Endoscopic Treatment of Complete Ureterointestinal Stenosis Without Antegrade Ureteroscopy

Endoureterotomy with the Lovaco technique for treatment of ureterointestinal strictures: outcomes in an experienced center and factors associated with procedural success or failure

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to present the outcomes of an endoureterotomy series using the Lovaco technique for the treatment of ureterointestinal strictures. Factors influencing the success or failure of this technique were also determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from all endoureterotomies for ureterointestinal strictures performed in a single-center between 2017 and 2020. Clinical variables and characteristics of the stricture were recorded in each case, and success was defined as the complete resolution of ureterohydronephrosis. Univariate analysis was used to correlate the variables recorded with procedural success or failure.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were recruited: 16 with strictures on the left side, 5 on the right, and 4 bilateral. With the first endoureterotomy, 52% of the cases (13 patients) were resolved, and in patients undergoing a second intervention 64% success (16 patients) was achieved. Infectious complications occurred in 23.3% of surgeries. Stricture length, poor renal function, and left side involvement were associated with endoureterotomy failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoureterotomy with the Lovaco technique is a useful method in the setting of ureterointestinal strictures, achieving complete resolution of the obstruction in more than 60% of cases. Factors that can negatively affect the success of the procedure include stricture length, poor renal function, and left side involvement.

Retrograde endoureterotomy as a treatment option for impacted calculus in the ureterointestinal junction

INTRODUCTION

In patients with a history of radical cystectomy and with intestinal diversion, urolithiasis in the upper urinary tract is a frequent event.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We describe for the first time a case of retrograde endoureterotomy used to treat a calculus proximal to the ureterointestinal junction.

RESULTS

This technique is of interest when antegrade access is not possible. In our example, after passing the guidewire percutaneously, and externalize it through the stoma, the left meatus was reached with a resectoscope inserted through the ileal duct. After the use of a balloon to prevent migration of the calculus, a retrograde endoureterotomy was performed with a Collins knife and the stone removed. The patient's progress was satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of calculi in patients with intestinal diversion can be performed with different approaches. We recommend retrograde endoureterotomy as a feasible treatment option for the removal of impacted calculi at the ureterointestinal junction.