1
|
Wiley L, Cheek M, LaFar E, Ma X, Sekowski J, Tanguturi N, Iltis A. The Ethics of Human Embryo Editing via CRISPR-Cas9 Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Arguments, Reasons, and Concerns. HEC Forum 2024:10.1007/s10730-024-09538-1. [PMID: 39302534 DOI: 10.1007/s10730-024-09538-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
The possibility of editing the genomes of human embryos has generated significant discussion and interest as a matter of science and ethics. While it holds significant promise to prevent or treat disease, research on and potential clinical applications of human embryo editing also raise ethical, regulatory, and safety concerns. This systematic review included 223 publications to identify the ethical arguments, reasons, and concerns that have been offered for and against the editing of human embryos using CRISPR-Cas9 technology. We identified six major themes: risk/harm; potential benefit; oversight; informed consent; justice, equity, and other social considerations; and eugenics. We explore these themes and provide an overview and analysis of the critical points in the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Wiley
- Wake Forest University Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Winston-Salem, USA
| | - Mattison Cheek
- Wake Forest University Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Winston-Salem, USA
| | - Emily LaFar
- Wake Forest University Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Winston-Salem, USA
| | - Xiaolu Ma
- Department of Communication Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Justin Sekowski
- Wake Forest University Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Winston-Salem, USA
| | - Nikki Tanguturi
- Wake Forest University Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Winston-Salem, USA
| | - Ana Iltis
- Department of Philosophy, Wake Forest University Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Winston-Salem, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rueda J, Segers S, Hopster J, Kudlek K, Liedo B, Marchiori S, Danaher J. Anticipatory gaps challenge the public governance of heritable human genome editing. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2024:jme-2023-109801. [PMID: 38955479 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Considering public moral attitudes is a hallmark of the anticipatory governance of emerging biotechnologies, such as heritable human genome editing. However, such anticipatory governance often overlooks that future morality is open to change and that future generations may perform different moral assessments on the very biotechnologies we are trying to govern in the present. In this article, we identify an 'anticipatory gap' that has not been sufficiently addressed in the discussion on the public governance of heritable genome editing, namely, uncertainty about the moral visions of future generations about the emerging applications that we are currently attempting to govern now. This paper motivates the relevance of this anticipatory gap, identifying the challenges it generates and offering various recommendations so that moral uncertainty does not lead to governance paralysis with regard to human germline genome editing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Rueda
- University of Basque Country, Leioa, Spain
| | - Seppe Segers
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Hopster
- Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karolina Kudlek
- Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Belén Liedo
- Instituto de Filosfía, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
- Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - John Danaher
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Y, Peng Y, Zi G, Chen J, Peng B. Co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and guide RNAs for editing of LGMN gene represses breast cancer cell metastasis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8095. [PMID: 38582932 PMCID: PMC10998893 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58765-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Legumain (or asparagine endopeptidase/AEP) is a lysosomal cysteine endopeptidase associated with increased invasive and migratory behavior in a variety of cancers. In this study, co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and guide RNA (gRNA) by lipid nanoparticles (LNP) for editing of LGMN gene was performed. For in-vitro transcription (IVT) of gRNA, two templates were designed: linearized pUC57-T7-gRNA and T7-gRNA oligos, and the effectiveness of gRNA was verified in multiple ways. Cas9 plasmid was modified and optimized for IVT of Cas9 mRNA. The effects of LGMN gene editing on lysosomal/autophagic function and cancer cell metastasis were investigated. Co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and gRNA resulted in impaired lysosomal/autophagic degradation, clone formation, migration, and invasion capacity of cancer cells in-vitro. Experimental lung metastasis experiment indicates co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and gRNA by LNP reduced the migration and invasion capacity of cancer cells in-vivo. These results indicate that co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and gRNA can enhance the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in-vitro and in-vivo, and suggest that Cas9 mRNA and gRNA gene editing of LGMN may be a potential treatment for breast tumor metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Wang
- College of Pharmacy, Dali University, 2 HongShen Road, Dali, 671003, Yunnan, China
| | - Yatu Peng
- JinCai High School, 2788 Yang Gao Middle Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200135, China
| | - Guanghui Zi
- College of Pharmacy, Dali University, 2 HongShen Road, Dali, 671003, Yunnan, China
| | - Jin Chen
- College of Pharmacy, Dali University, 2 HongShen Road, Dali, 671003, Yunnan, China
| | - Baowei Peng
