Use and Characteristics of Antipsychotic/Methylphenidate Combination Therapy in Children and Adolescents with a Diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Antipsychotic Drug Prescribing in Children Previously Treated With Stimulants for ADHD: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study: La prescription d'antipsychotiques chez les enfants précédemment traités avec des stimulants pour le TDAH : une étude longitudinale basée sur la population

OBJECTIVE

Stimulant drug treatment in preschool-age children for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as the concomitant use of antipsychotic drugs is largely unstudied in terms of longitudinal outcomes. We characterized longitudinal patterns of stimulant drug use in children diagnosed for ADHD and analyzed the mental health disorders leading to add-on therapy with antipsychotics.

METHOD

The study population comprised of children and adolescents (age: 0-19 years) in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, with at least one dispensing for any psychotropic drug between 1997 and 2017 (N = 144,825). BC health administrative databases were used to identify children with diagnosis for ADHD and dispensings for stimulant and antipsychotic drugs. Longitudinal patterns of drug use and diagnostic codes proximal to the add-on of antipsychotics were assessed.

RESULTS

We found that residence in rural regions and lack of child psychiatrists are significantly associated with higher rates of stimulant drug prescription in preschool and early school-age children. Residence in rural regions was also associated with a higher rate for the concomitant use of antipsychotics over the course of stimulant treatment. When comparing children starting stimulant therapy before the age of 6 with those starting therapy after 6 years, we found an 82% increase in the likelihood of antipsychotic add-on in those starting stimulants at younger ages (HR: 1.82, 95% CI [1.63-2.04]). Moreover, children starting stimulant therapy before the age of 6 years had 3.57-fold higher rates of diagnostic codes for specific delays in development (ICD-9 315) in close proximity to the antipsychotic add-on.

CONCLUSIONS

The question remains whether the add-on of antipsychotics is a consequence of insufficient action of the stimulant in ADHD, or required to ameliorate the adverse effects of the stimulant drug. Our result suggests that care need to be taken in the diagnosis for ADHD in children at the age when entering elementary school.

Recognition and management of children and adolescents with conduct disorder: a real-world data study from four western countries

BACKGROUND

Conduct disorders (CD) are among the most frequent psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, with an estimated worldwide prevalence in the community of 2-4%. Evidence-based psychological outpatient treatment leads to significant improvement in about two-thirds of cases. However, there seems to be considerable variation in rates of CD diagnoses and implementation of evidence-based interventions between nations. The aim of this study was to compare administrative prevalence and treatment patterns for CD in children and adolescents seen in health care systems across four Western countries (Denmark, Germany, Norway, and the USA).

METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study using healthcare data to identify children and adolescents (aged 0-19 years) with an ICD-10 code for CD within the calendar year 2018. Within each country's study population, the prevalence of CD, psychiatric comorbidity, psychopharmacological treatment, and psychiatric hospitalisation was calculated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diagnosed CD differed 31-fold between countries: 0.1% (Denmark), 0.3% (Norway), 1.1% (USA) and 3.1% (Germany), with a male/female ratio of 2.0-2.5:1. The rate of psychiatric comorbidity ranged from 69.7 to 86.1%, with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder being most common. Between 4.0% (Germany) and 12.2% (USA) of youths with a CD diagnosis were prescribed antipsychotic medication, and 1.2% (Norway) to 12.5% (Germany) underwent psychiatric hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

Recognition and characteristics of youths diagnosed with CD varied greatly by country. In some countries, the administrative prevalence of diagnosed CD was markedly lower than the average estimated worldwide prevalence. This variation might reflect country-specific differences in CD prevalence, referral thresholds for mental health care, diagnostic tradition, and international variation in service organisation, CD recognition, and availability of treatment offers for youths with CD. The rather high rates of antipsychotic prescription and hospitalisation in some countries are remarkable, due to the lack of evidence for these therapeutic approaches. These findings stress the need of prioritising evidence-based treatment options in CD. Future research should focus on possible reasons for inter-country variation in recognition and management of CD, and also address possible differences in patient-level outcomes.

Psychotropic Polypharmacy and Antipsychotics in Children: A Survey of Caregiver's Perspectives

OBJECTIVE

We examined caregiver's knowledge, attitudes, and concerns about their child's psychotropic medication regimen and the potential side effects, describe how they seek information regarding treatment, and ascertain their perspectives toward deprescribing.

