Measuring Changes in Electrical Impedance During Cell-Mediated Mineralization

In vitromodel to study confined osteocyte networks exposed to flow-induced mechanical stimuli

Osteocytes are considered the primary mechanical sensor in bone tissue and orchestrate the coupled bone remodeling activity of adjacent osteoblast and osteoclast cells.In vivoinvestigation of mechanically induced signal propagation through networks of interconnected osteocytes is confounded by their confinement within the mineralized bone matrix, which cannot be modeled in conventional culture systems. In this study, we developed a new model that mimics thisin vivoconfinement using gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogel or GelMA mineralized using osteoblast-like model cells. This model also enables real-time optical examination of osteocyte calcium (Ca2+) signaling dynamics in response to fluid shear stimuli cultured under confined conditions. Using this system, we discovered several distinct and previously undescribed patterns of Ca2+responses that vary across networks of interconnected osteocytes as a function of space, time and connectivity. Heterogeneity in Ca2+signaling may provide new insights into bone remodeling in response to mechanical loading. Overall, such a model can be extended to study signaling dynamics within cell networks exposed to flow-induced mechanical stimuli under confined conditions.

Electroconductive Nanobiomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Regenerative medicine aims to engineer tissue constructs that can recapitulate the functional and structural properties of native organs. Most novel regenerative therapies are based on the recreation of a three-dimensional environment that can provide essential guidance for cell organization, survival, and function, which leads to adequate tissue growth. The primary motivation in the use of conductive nanomaterials in tissue engineering has been to develop biomimetic scaffolds to recapitulate the electrical properties of the natural extracellular matrix, something often overlooked in numerous tissue engineering materials to date. In this review article, we focus on the use of electroconductive nanobiomaterials for different biomedical applications, particularly, very recent advancements for cardiovascular, neural, bone, and muscle tissue regeneration. Moreover, this review highlights how electroconductive nanobiomaterials can facilitate cell to cell crosstalk (i.e., for cell growth, migration, proliferation, and differentiation) in different tissues. Thoughts on what the field needs for future growth are also provided.

Electrical Stimulation Decreases Dental Pulp Stem Cell Osteo-/Odontogenic Differentiation

Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) have great potential for use in tissue engineering (TE)-based dental treatments. Electrical stimulation (EStim) has been shown to influence cellular functions that could play an important role in the success of TE treatments. Despite many recent studies focused on DPSCs, few have investigated the effect EStim has on these cells. The aim of this research was to investigate the effects of direct current (DC) EStim on osteo-/odontogenic differentiation of DPSCs. To do so cells were isolated from male Sprague Dawley rats (7-8 weeks old), and phenotype characterization and multilineage differentiation analysis were conducted to verify their "stemness." Different voltages of DC EStim were administrated 1 h/day for 7 days, and the effect of EStim on DPSC osteo-/odontogenic differentiation was assessed by measuring calcium and collagen deposition, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and expression of osteo- and odontogenic marker genes at days 7 and 14 of culture. We found that while 10 and 50 mV/mm of EStim had no effect on cell number or metabolic activity, 100 mV/mm caused a significant reduction in cell number, and 150 mV/mm resulted in cell death. Despite increased gene expression of osteo-/odontogenic gene markers, Osteocalcin, RunX2, BSP, and DMP1, at day 7 in EStim treated cells, 50 mV/mm of EStim decreased collagen deposition and ALP activity at both time points, and calcium deposition was found to be lower at day 14. In conclusion, under the conditions tested, EStim appears to impair DPSC osteo-/odontogenic differentiation. Additional studies are needed to further characterize and understand the mechanisms involved in DPSC response to EStim, with an eye toward its potential use in TE-based dental treatments.