1
|
Slušná ĽK, Balog M. Review of Indicators in the Context of Biobanking. Biopreserv Biobank 2023; 21:318-326. [PMID: 36099204 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Biobanks that intend to serve as high-performing and stable elements of an innovative research ecosystem must have an established system for regular measurement and evaluation using appropriately set indicators. The main objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of indicators in the context of biobanking, with new perspectives to highlight the existence of numerous options and introduce indicators that could help overcome problems associated with the difficult assessment of the impact of biobanks. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify publications relevant to the topic of indicators in biobanking. The Web of Science Core Collection and PubMed databases were searched using specific keywords. In addition, three articles that focused on indicators designed for the evaluation of research infrastructures were included in the review. Results: Based on the scientific literature for the biobanking field, many types of quantitative and qualitative indicators exist. They are mainly related to the quantity and quality of data and samples, their distribution, the monitoring of research projects, and subsequent publication outputs. The indicators identified in the biobanking literature primarily focus on the outcome, not the impact. Conclusions: Indicators identified in the biobanking literature may be further expanded with suggestions designed for other types of research infrastructures, while considering the context where biobanks operate and the needs of individual biobanking stakeholders. The establishment of a comprehensive monitoring system that captures all necessary elements is crucial for modern biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miroslav Balog
- Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, SAS, Bratislava, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Economics of Biobanking: Business or Public Good? Literature Review, Structural and Thematic Analysis. SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/socsci11070288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
This paper reviewed the relevant scientific literature on the business and economics of biobanking to explore key themes and paradigms. The structural properties of the literature were investigated, such as key authors, journals, studies, as well as co-citation and co-authorship networks; the study revealed that the research on business and economics is a niche area within the vast biobanking literature. The research is concentrated in a relatively small number of journals, institutions, and countries, which is rather surprising given the substantial public investment in and concerns about biobank sustainability. The structural analysis also suggested major themes in research on biobanking business and economics and noted shifts in focus on specific themes. The commercialisation of samples is more acknowledged than before but under the condition of equitable sharing of benefits across various stakeholders. Most biobanks are heavily subsidised by the public sector and are considered public goods rather than business enterprises. This is OK, but underutilisation of specimens and low rates of cost recovery suggest that the current mainstream operating model is hardly sustainable. With many biobanks maturing, long-term sustainability became a key topic of the discussion on biobanking trends.
Collapse
|
3
|
Matzke LA, Tarling TE, Gali B, Dee S, LeBlanc J, Vercauteren S, Watson PH. Finding the Value in Biobanks: Enhancing the CTRNet Locator. Biopreserv Biobank 2021; 20:132-137. [PMID: 34252293 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2021.0043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Biobanks are a critical piece of Research Infrastructure (RI). However, biobanks need to accept the reality of a life cycle for RIs. Until recently, strategies to sustain biobanks have been commonly focused on ways to maintain current operational models. However, sustaining biobanks as they exist today may be increasingly challenging in the face of the disruption in health and research priorities caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this opinion article, we review the current and emerging future drivers of biobank value for their researchers, institutions, and funders, highlighting utilization and impact of research performed using the biobank as key measures of future value. While biobanks can only indirectly influence the specific impact of the research performed, they can transform themselves to more actively redefine utilization to their advantage. Utilization means more than the balance of samples and data in versus out. Utilization means redirecting expertise to best support end users, and importantly, closing the operating gap between biobanks and their end users who seek to find the right biospecimens and data to pursue their research. We discuss the specific role of locators (those created by public investment) in closing this gap and the need for additional tools for researchers, before and subsequent to connecting with locators. For the former, we specifically propose that more support is needed to assist researchers in the decision as to how to best obtain biospecimens and navigate the options as to whether finding existing biospecimens and data held by a biobank is the optimal solution for a given project, or whether the optimal solution is either contracting with a biobank to collect samples or creating a new biobank. We believe this type of biospecimen navigator platform will help to maximize utilization of current biobank resources, and also promote the services and expertise in biobanks to better serve researchers' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise A Matzke
- Office of Biobank Education and Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tamsin E Tarling
- Office of Biobank Education and Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brent Gali
- Biobanking and Biospecimen Research Services, Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Simon Dee
- Biobanking and Biospecimen Research Services, Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jodi LeBlanc
- Biobanking and Biospecimen Research Services, Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Suzanne Vercauteren
- Haematology, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Peter H Watson