METHODS

We surveyed 48 caregivers of children 6-17 years old treated with two or more psychotropic medications or an antipsychotic medication, analyzing outcomes using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Almost all (N = 44, 92%) participants reported feeling very knowledgeable about why medications were prescribed, but only one-third (N = 16, 33%) reported feeling very knowledgeable about potential problems with long-term use or polypharmacy. Half of respondents (N = 24, 50%) reported asking their provider about reducing/stopping medications due to concerns about harmful effects, and nearly half (N = 20, 42%) reported stopping medications earlier than recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to engage caregivers in shared decision-making about complex medication regimens and to support prescribers to safely deprescribe psychotropic medications are needed to address caregivers' concerns regarding psychotropic medication use.

Relative Age and the Use of Second-Generation Antipsychotics from 7 to 17 Years of Age: A Population-Based Register Study

Objective: The youngest children in a classroom have a higher risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders (ADHDs) and depression than their relatively older peers. However, there has been a lack of research on how relative age is related to second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medication use. Methods: This study used the Finnish National Prescription Register data and comprised all 669,726 Finnish children and adolescents aged 7-17 in 2018. We extracted data for those who were dispensed SGAs (risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and olanzapine) and ADHD medication (methylphenidate, atomoxetine, dexamphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for medication dispensed to schoolchildren born from January to April (the relatively oldest), May to August, and September to December (the relatively youngest). Dispensed prescriptions were a proxy for medication use. Results: SGAs were dispensed to 9146 (1.4%) individuals in 2018. Their use was lower among girls aged 12-17 years born from September to December than January to April (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.97), with no association between SGA use and birth month among boys. However, younger relative age was associated with combined SGA and ADHD medication, which was used by 2556 (0.4%) of the cohort: 2074 (0.6%) boys and 482 (0.1%) girls. The OR was 1.27 for boys aged 12-17 born from September to December (95% CI 1.10-1.46), compared with January to April. The OR for girls born from May to August was 1.35 (95% CI 1.04-1.76) and from September to December it was 1.33 (95% CI 1.02-1.74), compared with January to April. Conclusions: A novel discovery of this study was that using both SGA and ADHD medication at the age of 12-17 years was more common among the youngest subjects in a school year than their relatively older peers.

Characterisation of methylphenidate-induced excitation in midbrain dopamine neurons, an electrophysiological study in the rat brain

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a drug routinely used for patients with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Concerns arise about psychostimulant use, with dramatic increases in prescriptions. Besides, antipsychotic drugs are often administered in combination with MPH. In this study, we examine the consequences of MPH exposure in combination with dopamine D₂ receptor antagonism (eticlopride) on midbrain dopaminergic neurons in anaesthetised rodents, using in vivo extracellular single-cell electrophysiology. As expected, we show that methylphenidate (2 mg/kg, i.v.) decreases the firing and bursting activities of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons, an effect that is reversed with eticlopride (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.). However, using such a paradigm, we observed higher firing and bursting activities than under baseline conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that such an effect is dependent on dual alpha-1 and dopamine D₁ receptors, as well as glutamatergic transmission, through glutamate N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation. Chronic MPH treatment during adolescence greatly dampens MPH-induced excitatory effects measured at adulthood. To conclude, we demonstrated here that a combination of methylphenidate and a dopamine D₂ receptor antagonist produced long-lasting consequences on midbrain dopamine neurons, via glutamatergic-dependent mechanisms.

Pediatric use of prescribed melatonin in Sweden 2006-2017: a register based study