- College of Pharmacy, Dali University, 2 HongShen Road, Dali, 671003, Yunnan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Christian A. Addressing Conflicts of Interest and Conflicts of Commitment in Public Advocacy and Policy Making on CRISPR/Cas-Based Human Genome Editing. Front Res Metr Anal 2022; 7:775336. [PMID: 35572153 PMCID: PMC9094628 DOI: 10.3389/frma.2022.775336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Leading experts on CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing-such as 2020 Nobel laureates Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier-are not only renowned specialists in their fields, but also public advocates for upcoming regulatory frameworks on CRISPR/Cas. These frameworks will affect large portions of biomedical research on human genome editing. In advocating for particular ways of handling the risks and prospects of this technology, high-profile scientists not only serve as scientific experts, but also as moral advisers. The majority of them currently intend to bring about a "responsible pathway" toward human genome interventions in clinical therapy. Engaging in advocacy for such a pathway, they issue moral judgments on the risks and benefits of this new technology. They declare that there actually is a responsible pathway, they draft resolutions on temporary moratoria, they make judgments on which groups and individuals are credible and should participate in public and semi-public debates, so they also set the standards for deciding who counts as well-informed, as well as the standards of evidence for adopting or rejecting research policies. This degree of influence on public debates and policy making is, at the very least, noteworthy. This contribution sounds a note of caution with regard to the endeavor of a responsible pathway to human genome editing and in particular scrutinizes the legitimacy of expert-driven research policies given commercial conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment among first-rank scholars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Christian
- DCLPS, Institute of Philosophy, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shozi B, Kamwendo T, Kinderlerer J, Thaldar DW, Townsend B, Botes M. Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2022; 48:165-168. [PMID: 33762299 PMCID: PMC8899489 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
WHO in 2019 established the Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing, which has recently published a Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing. Although the Draft Framework is a good point of departure, there are four areas of concern: first, it does not sufficiently address issues related to establishing safety and efficacy. Second, issues that are a source of tension between global standard setting and state sovereignty need to be addressed in a more nuanced fashion. Third, it fails to meaningfully engage with the extent to which the conceptualisation of human dignity may justifiably vary between jurisdictions. Fourth, the meaning of harm to the interests of a future person requires clarity. Provided these four areas of concern can be addressed, the future of the global governance of human genome editing may hold promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonginkosi Shozi
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Tamanda Kamwendo
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Julian Kinderlerer
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Donrich W Thaldar
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Beverley Townsend
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Marietjie Botes
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thaldar D, Townsend B, Botes M, Shozi B, Pillay S. A virtual deliberative public engagement study on heritable genome editing among South Africans: Study protocol. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256097. [PMID: 34411176 PMCID: PMC8376038 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
This article outlines the protocol for a prospective study for virtual deliberative public engagement on heritable genome editing in humans. The study intends to create a platform for a diverse group of 25–30 South Africans to engage with a facilitator and each other on 15 policy questions regarding heritable genome editing, with a focus on: a) the prevention of heritable genetic conditions; b) editing for immunity; and c) editing for enhancement. The aim is to understand the views on these issues so as to inform further research and policy, and to analyse the process and effect of deliberation on opinion. Participants will be expected to study the provided resource materials and pass the entrance exam—aligning with the protocols of the Harvard Personal Genome Project. In this way, the commitment, openness and basic knowledge of the candidates will be tested to ascertain whether they are suitable participants for the deliberative engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donrich Thaldar
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.,African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Beverley Townsend
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.,African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Marietjie Botes
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.,African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Bonginkosi Shozi
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.,African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Siddharthiya Pillay
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.,African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Angrist M, Barrangou R, Baylis F, Brokowski C, Burgio G, Caplan A, Chapman CR, Church GM, Cook-Deegan R, Cwik B, Doudna JA, Evans JH, Greely HT, Hercher L, Hurlbut JB, Hynes RO, Ishii T, Kiani S, Lee LH, Levrier G, Liu DR, Lunshof JE, Macintosh KL, Mathews DJH, Meslin EM, Mills PHR, Montoliu L, Musunuru K, Nicol D, O'Neill H, Qiu R, Ranisch R, Sherkow JS, Soni S, Terry S, Topol E, Williamson R, Zhang F, Davies K. Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome Editing. CRISPR J 2021; 3:332-349. [PMID: 33095048 DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2020.29106.man] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In September 2020, a detailed report on Heritable Human Genome Editing was published. The report offers a translational pathway for the limited approval of germline editing under limited circumstances and assuming various criteria have been met. In this perspective, some three dozen experts from the fields of genome editing, medicine, bioethics, law, and related fields offer their candid reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society report, highlighting areas of support, omissions, disagreements, and priorities moving forward.
