1
|
Sladkey N, King DD, Reede LJ. Enhancing the Preanesthesia Evaluation: Consensus Development of the Cannabis Use and Behaviors Assessment Tool (CUBAT). J Perianesth Nurs 2024:S1089-9472(24)00109-6. [PMID: 38935007 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This project aimed to develop an evidence-based preanesthesia cannabis use assessment tool to acquire complete and accurate patient history and develop a best-informed, individualized anesthesia and analgesia care plan. DESIGN Modified Delphi. METHODS Using an evidence synthesis and multistage, modified Delphi process, eight experts from across the United States developed a consensus-based tool to aid in developing a best-informed, individualized plan for anesthesia and analgesia care. FINDINGS Two survey rounds integrated informed evidence-based tool revisions. The final tool included instructions for use, a glossary of terms, and seven key assessment items aimed at gathering the most influential information regarding cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS The Cannabis Use and Behaviors Assessment Tool is a first-of-its-kind tool providing an essential framework for preanesthesia cannabis use assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Sladkey
- Northeastern University, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel D King
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, College of Nursing, North Chicago, IL.
| | - Lynn J Reede
- Northeastern University, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ding C, Xu D, Cheng T. Cannabis Use Disorder Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications After Hip or Knee Arthroplasties: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024:00124635-990000000-00988. [PMID: 38759231 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the legalization of marijuana in the United States, the number of patients with cannabis use disorder (CUD) in the joint arthroplasty population has increased markedly. The primary purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether there were differences in clinical and economic outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) between patients with and without perioperative CUD. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to July 2018 to identify all eligible studies investigating the association of CUD with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TJA. Postoperative outcomes assessed consisted of complications, readmission, length of stay (LOS), implant revision, and cost of care. For dichotomous outcomes, pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS We identified 10 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 17,981,628 study participants. Patients with CUD had significantly higher odds of medical complications (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.66], P = 0.01) and implant-related complications (OR 1.75 [95% CI: 1.64 to 1.88], P < 0.00001) than noncannabis users. Specifically, CUD was associated with significantly increased odds of cardiac complications (OR 1.95 [95% CI 1.50 to 2.54], P < 0.00001), cerebrovascular accidents (OR 2.06 [95% CI 1.66 to 2.57], P < 0.00001), postoperative infections (OR 1.68 [95% CI 1.34 to 2.10], P < 0.00001), periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.19 to 1.70], P < 0.0001), mechanical loosening (OR 1.54 [95% CI 1.42 to 1.66], P < 0.00001), and dislocation/instability (OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.32 to 2.68], P = 0.0005). Longer LOS and higher cost of care were also found in patients with CUD. CONCLUSION This study strengthens the body of evidence that patients with CUD face higher risk of postoperative complications and greater financial burden after knee and hip arthroplasties. Physicians should inform patients about adverse outcomes and undertake appropriate risk adjustments before elective orthopaedic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Ding
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, The People's Republic of China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kosirog J, Bouvette C, Pannu J, Gondal J, Madhoun M. Marijuana and endoscopy: the effects of marijuana on sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)00018-X. [PMID: 38215858 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Marijuana usage has increased significantly as it has become more readily available and legal, either recreationally or medicinally, in many states. It has been postulated that marijuana usage increases the amount of sedation required for procedures. However, there are minimal data defining this relationship. We aimed to establish the relationship between marijuana usage and the amount of sedation used during endoscopy. METHODS This was a single-institution prospective study of patients undergoing outpatient endoscopy (both monitored anesthesia care [MAC] and moderate sedation) at the Oklahoma City Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Marijuana usage was assessed by a voluntary de-identified pre-endoscopy survey. Information regarding sedation used, endoscopy outcomes, demographics, comorbidities, medical history, and medications used was extracted from the medical record. A univariate and stratified analysis of alcohol usage was performed. A P value of <.