Sleep disturbances are common in the pediatric population and should primarily be treated non-pharmacologically. Most medicines for sleep disturbances are not approved for pediatric use and data on long-term safety is scarce. In Sweden, melatonin is classified as a prescription medicine. The aim of the present study was to characterize the prevalence and incidence of dispensed melatonin prescriptions, long-term treatment, concomitant dispensation of psychotropic medication, and psychiatric comorbidity, in children and adolescents aged 0-17 years living in Sweden during 2006-2017. Data was retrieved by linking the national population-based registers, the Swedish Prescribed Drug register and the National Patient register. In 2017, nearly 2% of the pediatric population 0-17 years was dispensed at least one prescription of melatonin, which was more than a 15-fold increase for girls and a 20-fold increase for boys, when compared to 2006. Among the children in the age group 5-9 who initiated a melatonin treatment in 2009, 15% of girls and 17% of boys were found to be continuously prescribed melatonin 8 years later. Nearly 80% of all children with dispensed melatonin had concomitant dispensations of psychotropic medications. The most common combination was melatonin together with centrally acting sympathomimetic medicines (23% of girls and 43% of boys). About half of the children (47% of girls and 50% of boys) had at least one registered diagnosis of mental or behavioral disorders. The most common diagnosis was attention deficit hyperactive disorder, across all age groups and genders. The continuous increase of use of melatonin in children, often concomitant with other psychotropic medications, together with a high proportion of younger children with prescriptions of melatonin on a long-term basis, suggests the need for further structured follow up studies, in particular of long-term use.

Movement disorders and use of risperidone and methylphenidate: a review of case reports and an analysis of the WHO database in pharmacovigilance

For patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and comorbid conduct-dissocial disorder, a combination therapy of the psychostimulant methylphenidate and the antipsychotic risperidone may be prescribed. Case reports describe the occurrence of movement disorders under this combination therapy, but clinical trials had limited power to detect these events. This study aimed (1) to summarise published case reports and (2) to analyse pharmacovigilance data consisting of adverse drug event reports to elucidate these reactions. PubMed, Embase, and APA PsycInfo were used to retrieve case reports. For the pharmacovigilance data, aggregated information on individual case safety reports (ICSRs) within the database of suspected adverse drug events by the WHO were analysed. ICSRs were assessed for disproportionality in reporting. Thirteen published case reports (62% male) on movement disorders were identified, with ages between 5 and 15 years. Seven reports (54%) described incidents when risperidone was tapered down or switched to methylphenidate. From the WHO, we identified 25,556 ICSRs (16,118 for methylphenidate, 8,614 for risperidone, and 824 for both). Of these, 953 (5.9%), 1356 (15.7%), and 159 (19.3%) ICSRs reported movement disorders in association with methylphenidate, risperidone or both, respectively. The analyses on disproportionality showed an increased number of ICSRs with movement disorders when the two drugs were coded in combination. The potential of movement disorders as adverse effects might be amplified when methylphenidate and risperidone are used in combination. The results from the literature underline the necessity of caution and patient monitoring when risperidone dosing is modified during methylphenidate therapy.

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Psychotropic Polypharmacy Prescribing Trends

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication use and psychotherapeutic polypharmacy is increasing. This study was designed to assess annual rates of ADHD medication prescribing and psychotherapeutic polypharmacy among patients 2 to 24 years old in the United States, identify commonly prescribed ADHD medications and concomitant psychotropic agents, and assess if specific characteristics are associated with polypharmacy.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we used publicly available ambulatory health care data sets to evaluate ADHD and psychotropic polypharmacy use in patients 2 to 24 years old from 2006 to 2015. National rates were estimated by using sampling weights, and common ADHD and psychotropic drugs prescribed were identified. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to assess the strength of association between polypharmacy and patient or provider characteristics.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2015, ADHD medication prescribing increased from 4.8% to 8.4%. ADHD polypharmacy increased from 16.8% to 20.5%, whereas psychotropic polypharmacy increased from 26.0% to 40.7%. The most common ADHD combinations were stimulants and α-2 agonists (67.1%), whereas the most common concomitant psychotropic agents were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (14.4%) and second-generation antipsychotics (11.8%). Factors associated with polypharmacy were age, female sex (psychotropic), nonprivate insurance, northeast and south regions (ADHD), receipt of mental health counseling or psychotherapy, and calendar year.

CONCLUSIONS

ADHD and psychotropic polypharmacy use is increasing and associated with specific patient characteristics. These patterns should spark further inquiry about the appropriateness, efficacy, and safety of psychotherapeutic polypharmacy in children and young adults, particularly within subgroups in which the use is high.

