On the Use of Buffy or Whole Blood for Obtaining DNA of High Quality and Functionality: What Is the Best Option?

Measurement of yield and quality of DNA in human buffy coat is extraction method dependent

During the last few years, an important element in the improvement of the molecular biology techniques has been the necessity for availability of high quality and functionality DNA. Several DNA extraction procedures with different results in both performance and quality, have been proposed. In this study our objective was to determine the most reliable extraction method that balances DNA quantity, and to assess the sample quantification of the fluorometric DNA quantification methods. For this, blood extracted by venopunction from 20 healthy volunteers was used to obtain DNA from buffy coat, and 4 commercial DNA extraction kits were assessed as well as two fluorometric DNA quantification methods with protocols of different complexity. Results suggest that manual methods achieve higher quality and larger yields of DNA. DNA purity obtained with the 4 extraction kits evaluated through the 260/280 and 260/230 ratio showed that the Qiacube kit fulfilled the criteria established in this work, followed very close by the Flexigene kit. On the other hand, the fluorometric DNA methods used in the samples quantification showed a higher variability when using QuantiFlour method, obtaining better results probably due to the simplicity of this protocol.

Effects of Freezing and Rewarming Methods on RNA Quality of Blood Samples

Background: RNA extracted from human blood has been widely applied to biological, medical, and clinical research of numerous diseases. Previous studies have demonstrated that high-quality RNA is indispensable to guarantee the reliability of downstream assays. In this study, we investigated the effects of freezing procedures, rewarming methods, and blood components on RNA quality of blood samples. Methods: Rabbit blood samples were divided into two groups: (1) whole blood (WB) and (2) blood cell components (BCC) with plasma removed. Samples were frozen using four representative freezing procedures (snap freezing in liquid nitrogen, snap freezing at -80°C, traditional slow freezing, and programmable controlled rate freezing) and rewarmed by placing at 4°C or by vortexing. RNA was extracted using the phenol-chloroform RNA extraction method and measured by an Agilent bioanalyzer. Then, human blood was used to verify the best protocol obtained from the rabbit blood experiment. Results: For the four freezing procedures, there were no differences in RNA integrity. For different rewarming methods, RNA integrity number (RIN) values of RNA extracted from frozen WB and BCC samples in the vortex group were above 9, while RNA obtained from WB showed worse quality compared with BCC in the 4°C group. For verification using human blood, RIN values of frozen human WB rewarmed by vortexing ranged from 8.0 to 9.1. Conclusions: Blood components and rewarming methods could affect the RNA quality of blood samples. For scenarios where WB samples have already been cryopreserved, the vortex rewarming method is optimal for high-quality RNA. Otherwise, we would recommend centrifuging fresh WB and cryopreserving it in the form of BCC, which showed a tendency to obtain high-quality RNA by either of the two rewarming methods.

Quality Control of DNA Extracted from All-Cell Pellets After Cryopreservation for More Than 10 Years

Background: Cryopreserved whole blood, all-cell pellets (ACPs), and buffy coats in biobanks are widely used to obtain DNA for genetic testing. However, there are few studies concerning the quality control of DNA extracted from them. Our research aimed to perform quality control of DNA extracted from ACPs after cryopreservation for >10 years. Materials and Methods: A total of 1377 ACP samples (separated from 3 mL of whole blood) were retrieved from our biobank, where they had been cryopreserved for 10-15 years. Chemagic STAR was used to extract the DNA. Absorbance at A260, A280, and A230 were measured by spectrophotometry, and integrity was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The quality thresholds for an Illumina Asian Screening Array (ASA) were yields greater than 0.5 μg, concentration of 25-150 ng/μL, A260/280 ratio of 1.6-2.1, and no degradation fragments in the electrophoresis gel. Results: The median yield of genomic DNA was 54.30 μg (interquartile range [IQR] 35.55-74.64). The median A260/280 and A260/230 ratios were 1.90 (IQR 1.87-1.94) and 1.98 (IQR 1.64-2.41), respectively. In total, 1377 samples (100%) had qualified yields, and 1366 samples (99.20%) had qualified integrity results. Finally, 1328 (96.44%) samples were used for ASA. Of the remaining samples, 34 needed to be repurified, 4 were obtained at an insufficient concentration, and 11 were unqualified for integrity. In addition, we analyzed the influence of hemolysis (90 samples) and clots (102 samples) on the quality of DNA samples. Hemolysis and clotting did not influence yield or integrity, but a significant difference was found in A260/230 compared to normal samples (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the samples (14 samples) with both hemolysis and clots had higher A260/280 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: ACP samples stored for >10 years at -80°C produced DNA with high quality for use in genetic analysis. Hemolysis and clots in the ACPs led to lower purity, but did not significantly affect yield or integrity.

Shelf life of whole blood samples in a biobank and the yield of deoxyribonucleic acid during genetic testing

Aim. To study the effect of the shelf life of frozen whole blood samples in a biobank on the amount of released deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).

Material and methods. The study included whole blood samples placed in tubes with the anticoagulant EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid at a concentration of 1,8 mg/ml) from participants in the epidemiological study ESSE-RF-1 and ESSE-RF-2 and cohort studies conducted at the National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine. The samples were stored in the biobank of the National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine at temperature from -22О C to -32О C. The shelf life from blood collection to DNA extraction ranged from several weeks to 11 years. DNA was extracted using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (250) and 96 Blood Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Statistical analysis was performed using the R 3.6.1 software. To analyze the association of blood storage time with the logarithm of DNA concentration, a linear regression was used.

Results. The analysis included data on the DNA concentration of 5405 samples. Multivariate regression showed that the blood shelf life was significantly associated with a decrease in concentration by 3,92% (3,16-4,68) for each year of storage (p <0,0001). For 509 samples, the DNA concentration was measured twice, immediately after isolation and after 4,5 years of DNA storage at -32О C. During storage, the concentration of DNA increased by an average of 2% (p=0,046).

Conclusion. Long-term storage of whole blood samples at temperature from -22О C to -32О C is associated with a decrease in the DNA yield. Long-term storage of the isolated DNA at a temperature of -32О C is not associated with a decrease in its concentration.

Collection and storage of DNA-containing biomaterial and isolated DNA

The advances of biomedicine include the new technologies, diagnosis and treatment techniques, as well as the practical use of new types of biological targets, in particular, nucleic acids. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), extracellular DNA (exDNA) and microbiome DNA obtained from different types of samples (tissues, blood and its derivatives, feces, etc.) are used as objects of genetic research. The use of new technologies for DNA analysis required the development of standardized methods for processing biological samples in order to obtain high-quality DNA samples. The research uses various methods for collecting, preparing samples and storing various DNA-containing biomaterials and isolated DNA, as well as methods for assessing the quality of samples and biobank standards. It is obvious that the use of uniform standards will allow large-scale genetic research on the basis of biobanks and research laboratories. Specialists from professional organizations such as International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER), Biobanking and BioMolecular Resources Research Infrastructure-European Research Infrastructure Consortium (BBMRI-ERIC), European, Middle Eastern & African Society for Biopreservationa and Biobanking (ESBB) and the Russian National Association of Biobanks and Biobanking Professionals.