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS A total of 976 patients were analyzed; 21.5% of them endorsed marijuana usage (210/976). Marijuana users were found to be younger (P = .0002), leaner (P < .0001), and less likely to have diabetes (P = .002), obstructive sleep apnea (P = .0002), and hypertension (P = .04). They were also more likely to smoke (P < .0001) and vape (P < .0001). Marijuana usage was associated with a higher requirement of sedation (fentanyl [P = .003], midazolam [P = .05], propofol [P = .02]) and higher use of adjunct sedation (diphenhydramine in moderate sedation [P = .0003]). Further multivariate analyses were performed to control for possible confounders. Marijuana usage was still deemed to be an independent predictor for high propofol use among MAC cases (odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-3.12). Likewise, marijuana usage was found to be an independent predictor for high midazolam use (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02-2.42) and high fentanyl use (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.98-2.38), but failed to reach statistical significance in the fentanyl group. CONCLUSIONS Marijuana use is associated with a significantly higher amount of sedation along with a significantly higher usage of other adjunct sedatives. A patient's marijuana history should be considered when determining the methods of sedation to be used for endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Kosirog
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Christopher Bouvette
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jiteshwar Pannu
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jalal Gondal
- University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Mohammad Madhoun
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moon AS, LeRoy TE, Yacoubian V, Gedman M, Aidlen JP, Rogerson A. Cannabis Use Is Associated With Increased Use of Prescription Opioids Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery. Global Spine J 2024; 14:204-210. [PMID: 35536563 PMCID: PMC10676165 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221099857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES Cannabis is an antinociceptive which has been evaluated as a possible adjunct or substitute for opioid use in the treatment of acute pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative cannabis usage and consumption of opioids for postoperative analgesia. METHODS Patients who underwent one- or two-level posterior lumbar fusion surgery were categorized as cannabis users or non-cannabis users based on preoperative diagnoses of cannabis use. Total morphine equivalent dose was calculated for both in-house opioid consumption and postoperative prescription opioid usage. Age, ASA, BMI, depression, tobacco use, estimated blood loss, OR time, LOS, disposition to rehab, 30-day readmission, in-house opioid consumption and postoperative prescription opioid usage were compared between groups using t-tests. RESULTS Of the 220 opioid naïve patients, 29 (13%) patients were identified as cannabis users while 191 (87%) were non-cannabis users. There were no significant associations between opioid naïve cannabis usage and ASA, BMI, tobacco use, EBL, OR time, LOS, disposition to rehab, or readmission. Opioid naïve cannabis users had greater association with depression (31.3% vs 13.7%, P=.017) and younger age (56.37 years vs 65.37 years, P<.001). Interestingly, cannabis use was associated with a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), with 1.38 vs 2.49 (P=.002). Cannabis users were found to have increased postoperative prescription opioid usage (2545.41 POST-MED vs 1379.72 POST-MED, P=.019). CONCLUSIONS Cannabis usage is associated with increased usage of opioids postoperatively, both while in-patient and post-discharge, after posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S. Moon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Taryn E. LeRoy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Jessica P. Aidlen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Ashley Rogerson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee BH, Sideris A, Ladha KS, Johnson RL, Wu CL. Cannabis and Cannabinoids in the Perioperative Period. Anesth Analg 2024; 138:16-30. [PMID: 35551150 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Cannabis use is increasingly common, and with a growing number of jurisdictions implementing legalization frameworks, it is likely that providers will encounter more patients who use cannabis. Therefore, it is important for providers to understand the implications of cannabis use and practical considerations for the perioperative period. Cannabis affects multiple organ systems and may influence intraoperative anesthesia, as well as postoperative pain management. The effects of cannabis and key anesthetic considerations are reviewed here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley H Lee
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Alexandra Sideris
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Karim S Ladha
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca L Johnson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Christopher L Wu
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoon Y, Lee N, Lee AD, Gehring MB, Constantine R, Mathes DW, Yu JW, Khechoyan D, Iorio ML, Kaoutzanis C. Analysis of postoperative complications related to cannabis and tobacco usage in patients undergoing mandible facial fracture surgeries. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 85:127-133. [PMID: 37482026 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis is the third most used controlled substance in the world. Despite its widespread use, minimal research investigates cannabis usage in patients undergoing facial fracture surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate patterns of postoperative complications related to cannabis and tobacco usage after mandible fracture surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS PearlDiver™, a commercially available healthcare database, was used to identify patients endorsing the use of cannabis, tobacco, or both who underwent mandible fracture surgeries for cross-sectional analysis. The study population was categorized into groups using the Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. A chi-square analysis was performed to assess the influence of cannabis and tobacco use on postoperative complications. RESULTS A total of 8288 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 72 patients with cannabis-only usage, 914 patients with cannabis and tobacco usage, 3236 patients with tobacco-only usage, and 4066 in the control group. For patients using only cannabis, there was not an increased risk of developing postoperative complications compared with the control population. Patients with concurrent cannabis and tobacco usage and those with tobacco-only usage had an increased risk of surgical site infection, facial nonunion, facial abscess, debridement, and malocclusion after surgical repair of mandibular facial fracture. CONCLUSION Patients with tobacco-only as well as cannabis and tobacco usage had an increased risk of all postoperative complications, except malocclusion, compared with cannabis-only. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that healthcare providers consider a patient's history of tobacco use when planning and performing surgical treatment for traumatic mandible fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YooJin Yoon
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, United States
| | - Nayun Lee
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, United States
| | - Anna D Lee
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, United States
| | - Michael B Gehring
- University of Colorado School of Medicine Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, United States
| | - Ryan Constantine
- University of Colorado School of Medicine Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, United States
| | - David W Mathes
- University of Colorado School of Medicine Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, United States
| | - Jason W Yu
- University of Colorado School of Medicine Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, United States
| | - David Khechoyan
- University of Colorado School of Medicine Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, United States
| | - Matthew L Iorio
- University of Colorado School of Medicine Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, United States
| | - Christodoulos Kaoutzanis
- University of Colorado School of Medicine Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kirchner GJ, Kim A, Lieber AM, Hines SM, Nikkel LE. Cannabis Use Does Not Increase Risk of Perioperative Complications Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cohort-Matched Comparison. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2023; 8:684-690. [PMID: 35638970 DOI: 10.1089/can.2022.0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Cannabis use among arthroplasty patients has dramatically increased throughout the United States. Despite this trend, knowledge remains particularly limited regarding the effects of cannabis use on perioperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the goal of this research was to investigate how cannabis use affects risk of perioperative outcomes, cost and length of stay (LOS) after THA. Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify 331,825 patients who underwent primary THA between 2010 and 2014 using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) procedure code 81.51. Patients with an ICD-9 diagnosis code correlating to history of thromboembolic events, cardiac events, or active substance use other than cannabis were eliminated. The ICD-9 diagnosis codes for cannabis use (304.3-304.32, 305.2-305.22) were used to identify 538 patients with active use. Cannabis users were matched 1:1 to nonusers on age, sex, tobacco use, and comorbidities. The chi-square test was used to determine risk of major and minor complications, whereas the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare hospital charges and LOS. Results: A total of 534 (99.3%) patients with cannabis use were successfully matched with 534 patients without cannabis use. Risk of major complications among cannabis users (25, 4.68%) was similar to that of nonusers (20, 3.74%, p=0.446). Minor complications also occurred at similar rates between cannabis users (77, 14.4%) and nonusers (87, 16.3%, p=0.396). LOS for cannabis users (3.07±2.40) did not differ from nonusers (3.10±1.45, p=0.488). Mean hospital charges were higher for cannabis users ($17,847±10,024) compared with nonusers ($16,284±7025, p<0.001). Conclusion: Utilizing statistically matched cohorts within a nationally representative database demonstrated that cannabis use is not associated with increased risk of complications or prolonged LOS after primary THA. However, cannabis use is associated with higher hospital charges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Kirchner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew Kim
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander M Lieber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shawn M Hines
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lucas E Nikkel
