Associations Between Prenatal Intention and Postpartum Choice: Infant Feeding and Contraception Decisions Among Inner-City Women

Breastfeeding Perceptions and Behavior Among Postpartum Women Initiating Different Hormonally Systemic Contraceptive Methods

BACKGROUND

There continues to be controversy regarding the simultaneous encouragement of both breastfeeding and immediate postpartum contraception.

RESEARCH AIM

To explore postpartum women's perspectives about breastfeeding and their breastfeeding behaviors, while using one of three different hormonally systemic contraceptive methods immediately postpartum over a 6 month period of time.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal, three group comparative, secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study (N = 471) of immediate postpartum contraception. Breastfeeding, for this study, was defined as providing any human milk to the infant. Participants who chose one of three different hormonally systemic forms of contraception immediately postpartum (a long-acting hormonal reversible contraceptive (n = 200), depot medroxyprogesterone acetate 150 mg (n = 98), or a non-hormonal method (n = 173)) were compared at hospital discharge, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum. The primary outcome was any breastfeeding at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included any and exclusive breastfeeding, concerns about breastfeeding while using contraception, and reasons for breastfeeding discontinuation.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the rate of any breastfeeding between the two hormonal and the non-hormonal contraceptive groups at 6 months postpartum (long-acting hormonal 20.1%, non-hormonal 21.7%, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate 13.9%, p = .77, 0.28, respectively). The number of participants who reported stopping breastfeeding due to decreased milk supply was not significantly different between any groups at all time points (total number who discontinued at 6 months postpartum was long-acting hormonal 24.7%, non-hormonal 25.1%, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate 19.3%, p = .30).

CONCLUSIONS

Breastfeeding perspectives and behavioral outcomes over the first 6 months postpartum were not influenced by participants chosen form of immediate postpartum contraception.

Getting Intentional about Intention to Use: A Scoping Review of Person-Centered Measures of Demand

In recent years, there has been much reflection on the measures used to assess and monitor contraceptive programming outcomes. The meaning and measurement of intention‐to‐use (ITU) contraception, however, has had less attention and research despite its widespread inclusion in many major surveys. This paper takes a deeper look at the meaning and measurement of ITU around contraception. We conducted a scoping review guided by the following questions: What is the existing evidence regarding the measurement of ITU contraception? What definitions and measures are used? What do we know about the validity of these measures? We searched databases and found 112 papers to include in our review and combined this with a review of the survey instruments and behavioral theory. Our review found growing evidence around the construct of ITU in family planning programming and research. However there are inconsistencies in how ITU is defined and measured, and this tends not to be informed by advances in behavioral theory and research. Further work is needed to develop and test measures that capture the complexity of intention, examine how intention differently relates to longer‐range goals compared to more immediate implementation, and demonstrate a positive relationship between ITU and contraceptive use.

Reliability and validity of the reduced Spanish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale

Breastfeeding self-efficacy is a relevant predictor of exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months of life. The Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (PBSES) is a 20-item tool developed to determine breastfeeding self-efficacy during pregnancy. Our study aimed to assess the structural validity and psychometric characteristics of the PBSES and to explore item reduction according to the statistical criteria for parsimony and incremental validity. In this study, conducted in six hospitals in eastern Spain, we recruited 1183 women with healthy, full-term, single-birth newborns. Data on sociodemographic, breastfeeding-related variables, and the PBSES, were obtained from self-administered questionnaires during the third trimester of pregnancy, at postpartum discharge, and 5 months postpartum, and from a phone survey 12 months postpartum. Item reduction was conducted after revising the PBSES item floor and ceiling effects, interitem correlations, and item-score relationships with breastfeeding-status variables during follow-up. The factorial structure of the short form of the PBSES (PBSES-SF) was tested using both exploratory and confirmatory approaches. After item reduction, the confirmatory factor analysis of the 12 remaining items of the PBSES-SF revealed adequate fit statistics for a three-factor structure and a second-order factor. Internal consistency was measured using the Cronbach's α coefficient of the PBSES-SF (0.86). We provided evidence on the discriminant validity of the PBSES-SF by comparing its scores between known groups, convergent validity by examining its correlations with other variables, and predictive validity by assessing the association of PBSES-SF scores with breastfeeding behavior at critical points in time during the first postpartum year.

Barriers to post-placental intrauterine device receipt among expectant minority women

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify barriers to breastfeeding-compatible post-placental intrauterine devices (IUDs) for expectant predominantly non-Hispanic African-American women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional survey study, conducted at 3 Cleveland community partner locations, enrolled 119 expectant predominantly unmarried but partnered non-Hispanic African-American women. The survey assessed contraceptive, IUD-specific and breastfeeding attitudes and intentions. Survey responses were described with percentages and frequencies, and compared by feeding intention using 2-sided Chi-Square tests. Factor analysis with Varimax rotation identified 2 potential measures of reluctance to post-placental IUD acceptance. The relationship of factors scores to maternal characteristics was assessed.

RESULTS

Feeding intention (breastfeeding versus not) was not related to perceived barriers to post-placental IUD receipt among expectant minority women. A "Personal Risks Reluctance" factor included low risk IUD events (migration and expulsion), misconceptions (delayed fertility return), menstrual changes and partner preference: a higher score was significantly associated with younger age group but no other maternal characteristics. A "Not Me Reasons" factor included provider and insurance barriers, and was not related to any maternal characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Expectant minority women's perceived barriers to post-placental IUDs are not related to prenatal feeding intentions. We identified two clinically relevant factors that appear to measure barriers to post-placental IUD acceptance.

Assessing the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Two Prenatal Breastfeeding Intervention Apps in Promoting Postpartum In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding

Purpose: To test the feasibility and possible effects of two iPad^®-based breastfeeding interventions for expectant minority women and evaluate (1) the intervention effect on exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) intention, (2) intervention acceptability and satisfaction, and (3) follow-up rates of in-hospital EBF. Materials and Methods: This was a longitudinal survey study with follow-up chart review. Expectant women who completed clinically required breastfeeding education were eligible and were assigned to one of the following interventions by nonrandomized block design: the champion intervention utilized a free commercially available app to identify a supportive breastfeeding champion and the positive messaging intervention offered breastfeeding information in a question-answer format. Medical records were reviewed postpartum for in-hospital feeding choice. Data were analyzed using percentages, frequencies, chi-squared analyses, and McNemar's test. Results: We enrolled 243 publicly insured predominantly African American women: 132 and 111 completed the champion and positive messaging interventions, respectively. Thirty-two of 40 champion participants (80.03%) intended EBF and did in-hospital EBF; 39/86 champion participants (45.3%) not intending EBF did in-hospital EBF (p < 0.0001 for change). Similarly, 30/36 positive messaging participants (83.3%) intended EBF and did in-hospital EBF; 36/67 positive messaging participants (53.7%) not intending EBF did in-hospital EBF (p < 0.0001 for change). Conclusions: In this pilot of two brief, iPad-based prenatal interventions designed to promote in-hospital EBF among minority women, interventions were feasible and a statistically significant change in the proportion of women who intended (prenatally) and then chose (postpartum) EBF was noted. Additional controlled trials are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.