Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Detection in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Cerebrospinal fluid diversion and outcomes for lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive lung cancer patients with LMC suffering from increased intracranial pressure (IICP) and hydrocephalus between February 2017 and February 2020. We evaluated the survival benefit of CSF diversion surgery and assessed the outcomes of treatments administered post-LMC in terms of overall survival and shunt-related complications.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 50 patients (median age: 59 years). Ventricular peritoneal (VP) shunts were placed in 33 patients, and lumbar peritoneal (LP) shunts were placed in 7 patients. Programmable shunts were placed in 36 patients. Shunt adjustment was performed in 19 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that shunt placement increased overall survival from 1.95 months to 6.21 months (p = 0.0012) and increased Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) from 60 to 70. Univariate analysis revealed no difference between VP or LP shunts in terms of survival. No differences in post-shunt systemic treatments (tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or systemic treatments) were observed in overall survival. Shunt-related complications were noted in 7 patients, including shunt obstruction (n = 4), infection (n = 1), and over-drainage (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

CSF diversion (VP or LP shunt) appears to be an effective and safe treatment for lung cancer patients with LMC and hydrocephalus. Programmable shunts should be considered for complex cases, which commonly require pressure adjustments as the disease progresses.

[Clinical Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid ctDNA in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Meningeal Metastasis]

BACKGROUND

The mortality rate of lung cancer meningeal metastasis is extremely high. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been confirmed to be contain the genomic alterations present in tumors and has been used to monitor tumor progression and response to treatments. Due to the presence of blood-brain barrier and other factors, peripheral blood ctDNA cannot reflect the information of brain lesions for patients with meningeal metastases. However, cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA as a test sample can better reflect the genetic status of intracranial tumors and guide clinical targeted treatment of intracranial lesions. This study explored the feasibility of cerebrospinal fluid ctNDA for evaluating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) meningeal metastasis and the potential clinical value of cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA detection in NSCLC meningeal metastasis.

METHODS

A total of 21 patients with NSCLC meningeal metastasis were included. Tumor genomic variation was performed on the cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood samples of patients by second-generation gene sequencing technology. The situation was examined, and pathological evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid cytology and head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enhanced examination were performed.

RESULTS

ctDNA was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of 21 patients. The sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA detection was superior to cytology in the diagnosis of meningeal metastasis (P<0.001). The detection rate and gene mutation abundance of cerebrospinal fluid were higher than plasma (P<0.001). Cerebro-spinal fluid had a unique genetic profile. In 6 patients with dynamic detection, changes of ctDNA allele fraction occurred at the same time or earlier than clinical disease changes, which could timely monitor drug resistance mechanism and relapse trend.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection rate of ctDNA in cerebrospinal fluid is higher than that in cytology and imaging. The detection of ctDNA in cerebrospinal fluid can reveal the specific mutation map of meningeal metastasis lesions. The dynamic monitoring of ctDNA in cerebrospinal fluid has hint significance for clinical response of lung cancer patients.