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah S, Schwenk ES, Sondekoppam RV, Clarke H, Zakowski M, Rzasa-Lynn RS, Yeung B, Nicholson K, Schwartz G, Hooten WM, Wallace M, Viscusi ER, Narouze S. ASRA Pain Medicine consensus guidelines on the management of the perioperative patient on cannabis and cannabinoids. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:97-117. [PMID: 36596580 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past two decades have seen an increase in cannabis use due to both regulatory changes and an interest in potential therapeutic effects of the substance, yet many aspects of the substance and their health implications remain controversial or unclear. METHODS In November 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine charged the Cannabis Working Group to develop guidelines for the perioperative use of cannabis. The Perioperative Use of Cannabis and Cannabinoids Guidelines Committee was charged with drafting responses to the nine key questions using a modified Delphi method with the overall goal of producing a document focused on the safe management of surgical patients using cannabinoids. A consensus recommendation required ≥75% agreement. RESULTS Nine questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved on third-round voting. Topics addressed included perioperative screening, postponement of elective surgery, concomitant use of opioid and cannabis perioperatively, implications for parturients, adjustment in anesthetic and analgesics intraoperatively, postoperative monitoring, cannabis use disorder, and postoperative concerns. Surgical patients using cannabinoids are at potential increased risk for negative perioperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Specific clinical recommendations for perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoids were successfully created.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalini Shah
- Dept of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, UC Irvine Health, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric S Schwenk
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Hance Clarke
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Univ Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Zakowski
- Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Brent Yeung
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | | | - Gary Schwartz
- AABP Integrative Pain Care, Melville, New York, USA.,Anesthesiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | | | - Mark Wallace
- Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Eugene R Viscusi
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Samer Narouze
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Horton A, McLean Davies L. Where are the students? A close reading of priorities and silences in scholarly and public debates on VCE English (1990-2021). AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER 2022; 50:1-16. [PMID: 35966413 PMCID: PMC9362529 DOI: 10.1007/s13384-022-00543-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Debates about subject English in Australia are often conducted through the senior years curriculum. In light of the anticipated interest in the new Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE) English study design released in 2022 to be implemented in 2023, this paper outlines the current state of research on the VCE English subject by mapping areas of interest, types of evidence and gaps in research. The authors utilise a hybrid approach of narrative scoping review to identify methodological and thematic trends in the scholarly literature, and intersecting professional and media discourse on VCE English from 1990 to 2021. Finding that the student experience and the enacted curriculum have been largely elided, the paper identifies fresh lines of inquiry into VCE English and advocates for new discussions around scholarly interest and approaches to senior secondary English in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allayne Horton
- Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Larissa McLean Davies
- Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Directive clinique n o 425a : Le cannabis aux différentes périodes de la vie des femmes - Partie 1 : Fertilité, contraception, ménopause et douleur pelvienne. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:420-435.e4. [PMID: 35400520 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIF Fournir aux fournisseurs de soins de santé les meilleures données probantes sur l'utilisation de cannabis et la santé des femmes. Les domaines d'intérêt sont : les profils généraux d'utilisation du cannabis ainsi que la sécurité de la consommation; les soins aux femmes qui utilisent le cannabis; la stigmatisation; le dépistage, l'intervention brève et l'orientation vers le traitement; les effets sur la régulation hormonale; la santé reproductive, y compris la contraception et la fertilité; la fonction sexuelle; les effets sur les symptômes périménopausiques et postménopausiques; et l'utilisation dans le traitement des syndromes de douleur pelvienne chronique. POPULATION CIBLE La population cible comprend toutes les femmes qui consomment ou utilisent du cannabis ou qui envisagent de le faire. RéSULTATS: Un dialogue ouvert et fondé sur des données probantes relativement à l'utilisation et la consommation de cannabis, dialogue qui mènera à l'amélioration des soins aux patientes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: L'exploration de l'utilisation et de la consommation de cannabis par une approche basée sur la connaissance des traumatismes donne l'occasion au fournisseur de soins et à la patiente de créer une solide alliance thérapeutique collaborative. Cette alliance permet aux femmes de faire des choix éclairés sur leurs propres soins. Elle facilite également le diagnostic et le traitement possible des troubles de l'usage du cannabis. Il ne faut pas stigmatiser la consommation, car la stigmatisation nuit à l'alliance thérapeutique (c'est-à-dire le partenariat entre la patiente et le fournisseur de soins). Plusieurs effets indésirables de la consommation de cannabis peuvent être confondus avec d'autres problèmes de santé. À l'heure actuelle, l'utilisation du cannabis pour traiter les problèmes de santé féminine n'est pas financée par le secteur public; par conséquent, les utilisatrices doivent assumer les coûts directs. Les coûts indirects de l'utilisation de cannabis sont inconnus. Ainsi, les fournisseurs de soins et les patientes doivent comprendre le rôle du cannabis dans les problèmes de santé féminine de sorte que les femmes puissent prendre des décisions éclairées. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans PubMed, Embase et la littérature grise pour recenser des études publiées entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 18 février 2021 concernant l'utilisation du cannabis et ses effets sur l'infertilité, la contraception, les symptômes périménopausiques et postménopausiques et la douleur pelvienne. Toutes les publications des types suivants ont été incluses : essais cliniques, études observationnelles, revues (y compris les revues systématiques et les méta-analyses), directives cliniques et déclarations de conférences de consensus. Un survol des publications a été effectué pour en confirmer la pertinence. Les termes de recherche ont été définis à l'aide des termes MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) et mots clés (et variantes) suivants : cannabis, cannabinoids, marijuana, dexanabinol, dronabinol et tetrahydrocannabinol. À ces termes ont été combinés les termes suivants afin de cerner la santé des femmes : estrogen, estradiol, medroxyprogesterone acetate, vaginal contraception, oral contraceptives, fertilization, amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, vulvodynia et menopause. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant l'approche d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins de santé qui prodiguent des soins aux femmes. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.
Collapse
|
11
|
Robert M, Graves LE, Allen VM, Dama S, Gabrys RL, Tanguay RL, Turner SD, Green CR, Cook JL. Guideline No. 425a: Cannabis Use Throughout Women's Lifespans - Part 1: Fertility, Contraception, Menopause, and Pelvic Pain. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:407-419.e4. [PMID: 35400519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide health care providers with the best evidence on cannabis use with respect to women's health. Areas of focus include general patterns of cannabis use as well as safety of use; care for women who use cannabis; stigma; screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment; impact on hormonal regulation; reproductive health, including contraception and fertility; sexual function; effects on perimenopausal and menopausal symptoms; and use in chronic pelvic pain syndromes. TARGET POPULATION The target population includes all women currently using or contemplating using cannabis. OUTCOMES Open, evidence-informed dialogue about cannabis use, which will lead to improvement in patient care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS Exploring cannabis use through a trauma-informed approach provides the health care provider and patient with an opportunity to build a strong, collaborative, therapeutic alliance. This alliance empowers women to make informed choices about their own care. It also allows for the diagnosis and possible treatment of cannabis use disorders. Use should not be stigmatized, as stigma leads to poor "partnered care" (i.e., the partnership between the patient and care provider). Multiple side effects of cannabis use may be mistaken for other disorders. Currently, use of cannabis to treat women's health issues is not covered by public funding; as a result, individual users must pay the direct cost. The indirect costs of cannabis use are unknown. Thus, health care providers and patients must understand the role of cannabis in women's health issues, so that women can make knowledgeable decisions. EVIDENCE PubMed, EMBASE, and grey literature were searched to identify studies of "cannabis use and effect on infertility, contraception, perimenopause and menopausal symptoms, and pelvic pain" published between January 1, 2018 and February 18, 2021. All clinical trials, observational studies, reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), guidelines, and conference consensus statements were included. Publications were screened for relevance. The search terms were developed using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords (and variants), including cannabis, cannabinoids, marijuana, dexanabinol, dronabinol, tetrahydrocannabinol; the specific terms to capture women's health were estrogen, estradiol, medroxyprogesterone acetate, vaginal contraception, oral contraceptives, fertilization, amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, vulvodynia, and menopause. VALIDATION METHODS The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE All heath care providers who care for women. SUMMARY STATEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wiseman LK, Mahu IT, Mukhida K. The Effect of Preoperative Cannabis Use on Postoperative Pain Following Gynaecologic Oncology Surgery. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:750-756. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
13
|
Cammarano CA, Villaluz JE. A Reason to Rethink Fasting Guidelines? Marijuana-Induced Gastroparesis and the Implications for Aspiration Risk in the Nil Per Os (NPO) Patient: A Case Report. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2021; 22:e934187. [PMID: 34840324 PMCID: PMC8646949 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.934187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient: Male, 24-year-old
Final Diagnosis: Gastroparesis • tetrahydrocannabinol
Symptoms: Vomiting
Medication: —
Clinical Procedure: —
Specialty: Anesthesiology
