Breastfeeding: an emotional instinct

The Beliefs About Breastfeeding Questionnaire (BAB-Q): A psychometric validation study

Objectives

Questionnaires used to assess women’s beliefs as a predictor of breastfeeding behaviour are not theoretically informed or tested for psychometric validity and reliability. This study conducted a psychometric evaluation of the Beliefs About Breastfeeding Questionnaire (BAB‐Q).

Design

A two‐phase evaluation in an online cross‐sectional questionnaire study (N = 278) and cohort study sample (N = 264). A ten‐item questionnaire was proposed to assess women’s beliefs about the benefits and efforts of breastfeeding.

Methods

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) assessed construct validity and reliability. Multivariate regression analyses assessed validity in predicting breastfeeding behaviour and experiences.

Results

EFA found a shortened 8‐item, 2‐factor model had good fit (χ² = 23.3, df = 13, p < .040; CFI = .99, TLI = .99, RMSEA = .05), with significant factor loadings. Factor 1 (benefit beliefs) and factor 2 (effort beliefs) accounted for 47 and 19.4% of the explained variance and correlated moderately (r = −.40). CFA confirmed the solution in the cohort sample (χ² = 49.6 df = 19, p < .010; CFI = .97, TLI = .96, and RMSEA = .078). Adjusted regression analyses found beliefs did not reliably predict infant feeding practices. Women’s beliefs significantly predicted the likelihood that women experienced breastfeeding as ‘much more’ positive and negative than they expected.

Conclusions

The eight‐item questionnaire showed good model fit with acceptable loadings, and good reliability for all subscales. The utility of the BAB‐Q at predicting breastfeeding behaviour remains unclear and unsupported by empirical evidence. Further assessments of the predictive validity of the questionnaire in longitudinal studies with diverse beliefs and infant feeding practices are required.

Effects of assisted reproduction techniques on breastfeeding outcomes

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the breastfeeding outcome between those who conceived via assisted reproduction techniques (ART) and those who had spontaneous conception.

METHODS

This case-control study was conducted during a 2-year period between 2014 and 2016 in a tertiary healthcare center in Tehran, capital of Iran. We included a total number of 80 women with ATR conception and 81 women with spontaneous conception. The two study groups were matched regarding the age, parity and the gestational age. Those with contraindication of breastfeeding and history of psychiatric disorders were excluded. The breastfeeding outcome was measured using a structured-based interview and the results were compared between the two study groups.

RESULTS

The exclusive breastfeeding was significantly higher in spontaneous conception (p < .001). The duration of the breastfeeding was significantly higher in those with spontaneous conception (p < .001). In the same way, the exclusive breastfeeding within the first week was significantly higher in the spontaneous conception group (p = .002). The ATR conception was associated with higher bad feeling during the breastfeeding (p < .001), higher breastfeeding dysfunction (p < .001) and higher experience with difficult breastfeeding (p < .001). The return of the work after 3 months was significantly higher in spontaneous conception (p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that ATR conception is associated with worse breastfeeding outcome determined by lower rate of exclusive breastfeeding and higher rate of breastfeeding dysfunction and bad feeling during breastfeeding.

What Do Women Lose if They Are Prevented From Meeting Their Breastfeeding Goals?

This article explores the complex issue of breastfeeding and maternal mental health. Many women stop breastfeeding before they are ready, often leading to feelings of anxiety, guilt, and anger. Critics of breastfeeding promotion blame breastfeeding advocates for this impact, claiming that if the focus were merely on feeding the baby, with all methods equally valued and supported, maternal mental health would be protected. Established health impacts of infant feeding aside, this argument fails to account for the importance of maternal breastfeeding goals, or the physical and emotional rewards breastfeeding can bring. Although some women will take comfort in the message that what matters most is that the baby is fed, others view such suggestions as a lack of recognition of their wishes and the loss that they feel, exacerbating their grief and frustration. The purpose of this article is to highlight the importance of recognizing and valuing women’s individual breastfeeding goals, and not dismissing or invalidating their experience if they do not meet these by telling them that they do not matter. To move forward, we must recognize the impact of all infant feeding experiences, consider the impact of public messaging, and work to support more women to meet their goals.

