychological measures, Maternal Outcome after THERapy for Sleep (MOTHERS)

BACKGROUND

Sleep is vital for maintaining individuals' physical and mental health and is particularly challenged during pregnancy. More than 70% of women during the gestational period report insomnia symptoms. Sleep dysfunction in the peripartum increases the risk for a cascade of negative health outcomes during late pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. While psychological interventions are considered the first line treatment for sleep difficulties, they are still scarcely offered during pregnancy and there is a lack of longitudinal research combining psychological and physiological indices.

METHODS

The present protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial aimed at testing the long-term effectiveness of an automatized digitalized psychoeducational intervention for insomnia for expectant mothers complaining insomnia symptoms without comorbidity. Outcomes include physiological, hormonal, and subjective indices of maternal psychopathology, stress, and emotional processes, and sleep and wellbeing of the family system. The trial is part of a longitudinal study evaluating expectant mothers from early pregnancy (within the 15th gestational week) to 6-months postpartum through 6 observational phases: baseline (BSL), 6- and 12-weeks from BSL (FU1-FU2), 2-to-4 weeks after delivery (FU3), and 3- and 6-months after delivery (FU4-5). We plan to recruit 38 women without sleep difficulties (Group A) and 76 women with sleep difficulties (Group B). Group B will be randomly assigned to digital psychological control intervention (B1) or experimental psychoeducational intervention targeting insomnia (B2). At 3 time points, an ecological-momentary-assessment (EMA) design will be used to collect data on sleep and emotions (diaries), sleep-wake parameters (actigraphy) and stress reactivity (salivary cortisol). We will also test the DNA methylation of genes involved in the stress response as biomarkers of prenatal poor sleep. Information on partner's insomnia symptoms and new-borns' sleep will be collected at each stage.

DISCUSSION

The proposed protocol aims at testing an easily accessible evidence-based psychoeducational intervention for expectant mothers to help them improving sleep, health, and wellbeing in the peripartum. The results could improve the understanding and management of sleep difficulties and peripartum depression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol has been registered on 22 April 2024 with ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS), ID: NCT06379074.

PROTOCOL VERSION

April 23, 2024.

Measurement matters: A commentary on the state of the science on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in autism research

High quality science relies upon psychometrically valid and reliable measurement, yet very few Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) have been developed or thoroughly validated for use with autistic individuals. The present commentary summarizes the current state of autism PROM science, based on discussion at the Special Interest Group (SIG) at the 2022 International Society for Autism Research (INSAR) Annual Meeting and collective expertise of the authors. First, we identify current issues in autism PROM research including content and construct operationalization, informant-structure, measure accessibility, and measure validation and generalization. We then enumerate barriers to conducting and disseminating this research, such as a lack of guidance, concerns regarding funding and time, lack of accessible training and professionals with psychometric skills, difficulties collecting large representative samples, and challenges with dissemination. Lastly, we offer future priorities and resources to improve PROMs in autism research including a need to continue to evaluate and develop PROMs for autistic people using robust methods, to prioritize diverse and representative samples, to expand the breadth of psychometric properties and techniques, and to consider developing field specific guidelines. We remain extremely optimistic about the future directions of this area of autism research. This work is well positioned to have an immense, positive impact on our scientific understanding of autism and the everyday lives of autistic people and their families.

Assessing Activity of Daily Living Task Performance Among Autistic Adults

Activities of daily living (ADLs) are activities that people engage in on a routine basis, such as brushing their teeth, preparing a meal, and caring for their child. Independence with ADLs is associated with better outcomes in independent living, education, employment, relationships, and mental health. Therefore, this perspective piece includes a review of the literature and assessment databases to identify and summarize ADL assessments for Autistic adults. These assessments were compared and analyzed using the neurodiversity paradigm. Specifically, we compared assessments using predetermined priorities the authors identified: (1) assessment type, (2) inclusivity, and (3) performance factors. We identified five unique norm-referenced measures, four performance-based measures, and a variety of checklists, surveys, questionnaires, and/or interviews used to assess ADL performance among Autistic adults. The authors present their perspectives regarding the challenges with the current assessments, including the high-frequency use of norm-referenced assessments, lack of inclusivity, and failure to consider performance factors (e.g., sensory, motor, and emotional), and the paucity of assessments designed specifically for Autistic adults older than 30 years. In response to these challenges, we recommend researchers partner with Autistic adults to develop a new assessment tool. If researchers or clinicians are using existing measures, we recommend that they utilize self-report over proxy-report and include methods to improve the accessibility of the assessment. We also recommend that clinicians and researchers offer breaks, comfort objects, or sensory modifications during the assessment to decrease anxiety; and ask follow-up questions to understand whether environment or emotional health are impacting one's ADL performance.

Lay summary

Why is this topic important?: Activity of daily living (ADL) assessments are used to determine what Autistics can and cannot do in their day-to-day life, what services they may be eligible for, and to monitor gains. However, we struggled to find an assessment that was useful and relevant from an Autistic point-of-view.What is the purpose of this article?: The purpose of this article was to review and evaluate current ADL assessments usefulness for Autistics and provide recommendations for improving the ADL assessment process.What is the perspective of the authors?: The first author is an Autistic social worker and the second author is an occupational therapist and postdoctoral fellow. The authors' perspective is based in the neurodiversity paradigm and social model of disability, which centers on respecting and acknowledging differences in the brain and their effects on Autistics' lives. We believe in strengths-based approaches versus deficit-based models.What did you find about this topic?: We found 17 measurement tools, some that compared Autistic ADL performance with neurotypical performance, a few that were observation-based meaning the researcher or clinician watched the Autistic person complete the ADLs, and many forms or guides that asked questions about ADL performance. Only six measures allowed Autistic people to respond to the questions themselves, whereas the rest of the measures had someone else respond for them. These measures did not include questions about how sensory differences (e.g., feeling upset by the feeling of jeans or the taste of minty toothpaste) or feeling sad or nervous may also impact ADL performance.What do the authors recommend?: We recommend that researchers partner with Autistic adults to make new ADL assessments. If researchers or clinicians are using previously made ADL assessments, we recommend that they use self-report and adapt the materials to make it easier to understand (e.g., using pictures). We also recommend that researchers and clinicians ask Autistics what they need or want to make the assessment easier and more comfortable for them. Finally, researchers and clinicians should ask follow-up questions about sensory differences and whether someone is feeling sad or nervous to know how this impacts their ability to do their ADL tasks.How will these recommendations help autistic adults now or in the future?: These recommendations will help Autistic adults be more involved in the evaluation process, which will make the assessments more trustworthy and relevant to Autistics. This also could help more Autistic people get services and supports that are useful to them. Finally, this may help researchers when monitoring if these supports or services actually work.