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang BH, Saud H, Sengupta N, Chen M, Bakshi D, Richardson L, Wang L, Shanthanna H. Effect of preoperative cannabis use on perioperative outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46:650-655. [PMID: 33990440 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The reported use of cannabis within surgical population is increasing. Cannabis use is potentially associated with increased harms and varied effects on pain control. These have important implications to perioperative care. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing surgical patients reporting cannabis use preoperatively to control patients with no cannabis exposure, in a 1:2 ratio. To control for confounding, we used a propensity score-matched analysis to assess the adjusted association between cannabis use and study outcomes. Our primary outcome was a composite of (1) respiratory arrest or cardiac arrest, (2) intensive care admission, (3) stroke, (4) myocardial infarction and (5) mortality during this hospital stay. Secondarily, we assessed the effects on pain control, opioid usage, induction agent dose and nausea-vomiting. RESULTS Between January 2018 and March 2019, we captured 1818 patients consisting of cannabis users (606) and controls (1212). For propensity score-matched analyses, 524 cannabis patients were compared with 1152 control patients. No difference in the incidence of composite outcome was observed (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.98). Although a higher incidence of arrhythmias (2.7% vs 1.6%) and decreased incidence of nausea-vomiting needing treatment (9.6% vs 12.6%) was observed with cannabis users vs controls, results were not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed with other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION Our results do not demonstrate a convincing association between self-reported cannabis use and major surgical outcomes or pain management. Perioperative decisions should be made based on considerations of dose, duration, and indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty Huiyu Zhang
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Haris Saud
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Sengupta
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Max Chen
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Devyani Bakshi
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liz Richardson
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harsha Shanthanna
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada .,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Research Institute of St Joes, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ladha KS, McLaren-Blades A, Goel A, Buys MJ, Farquhar-Smith P, Haroutounian S, Kotteeswaran Y, Kwofie K, Le Foll B, Lightfoot NJ, Loiselle J, Mace H, Nicholls J, Regev A, Rosseland LA, Shanthanna H, Sinha A, Sutherland A, Tanguay R, Yafai S, Glenny M, Choi P, Ladak SSJ, Leroux TS, Kawpeng I, Samman B, Singh R, Clarke H. Perioperative Pain and Addiction Interdisciplinary Network (PAIN): consensus recommendations for perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoid-based medicine users by a modified Delphi process. Br J Anaesth 2020; 126:304-318. [PMID: 33129489 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In many countries, liberalisation of the legislation regulating the use of cannabis has outpaced rigorous scientific studies, and a growing number of patients presenting for surgery consume cannabis regularly. Research to date suggests that cannabis can impact perioperative outcomes. We present recommendations obtained using a modified Delphi method for the perioperative care of cannabis-using patients. A steering committee was formed and a review of medical literature with respect to perioperative cannabis use was conducted. This was followed by the recruitment of a panel of 17 experts on the care of cannabis-consuming patients. Panellists were blinded to each other's participation and were provided with rater forms exploring the appropriateness of specific perioperative care elements. The completed rater forms were analysed for consensus. The expert panel was then unblinded and met to discuss the rater form analyses. Draft recommendations were then created and returned to the expert panel for further comment. The draft recommendations were also sent to four independent reviewers (a surgeon, a nurse practitioner, and two patients). The collected feedback was used to finalise the recommendations. The major recommendations obtained included emphasising the importance of eliciting a history of cannabis use, quantifying it, and ensuring contact with a cannabis authoriser (if one exists). Recommendations also included the consideration of perioperative cannabis weaning, additional postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, and additional attention to monitoring and maintaining anaesthetic depth. Postoperative recommendations included anticipating increased postoperative analgesic requirements and maintaining vigilance for cannabis withdrawal syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim S Ladha
- Department of Anesthesia and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander McLaren-Blades
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Akash Goel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael J Buys
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Paul Farquhar-Smith
- Department of Anaesthetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Haroutounian
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yuvaraj Kotteeswaran
- Department of Anesthesia, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Kwesi Kwofie
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Acute Care Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Division of Brain and Therapeutics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas J Lightfoot
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Joel Loiselle
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Hamish Mace
- Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospital Group, Melville, Australia; University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Judith Nicholls
