Impact of Nipple Shield Use on Milk Transfer and Maternal Nipple Pain

Cortisol, Maternal Stress, and Breastfeeding Rate at Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Breastfeeding is considered the best way to provide essential and necessary nutrients to the newborn, intervening in its growth and development. However, early abandonment of this method is quite common, due to various factors such as stress. Objectives: To determine whether the level of postpartum cortisol can serve as an indicator of maternal stress and whether there is a relationship between the level of cortisol and the rate of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at hospital discharge. Methodology: Systematic review of the literature under the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were used. Original articles published from 2017 to 2022 in English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish were included. All study designs were eligible. Of the 3,712 records initially identified, 15 studies were included in this review. Results: Elevated cortisol levels, due to immediate postpartum stressors, have direct effects on the performance of the essential hormones in breast milk production. The EBF rates are negatively influenced by perceived maternal stress. Conclusion: Cortisol levels may be a good indicator of the level of stress to which the mother is subjected during the immediate postpartum period.

Breast Milk Production in Women Who Use Nipple Shields for Persistent Nipple Pain

OBJECTIVE

To examine relationships between nipple pain scores and 24-hour milk production volumes, breastfeeding and pumping frequencies, and breastfeeding duration in women using nipple shields for persistent nipple pain.

DESIGN

Secondary outcome analysis of a prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Research laboratory and participants' homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five breastfeeding women (6 ± 4 weeks after birth) who used nipple shields for persistent nipple pain.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial to investigate the primary outcome of milk transfer with and without nipple shields among participants with and without nipple pain. Here, we report secondary outcomes of associations between 24-hour milk production, breastfeeding and pumping frequencies, breastfeeding durations, and intake in participants using a nipple shield for nipple pain. Participants completed demographic, health and breastfeeding questionnaires and, at two monitored breastfeeding sessions, completed a pain visual analogue scale and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF; total and subscale scores for pain interference with General Activity, Mood, Sleep, and Breastfeeding). Milk production (milliliters per 24 hours), feed volumes, and percentage of available milk removed were calculated from data and milk samples obtained by participants over one 24-hour period and at study visits. Participants logged 24-hour data on a customized research website. We used descriptive statistics as well as simple and multiple linear regression for analyses.

RESULTS

Milk production and feeding duration were not associated with nipple pain scores (visual analogue scale: p = .80, BPI-SF: p = .44). An increase in BPI-SF Breastfeeding subscale score of 1 unit, indicating pain interference with breastfeeding, was associated with a 0.28 decrease in breastfeeding frequency (p = .02) and an 18.8-ml decrease in 24-hour breastfeeding intake (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

Persistent nipple pain was associated with reduced breastfeeding frequency; therefore, continuing professional support is required to ensure adequate milk removal and pain management.