Quetiapine and clozapine combination treatment for tourette's syndrome in an adolescent boy: potential role of dopamine supersensitivity in loss of treatment response

Interest of Fluvoxamine as an Add-On to Clozapine in Children With Severe Psychiatric Disorder According to CYP Polymorphisms: Experience From a Case Series

Despite its drastic efficacy in resistant psychiatric disorders, clozapine remains rarely used in youth due to its side effects. Clozapine plasma level is determined through its metabolism involving several isoforms of cytochromes 450 (CYP450) family. Isoform CYP1A2 appears as a limiting enzyme involved in the metabolism of clozapine, while isoforms 2C19, 2D6, 3A4, and 3A5 also contribute in a minor way. Clozapine efficacy is limited by a significant inter-patient variability in exposure according to CYP's polymorphisms. Clozapine plasma levels may be increased with CYP inhibitors such as fluvoxamine. This drug is a potent enzymatic inhibitor of CYP1A2 and, to a lesser extent, of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. Hence, in case of CYP's polymorphisms in youth, the use of fluvoxamine as add-on to clozapine could help in reaching clinical and biological efficacy and allowing lower clozapine dosage and a better tolerance profile as it has already been described in adults. We report four pediatric cases with severe psychiatric disorders underlying our experience with CYP polymorphism explorations and the use of fluvoxamine as add-on to clozapine. Our four patients clinically improved after the introduction of fluvoxamine, enhancing clozapine metabolism and therefore the clozapine plasma level within therapeutic range. Despite the interesting results of fluvoxamine, we report a severe issue of tolerance for one patient, emphasizing the need for caution regarding possible drug interactions when fluvoxamine is considered. Hence, we propose a detailed step-by-step multidisciplinary protocol.

Antipsychotic-Associated Symptoms of Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Although antipsychotics are used to treat Tourette syndrome, there have been reports of paradoxical induction of tics by first- and second-generation antipsychotics.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to better characterize tics as the potential adverse effect of antipsychotics.

METHODS

A literature search was performed, with no language restriction, using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases for all publications up to January 2018. To be included, studies utilizing any study design had to meet the following criteria: (1) a temporal association of tics with antipsychotic use where tics emerged during treatment or after discontinuation and (2) no diagnosis of Tourette syndrome before tic emergence. More stringent criteria were used for individuals under 18 years of age that included (1) no personal or family history of primary tic disorder and either (2) tics occurring during antipsychotic treatment improved significantly upon discontinuation or dose reduction or (3) tics emerged after discontinuation of at least 3 months of antipsychotic treatment. Data were extracted according to: age, sex, diagnosis, personal history of motor symptoms or family history of tics, antipsychotic type and dose, treatment duration, types of symptoms emerged, treatment strategies, and follow-up. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare the occurrence of symptoms between first- and second-generation antipsychotic users.

RESULTS

The search identified 1290 articles, of which 92 full-text articles were assessed leading to the inclusion of 50 articles. Most of the included articles were case reports or series, involving a total of 60 cases. Thirty cases were associated with treatment with first-generation antipsychotics, 27 with second-generation antipsychotics, and three with a combination of first- and second-generation antipsychotics. Antipsychotics were being used to treat schizophrenia in 60% of the cases and other indications included developmental, behavioral, and mood or anxiety disorders. Tics occurred during treatment (n = 44) or following treatment discontinuation (n = 16). The occurrence of vocal tics with or without motor tics was significantly higher in the first- vs. second-generation antipsychotic users (p < 0.0001). Significantly higher occurrences were also noted in the first- vs. second-generation antipsychotic users for specific types of vocal tics (i.e., barking and coprolalia) and other concurrent motor symptoms (i.e., tardive dyskinesia). In the cases identified, antipsychotic-associated tics were treated by (1) discontinuing the offending antipsychotic, reducing its dose, or switching to different antipsychotics for tics occurring during treatment, (2) reinitiating antipsychotic treatment for tics occurring following discontinuation, or (3) using non-antipsychotic agents. It should be noted that symptoms were not always fully reversible and recurred at times.

CONCLUSION

Tics can be a disturbing adverse effect of antipsychotics. Clinicians need to be particularly vigilant when initiating and modifying antipsychotic regimens.

Update on the Pharmacological Treatment of Tics with Dopamine-Modulating Agents

More than 40 years of research and clinical practice have proven the effectiveness of dopamine receptor antagonists in the pharmacological treatment of tics. A blockade of the striatal dopamine-D2 receptors is mainly responsible for their tic-reducing effect. A broad spectrum of dopamine-modulating agents, such as typical and atypical antipsychotics, but also dopamine receptor agonists are used with an immanent discord between experts about which of them should be considered as first choice. The present Review outlines the state of the art on pharmacological treatment of tics with dopamine-modulating agents by giving an systematic overview of studies on their effectiveness and a critical discussion of their specific adverse effects. It is considered as an update of a previous review of our research group published in 2013. The Review closes with a description of the current resulting treatment recommendations including the results of a first published revised survey on European expert's prescription preferences. Based on the enormously growing evidence on its effectiveness and safety, aripiprazole currently seems to be the most promising agent in the pharmacological treatment of tics. Furthermore, benzamides (especially tiapride), which are commonly used in Europe, have proven their excellent effectiveness-tolerability profile over decades in clinical practice and are therefore also highly recommended for the treatment of tics. Nevertheless, pharmacological treatment of tics remains an indiviual choice depending on each patient's own specific needs.