Germline Genome Editing Research: What Are Gamete Donors (Not) Informed About in Consent Forms?

The dark side of random-start ovarian stimulation: ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome due to inadvertent pregnancy

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can inadvertent pregnancies go unnoticed when initiating random-start ovarian stimulation (RSOS) despite monitoring?

DESIGN

Case series at a university-based tertiary care fertility clinic.

RESULTS

Between June 2022 and December 2023, two cases of undetected early pregnancy at the onset of RSOS were identified, both leading to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) with hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

RSOS protocols add flexibility in fertility clinics when there is no intention of a fresh embryo transfer, but may be associated with insidious risk of OHSS. The authors advocate for comprehensive consultation and serial monitoring of human chorionic gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, while cautioning against over-reliance on baseline hormone concentrations when initiating RSOS. If the benefits of RSOS seem limited, healthcare providers should consider delaying ovarian stimulation to avert health, but also medicolegal and financial, complications.

Review on Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Managing Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a foremost global health concern, necessitating ongoing exploration of innovative therapeutic strategies. This review surveys the latest developments in cardiovascular therapeutics, offering a comprehensive overview of emerging approaches poised to transform disease management. The examination begins by elucidating the current epidemiological landscape of CVD and the economic challenges it poses to healthcare systems. It proceeds to scrutinize the limitations of traditional therapies, emphasizing the need for progressive interventions. The core focus is on novel pharmacological interventions, including advancements in drug development, targeted therapies, and repurposing existing medications. The burgeoning field of gene therapy and its potential in addressing genetic predispositions to cardiovascular disorders are explored, alongside the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in risk assessment and treatment optimization. Non-pharmacological interventions take center stage, with an exploration of digital health technologies, wearable devices, and telemedicine as transformative tools in CVD management. Regenerative medicine and stem cell therapies, offering promises of tissue repair and functional recovery, are investigated for their potential impact on cardiac health. This review also delves into the interplay of lifestyle modifications, diet, exercise, and behavioral changes, emphasizing their pivotal role in cardiovascular health and disease prevention. As precision medicine gains prominence, this synthesis of emerging therapeutic modalities aims to guide clinicians and researchers in navigating the dynamic landscape of cardiovascular disease management, fostering a collective effort to alleviate the global burden of CVD and promote a healthier future.

Gamete and embryo donation for research: what might shape the willingness to donate among gamete donors and recipients?

PURPOSE

Research using gametes and embryos donated by reproductive and third-party donors contributed to substantial, albeit contentious achievements. The views of gamete donors and recipients on donation for research and the underpinning role of attitudes towards research have been seldom explored and are yet to be incorporated into ethical, legal, and regulatory landscapes. From a cultural standpoint, this study adapts and explores psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Research Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ), and analyzes the willingness of gamete donors and recipients to donate gametes and embryos for research and its association with sociodemographic, reproductive characteristics, and attitudes towards research.

METHODS

Between July 2017 and June 2018, 71 donors and 165 recipients completed a self-administered questionnaire at the Portuguese Public Bank of Gametes. Willingness to donate and attitudes towards research were measured with a 5-point Likert scale. RAQ psychometric characteristics were explored.

RESULTS

Two RAQ components were identified: "trustworthiness of research" and "critical perspective". Most participants were willing to donate gametes and embryos: donors more willing to donate gametes and male recipients more willing to donate gametes and embryos. Higher RAQ scores, indicating a more positive attitude towards research, were observed on the component "trustworthiness of research" among those willing to donate gametes and embryos and on the component "critical perspective" among those willing to donate embryos.

CONCLUSION

These findings help foster inclusivity, diversity, and responsiveness of research and call for upstream engagement of male and female gamete donors and recipients, promoting a trustworthy, anticipatory, democratic, and people-centered approach to policies, regulations, and practices in human gamete and embryo research.

Breaking Boundaries in the Brain-Advances in Editing Tools for Neurogenetic Disorders

Monogenic neurological disorders are devastating, affecting hundreds of millions of people globally and present a substantial burden to individuals, carers, and healthcare systems. These disorders are predominantly caused by inherited or de novo variants that result in impairments to nervous system development, neurodegeneration, or impaired neuronal function. No cure exists for these disorders with many being refractory to medication. However, since monogenic neurological disorders have a single causal factor, they are also excellent targets for innovative, therapies such as gene therapy. Despite this promise, gene transfer therapies are limited in that they are only suitable for neurogenetic disorders that fit within the technological reach of these therapies. The limitations include the size of the coding region of the gene, the regulatory control of expression (dosage sensitivity), the mode of expression (e.g., dominant negative) and access to target cells. Gene editing therapies are an alternative strategy to gene transfer therapy as they have the potential of overcoming some of these hurdles, enabling the retention of physiological expression of the gene and offers precision medicine-based therapies where individual variants can be repaired. This review focusses on the existing gene editing technologies for neurogenetic disorders and how these propose to overcome the challenges common to neurogenetic disorders with gene transfer therapies as well as their own challenges.