We Really Need Clear Guidelines and Recommendations for Safer and Proper Use of Aripiprazole and Risperidone in a Pediatric Population: Real-World Analysis of EudraVigilance Database

Background: Although aripiprazole and risperidone are used widespread in pediatrics, there are still limited pieces of evidence on their actual safety profile. By using the EudraVigilance database, we carried out an analysis to perform a comprehensive overview of reported adverse events among children and adolescents treated with aripiprazole and risperidone. Methods: Descriptive analysis was performed of all individual case safety reports (ISCRs) submitted to EudraVigilance associated with aripiprazole and risperidone and related to the pediatric population from 2016 to 2018. Results: A total of 855 and 2,242 ISCRs for aripiprazole and risperidone, respectively, were recorded for a total of 11,042 suspected adverse drug reactions (2,993 for aripiprazole and 8,049 for risperidone). Most ISCRs were related to male patients (65.0 and 86.3% for aripiprazole and risperidone, respectively) and were serious (81.0 and 94.1% for aripiprazole and risperidone, respectively). Schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, such as disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders, and autism spectrum disorder were the top three clinical indications for aripiprazole (19.0, 16.1, and 11.6%, respectively). For risperidone, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (25.4%), disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders (17.1%), and bipolar and related disorders (14.2%) were more commonly reported as clinical indications. Data also showed a high proportion of use for clinical conditions not authorized in children. Psychiatric disorders were the main related adverse events for aripiprazole (20.2%), and among these, suicidal behavior was one of the most reported (14.9%). Reproductive system and breast disorders were the main related adverse events for risperidone (19.8%), and gynecomastia was the most reported event; metabolism and nutrition disorders, mainly reported as weight gain disorders, were more reported in children (3-11 years) than in adolescents (12-17 years). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that spontaneously reported adverse events associated with aripiprazole and risperidone reflect what is already known in terms of safety profile, although with about 90% of them being serious. This analysis stresses the need for further studies and effective training and information activities to better define the actual benefit/risk ratio of these drugs in pediatric patients.

Childhood methylphenidate adherence as a predictor of antidepressants use during adolescence

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a common and effective treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but little is known about the relationship between early childhood intake of MPH and onset of antidepressant treatment during adolescence. The study aimed to examine whether adherence to MPH during early childhood predicts the initiation of antidepressants during adolescence. This is a 12-year historical prospective nationwide cohort study of children enrolled in an integrated care system who were first prescribed MPH between the ages of 6 and 8 years (N = 6830). We tested for an association between their adherence to MPH during early childhood (as indicated by medication possession ratio from MPH onset through the age of twelve) and the likelihood of being prescribed any antidepressant during adolescence (age 13-18). As all country citizens are covered by mandatory health insurance, and full services are provided by one of the four integrated care systems, data regarding patients' diagnoses, prescriptions, and medical purchases are well documented. Logistic regression analysis indicated that those with higher adherence to MPH had a 50% higher risk (95% CI 1.16-1.93) of receiving antidepressants during adolescence when controlling for other comorbid psychiatric conditions and parental use of antidepressants. In this large-scale longitudinal study, MPH adherence during early childhood emerged as a predictor for antidepressant treatment during adolescence, which may reflect increased emotional and behavioral dysregulation in this group. The highly adherent patients are at higher risk and should be clinically monitored more closely, particularly into adolescence.

Potential Explanations for Increasing Methylphenidate Use in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Germany From 2004 to 2013

BACKGROUND

Despite a decreasing population of children and adolescents, the cumulative total amount of dispensed methylphenidate (MPH), the first-choice treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in this age group, has increased dramatically in Germany. We investigated potential reasons for this increase such as changes in the ADHD prevalence over time and other potential explanations including the cumulative amount of dispensed MPH per person.

METHODS

Based on German claims data, we calculated standardized annual ADHD prevalence rates, proportions of ADHD cases treated with MPH and/or psychotherapy, and mean cumulative defined daily doses of ADHD drugs for 3- to 17-year-old children and adolescents from 2004 to 2013.

RESULTS

The ADHD prevalence increased continuously from 2004 to 2011 and remained stable thereafter. In ADHD cases, there was little variation in the proportion of individuals treated with drugs and in the frequency of psychotherapeutic treatment during the whole study period. The annual cumulative mean amount of MPH defined daily doses increased by approximately 30% from 2004 to 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses suggest that the increase in MPH use in Germany was mainly influenced by an increasing ADHD prevalence and increasing amounts of dispensed MPH per person.