1
|
Lv C, Liang J, Yang H, Ni X, Raza SHA, Shah MA, Wu G, Quan G. The Proteomic Modification of Buck Ejaculated Sperm Induced by the Cryopreservation Process. Biopreserv Biobank 2022. [PMID: 35793518 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Using two-dimensional electrophoresis along with mass spectroscopy, we have investigated how the cryopreservation process affected the protein profile of goat ejaculated sperm. In this study, five bucks were used for semen collection. After removal of seminal plasma, the Tris-based extender containing glycerol and egg yolk was used to freeze semen. The results indicated that the post-thaw sperm quality showed a significant reduction compared with fresh sperm. The numbers of protein spots acquired in fresh and post-thaw sperm were 2926 ± 57 and 3061 ± 81, respectively. Twenty-two different abundant proteins (DAPs) were identified between fresh sperm and frozen-thawed sperm (≥3.0-folds, p < 0.05). The abundances of 19 proteins were significantly higher in the fresh sperm than the post-thaw sperm. The results of the gene ontology annotation showed the primary location of the DAPs on sperm cytoskeleton, protein complex, cytoplasm, and mitochondria. In addition, these proteins were mainly involved in ion binding, small molecular metabolic processes, structure molecule activity, guanosine triphosphatase activity, oxidoreductase activity, and protein complex assembly. The interaction networks among these DAPs demonstrated that they may play roles in oxidoreductase activity, structure, acrosomal function, and motility of sperm. Collectively, the proteome of goat sperm was altered during the cryopreservation process, demonstrating that protein modification induced by cryopreservation may be associated with the reduced quality of goat sperm after thawing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunrong Lv
- Small Ruminant Department, Yunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China.,Yunnan Provincial Genebank of Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources, Yunnan Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Animal Genetic Resource Conservation and Germplasm Enhancement, Kunming City, China
| | - Jiachong Liang
- Small Ruminant Department, Yunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China.,Yunnan Provincial Genebank of Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources, Yunnan Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Animal Genetic Resource Conservation and Germplasm Enhancement, Kunming City, China
| | - Hongyuan Yang
- Small Ruminant Department, Yunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China
| | - Xiaojun Ni
- Small Ruminant Department, Yunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China
| | | | - Mujahid Ali Shah
- Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Water, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
| | - Guoquan Wu
- Small Ruminant Department, Yunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China.,Yunnan Provincial Genebank of Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources, Yunnan Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Animal Genetic Resource Conservation and Germplasm Enhancement, Kunming City, China
| | - Guobo Quan
- Small Ruminant Department, Yunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China.,Yunnan Provincial Genebank of Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources, Yunnan Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Animal Genetic Resource Conservation and Germplasm Enhancement, Kunming City, China
| |
Collapse
|