Collapse
|
8
|
Nelson JP, Selin CL, Scott CT. Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION 2021; 8:382-420. [PMID: 35281674 PMCID: PMC8916747 DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2021.1957579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
The rapid development of human genome editing (HGE) techniques evokes an urgent need for forward-looking deliberation regarding the aims, processes, and governance of research. The framework of anticipatory governance (AG) may serve this need. This article reviews scholarly discourse about HGE through an AG lens, aiming to identify gaps in discussion and practice and suggest how AG efforts may fill them. Discourse on HGE has insufficiently reckoned with the institutional and systemic contexts, inputs, and implications of HGE work, to the detriment of its ability to prepare for a variety of possible futures and pursue socially desirable ones. More broadly framed and inclusive efforts in foresight and public engagement, focused not only upon the in-principle permissibility of HGE activities but upon the contexts of such work, may permit improved identification of public values relevant to HGE and of actions by which researchers, funders, policymakers, and publics may promote them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Nelson
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, 1120 South Cady Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5603
| | - Cynthia L. Selin
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society/Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, 1120 South Cady Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5603
| | - Christopher T. Scott
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030-3411
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang X, Li T, Ou J, Huang J, Liang P. Homology-based repair induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in mammalian embryo genome editing. Protein Cell 2021; 13:316-335. [PMID: 33945139 PMCID: PMC9008090 DOI: 10.1007/s13238-021-00838-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in genome editing, especially CRISPR-Cas nucleases, have revolutionized both laboratory research and clinical therapeutics. CRISPR-Cas nucleases, together with the DNA damage repair pathway in cells, enable both genetic diversification by classical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ) and precise genome modification by homology-based repair (HBR). Genome editing in zygotes is a convenient way to edit the germline, paving the way for animal disease model generation, as well as human embryo genome editing therapy for some life-threatening and incurable diseases. HBR efficiency is highly dependent on the DNA donor that is utilized as a repair template. Here, we review recent progress in improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease-induced HBR in mammalian embryos by designing a suitable DNA donor. Moreover, we want to provide a guide for producing animal disease models and correcting genetic mutations through CRISPR-Cas nuclease-induced HBR in mammalian embryos. Finally, we discuss recent developments in precise genome-modification technology based on the CRISPR-Cas system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiya Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Tao Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Jianping Ou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
| | - Junjiu Huang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China. .,Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine of Guangdong Province, the First Affiliated Hospital and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China.
| | - Puping Liang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China. .,Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine of Guangdong Province, the First Affiliated Hospital and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thaldar D, Botes M, Shozi B, Townsend B, Kinderlerer J. Human germline editing: Legal-ethical guidelines for South Africa. S AFR J SCI 2020. [DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2020/6760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Human germline editing holds much promise for improving people’s lives, but at the same time this novel biotechnology raises ethical and legal questions. The South African ethics regulatory environment is problematic, as it prohibits all research on, and the clinical application of, human germline editing. By contrast, the South African legal regulatory environment allows a regulatory path that would, in principle, permit research on human germline editing. However, the legal regulation of the clinical application of human germline editing is uncertain. As such, the current ethical and legal positions in South Africa are in need of reform. Five guiding principles – aligned with the values of the Constitution – are proposed to guide ethical and legal policy reform regarding human germline editing in South Africa: (1) Given its potential to improve the lives of the people of South Africa, human germline editing should be regulated, not banned. (2) Human germline editing clinical applications should only be made accessible to the public if they are proven to be safe and effective. (3) Non-therapeutic human germline editing may be permissible, and should be regulated in the same way as therapeutic human germline editing. (4) The decision on whether to use germline gene editing on a prospective child, should, subject to Principle 2, be left to the prospective parents. (5) Concerns about exacerbating social inequalities should be addressed by measures to increase access. In conclusion, recommendations are made to policymakers and scientists contemplating research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donrich Thaldar
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Marietjie Botes
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Bonginkosi Shozi
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Beverley Townsend
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Julain Kinderlerer
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- African Health Research Flagship, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ayanoğlu FB, Elçin AE, Elçin YM. Bioethical issues in genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 technology. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 44:110-120. [PMID: 32256147 PMCID: PMC7129066 DOI: 10.3906/biy-1912-52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Genome editing technologies have led to fundamental changes in genetic science. Among them, CRISPR-Cas9 technology particularly stands out due to its advantages such as easy handling, high accuracy, and low cost. It has made a quick introduction in fields related to humans, animals, and the environment, while raising difficult questions, applications, concerns, and bioethical issues to be discussed. Most concerns stem from the use of CRISPR-Cas9 to genetically alter human germline cells and embryos (called germline genome editing). Germline genome editing leads to serial bioethical issues, such as the occurrence of undesirable changes in the genome, from whom and how informed consent is obtained, and the breeding of the human species (eugenics). However, the bioethical issues that CRISPR-Cas9 technology could cause in the environment, agriculture and livestock should also not be forgotten. In order for CRISPR-Cas9 to be used safely in all areas and to solve potential issues, worldwide legislation should be prepared, taking into account the opinions of both life and social scientists, policy makers, and all other stakeholders of the sectors, and CRISPR-Cas9 applications should be implemented according to such legislations. However, these controls should not restrict scientific freedom. Here, various applications of CRISPR-Cas9 technology, especially in medicine and agriculture, are described and ethical issues related to genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 technology are discussed. The social and bioethical concerns in relation to human beings, other organisms, and the environment are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Betül Ayanoğlu
- Tissue Engineering, Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Ankara University Faculty of Science,Ankara University Biotechnology Institute, Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Ankara Turkey
| | - Ayşe Eser Elçin
- Tissue Engineering, Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Ankara University Faculty of Science,Ankara University Biotechnology Institute, Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Ankara Turkey
| | - Yaşar Murat Elçin
- Tissue Engineering, Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Ankara University Faculty of Science,Ankara University Biotechnology Institute, Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Ankara Turkey.,Biovalda Health Technologies, Inc., Ankara Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sheetal Soni
- School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Soren H. Hough
- The Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|