The Role of Social-Cognitive and Emotional Factors on Exclusive Breastfeeding Duration

BACKGROUND

Previous research has suggested that exclusive breastfeeding is likely to be predicted by social-cognitive variables and fear. However, there is little research assessing the role of regret and self-conscious emotions (e.g., pride and guilt) in promoting exclusive breastfeeding. Research aim: The primary aim of this research was to determine whether social-cognitive variables, fear, regret, and self-conscious emotions predict exclusive breastfeeding duration. The secondary aim of this research was to assess whether these factors predict infant-feeding choice (i.e., exclusively breastfed, combination fed, or generally formula fed).

METHODS

In this nonexperimental one-group self-report survey, 375 mothers rated social-cognitive variables toward breastfeeding (attitude, subjective norm, perceived control, and self-efficacy), their fear toward inadequate nutrition from breastfeeding and breastfeeding damaging their physical appearance, and the extent to which mothers may feel pride toward breastfeeding and negative self-conscious emotions (guilt and shame) and regret for not breastfeeding their infant.

RESULTS

Exclusive breastfeeding duration was positively predicted by self-efficacy, pride, and regret but negatively predicted by the fear toward inadequate nutrition. We also found that in contrast with exclusive breastfeeding, generally formula feeding an infant was associated with lower self-efficacy, pride, and regret but higher subjective norm and fear toward inadequate nutrition through breastfeeding.

CONCLUSION

The authors argue that it is important to consider the role of self-conscious emotions and regret on exclusive breastfeeding.

Antibiotics and Breastfeeding

During the breastfeeding period, bacterial infections can occur in the nursing mother, requiring the use of antibiotics. A lack of accurate information may lead health care professionals and mothers to suspend breastfeeding, which may be unnecessary. This article provides information on the main antibiotics that are appropriate for clinical use and the interference of these antibiotics with the infant to support medical decisions regarding the discontinuation of breastfeeding. We aim to provide information on the pharmacokinetic factors that interfere with the passage of antibiotics into breast milk and the toxicological implications of absorption by the infant. Publications related to the 20 most frequently employed antibiotics and their transfer into breast milk were evaluated. The results demonstrate that most antibiotics in clinical use are considered suitable during breastfeeding; however, the pharmacokinetic profile of each drug must be observed to ensure the resolution of the maternal infection and the safety of the infant.

Factors associated with prolonged non-nutritive sucking habits in two cohorts of Brazilian children

BACKGROUND

Non-nutritive sucking habits (NNSH) are very common during childhood. However, if these habits were maintained for 36 months of age or more, they are considered to be prolonged (PNNSH) and can cause occlusal, physiological and esthetic changes. There is controversy about their prevalence and whether perinatal, social, demographic and health characteristics influence their onset and duration. So, the objectives of this study are to estimate the prevalence of PNNSH and to evaluate perinatal, early life and school age factors associated with their occurrence in children.

METHODS

A sample of 1,463 children aged 7-11 years born in Ribeirão Preto (RP-1994) and São Luís (SL-1997/98), Brazil, was reevaluated at school age in 2004/05. Birth weight, gestational age and perinatal variables were obtained at birth. Type of feeding, occurrence and duration of finger and pacifier sucking were recorded retrospectively at school age. PNNSH were defined when persisted for 36 months of age or more. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) were estimated by Poisson regression (alpha = 5%).

RESULTS

Prevalence of PNNSH was higher in RP (47.6%) than in SL (20.2%) - (p < 0.001). Perinatal variables were not associated to PNNSH, whilst female sex (PR = 1.27 in RP; PR = 1.47 in SL) and bottle feeding for 24 months or more (PR = 2.24 in RP; PR = 2.49 in SL) were risk factors in both locations. Breast feeding for 12 months or more (PR = 0.53 in RP; PR = 0.31 in SL) was associated with lower prevalence of PNNSH in both places. In SL, children whose mothers lived in consensual union (PR = 1.62) and worked outside the home (PR = 1.51) showed higher prevalence of PNNSH compared to their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of PNNSH was high especially in RP and was not associated with perinatal variables. In both cities there was an association between female sex, shorter breast-feeding duration, longer bottle feeding duration and higher prevalence of PNNSH.