- Office of Biobank Education and Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Biobanking and Biospecimen Research Services, Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.,Canadian Tissue Repository Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tarling T, Matzke LAM, Rush A, Gali B, Byrne JA, Watson PH. Vignettes to Illustrate the Value of Tumor Biobanks in Cancer Research in Canada. Biopreserv Biobank 2021; 20:75-83. [PMID: 34165356 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2021.0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tumor biobanks are a common research infrastructure. As a collection of biospecimens and annotated data collected to support a multitude of research projects, biobanks facilitate access to materials that are the critical fuel for the generation of data in up to 40% of cancer research publications. However, quantifying how to measure biobanks' impact and their value on the field of cancer research discoveries and findings, has not been well elucidated. Methods: We have used a qualitative case study approach to illustrate the impact of tumor biobanks. We assessed the impact of three research studies published between 2010 and 2012 that required easily accessible "classic" biobanks. Each study utilized preassembled collections of tumor biospecimens with associated patient outcomes data at the outset of the research project. We compared the resulting journal impact factor, altmetric and field-weighted citation impact factor scores for each article to a set of six "benchmark" articles that represent cancer research and treatment discoveries from the same time period and two sentinel scientific discovery articles. Results: We developed a value model using a literature search and design-thinking methodologies to illustrate the contributions of these "classic" model biobanks to these research studies. Assessment of the three example articles supported by biobanks demonstrates that the output can have impact that is comparable to the impact of a set of benchmark articles describing milestones in the field of cancer research and cancer care. Conclusions: These case studies illustrate the value of the sustained investment of funds, planning, time, and effort on the part of the biobanks before the conduct of the research study to be able to ultimately support high-value research. The "value" model will enable further discussion around impact and may be useful in better delineating qualitative metrics of biobank value in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamsin Tarling
- Office of Biobank Education and Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lise Anne Marie Matzke
- Office of Biobank Education and Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amanda Rush
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty Medicine and Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,New South Wales Statewide Biobank, New South Wales Health Pathology, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brent Gali
- Biobanking and Biospecimen Research Services, Deeley Research Center, BC Cancer Victoria Center, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jennifer A Byrne
- New South Wales Statewide Biobank, New South Wales Health Pathology, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter H Watson
- Office of Biobank Education and Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Biobanking and Biospecimen Research Services, Deeley Research Center, BC Cancer Victoria Center, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.,Canadian Tissue Repository Network, BC Cancer Research Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rush A, Catchpoole DR, Ling R, Searles A, Watson PH, Byrne JA. Improving Academic Biobank Value and Sustainability Through an Outputs Focus. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:1072-1078. [PMID: 32828220 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Although it is generally accepted that human tissue biobanks are important to facilitate progress in health and medical research, many academic biobanks face sustainability challenges. We propose that biobank sustainability is challenged by a lack of available data describing the outputs and benefits that are produced by biobanks, as reflected by a dearth of publications that enumerate biobank outputs. We further propose that boosting the available information on biobank outputs and using a broader range of output metrics will permit economic analyses such as cost-consequence analyses of biobank activity. Output metrics and cost-consequence analyses can allow biobanks to achieve efficiencies, and improve the quality and/or quantity of their outputs. In turn, biobank output measures provide all stakeholders with explicit and accountable data on biobank value, which could contribute to the evolution of biobank operations to best match research needs, and mitigate some threats to biobank sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Rush
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Daniel R Catchpoole
- Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Rod Ling
- Health Research Economics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Searles
- Health Research Economics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter H Watson
- Office of Biobank Education and Research, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jennifer A Byrne
- NSW Health Statewide Biobank, NSW Health Pathology, Professor Marie Bashir Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Henderson MK, Goldring K, Simeon-Dubach D. Advancing Professionalization of Biobank Business Operations: Performance and Utilization. Biopreserv Biobank 2019; 17:213-218. [PMID: 31188630 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2019.0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Biobanks are now in the spotlight as key enablers supporting preclinical, clinical, and environmental research. Awareness of their value has increased along with the need for these infrastructures to be sustained through business-focused practices. Following our 2017 pilot survey on biobank business planning, we initiated a more comprehensive 38-question multiple-language worldwide survey on biobank sustainability. Two hundred seventy-six biobanks of various sizes and stages of business planning (in place, in progress or none) responded. About two-thirds were established in the last 10 years. Survey results confirm our hypothesis that biobanks with business plans or preparing such plans are trending toward more professional structures. Specific survey data focusing on performance metrics and utilization, as related to sustainability, are presented. Biobanks most frequently measured basic performance metrics (sample utilization, samples collected, samples distributed, internal projects supported). Metrics less often reported included sample and data quality, cost recovery, citations, and publications, typically correlating with higher levels of biobank complexity and professionalism. Biobanks reported supporting projects for both internal and external use, with support of projects within their own organizations as the main driver of biobanks, independent of business plan status. Having a business plan seemed to be a key factor for biobanks that had developed sustained support for external commercial projects. While under half of the biobanks reported both target and actual utilization rates, the responses provided valuable data on utilization. Target utilization rates were much higher (2.5 to 5 times higher) than the rate of actual use. Many of the biobanks report less than 10% utilization. Biobanks with low utilization rates make sustainability a very distant and likely unreachable goal. Our survey has provided some basic data about biobank business planning globally. Continued research should be done, with the data and information shared within the community for the good of all biobank stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne K Henderson