Alignment between expectations and experiences of egg donors: what does it mean to be informed?

This study evaluated the retrospective perceptions of egg donors regarding information communicated about immediate and long-term risks during the process of becoming an egg donor, and the alignment of that perception with their experiences and expectations of egg donation. Data were collected using an anonymous online survey. Egg donors' demographics, perceptions of being informed about immediate complications and long-term risks, and alignment between their expectations and experiences were analysed. In total, 375 current and former egg donors participated in an online survey about their decisions and experiences. Participants ranged in age from 18 to 57 years, with a median age of 24 years at first donation for compensated donors. The majority of the participants (81%) provided eggs in the USA, and 86.1% reported being compensated beyond direct reimbursement. Overall, 66% of egg donors surveyed reported feeling that their experiences matched their expectations based upon what they had been told during the informed consent process. While most participants (64.8%) felt well informed about potential short-term risks, 55.2% did not feel well informed about potential long-term risks. The findings indicate that while the majority of egg donors felt informed about immediate complications, there are gaps in knowledge about potential long-term risks. Results from this research provide insight into how egg donors understand risks and benefits, and can be used to improve counselling and informed consent forms and processes. The findings also indicate that longitudinal research on the health and well-being of egg donors is needed in order to improve informed consent.

The Ethics of Genetic Cognitive Enhancement: Gene Editing or Embryo Selection?

Recent research with human embryos, in different parts of the world, has sparked a new debate on the ethics of genetic human enhancement. This debate, however, has mainly focused on gene-editing technologies, especially CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats). Less attention has been given to the prospect of pursuing genetic human enhancement by means of IVF (In Vitro Fertilisation) in conjunction with in vitro gametogenesis, genome-wide association studies, and embryo selection. This article examines the different ethical implications of the quest for cognitive enhancement by means of gene-editing on the one hand, and embryo selection on the other. The article focuses on the ethics of cognitive enhancement by means of embryo selection, as this technology is more likely to become commercially available before cognitive enhancement by means of gene-editing. This article argues that the philosophical debate on the ethics of enhancement should take into consideration public attitudes to research on human genomics and human enhancement technologies. The article discusses, then, some of the recent findings of the SIENNA Project, which in 2019 conducted a survey on public attitudes to human genomics and human enhancement technologies in 11 countries (France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Brazil, South Africa, South Korea, and United States).

Responsible Translational Pathways for Germline Gene Editing?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Continued development of gene editing techniques has raised the real possibility of clinical application of germline gene editing. These results, as well as reports of an unethical experiment which resulted in the birth of at least two children from edited embryos in 2018, have highlighted the urgency and importance of ethical issues about translational pathways for editing of human germline cells. Charting responsible translational pathways for germline gene editing requires tackling some significant and complex ethical issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

A literature on development of clinical applications of germline gene editing is emerging, and several key ethical issues are coming into focus as major challenges for responsible translational pathways.

SUMMARY

Potential clinical utility, clinical justification, and human subjects research for germline gene editing raise outstanding ethical questions. Work on these questions will help provide guidance to researchers and clinicians and direct translational projects toward justifiable applications.

Ethical issues related to research on genome editing in human embryos

Although the potential advantages of clinical germline genome editing (GGE) over currently available methods are limited, the implementation of GGE in the clinic has been proposed and discussed. Ethical issues related to such an application have been extensively debated, meanwhile, seemingly less attention has been paid to ethical implications of studies which would have to be conducted in order to evaluate potential clinical uses of GGE. In this article, we first provide an overview of the debate on potential clinical uses of GGE. Then, we discuss questions and ethical issues related to the studies relevant to evaluation of potential clinical uses of GGE. In particular, we describe the problems related to the acceptable safety threshold, current technical hurdles in human GGE, the destruction of human embryos used in the experiments, involvement of egg donors, and genomic sequencing performed on the samples of the research participants. The technical and ethical problems related to studies on GGE should be acknowledged and carefully considered in the process of deciding to apply technology in such a way that will provide benefits and minimize harms.