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain, Cayman Islands Health Services Authority, George Town, Cayman Islands
| | | | - Leiv Arne Rosseland
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Avinash Sinha
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Rob Tanguay
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sherry Yafai
- Releaf Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA; John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Martha Glenny
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Choi
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Salima S J Ladak
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Ian Kawpeng
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bana Samman
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rajbir Singh
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hance Clarke
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Centre for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McLaren-Blades A, Ladha K, Goel A, Manoo V, Kotteeswaran Y, Gee YY, Fiorellino J, Clarke H. Perioperative pain and addiction interdisciplinary network (PAIN): protocol for the perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoid-based medicines using a modified Delphi process. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036472. [PMID: 32690522 PMCID: PMC7371125 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION At the conception of this study (January 2019), a literature search by the authors found no evidence-based or consensus perioperative guidelines for patients consuming cannabis products, or for those patients in whom a cannabinoid medication could be considered for perioperative treatment. Currently, there is a large global population that consumes cannabis. The availability of cannabis has also increased this decade with greater legal access to cannabis products in some countries such as USA, Canada, Uruguay, Israel, Australia and Germany. There are recognised possible therapeutic benefits for the use of cannabis in patients with chronic pain, chronic neuropathic pain and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. There are also potential side effects from cannabis use such as psychosis, cannabis hyperemesis syndrome, misuse disorder and cannabis withdrawal syndrome. There is evidence that cannabis may also affect factors in the perioperative period such as monitoring, quality of analgesia, sleep and opioid consumption. Given the large population of persons using cannabis, the heterogeneity of cannabis products and the paucity (and heterogeneity) of perioperative literature surrounding it, perioperative guidelines for cannabis consuming patients are both lacking and necessary. In this paper, we present the design for a modified Delphi technique that has been started with the intent of deriving cannabis perioperative guidelines from the available medical literature and the consensus of multidisciplinary experts. MATERIALS, METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will use a scoping narrative literature review and modified Delphi process to generate cannabis perioperative guidelines. A scoping narrative review of cannabis in the perioperative period by the authors of this proposal was completed and provided to a panel of 17 experts. These experts were recruited for their knowledge and expertise regarding cannabis and/or perioperative medicine. They were asked to rate a series of indications and clinical scenarios in two rounds. During the first round, the expert panel was blinded to each other's participation. During the second round of this process, the expert panel met after being provided with an analysis of the first round's submissions so they could be discussed further and, if possible, reach a further consensus regarding them. Using the results obtained from the Delphi review process, a draft of proposed cannabis perioperative guidelines will be generated. These proposed guidelines will be returned to the expert panel for critiquing prior to their finalisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Study and panellist data will be deidentified and stored as per institutional (Toronto General Hospital) guidelines. Institutional research ethics board provided a waiver for this modified Delphi protocol. Findings will be presented and published in peer-reviewed publications and conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karim Ladha
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Anesthesia and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Akash Goel
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Varuna Manoo
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuvaraj Kotteeswaran
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yen-Yen Gee
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph Fiorellino
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hance Clarke
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clarke H, Roychoudhury P, Ladha KS, Leroux T, Fiorellino J, Huang A, Kotra LP. Daring discourse - yes: practical considerations for cannabis use in the perioperative setting. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45:524-527. [PMID: 32471923 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hance Clarke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Priodarshi Roychoudhury
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karim S Ladha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy Leroux
- Centre for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,The Arthritis Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph Fiorellino
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lakshmi P Kotra
- Centre for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|