- 1 National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kirstin Goldring
- 2 Sample Management, Discovery Science, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Linsen L, Vanhees K, Vanoppen E, Ulenaers K, Driessens S, Penders J, Somers V, Stinissen P, Rummens JL. Raising to the Challenge: Building a Federated Biobank to Accelerate Translational Research-The University Biobank Limburg. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6:224. [PMID: 31750305 PMCID: PMC6842921 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Irreproducibility of research results is one of the major contributing factors to the failure of translating basic research results into tangible bedside progress. To address this, the University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim) was founded by a collaboration between Hasselt University, the Hospital East-Limburg, and the Jessa Hospital. This paper describes the evolution of this process and the barriers encountered on the way. UBiLim evolved from an archival collection over a single-site biobank into a federated structure, supporting translational research at the founding institutions. Currently, UBiLim is a federated biobank, with an established organizational structure and processing, and storage facilities at each of the three sites. All activities are integrated in an ISO15189-accredited Quality Management System and based on (inter)national biobank guidelines. Common methods for processing and storage of a plethora of sample types, suitable for state-of-the-art applications, were validated and implemented. Because the biobank is embedded in two hospitals, the request of researchers to include certain sample types or enroll specific patient groups can quickly be met. Funding has been a major challenge in each step of its evolution and remains the biggest issue for long-term biobank sustainability. To a lesser extent, the Belgian legislation and the operational cost of information management system are also concerns for smooth biobank operations. Nonetheless, UBiLim serves as a facilitator and accelerator for translational research in the Limburg area of Belgium that, given the fields of research, may have an impact on international patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes Linsen
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.,Clinical Laboratory, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Kimberly Vanhees
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.,Clinical Laboratory, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Evi Vanoppen
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Clinical Laboratory, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Kim Ulenaers
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Suzanne Driessens
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Clinical Laboratory, Hospital East-Limburg (ZOL), Genk, Belgium
| | - Joris Penders
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.,Clinical Laboratory, Hospital East-Limburg (ZOL), Genk, Belgium
| | - Veerle Somers
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Piet Stinissen
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Rummens
- University Biobank Limburg (UBiLim), Hasselt, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Limburg Clinical Research Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.,Clinical Laboratory, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Henderson MK, Goldring K, Simeon-Dubach D. Advancing Professionalization of Biobank Business Operations: A Worldwide Survey. Biopreserv Biobank 2018; 17:71-75. [PMID: 30412417 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2018.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality specimens from biobanks are key resources to support reproducible research. Sustaining biobanks requires robust management. We recently published a pilot survey that indicated that over half the participating biobanks had business plans in place and another third were working on business planning. While the results provided a clue to the status of business planning in biobanking, it was concluded that a longer and more in-depth survey and analysis were required. In April 2017, an extended survey was distributed worldwide in English, French, Chinese, German, and Spanish, through multiple channels. The survey was built using the Survey Monkey tool. Our hypothesis was that those biobanks that already have a business plan also have a more professional management structure. The questions were designed to understand more details about each biobank's business operations and communications. A total of 276 biobanks participated (China 65, France 40, United States 34, Spain 27, Germany 24, Australia 23, and rest of the world 63). About two thirds of the biobanks were established in the last 10 years. The responses provided data on the size of biobanks answering the survey, their status of business planning, and how and through what mediums they are communicating with customers. Biobanks with a business plan or preparing to have one showed a clear trend of having a customer strategy for marketing the samples and communicating with customers. No trend could be seen regarding websites and activities in social media. We confirmed our hypothesis that biobanks that have or are in the process of preparing a business plan are showing a trend toward more professional structures. In the biobanking community, the business mind-set and use of the business plan as a management tool have not quite arrived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne K Henderson
- 1 National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, Maryland
| | - Kirstin Goldring
- 2 Sample Management, Discovery Science, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|